The URL can be used to link to this page

4637 PD Rezone 21.5 Acres 2485 W. Seminole BlvdOrdinance No. 2021-4637 An ordinance of the City of Sanford, Florida relating to the rezoning of approximately 21.56 acres of real property located at 2485 West Seminole Boulevard (Tax Parcel Identification Numbers 23-19-30-501-0000-0140 and 23-19-30-300-0040-0000) to create the Townes at Lake Monroe Planned Development (PD) (map of the property attached); rezoning the property to a PD, zoning district/classification master plan; providing for approval of the Townes at Lake Monroe PD Master Plan; providing for the taking of implementing administrative actions; providing for conflicts; providing for severability; providing for non -codification and providing for an effective date. Whereas, the Leo C. Trepanier Revocable Trust and Triple B Acquisitions, LLC are the owners of certain real property which land totals approximately 21.56 acres in size, which real property is located at 2485 West Seminole Boulevard and is assigned Tax Parcel Identification Numbers 23-19-30-501-0000-0140 and 23-19-30- 300-0040-0000 by the Property Appraiser of Seminole County; and Whereas, the sole member of Triple B Acquisitions, LLC is Richard Arenas of Ft. Myers; and Whereas, the two parcels are located on the south side of West Seminole Boulevard, west of Oak Drive and north of an unnamed and unopened right-of-way, west of Riverview Avenue and is located to the west of the northern portion of Venetian Bay, a residential planned development within the jurisdictional limits of the City; and Whereas, the subject property not located within any of the overlay zoning districts of the 2015 City of Sanford/Seminole County Joint Planning Agreement (JPA) associated with the downtown and riverfront, but is located within Sub Area 9 of the JPA and Sub Area 9 dictates that all parcels between the railroad and United States Highway 17-92 (Seminole Boulevard) from Mellonville Avenue to Interstate Highway 4 will be assigned the future land use designation of WDBD, Waterfront Downtown Business District, as they are annexed into the City; and Whereas, on November 8, 2021, the City Commission enacted Ordinance No. 4635, which annexed the subject property into the City; and. Whereas, the real property which is the subject of this Ordinance was assigned the County's SE, Suburban Estates, COM, Commercial, and LDR, Low Density Residential, land use designations prior to annexation of the subject real property which land use designation was modified to the City's WDBD, Waterfront Downtown Business District, land use designation by means of an amendment to the City's Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, as set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan, the WDBD, Waterfront Downtown Business District, land use designation is designed to provide centralized residential, governmental, cultural, institutional, and general commercial activities within the downtown and waterfront urban area, while preserving the City's historic character and cultural heritage through context -sensitive design as well as to provide a planning and management framework for promoting the revitalization, development and redevelopment of the historic downtown commercial area; and Whereas, the property owners are requesting that the subject property be rezoned from Seminole County's R -1A, Single Family Residential, A-1, Agriculture, and C-1, Retail Commercial Commodities, to the City of Sanford's PD, Planned Development, zoning district/classification in order to create the Townes at Lake Monroe PD; and 21 P a g e Whereas, the property owners are proposing to construct a residential housing community on the subject property; and Whereas, the applicant, on behalf of the property owners, is Javier Omana with CPN, Inc. of Sanford who was responsible for completing the Citizens Awareness and Participation Plan (CAPP) requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs); and Whereas, Mr. Omana held a CAPP meeting on July 27, 2021, to the satisfaction of the City, with 76 invitations being mailed out to owners of properties within 500' of the subject parcels and the applicant has proposed modifications to the master plan based on the feedback received from adjacent neighbors and has provided the City with revised concepts to the plan associated with that input; and Whereas, on October 7, 2021, the City's Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing and recommended that the City Commission approve this Ordinance adding a condition that supplemented those conditions recommended by City staff with said recommendation occurring by means of a vote of 6 to 1 with Commission Dominick Fiorentino dissenting, citing Policy 1.11.2 of the City's Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element; and Whereas, this Ordinance is enacted pursuant to the home rule powers of the City of Sanford as set forth at Article VIII, Section 2, of the Constitution of the State of Florida; Chapter 166, Florida Statutes, and other applicable controlling law; and Whereas, the City Commission of the City of Sanford has taken all actions relating to the Townes at Lake Monroe PD rezoning action set forth herein in accordance with the requirements and procedures mandated by State law. 31 P as e Now, therefore, be in enacted by the People of the City of Sanford, Florida. Section 1. Legislative findings and intent. (a). The City Commission of the City of Sanford hereby adopts and incorporates into this Ordinance, as legislative findings and intent, the above recitals (whereas clauses). (b). The approval set forth in this Ordinance is subject to the specific conditions that are set forth subsequently in this Ordinance and the property owners have agreed that no requirement herein lacks an essential nexus to a legitimate public purpose and is not roughly proportionate to the impacts of the proposed use that the City seeks to avoid, minimize, or mitigate. Section 2. Rezoning of real property/implementing actions; Townes at Lake Monroe PD. (a), Upon enactment of this Ordinance the property, as depicted in the map attached to this Ordinance shall be rezoned from the zoning classification resulting from a separate and distinct Townes at Lake Monroe PD consistent with the provisions of this Ordinance. (b). The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute any documents necessary to formalize approval of the Townes at Lake Monroe PD rezoning action set forth herein action taken herein with regard to the Townes at Lake Monroe PD and to revise and amend the Official Zoning Map or Maps of the City of Sanford as may be appropriate to accomplish the action taken in this Ordinance. (c). The conditions to be incorporated into the pertinent development order relating to the action taken in this Ordinance include the following: (1). Pursuant to Section 4.3.G of the City's LDRs, this rezoning 4 1 P ,,.i g e shall expire 3 years from the effective date of this Ordinance if all improvements have not been completed or an extension granted. (2). All development shall be consistent with the Townes at Lake Monroe PID Master Plan, revision dated July 20, 2021, unless otherwise specifically set forth in any associated development order; provided, however, that all subsequent development orders shall be consistent with the provisions of this Ordinance. (3). Unless specifically requested and approved on the referenced Townes at Lake Monroe PID Master Plan, any required elements missing from or not shown on the Townes at Lake Monroe PID Master Plan shall comply with the City's LDRs. (4). The final design and location of all driveways and access points including, but not limited to, cross access locations, shall be proposed within and shall be subject to City approval as to location and legal form of document(s) (by the City Attorney) during, the development plan review and approval process. (5). A decorative and functional fountain shall be installed in all wet retention ponds as part of development approval which approval shall provide for ongoing maintenance requirements and responsibilities upon the appropriate party, but not the City. (6). A dog walk area with waste collection receptacles shall be provided as determined by the City for use by residents of the development. 51 P ei w e (7). A comprehensive signage program meeting the standards of the City's LDRs, shall be required for the entire development including, but not limited to, the commercial and multiple family residential uses. (8). Unless specifically requested and approved on the Townes at Lake Monroe PD Master Plan or the associated Townes at Lake Monroe PD development agreement, all development shall comply with: (a). Lighting and pedestrian amenities shall be included to improve the overall image of the pedestrian network. (b). A comprehensive landscape design, including landscape and hardscape elements shall be provided to complement the existing Riverwalk improvements. The comprehensive landscape design shall incorporate landscape/hardscape elements to screen any mechanical equipment/ appurtenances from the public right-of-way. (9). A preliminary subdivision plan and subdivision improvement plan shall be submitted and subject to approval by the City with all construction activity being subject to approval by the City, and a subsequent subdivision plat being reviewed, approved and recorded, prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy. (10). The property owner shall install sidewalks, a minimum of 5' in width, on both sides of the streets. (11). A school capacity availability letter of determination letter shall be required from the Seminole County School District prior to the recording of the final plat. am (12). A new traffic study shall be accomplished at the time of engineering review of the project based on the timing of the original study not accurately reflecting traffic counts due to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. (13). If City staff and the property owners are unable to agree to the details of this Ordinance and its implementing development order in any way, the matter will be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission for resolution at a public hearing, and the matter will be adjudicated by means of a development order or denial development order relating thereto. Section 3. Incorporation of map and Townes at Lake Monroe PD Master The map attached to this Ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed and incorporated into this Ordinance as a substantive part of this Ordinance amending the Townes at Lake Monroe PD. Section 4. Conflicts. All ordinances or part of ordinances in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed. City staff shall harmonize the approval and actions set forth herein together which those taken relative to the Townes at Lake Monroe PD with all past actions of the City relative to the property being hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence, phrase, word, or portion of this Ordinance is determined to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional, said determination shall not be held to invalidate or impair the validity, force or effect of any other section, sentence, phrase, 7 1 P ai ;e word, or portion of this Ordinance not otherwise determined to be invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional. Section 6. Non -codification; Implementation. (a). This Ordinance shall not be codified in the City Code of the City of Sanford or the Land Development Code of the City of Sanford; provided, however, that the actions taken herein shall be depicted on the zoning maps of the City of Sanford by the City Manager, or designee. (b). The City Manager, or designee, shall implement the provisions of this Ordinance by means of a non -statutory development agreement which shall be executed by the property owners, or their successor(s) in interest within 60 days of the effective date of this Ordinance or the Townes at Lake Monroe PD property's zoning classification shall revert to an un -zoned property status. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon enactment. Passed and adopted this 8t" day of November, 2021. Attest: daojq4mAel Traci Houchin, MMC, ECRM City Clerk Approved as to form and legal William L. Colbert, City Attorney City Commission Sanford, Florida -14 4 A'bod "m4yof deppy. of the City of 8 1 P a, g e TABLE OF �^��^ �~~�"�"�^�^^� Page No. Table ofContents /Figures i Appendices ii Property Owners /Applicant -Authorized Agent /Consultants iii Project Overview 1 Demonstrate Compatibility with Adjacent Land Uses Q Demonstrate the Changes inCharacter tothe Surrounding Area 11 Demonstrate the Support and Furthering of City Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies 16 Policies ofthe East Central Florida Strategic Regional Policy Plan 19 Facility Capacity Impact Assessments 21 School Board Assessment 22 Transportation Assessment 23 Conclusion 24 ��U�� ^^~�~~'^�� 1 Location Map 2 2 Aerial Photograph ] 3 Existing Future Land Use Map (Seminole County) 4 4 Existing Zoning Map (Seminole County) S 5 Future Land Use Map (City ofSanford) 6 6 Zoning Map (City ofSanford) 7 Tom/nes atLake Monroe Page|i Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15,2O21 The following information is provided in support of the Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment: APPENDiCES A Property Property Card Printouts B Affidavit ofOwnership & Designation ofAgent Forms C Boundary /& Topographic Survey D Legal Description E School Impact Analysis F Traffic Impact Analysis 6 Environmental Assessment Report H Resolution No. 2O2O-R-7OVacation ofPublic Townes atLake Monroe Page | ii Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15,2O21 PROPERTY OWNERS PARCEL 23-19-30-300-0040-0000 Leo C.TrepanierRevocable Trust 28GClubhouse Blvd. New Smyrna Beach, FL32168-791D Attn: Carol J. Castello T� /\�P��^N"�/n�TA[DR|""`/""""`E[]AGEl',1T MattNanzeck Beazer Homes 151SnuthhaULane, Suite 2OO Maitland, FL327S1 P:(4O7)362-6819 Email: matthew.wanzeck@beazer.com [4I I')P[A, N E R: Javier E.Ornano,QNU-a [PH,Inc. 1117 E. Robinson Street Orlando, FL328O1 P:(407)493-9266 Email: jomana@cphcorp.com Maxwell Spann, PLA CPH,|nc. 500 West Fulton Street Sanford, FL 32771 P:(4O7)322-6841 Email: mspann@cphcorp.com �1� TT� Mark Audey Bio -Tech Consulting, Inc. 3O2SEast South Street Orlando, FL 32803 P:(4O7)O94-5969 Email: mark@bio-techconsulting.com PARCEL 14O Triple BAcquisitions LLC 12OStone Post Rd. Longwood, FL32779'2745 Attn: Frank |oppu/o,Jr. �1 V! L E N G i N EE R: Jeremy Owens, PE CPH,|nc 50West Fulton Street Sanford, FL 32771 P:(4U7)322-6841 Email: jowens@cphcorp.com �j�V�Y{]�� Ralph A. Nieto, PSM Nieto-Whittaker Surveying, LLC 1728N.Ronald Reagan Boulevard Longwood, FL3275O P:(4O7)636'8460 Email: ralph@nietowhittakersurveying.com T`/\ir|[/T�/\-P[)\DNK'jH,,1EER: AymanH. As-SaidiPE Traffic & Mobility Consultants 3101Maguire Boulevard, Suite 2G5 Orlando, Florida 3J8O3 P:(4O7)531-5332 \_ Townes atLake Monroe Page | iii Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15,2OZ1 ��JEC-11'UYVERV\EW [P|tInc. mnbehalf ofMatt WanzeckBeazer Homes (Authorized Agent), respectfully requests a Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment for the subject site located southwest of the intersection of Seminole Boulevard and Oak Drive (FIGURE I f& 2\. The site is 21.56± acres in size' with parcel identification numbers 23-I9-30-300-0040'000 and 23-19-30-501-0000-0140. The site is currently located in unincorporated Seminole County. AnAnnexation application has been submitted concurrently with this application, and isbeing processed bythe City ofSanford. The existing County Future Land Use designations are SE: Suburban Estates, COM: Commercial, and LDA: Low Density Residential 3\.The site's current County zoning designations are AA: Agriculture, C- 1: Retail Commercial, and R-1A:Single Family Dwelling (fIGURE4). City ofSanford maps are attached tn delineate City Future Land Use designations and Zoning in proximity to subject site (FIGURE 5 and The Applicant desires to change the Future Land Use designation to Waterfront Downtown Business District (0DBD), and rezone the property to Manned Development (PD) in order to obtain the entitlements for the desired Townes at Lake Monroe (Townes) community of attached single-family residential homes /tom/nhomnes\and associated amenities. We provide the following additional documents in support of the applications: • Application Fee: * Property Appraiser's Property Card Printout /%\ w Affidavit ofOwnership & Designation ofAgent Forms B) • Boundary & Topographic Survey (APPENDIX C) * Legal description b4PPENDIXD\ • School Impact Analysis (APPENDIX E) • Traffic Impact Analysis (with approved Traffic Methodology) (APPENDIX F) * Environmental Assessment Report (APPENDIX G) p Resolution No. 2020-R-70 Vacation of Public Right -Of -Way (APPENDIX H) -------'----------�---------�-------Townes at Lake Monroe --- ----------P---|1 age Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment Approximate 'te Project Location ocation V/ "k, Approximate Project Location 21.66 Acres Sanford 1- incri � i muc D_a I a_, 1118 12 11 1 N Rholo Date: N.A Projer.1 lvu816504 Bic�'(DA�,sf GIs: JOG LOCATION MAP TONES AT LAKE MONROE SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 19 SOUTH, RANGE 30 EAST SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA ;,)[I d Po I idks D (rn or: st(a te thf"'< f urn a i Hbi it'/ v, fi "h 4o J nd �'J ses Future Land Use designations, zoning and existing uses surrounding the subject property are as follows: N/A Waterfront/Downtown Business District (Sanford) Suburban Estates (Sanford) N/A Agriculture (Sanford) R -IA Single Family A-1 Agriculture Lake Monroe Unnamed and unimproved 3O' ROW St. Thomas More Catholic Church/Academy Oak Drive Single Family Vacant Government Owned/Wetland Townes at Lake Monroe Page 8 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15, 2021 source: Seminole county w5 Source: Seminole Countv GIS Townes at Lake Monroe Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15, 2021 'i-,rasa ? ! cmd Use A/Icw Page 19 Future Land Use Compatibility N/A— Seminole Boulevard/Lake Monroe. A ]O wide unnamed, unimproved Suburban Estates k]tv of Sanford) and Waterfront Downtown Business District (City of Sanford) Future Land Use designations abut the subject site to the south. The land in which these designations occur is zoned Agriculture and ishome hzthe St. Thomas More Catholic Church, Priory (Priest Residence) and Academy (kindergarten to 8m grade) located at G0U/5SORiverview Avenue. The City ofSanford permits houses ofworship and educational facility uses within the Agriculture zoning district upon approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission of major conditional use. Due to the 30' wide and existing uses on the adjacent site (St. Thomas More), compatibility concerns are minimal. A nominal landscape buffer may be established through the Planned Development rezone process. Low Density Residential (Seminole land abuts the subject site tothe east. Alandscape buffer, appropriate setbacks and building heights will beestablished aspart ofthe Planned Development rezone process to address compatibility. The lands immediately west include Future Land Use designation of Public/Quasi-Public (Seminole County), are vacant/undeveloped, and are mostyxvetonds/foodp|ain. Based on research of public records, lands are Seminole County surplus. Due to the vacant, undeveloped and wetlaplaincharacteristics of the adjacent site, compatibility concerns are minimal. No landscape buffering is proposed. Townes atLake Monroe Page 110 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June l5,2O21 �ssess11en1 of[un�;is�excyvvitk [omprehensive P|an Gno|�, U'ec1ives and Po|icies 0�mmostratethe[han�esinCharactertmflhesurrouI 4reaaca e) 11 Source: Google Maps Bar0ut Bac!<ot Lake �V�onroe VV(D �fe�sLakeNe v!Terrace �in�|e Fami|y�ubdivision StThomas ��ore Priory (Pr�es� Residence) F|aLandand[o|onizadmn company~s[e|eryP{antation SinQ|e Fomi|ySubdivision Re�aLaShoresApa�ment Homes The subject aerial photograph from March of 1994 depicts the Bar Out Back at Lake Monroe Bar/Restaurant /a commercial establishment) on the northern property boundary along Seminole Boulevard. The character of the surrounding area was residential (single and multi -family) in nature as demonstrated by the adjacent VVo|fe/s Lake View Terrace subdivision, Fla Land and Colonization Company's Celery Plantation subdivision, and the Regatta Shores Apartment Homes, �� Toxxnesa1Lake k�onroe Page |11 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 1S,ZUZ1 0 Source: Google Maps BorOut8ackatLnkeK8onnoe VVo|fe/sLakeVlewTenace 2ing/e F�mi|ySubdivision VenetianBaySing|eFamily Subdivision Rega(�a�hores4pariment Homes St.Thomas��uePriory/Phest Re�idence) 5LThornas��oreCathoUc Church F|aLandandCo|onization [ompanv/�Ce|eryP|ant�tion S|nQ|e Fmmi|y Subdividon |nthis aerial photograph from May of20O4 the Bar Out Back atLake Monroe Bar/Restaurant remains, an increase in single family homes in the surrounding area is evidenced by the addition of the Venetian Bay subdivision, and the St. Thomas More Church (and stormvvater pond) appear south of the subject property. The character of the surrounding area continues to be residential (single and multi -family) in nature. Townes atLake Monroe Page 112 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15,2OZ1 0 Source: Google Maps 8arOut Back atLakeK4onnze VVo|fer'sLake VievmTe/rzce Sing,|e Fami|y Subdivision VenetianBay SinQ|eFami/y Subdivision Re�attaShoresAparUri enL Homes S 1-1 , Thomas K8oro Phory (Priest Residence) SLThomas KAoreCatbo|ic Church F|aLandand[o|onization CompenY's Ce|ary P|antation Sin8!eFami|ySubdi vision |nthis aerial photograph from November of2O19, the Bar Out Back at Lake Monroe Bar/Restaurant had been demolished and the land used asastaging ground and material storage for the Seminole Boulevard construction improvements. The aerial photograph also shows the Venetian Bay subdivision isbuilt out. The character of the surrounding area continues to be residential (single and multi -family) in nature. Historically, the area has remained predominantly residential (single and multi -family) with the exception , of St. Thomas More Catholic Church and the Bar Out Back on Lake Monroe Bar/Restaurant. The Bar Out Back was demolished in 2019, and its Commercial Future Lend Use designation will change to a more Townes atLake Monroe Page | 13 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 1S,2O21 appropriate designation. The change in Future Land Use designationfnom SE: Suburban Estates, COM: \ Commercial, and LDR: Low Density Residential to VVD8D: Waterfront Downtown Business District is appropriate for the area and will not negatively impact its character, Compatibility with the adjacent VVo|fe/s Lake View Terrace Single Family Subdivision to the east will be achieved through landscape buffering, appropriate setbacks and building heights (through the site design/PD process). Sonfb/RivcWo&phose37n.�i&Roodwoyhnprvcncntsconstrocubnp/cicct'htersccuionqfBAI±and Oak Dr. Construction of Phase 3 of the Sanford RiverWalk Trail & Roadway project is expected tubecompleted this year. Phase 3 consists of the construction of approximately 13,192 linear feet (2.5 miles) of o new multi -use trail along with trail lighting, parking, hardscape, landscaping and irrigation. Roadway improvements consist of new streetlights, rounclabouts, landscaping, hardscape and irrigation. News Release from City of Sanford, —RiverWa|kPhase ] Seawall Groundbreaking Event: ��e�h/nDf��m b/e [e//�c Rbr�� ag/ono/ Hos��o/ on d/e eus� Az [ounq/ Rood 1S m/d //��rs/ore � �u �he wes� U/� seavoJ wi//�ro�d� /he n�ces�o/ypro{ccbon m�d su7�or� fo/d�e p/onned}Yno/ ex�e//z/on P/,o�e � cƒ �o/�brd'� �n�erno�/ono//y omord w�n/ng R�erN/o8c �hose �� s� �ern/no/e Bo��vord bW L1l 27`92) p/onned 000dm�y on� pedc��o/� �oproveme//�� mu/d beg/n /o�rr /n ��e yeo� Des/Qned uh/��/� con�A/ebs s��e� o/��/�sw urbon�/n pr�/c/p&z� �6e �/verN/ V/ v/0showcoze und bu��e/�/e c/�y'z e�br� �u //meos� ondp/o/no�e pe6,��on�n� um/kob8/�� o/�d ohao/�hycom/nuo/�y Townes atLake Monroe Page 14 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 1S,2O21 / Thi�l:pojt�,c-bpf/eg�n�/mpo/�onc�c��//�o�emnnecb�yofmonymmmun/�� \ ond /� v�8 be on /nL, egofthe s�o/eu��e hVe m�Jpedes��n oe�wuxi Loco&sd o/on� booub/u/ Lokr 8Jon/op'ssouLh r\ore /o s�o�e des/gno�edscen/c h/�humK\ t, T �u�ec� m///p/ov/de o/�r of�he mos��n�bne 6�ka ondpe�es�r/on expe//a/,ces seCf) n� �o none /n �or�b� ��ng res d ood vi"�Roa o sVec�ocu/oI Fiorf� h/t un/gyo onduncpo//e6vvo�erwo��gh�//ere/n�onfbrd/ ^Thazeou'u8gxzundbozok/ngevents/gn��hscd) n/,dourporNert/n:cs(o/en�/no w/od�-c/oss omen/�y' �he �nr�brd 8/vmkVo8iNV�sn phosc � /s conq/�� h� �u�ec� w/8/ co&zpu/��u/�zrd (o o dc6 ° �u�dn's Amges/ ��/ond shooe0ne 4/ on /n��/nudnoo/ ovw�� w��n/ng b�z nnd pcdesrion/ro8t fsK/vec �/hbp/o�'c/w�0prov��hu/�cxusbe�m�o/n�m�ymu///m:do/connecbon�indu�ng �unRo8onJK/cp/onnc�7o�n�por/obonO�en�e��av�/opm�n��rm/no/son�Yo/us/o [oun�y7ir8�>s�amo/�dIR42�on�/'4 ° 7hepn7��c� u�/con//�c�mony com/nux/bes �o vo�ous �our�m c&s�no�ons /ndu�ng �he Ctnt'o/ Ror�/o Zoo o/�d /nony p/is(/ne und ow/ord m/��n��g porks ond sp�ngs cƒ Rb//do The approval and subsequent development of Townes will be appropriately timed with the completion of the Riverwalk Phase 3Trail and Roadway Project. Sidewalk connections tothe Trail will provide Townes residents direct access tothis regional public recreation facility. Townes residents will benefit from this connection not only for its recreation value, but for the opportunity to have improved access to the LYNX and 3unRai|transportation systems. In addition, the approval and subsequent development ofTownes is appropriately timed tn provide needed housing for the slated redevelopment of Seminole Towne Center, a major retail and commercial project to undergo substantial improvements to continue to serve the north Seminole County and City of Sanford market, Townes atLake Monroe Page 15 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15,JU21 ""P, IC'[ ( OFOPCP I I 21�'16ive P,aft �^rd she sui"JpOrt arfd FtIrLhcrirlg, cff Plan and Pkflkpc!s Goals, Objectives and Pokies of the, 01-y's Conprehe�nsive, Plan a,q-)j:)orted I.)r furthered by d"11- Pr",-,")pOse'd applicat-ion ��we as fdlows: GOAL FLU I VVIANAGE LAIP40 USEDISTRUBUTION AND PROWS1044 OF SFRV1CFS AND FACILIIIES. THF S)HP-1-1- FIRCIV"CTE PJ4 0 L,',VAL� U`-iEs H"'I P"N S,�-,,,CJA� '- LY. P, N1 L., L 1)1' -4J, -':I,,\ E AF -C; LP(AL,LL %4AV%J4 LQ, VY! I THLA4 (JUA "-L': AQ[L, TINILL'Y' The proposed project helps implement the stated Goal given the City's projected population of 68,681 by 2025 (City of Sanford Comprehensive,Plan) through provision of residential units with centralized infrastructure (potable water and sewer). C),RJF-CT1VF F1.1) 1.11; (WDRD,�, Tn7,, Wh IR - n "ip'1 7,, r r - nag n fr-m, ,:-vwanr': f,r :,rca f - 'N-,, 1"Ir, carrrm",qc ui ;4,r -J 0 -on fvt,-4p. Lj�-.,L .4Ki S i7t FI-df-ve -irmriz:rl,,Oo-ea Kt, ThF istc-1 L-"wNIL fi.AAJ D d"'C' S, c "nir c, h-, C Yz--J Ig rf."Al , Tov""Ick "rle for The proposed project furthers this objective by providing quality housing stock along the Sanford waterfront. The project is both a redevelopment and infill project: it replaces a retail/entertainment establishment and provides an infill project (within the utility service area of the City of Sanford). Additionally, the project provides housing stock to the increasing north Seminole County population. Townes at Lake Monroe Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15, 2021 Page 116 OBJECTIVE FLU 1. 15 Prevent Pro0foration of Urban Sprain; and Oeveiop Efficient System.-; forCoordinating the T7ming and Staging of Puat and Private Deve4opment, Tete City sh, f or,.x tinue lo orifc. ,,-;:* adopteal LDfRs w-hicti r�r-quire %'r' a. p-ti,opc, fJ L�js &L, ar-k- - , lal, t�e - b - y Q, ely vvj, iu-qut-Sne! pibliz, fazAkies. %vate", and 't," --Pjrvlces. a"dctpuatie, ,"itorrrlwatur vA,,)%te cfisrvFat amIal-rarr-n;,I.s wasUe Triaraqem,-r-4.7hr- and' sfie plar shall prr;vIde a ur Me,,,ci syF.tem k*irnnOrdnaI,,qq thr- effnr?eevr timir q nNisFnn, aric", of puh-RC and" privatf., Cle-vr-,40n;7 en; in rnderr t-- abaFe-,jribar, zpraw ard xislirQ irfrastru-cl,dry all no VW,, ale'velopinfort if, 11 b,-cquii-umj t---, hoick tp to tt,.e xiHig c*rAral lef and w stewaat�rsystu-rn. iy st-,airn,,,ivq"air I-D-,R�F� 'A'4, ;'h irdt,,�-Jp- star -lards requiring req-sisif;e publir, ":icl pC.,vd,,T.nJ %ritri Vse "I-1pect"! of na%, c,,%,r ek-ipniort. 7V�;- Cly`s 1-DRz shall or%tif ,�Jc to it"'Clude pm—fotna-ric-a stan"Jard"'s 'illy t Vtf- loMwkon, tFr,[,,g ar-d of be vv' `!,'I P)Lbiic; facikiu,-�i ari servk�is Irl ufde� tf.-� pre,�ant Hhe p,,r�41fe-allian :-,I L,.=T-baq s:)ray.1 Vinci arhieve lar l Fit U avni :5praw) -Sh, it -01 h,a tljr-,ner a-atr-:,, 4hrouph I -DR,, indt, arg i" rte. s b v reac. w�L C� 4 , t frpw develcipxn iomt up to "i e ,—, Ity"-- uy,,,,,.Stng Cort, ilkl L"I"I'l, The subject project is located within the City of Sanford's urban service area and the project will be annexed within the City's jurisdictional boundaries. The City will provide potable water and sewer treatment services. Fscy FLU 1.15-2. Require Public Water and,'Or Wastewater Systems for New Devvelopment. F r�i c., r t f� re,,,.- e- I ".,-) h -,ii ^3: n ,.i perm 1, :�i p ry"I f -,,.17, ef - r', !i-v,,q rr P n i n r. 11, . d ii tor" !S 7, e ,'r:.„ 1 - rt P,xns- tte The subject project will be serviced by the City of Sanford's potable water and sewer treatment facilities. Policy FLU 1 -16.3 -Execute Vaivkntary Arim-xatfon, T�-se a vttn S,��rnlr,-jLc Gf,24 pmvidc- a f XLLz 4y IC i U�-,E,• pohr-y vvflhin tl t CIA,NR !, L. s.'� P',,Urr-ig Aru,si- yy J ancl a -Irexa�kv-- Pcria,ire � 4:,f trte (:JAF.i in, with saiti inl,*»,tlocai wit; the Cnar irabic x.- S, a`o h ftjt,,srr- iarlrl i card! —ningf n that is frcir, the VJV r-atlUit"O. i,iep arr,-,idwcrr te.�zf--,rtng in The subject parcels encompassing the Townes project are being annexed into the City of Sanford from unincorporated Seminole County. The subject project will comply with corresponding Comprehensive Plan, zoning and applicable Land Development Code criteria. Townes at Lake Monroe Page 117 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15, 2021 Policy FLU 2.2.5. Redevetopment of Waterfront and Historic Downtown. The Cit,, shal, ue rrlawiagu V TL lei, evudoprrsert uol; Lake taa4e-rfron�, and doveri`zoval h�soCIC tr' C"an!5"Ste-rit w4t-, the C;rrprehen- ive Plan, plarmrq i:IhAze-, -zlntalil direrll higheF,, vvith lora' h5slf,-.,rca! esspecia,,",'Iy areas al:3ng fne- vw,,,ivearf�-ont or I ar -. a h IL ,;%i thir� anz djaoen, I , t,,' e Dc-fwntr n, area. The C 4y zma I c�CIPV("L fto c lordaale pub'ic and prival Ou rQI:StJIJf,VQI�13 I'R, (:Elssary to irdtravu nee-Pxi ,,rrt rt., duvu loplyvu, rip., .vi lhi'n P'le svv a, ata y 8.;t1aH .:;orlllnuu tz.} ana.yzo for tne- doiv--ilown ".v-aterfrort czrridor at-,nnq Lake Wiorrrie- The s?lah hi:i on achilevir-t9 a rnrxre- and 7--ich-mes residiartial, r,., .,.i i� CSF iii ic�lo5� ar-tivit--es. Th -3 Lake Nionrce corTidor rsde-vr�-csPqffl-an-, SIaI OCIIIURLO 1.,:� crrpnaC,;,Zo cez-,-ign rneasures :3 IJTI�QLC WQUD[IfOrlt LICplie(z_-pr-riert 1-,@tl�orr by ullb;t,,r •dvt-?gr .-'md a "nix of The subject project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; it is an infill project and will be served by central services (potable water and sewer). Additionally, the project is situated within the Lake Monroe corridor and it will promote a unique pedestrian friendly development. Policy rLU 2-2.7: Promote Urban 1,r-fift Re -development. '1`iu CAC .inait_vi=ag�hc, rf..rliRVRInF.,rmenil C4 piirre-, 17 M'Ot-1,r� -,Arc, f. q, rerne:ai-,r�- awp,-i- --nna 7%Jrr,,.."idv use"-," cif�,).,,Nar, tff-T s .. LA G A! Q nit: fic, 81Q irt"Ir-Oit- z -z car fl -m -y' 18rt that. "u lyptca,i --nt ff7rrns ir adidit-1-1, zheFr lar .l Amd ,ated or -r- m-vv'RV' V e area vwirhr vpeni a i f Jr -w-4,1112, .Jrartr-r Ftl'k�, th a z ire [-,,e I �R57-ial I-' o 111,- Ine :�W�7a"15 r;t 3--, --1 %VrO7�rla, FO-alf h�� pe-rrnitie�� Y�*hir, an,,y i;rir-,I t',frie The subject project is located within the urban service area and it is a redevelopment/infill project. Utilities will be provided by the City of Sanford. Townes at Lake Monroe Page 18 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15, 2021 a 15t r" [ r'J Policies of the East. CerVtTal Fk)C-ida SIA-atr:.3gir RegJoral Policy suppoP-t¢�.'.,d oifu�thered �Yl/ the pr(: p(DSEd a(�-_)pkation af-e a.,, foHows: Policy 3.3 Promote innovative design for development in harmony with natural resources. The project will be designed in harmony with on-site wetlands and avoid and/or minimize impacts to the greatest extent possible. Additionally, Townes will have use of the Sanford Riverwalk as part of off-site amenity package to be enjoyed by the project's residents. Policy 3.9 Development should avoid or properly mitigate adverse impacts to listed species. The project does not impact any listed species. Policy 3.10 Wildlife management and conservation areas should be protected from encroachment. The project does not encroach onto any referenced areas. Policy 4.3 Support emerging economic centers that are located in the most appropriate areas, such as along transit corridors or in existing or planned employment centers. The project wilt provide housing stock opportunities for the emerging Sanford Downtown area and the Seminole Towne Center (undergoing redevelopment). Policy 5.3 Promote a multi -modal transportation system that provides for the safe, efficient and cost effective movement of people and goods. The project will be located 1.5+1- miles from the SunRail Sanford Station and less than one mile from the Lynx bus station at Central Florida Regional Hospital. Refer to LYNX SunRail Connections Brochure, page 20. Policy 5.24 Encourage the development of sidewalks to establish greater connectivity Internal sidewalks will be provided with direct access to the RiverWalk Trail. Townes at Lake Monroe Page 19 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15, 2021 Thom. Jr Pkwy AAA Headtivanos 01'�t"—"'0 " S'.01. at, Serial S.Cu, LY College Admin Uild YNX,I� . unRoil Ca nnectkms Biochwe Source: LYNX Website Townes at Lake Monroe Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15, 2021 Ctntral 5aminole County C",., FlabR Intal 21d02. Services Bulidmg FaM1 Hnith Cmw 5znfu F C,vu r Subject Property Page 20 19c I- '"0 0— Ox F.gWks v,� ;r;v/,';"" O'b"F.W" u.bal'. C"; M= SR.N ,�W prima I 01— QwrSo---------- O OC 0 Cutiu 2a5 1.00, Z-41, ONAII 1— M" A lha 0 Source: LYNX Website Townes at Lake Monroe Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15, 2021 Ctntral 5aminole County C",., FlabR Intal 21d02. Services Bulidmg FaM1 Hnith Cmw 5znfu F C,vu r Subject Property Page 20 19c I- 0— Ox v,� ;r;v/,';"" irfrilHG U. "m C"; Source: LYNX Website Townes at Lake Monroe Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15, 2021 Ctntral 5aminole County C",., FlabR Intal 21d02. Services Bulidmg FaM1 Hnith Cmw 5znfu F C,vu r Subject Property Page 20 [omp|e1ion c�Oa�aandIna/ya�s Requine/ments Potable Water LOS: 144 gallons/person/day 144 gallons/person/day x 270 = 38,880 gallons per day Sanitary Sewer LOS: 115 gallons/person/day 115 gallons/person/day x 270 = 31,050 gallons per day Solid Waste LOS: 4.Zpou Road Landfill) 4.2pnunds/caoitn/6ayx27O=1,1S4pounds/day LOS: 4`3poundu/capita/day(County Central Transfer Station) 4.3 pounds/capita/day x 270 = 1,161 pounds/day Stormwater The proposed stormwater ponds will be designed to meet the St Johns River Water Management District (SJRWMD) and City of Sanford criteria for wet detention and will be permitted through both SURVVK8D and the City of Sanford. The ponds will be designed to provide the pre -post discharge for the 25 -year, 24-hour event and provide the volume compensation for the 100 -year flood plain displacement. Recreation and Open Space LOS 4acres ofrecreation lan population 4acres ofrecreation |an population x.27=1I0acre ufrecreation land LOS: 0.05 miles ofmulti-use tnails/1'OOUpopulation O.OSmiles ofmulti-use trai|s/1,000population x.27=O.013Smiles ofmulti-use trails *Calculations assume 2.Gpersons per unit x1O4units =27Opersons Townes atLake Monroe Page 121 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 1S,2O3I F - i t N Capadty [Ynpacl Schoo� 1B,o,,ird Assc 1 ABnen.} A School Impact Analysis, dated March 15, 2021, was obtained from Seminole County Public Schools (SOPS), Facilities Planning Department (APPENDIX E). The project will generate approximately 28 students, as follows: ELEMENTARY MIDEILt 8CHOOL SCHOOL STUDENTS STUDENTS GENERATED GENERATED 0.106 per unit 0.051 per unit 13 6 *Student generation rate per Seminole County Public Schools data. X Total Students Townes at Lake Monroe Page 122 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15, 2021 [omp|etiono|andAna|ysi� Requirements Fac#�ty��pacity|ro�ac1�saessmer�s Trunsporta6unAsoessrnen1 The Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Traffic Mobility Consultants, dated ]uk/ 2020is attached (APPENDIX F). Townes atLake Monroe Page 123 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15,2021 CONCLUSION The requested Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment from SE: Suburban Estates, COM: Commercial, and LDR: Low Density Residential (Seminole County) to WDBD: Waterfront Downtown Business District is justified for the following reasons: m The Amendment isconsistent with the City's land use policies; * The proposed Future Land Use designation iscompatible with the surrounding Future Land Use designations; m The proposed attached single family residential homes (townhomnes) are compatible with surrounding uses. Compatibility with the adjacent VVo|fe/s Lake View Terrace Single Family Subdivision lothe east will be achieved through landscape buffering, appropriate setbacks and building heights; = During the rezoning process City staff will review the application to ensure that the proposed development complies with the City's development policies, and achieves the desired compatibility; • The Amendment does not increase, promote nrextend urban sprawl; • The proposed infill project discourages urban sprawl by providing a cohesive, well-planned community where its residents will enjoy ease of access to integrated support services; " The Amendment increases taxable value ofthe property; = The subject project will be 'designed to enable the safe use of multiple modes of transportation' by providing a direct sidewalk connection tothe Seminole Trail. This connection will enable its residents toutilize the Lynx and SunRmi|systems; • The proposed project has included consideration for elimination or minimization of any potential environmental impacts; = The proposed project m/i|| be designed as a cohesive community with regard toarchitecture, landscaping, and signage. A master stornnxvater system will be designed to accommodate drainage for the entire project site; w The Amendment does not create urban sprawl and utilizes City services; ° The Amendment implements Downtown Waterfront Business District goals and objectives; and � The Amendment provides residential units that may service needs for projected population increases. Townes at Lake Monroe Page 124 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment JuneI5,2021 APPENDIX A Property Appraiser's Property Card Printouts Townes at Lake Monroe Page 125 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15, 2021 12/22/2020 SOPA Parcel View; 23-19-30-300-0040-0000 proiselYy Record Card 1t Parcel: 23-19-30-300-0040-0000 $2,780.22 y11 2 Property Address: 17-92 HWY SANFORD, FL 32771 q�u Parcel Information Value Summary Parcel 23-19-30-300-0040-0000 2021 Working 2020 Certified Oviner(s) TREPANIER LEO C REV TRUST - Trust Values Values Property Address 17-92 HWY Valuation Method Cost/Market Cost/Market SANFORD, FL 32771 $0.00 ,7-F- C/O - 1 CASTELLO, - I I I - 1 1 CAROL . - T Number of Buildings 0 0 C/O CASTELLO, CAROL T Does i,ic'r INCLUDE Not) Ad Valoreni Assessments 286 CLUB HOUSE BLVD Depreciated Bldg Value NEW SMYRNA, FL 32168-7910 SEC 23 TWP 19S RGE 30E Subdivision Name Depreciated EXFT Value Tax District 01 Land Value (Market) $199,823 $199,823 DOR Use Code: 0030 -VACANT WATERFRONT OF S 1/4 SEC POST RUN W 350 FT N TO Land Value Ag Exemptions Just/tlarket Value $199,823 $199,823 Portability Adj ':axes Save Our Homes Adj $0 $0 7,((, ka, §1 o r; r Amendment I Adj $0 $0 Assessment Value P&G Adj $0 $0 ROAD DISTRICT Assessed Value $199,823 $199,823 Arn0L1rttVJth0Ut,S0H: 1 $2,780.22 lTax q�u I $2,780.22 Save Cur i-iornes Savings: $0.00 ,7-F- Does i,ic'r INCLUDE Not) Ad Valoreni Assessments Legal Description SEC 23 TWP 19S RGE 30E BEG 1518 FT W & 705 FT N OF S 1/4 SEC POST RUN W 350 FT N TO S RW 17-92 SELY ALONG RNV TO PT N OF BEG S TO BEG (LESS RD) ':axes Taxing Authority Assessment Value Exempt Values Taxable Value ROAD DISTRICT $199.823 $0 $199,823 SJWM(Saint Johns Water Management) $199,823 $0 $199,823 FIRE $199,823 $0 $199,823 COUNTY GENERAL FUND $199,823 $0 $199,823 Schools $199,823 $0 $199,823 Sales Description Date Book Page Amount Qualified Vac/Imp CORRECTIVE DEED 12/1/2003 05120 1953 $100 No Vacant WARRANTY DEED 11/1/2003 qLa 1957 $600,000 No Vacant WARRANTY DEED 9/1/1998 2L6L $100,000 Yes Vacant not Method Frontage Depth Units Units Price Land Value ACREAGE 16.18 $19,000.00 $199,823 Building Information htto.,;-//n.qr(,,Pltlptnilq.qr.n;;fI nm/Pqrr.PlDt-t;;ilPrinti-rPrip.nrilvq,,ny?Pin=g.11qinionnndn(innn 12122/2020 SOPA Parcel View: 23-19-30-300-0040-0000 i Permits Permit # Description Agency Amount CO Date Permit Date No Permits I Permit data does not originate from the Seminole county Property Appraisers office. For dat.11s or questions concern" a permit, please contact the building department of the Us district In which the property Is located. Extra Features Description Year Built Units Value New Cost No Extra Features Zoning Zoning Zoning Description Future Land Use FutureLandUseDescription SE Suburban Estates httc)s:IlDarceidetails.SCDafl.oralParcolDetailPrinterFCiendlv.asnx?PID=23193030O00400000 917 12/22/2020 SCPA Parcel View: 23-19-30-501-0000-0140 https:Hparceldetails.scpafl.org/ParceIDetailPrinterFriendly.aspx?PiD=23193050100000140 1/2 Prop Record Card jg�rty. Parcel: 23-19-30-501-0000-0140 I: �IAOY « 0�,QA Property Address: W SEMINOLE Cx' BLVD SANFORD, FL 32771 Parcel Information Value Summary Parcel 23-19-30-501-0000-0140 2021 Working 2020 Certified Cwrier(s): TRIPLE B ACQUISTITIONS LLC Values Values Property Address i W SEMIBLVD SANFORD, FL 32771 Valuation Method Cost/Market Cost/Market 120 STONE POST RD Number of Buildings 0 0 %4ailing 1 LONGWOOD, FL 32779-2745 Depreciated Bldg Value Subdivision Name WOLFERS LAKE VIEW TERRACE Tax District 01 Depreciated EXFT Value DOR Use Code; 10 -VAC GENERAL -COMMERCIAL Land Value (Market) $470,274 $470,274 Exemptions Land Value Ag Jl t I rk e _11", Values $470,274 $470,274 Portability Adj 'd n I I. a k 0 M c'� r% 1, c'), # Save Our Homes Adj $0 $0 Amendment I Adj $0 $0 P&G Adj $0 $0 Assessed Value $470,274 $470,274 Tax AriicuntwithoutSOH: $6,543.11 $6,543.11 $0.00 gal Description LOTS 14 TO 22&24&25&N 112 OF VACD ST ADJ ON S & VACD ST ADJ ON W WOLFERS LAKE VIEW TERRACE PB 10 PG 66 Taxes Taxing Authority Assessment Value Exempt Values Taxable Value ROAD DISTRICT $470,274 $0 $470,274 SJWMI(Saint Johns Water Management) $470,274 $0 $470,274 FIRE $470,274 $0 $470.274 COUNTY GENERAL FUND $470,274 $0 $470,274 Schools $470,274 $0 $470.274 Sales Description Date Book Page Amount Qualified Vac/Imp SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED 6/1/2014 $476,000 No Improved CERTIFICATE OF TITLE 1/1/2014 08202 Olin: $100 No Improved CERTIFICATE OF TITLE 10/1/2013 03143 1828 $100 No Improved QUIT CLAIM DEED 4/1/2002 04382 1348 $100 No Improved QUIT CLAIM DEED 1/1/2002 04382 1316 $100 No Improved ')UIT CLAIM DEED 2/1/1997 03202 0544 $100 No Improved WARRANTY DEED 1211/1996 03181 0-664 $600,000 No Improved WARRANTY DEED 7/1/1988 L) I 2nfi 2659 $67.500 No Improved WARRANTY DEED 1/111986 01702 0554 $100 No Improved https:Hparceldetails.scpafl.org/ParceIDetailPrinterFriendly.aspx?PiD=23193050100000140 1/2 12/22/2020 SCPA Parcel View: 23-19-30-501-0000-0140 WARRANTY DEED 611/1985 n l 45 F2 $410,000 No Improved Land Method Frontage Depth Units Units Price Land Value FRONT FOOT & DEPTH 100.00 134,00 $262.65 S7,643 FRONT FOOT & DEPTH 156.00 400.00 0 $262.65 $18,192 SQUARE FEET 128502 $5.25 $404,782 FRONT FOOT & DEPTH 100.00 190.00 0 $262.65 $30,730 FRONT FOOT & DEPTH 33.00 153.00 $262,65 $8,927 Building information Permits Permit # Description Agency Amount CO Date Permit Date 08836 2485 W SEMINOLE BLVD: ELECTRICAL - COMMERCIAL-Temporary Power to Construction County $41,482 6120/2019 Trailer [WOLFERS LAKE VIEW TERRACE] 01496 ELECTRICAL County $2,000 218/2019 21065 DEMO County $25,000 1/17/2019 05477 FLAG POLE County $1,525 6/512014 01545 2 FIRE WALLS TO SEAL OFF SECTION OF BUILDING AND MISC REPAIRS BAR OUT BACK County $1,000 2/21/2014 02490 DEMO. County 5300 41512013 02489 DEMOLITION. County 5300 4/5/2013 04105 REROOF; PAD PER PERMIT 2481 NW US HWY 17-92 County $5.000 5124/2011 02017 REMODEL & REPLACE BATH FIXTURES County 5700 3/1712009 00245 2 WINDOWS A DOUBLE DOOR AND RAMP County $1,800 1/13/2009 Page 1 of 2 (19 items) 1 3 Permit data docs not originate from the Senninoic County Pfafwny Appraiser's office. For cietaRt of ci cora—lf; a p.ro,11, plan. contact the Wiring d.p.Arnent of the fee district In which ite property is locart'd. Extra Features Description Year Built Units Value New Cost No Extra Features Zoning Zoning Zoning Description Future Land Use Futurel-andUseDescription COM Commercial https:llparceldetails.scpafl.org/ParcelDetailPrinterFriendly.aspx?PID=231930501O0000140 2/2 APPENDIX Affidavit of Ownership & Designation of Agent Forms Townes atLake Monroe Page26 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15,2U21 CITY OF -rF RD S AN PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP AND DESIGNATBON OF AGENT P -lease use addillionef sheeis as needed. If any additional sheets are aftched to tiffs document, please sign. here and note below: 1. Ownership Carol J. Casiefllo, Trustee, Leo C. Trepalies Revocable, Trust nereby aftest to ownership oil ihe property described beiov T-Ln,x Parcel tiuriiber(s).- 23-19-30-300-0040-0000 Address or Property: Seminole BK;d. Sanfr-rd, FL 332771 F.; for vvilich this application is submitted to the City of Sanford. 11.0asignation orf App3icant's Algent jh?ave blank If not aha pIlicable) As t1he 012vneriappjfcant of ffhe above deshgnaked, pro�r&tv for Y,,Mcch this affld3vit is submitted, i designate the bielow narinsd individual as , y agent ;r7 all rnalberss permining, to ':he application pro -cess, in, authiodzing tt-ie agent nanned belowto reDresent rile, orlrV company, l ailest that the aprpkat(on -is Made in good faith ind that all informakm contained in the apfplicFtri is accumte and conplate to the bt of nny personai %novVied1ge. Siqnatura Appilcan't's Agera fpri,YQ: Maii ',,Nanzeck, Beaze? Horgles Agent,Address;_151 Southahall Lane, ke 200, Maitland,. FL'32751 (407) 362-6819 Fax: IF. Pv'offw- to Chviler A '" , - - lorto'T -it, -. Sio-V r At 'Cil L I chang'es in owrie", ship arid/or Appif 'tins Agent pl: inal actlGn of 'he C - shall require an new affidavil ership changges, thenew vAmer assumes all obii9alions related, to the filing applfcalioni process. B. H "he ewner �ntoends for €9c author ivv of lihe Appfical"Ws Age. -"t 10 be ',Uniied In any inpnn-ar, p,.a2se indicate the lirnitallconsils) cmiled, 10 a ofooncunencv; flimited 1,o obtaininga:0,7'a use con p'fance r-sr-;fcaie' etc.) rhe 0wvnqr of ths neat proparty aissoclated 1,01h lbhF am- t M Ucation or profurarnan' activiqf Is a 4::t%a:one) U �i,ldividuaf n Corporart "'n u Liand T;*ijct 0 Paiffnershlp o L.hv,,RP-dd!,J;Fbii1ty Company L-1 04her (deqcriba): RvvciC8b1k--- Trust t-. UW allnatumi rson v""'hc' have, an ov"neFsHP interes, in the- Properiv, which is ;h -a- ...Syed rnat;er of this by narrie ard — - address. For each!�.ar-vqmt at i ;qn, , H , 1[he name, address, and de of each oAcsr, 'he narne and address of eacin, d'ffe'Gior of the =TKrabian; _rd the Paine and a6dress of each shaneholderwho vuvrs Iwo Percent f2%) or r-sors of the stc-ck of the corporai'v*0n. -Shareholders vd not he dGeri ased if a corponation's sto&' are traeled pub1frIly oq any national st'oclk exdh.ange. a. in ttle Case of atrust, list "he 6a4e and address of each i-istae and, d-te naine and address of the beneficiafies of the trust and the percentage of iritarest of each beneficiarv. If any trustee or 'bene"Ficia-r-y of a tr'u'st is a corporation, please provide the infbqration required in pariiigraph 2 above. Narna of Trust: Leo C. Trepanier Revocable Trust 4. For partnesme and address of Pach principal in the p.--�dnership, inelud� g inciuding limiled partnerships, list Via n, 11 general or Hmited paflnerz. if any partner is a C.,01 Poraflon, pone prowe Vie information required in paragraph 2 above. 5. For each gniKed lit Hie manna, address, and tifloof each rnanzigm or rnmaghg nambeG and to tome and address of each addiflonRl member wff.h Pa percent (2111'6) or more membarship interest. if any inurnber with hvo percent (2%) or more: rnefnbersbp interest, rmanager, or managing rnernber is a oorpnration, trist or parInership, please provide dhe information required in paragraphs 2, 3 and/or 4 above. 5. In the Circumstances of a �2,0 LttL g,,2 ff')ILILIrchase, Fist the and nddress of eaac*h Conbract purrhpser, df the Purchner is a oorpnration, trust, parinership, or UQ pmvida the information rajAnd Rr Use erk-ities in paragr2phs 2, 3, ; andlor 5abovs. Name of Pumhaser: Date of Contract: NAME TiTUF.10FMCEaRU8TEE_ ADDRESS OF iaerR,7rc, me Urelt S"he the S'.'C"Fri and subscrfbad bakwe rue, by,,,,, OR BEN EFICIARY preseace or mWe noWmW on TaZyMy d :T7L&1RL_ , M2( ke caid patsan d.fld 1,ake an MTEREST- dWy swarn by nx an oath, s -aid fuitw,,r, deposdng and dying fl ,,al has mad the fowegoing and �htai the qtatmnenls and -galions con�.,ainsd, herein are true and Colreat. caro� Jean Caste!fo Trustee/Bpnefldary 285 ClUbhOUSta Blvd., NeW SM5'Ma BaZ_rlil, FL 321681 firal V 15 2 ;a' Fubl�f;; State 111(X,ARY PUUK) (AMx NWarial Seall ape Amu No P&kd p,aIatn '--`Z5 aw -0 7 (Use ocUltinal sintiets f'orrrtcre 7. As U) any type of ovmer n-,ferrerd U.r abfve', as dmne of ol(vnershp ('.)courrixg subscquent to of Balis dcrcurnem shFfl bs, c'isclosed in writing to the City 1.�"Jur 1c, vmyacAion N,�ing tFbaen by Te CQ as I Om mWIr mbbe W YOU Ws dammmM parlbs. G. 1 ammi amt OF-, above repnasentai"ons are him and am based upon nW personat WmAdge 2nxl beffef F&er p1l reasonahle dnqulry. WaMond hat any Wum to make amiWold disolsaures is grounds ,or the aubje, excapftn, or vavisnc�e irvcived ',sfth 1his )'4jplr;allon tri beconne Void Or Pbr the as pmwrernent ado, W be nw- :e,$Ponsive. E carLify IM I am Agwy a0mBed to exeute Affidavit arid to the Pkpp-iioanl orVendw ioWe dscfosufas hwun. L -J was waAffIg-s"A AlpHcant BignaWre STATE OF F6,Q2ZQQA- 6,41'r C 0 U N T Y 1) F f,!a1-1 P,1r I Ei i NiEREBY CERTWY 1Jh,,,-,tre.u,n this dalv belpre roe 211 officar duly Waked A opklis afld f. ,t ackno,,,v;edqrnarfts, ensonaHy i:nown to me Or r�o Produced -N"�-d.aas ,.deritiilicean iaerR,7rc, me Urelt S"he the S'.'C"Fri and subscrfbad bakwe rue, by,,,,, oneatis of preseace or mWe noWmW on TaZyMy d :T7L&1RL_ , M2( ke caid patsan d.fld 1,ake an oath and was Mst dWy swarn by nx an oath, s -aid fuitw,,r, deposdng and dying fl ,,al has mad the fowegoing and �htai the qtatmnenls and -galions con�.,ainsd, herein are true and Colreat. VWTN ESS nW A n d a tid of 5 cia see i n Ih P Cou rAy �,�i nd Sta Le la, S t a ror—a W WA/ _6Jay o f 202ft- TV firal V 15 2 ;a' Fubl�f;; State 111(X,ARY PUUK) (AMx NWarial Seall ape Amu No P&kd p,aIatn '--`Z5 aw -0 7 AMWtl Please use additional sheets as needed. If any additional sheets are attached to this document, please sign here and note below: 1. Ownership 1, Frank S. loppolo, Jr., Manager & Member, Triple 8 Acquisitions, LLC , hereby attest to ownership of the property described below: Tax Parcel Number(s): 23-19-30-501-0000-0140 Address of Property. Seminole Blvd., Sanford, FL 32771 for which this application is submitted to the City of Sanford, II. Designation of Applicant's Agent (leave blank if not applicable) As the owner/applicant of the above designated property for which this affidavit is submitted, I designate the below named individual as my agent in all matters pertaining to the application process. In authorizing the agent named below to represent me, or my company, I attest that the application is made in good faith and that all information contained in the application is accurate and complete to the best of my personal knowledge. Applicants Agent (Print): Matt Wanzeck, Beazer Homes Signature: Agent Address: 151 Southhall Lane, Suite 200, Maitland, FL 32751 Email: matthew.wanzeck@beazer.com Phone: (407) 362-6819 Fax: Ill. Notice to Owner A. All changes in Ownership and/or Applicants Agent prior to final action of the City shall require a new affidavit. If ownership changes, the new owner assumes all obligations related to the filing application process. B. If the Owner intends for the authority of the Applicant's Agent to be limited in any manner, please indicate the limitations(s) below. (i.e.: limited to obtaining a certificate of concurrency; limited to obtaining a land use compliance certificate, etc.) The owner of the real property associated With this application or procurement activity is a (check one) o Individual o Corporation o Land Trust o Partnership A Limited Liability Company o Other (describe): 1. List all natural persons who have an ownership interest in the property, which is the subject matter of this petition, by name and address. 2. For each corporation, list the name, address, and title of each officer: the name and address of each director of the corporation; and the name and address of each shareholder who owns two percent (2%) or more of the stock of the corporation. Shareholders need not be disclosed if a corporation's stock are traded publicly on any national stock exchange. 3. In the case of a trust, list the name and address of each trustee and the name and address of the beneficiaries of the trust and the percentage of interest of each beneficiary. If any trustee or beneficiary of a trust is a corporation, please provide the information required in paragraph 2 above. Name of Trust; 4. For partnerships, including limited partnerships, list the name and address of each principal in the partnership, including general orlimited partners. If any partner is a corporation, please provide the information required in paragraph 2 above. 5. For each limited liability company, list the name, address, and Uda of each manager or managing member; and the name and address of each additional member with two percent (2%) or more membership interest. |fany member with two percent (2%)or more membership interest, monuger, or managing member is a oorporation, trust nrpartnership, please provide the information required inparagraphs 2.3and/or 4above, Name ofLLC: Triple B Acquisitions, LLC 6. |nthe circumstances of a. contract for purchase, list the name and address of each contract purchaser. If the purchaser is corporation, trust, partnership, or LLC, provide the information required for those entities in paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and/or 5 above. Name ofPurchaser: Date of Contract'. NAME TITLEIOFFICE/TRUSTEE OR BENEFICIARY ADDRESS % OF INTEREST Frank S. loppolo, Jr. Manager & Member 120 Stone Post Rd., Longwood, FL 32779 55% Michael F. Towers Member 951 Via Bonita St., Sanford, FL 32771 45% (Use additional sheets for more spare.) 7. Aatoany type ofowner referred toabove, achange ofownership nccurringeubsequento the execution ufthis document, shall be disclosed in writing to the City prior to any action being taken by the City as to the matter relative to which this document pertains. B. |offirm that the above representations are true and are based upon my personal knowledge and belief after all reasonable inquiry. / understand that any failure to make mandated disclosures is grounds for the subject rezone, future land use amendment, special oxcepdun, or variance involved with this Application to become void or for the submission for procurement activity to be non- responsive. | certify that | am legally authorized to execute this Affidavit and to bind the Applicant orVendor tothe disclosures herein. ~ Date Owner, Agent, Applicant Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF SEKNNULE administerI HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized to oaths and take acknowledgments, personally appeared (v 11"who is personally known to me or {} who produced Al 8as identification and acknowledged before me that s/he executed the same. Sworn and subscribed befor� me by xtoap�- 14Avov1,_W",V1 by means of physical presence or online notarization on the ( — _,L day of LrV-A-,f- , 20K,the'said' person did take an oath and was first duly sworn by me, on oath, said person, further, deposing and saying that s/he has read the foregoing and that the statements and allegations contained herein are true and correct. WITNESS myhand and official seal in the County nd State last aforesaid this _�day of . nuaEFIT MABRx. Notary Public; ��fH |d — wma�9uh|k��oe/ �JhxNo\aha|S U �y��mm.�p�mmo � Printed Name: ��mm�o�oN«GG.' ^m�m^��"�m,'n�w"�u�u --- 2 APPENDN C Boundary & Topographic Survey Townes atLake Monroe Page 127 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 1S,2O31 how tl ,� 1.0 ohm; NN AQ S - A j ke j 1 BOR gg ;11 zz gum Q how tl t! 1 MEC so! 1 i it! T 1tyo MA! ,� 1.0 ohm; NN AQ S - A j ke j 1 BOR gg ;11 1 gum Q I pt 11 1 §1 1 W .91 19 OUR AN 0 1fl; T of sq S, cis v poll 11 St mom ism 0 aFV Aear,QK L Svc is t! 1 MEC so! 1 i it! T 1tyo MA! ,� 1.0 ohm; NN AQ S - A j ke j 1 BOR gg ;11 1 gum Q I pt 11 1 §1 1 W .91 19 OUR AN 0 1fl; T of sq 0 f �S.r ;4T S wu M CIA PREPARED FOR. fXW .1 PAM 01A. M BEAZER HOMES-ORL Nista-W=k Am A UC LAKE MONROE INN &, BAR OUTBACK Son &NDO Nor PLATIM ' .Mtb b I YS-rp-pp--� pcs0-opW ONKR pU1M2 � �tua G+✓ G - • K m m c O D K p Z � G � 6 4 ` a €�d G C C C• m �2 C - . '• k 'Y E _ D , �t • A �` Z � � v //may . `� i� F f i,ii~ IS'ta G FZ G r, q Iiai " �a i f p x G{ 4p .f ••f zif pp 99 CCpp pypq_ PREPARED FOR. BEATER HOMES -ORLANDO LAKE MONROE INN & BAR OUTBACK 110 / �3 S E I ME .Q �AgAa t� aZdg$fEgg2�a�xg ga£��cii ��8k6A�aSgAAA o k Jaix • • • MMCGMM�N' 2G+GL •G • .tea i�iz7lzii Ell 4, I if2iiC'd�GC � � i€ q • 0 Z�K a u dtla :1 Z e o� i •. s ! ��—zS.7 -if A K K m f e . LC � . � • s 110 / �3 S E I ME .Q �AgAa t� aZdg$fEgg2�a�xg ga£��cii ��8k6A�aSgAAA o k Jaix rILiD Bn. BW BAIL l/lS/PB.'0 apAaN Br m+s �Q A41r N Niao•P(hittaker Survo�ing LLC MW :ro-I9l µr 1]]av w.�aJy.iM Elva,Lwpwnd, lL i.]W vNaa»c�apaw rnx-lams aiaaasl SG<E I••3H' 9ifk'T. / M t Ltl Nn ]]N • • • MMCGMM�N' 2G+GL •G • .tea i�iz7lzii Gk�FhGr.l3 rrRrG' .v" GC nc5"Gaf1� rtil%: if2iiC'd�GC rILiD Bn. BW BAIL l/lS/PB.'0 apAaN Br m+s �Q A41r N Niao•P(hittaker Survo�ing LLC MW :ro-I9l µr 1]]av w.�aJy.iM Elva,Lwpwnd, lL i.]W vNaa»c�apaw rnx-lams aiaaasl SG<E I••3H' 9ifk'T. / M t Ltl Nn ]]N JI A -1 S zP Z z > < - 15 C) > 0 0 i 0 0 0 1 r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N LA LP 00 to WOLFER'S LAKE VIEW]TERRACE PLAT BOOK 10, PG. 66 RIVER VIEW DRIVE 6�6'R�/W\ z E: O OR z PREPARED FOR: BEAZER HOMES -ORLANDO LAKE MONROE INN & BAR OUTBACK a to 0 Z C FXW or. ow VAIs 71"IJ 1 Nict um4yi.g LLC �AW APPEN[JiX D Legal Description Townes atLake Monroe Page 128 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 1S,2O21 NW20-197 August 24, 2020 BEAZER HOMES, LAKE MONROE TOWNHOMES PARCEL 23-19-30-300-0040-0000 A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 19 SOUTH, RANGE 30 EAST, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT A POINT 1518 FEET WEST AND 705 FEET NORTH OF THE QUARTER SECTION CORNER ON THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 19 SOUTH, RANGE 30 EAST, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE SOUTH EAST CORNER OF LOT 1, WOLFER'S LAKE VIEW TERRACE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 66, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN N89°45'53"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 350.00 FEET; THENCE RUN N00°14'04"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 2090.60 FEETTO THE SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 17-92 (SR 15/600) SEMINOLE BOULEVARD PER THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP SECTION 77010, DATED 8-3-2010; THENCE RUN S59°52'42"E ALONG SAID SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 110.22 FEET TO A PONT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2818.44 FEET, AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 6°13'01", A CHORD BEARING OF S56°46'12"E, AND A CHORD DISTANCE OF 305.67; THENCE RUN ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 305.82 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN S00°13'51"E ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF SAID WOLFER'S LAKE VIEW TERRACE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 66, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA FOR A DISTANCE OF 1869.22 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID LANDS CONTAINING 694,830.00 SQUARE FEET OR 15.951 ACRES MORE OR LESS. PARCEL 23-19-30-501-0000-0140 A PORTION OF LAND LYING IN THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 19 SOUTH, RANGE 30 EAST, SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1 WOLFER'S LAKE VIEW TERRACE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10, PAGE 66, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN N00°1351" W ALONG THE WESTERN BOUNDARY OF LOTS 1 THROUGH 13 INCLUSIVE AND THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF LOT 13 OF SAID WOLFER'S LAKE VIEW TERRACE FOR A DISTANCE OF 1147.64 FEET, TO A POINT BEING THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST LINE OF LAKE VIEW DRIVE, A 33 FOOT WIDE R/W AS PER SAID WOLFER'S LAKE VIEW TERRACE AS CURRENTLY VACATED PER OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9631 PAGE 1091 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AND THE CENTERLINE OF OAK VIEW DRIVE, A 66' WIDE R/W AS PER SAID WOLFER'S LAKE VIEW TERRACE, IN WHICH A PORTION IS CURRENTLY VACATED AS PER SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 9631 PAGE 1091; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE N00°13'51"W ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LAKE VIEW DRIVE FOR A DISTANCE OF 72157 FEET TO THE SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY 17-92 (SR 15/600) SEMINOLE BOULEVARD PER THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP SECTION 77010, DATED 8-3-2010, TO A POINT ON A NOW TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHWESTERLY HAVING A RADIUS OF 2818.44 FEET, AN INCLUDED ANGLE OF 3°56'14", A CHORD BEARING OF S51°41'34"E, AND A CHORD DISTANCE OF 193.64 FEET; THENCE RUN ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE FOR AN ARC LENGTH OF 193.67 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERN RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE RUN S49°4327"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 544.83 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 22 OF SAID PLAT; THENCE RUN S00°29'14"E ALONG SAID EAST LINE 105.94' TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 22; THENCE RUN N80°53'29"W ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 22 FOR A DISTANCE OF 155.07 FEET; THENCE RUN S00°16'59"E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF LOT 24 OF SAID PLAT FOR A DISTANCE OF 133.91' TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 24; THENCE RUN 589°5128"W ALONG THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF OAK VIEW DRIVE OF SAID PLAT FOR A DISTANCE OF 257.42 FEET; THENCE RUN S00°08'32"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.00' TO THE CENTER LINE OF SAID OAK VIEW DRIVE; THENCE S89°51'28"W ALONG SAID CENTERLINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 155.82 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID LANDS CONTAINING 244,228.58 SQUARE FEET, OR 5.607 ACRES MORE OR LESS. APPENDN E School Impact Analysis Townes at Lake Monroe Page 29 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15, 2021 Seminole County Public Schools School U00pa^�t Analysis � . School Capacity Determination To: Matt Young, Beazer Homes Rebecca Hammock, Seminole County Board of Commissioners Fnmmo; Richard LeBlanc, AlA, Director, Facilities Planning, Seminole County Public Schools Date: K4anrh 15'2O21 RE: Townes at Lake Monroe Seminole County Public Schools /SCPG>, in reviewing the above requent, has determined that if approved, the new FLUN1designation and/or zoning will have the effect of increasing residential density, and as a result generate additional school age children. Description: Proposed Rezone from All, C1, R - 11A to PD of +/-21.54 acres generally located adjacent to 444 Riverview Ave.. Sanford, FL within the jurisdiction of the Seminole County, FL The applicant is requesting a change tothe FLU and zoning designations tmallow amaximum of124 Single Family Attached residential units, to bedeveloped within the proposed land use and zoning designations. Parcel OQ(s) #: 23-19-30-300-0040-0000; 23- 9-30'501-0000'0140 This review and evaluation is performed on proposed future land use changes and rezones, unplatted parcels, or projects that have not received final entitlement approval. This evaluation does not guarantee that the developments subject to this declaration are exempt from, or determined to meet the school concurrency requirements effective as of January 1, 3008. Changes in enrollment, ompaoity, any newly platted developments, and any subsequent final development approvals may affect the provision of concurrent school facilities at the point of final subdivision approval, including the potential ofnot meeting statutory concurrency requirements based on future conditions. Based on information received from the jurisdiction and the application for the request,SCPSstaff has summarized the potential school enrollment impacts in the following tables: CSA Capacity DEVELOPMENT IMPACT ON STUDENT GENERATION BY CSA AFFECTED CSAs CAPACITY 5,807 5,894 8,627 3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY 308 - 150 ENROLLMENT 4,871 4,875 7,724 AVAILABLE CAPACITY 1,244 1,019 1,053 SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE 396 445 581 Townes at Lake Monroe 13 6 9 Comments CSA Evaluation: \._ 4dthis point, the students generated at the three CSA levels would be able to be accommodated without exceeding the adopted levels of service (LOS) for each CSA by school type, or there is adjacent capacity to meet LOS as allowed by interlocal agreement. Any planned expansions/additions in the current five-year capital plan would provide additional student capacity tu relieve the afhaubad schools is naOnded in this review. Zoned School Enrollment: For informational purposes, the below table indicates the analysis based on the individual _ school zones within the CSA under current conditions. At this point, the potential students generated / ��Yetobeacuornrn�dotedm/i�hmuto��|mgthem��p��Le�e|o�f�ervice(L[}S)�mrthecu�rentiyzon�� b��h ` sc� Any planned expansions/additions that would provide additional student capacity contained in the current five- year capital plan and scheduled to be completed within the next three years are included in this review. SCHOOLSI REGION 11 Bentley 50%1 Crystal Lakel Wicklowl GoIdsboroj,,,;,,' CAPACITY 2,484 499 879 843 1,102 5,807 ENROLLMENT 2,165 478 704 682 842 4,871 AVAI LABLE CAPACITY 627 21 175 161 260 1,244 SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE 3171 79 - 1 396 Townes at Lake Monroe 13j- - 13 R EMAII N I NG CAPACITY 297 (5 8) 175 161 575] Region I Elementary Schools includeBentley, Idyllwildeand Wilson ZONEDSCHOOL MIDDLE SCHOOLS Markham Woods Greenwood Lakes CAPACITY 1,260 1,266 Millennium 1,743 Sanford,,' 1,625 0SX, 41 5,894 3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY - - ENROLLMENT 1,051 998 1,403 1,423 4,875 AVAILABLECAPACITY - 209 268 340 202 1,019 ,SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE 681 35 170 172 445, Townes at Lake Monroe 61 REMAINING CAPACITY 135 233 1701, 30 1'�l 568] HIGH SCHOOLS CAPACITY ZONEDSCHOOL Seminole 4,868 Lake Mary 2,948 Crooms 811 C$A 10 8,627 3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY - - 150 150 ENROLLMENT 4,303 2,681 740 7,724 AVAILABLE CAPACITY 565, 267, 221 1,053, SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE 5641 171 1 1 581 - REMAINING CAPACITY 2501 1 1 2421 Terms and Definitions: Capacity: The amount of satisfactory permanent student stations aacalculated onthe date ofthe second FDOEcount inOctober ofthe current school year. The number ofstudents that can be satisfactorily accommodated inaroom atany given time and which, is typically a lesser percentage of the total number of student stations. NOTE: Capacity ioONLY ameasure ofstudent stations, not ufenrollment. Concurrency Service Area (CSA): A geographic unit promulgated by the School Board and adopted by local governments within which the level of service is measured when an application for residential development is reviewed for school concurrency purposes. THste� repre�ant� �h� �re� t�ot �he o��o�t9 �� r�n�idere� �o� stu�ent 8�men�m��be|n�C��a��u�ntto�hepno]act Enrollment: For the purposes ofconcurrency review, the enrollment level isestablished each year asper Public School Interlocal Agreement Section 12'4A,which sets the level onthe date Vfthe second full time equivalent (FTE) survey for FDOE.generally taken inmid-Ontnbmr. Programmed 3Year Additions: New permanent school capacity within the CSA, which will beinplace orunder actual construction within the first three years of the current SCPS Capital Improvement Plan. Remaining Capacity: The capacity available for future development after the addition of any programmed capacity and less the reserved capacity. Reserved Capacity: The total number of student stations reserved in the respective CSA's that are assigned to projects via SCALD certificate. School Size: For planning purpomon, each public school district must determine the maximum size of future elementary, middle and high schools. Existing school size is determined solely through FISH data. Seminole County Public Schools has established the sizes of future schools (with the exception of special centers and magnet schools) aafollows: i) 78Ostudent stations ii\ Middle: 1500 student stations iii) High: 2,800 student stations School Attendance Zone: The established geographic area that identifies school assignments pursmanttoBoardPo|iny for each District school or region of schools, other than county wide magnet schools. Students shall attend the achoo|/o> serving their residential or regional attendance zone unless otherwise permitted by Board Policy Students Generated by Project: iodetermined by applying the current GCPSstudent generation rate (calculated inthe 2017 Impact Fee Study) tothe number and type ofunits proposed. The number ofunits imdetermined using information provided by the jurisdiction and/or from the applicant's request. If no actual unit count is provided the unit count is then estimated based on the maximum allowable density under the existing/proposed future land use designation. Eventua| �ent�m�i��w�entn��ol �/� o�use�t �ro�imi�y�m �he t) 'v rami�ent�a� deve!��mom�. Utilization: A State Board Rule prescribed percentage of student stations that a room (and proportionetnly, e school and aohou| district) can satisfactorily accommodate atany given time. From a school/campus analysis perspective, , "utilization" is determined as the percentage of school enrollment to capacity. Current DOE established K-12utilization ( factors are aofollows: Elementary 100%, Middle 90%, High 95% noc"in""=ew *acung!om^*Sl^susmTo°ne""Lake m"nr"e/N*^cc-smr=ncsmLake APPENNX F Traffic Impact Analysis Townes at Lake Monroe Page 130 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15, 2021 LAKE MONROE TOWNHOMES Project N2 20075 July 2020 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS SEMINOLE COUNTY FLORIDA Prepared by., 3101 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 265 Orlando, Florida 32803 www.trafficmobility.com (407) 531-5332 Beazer Homes - Orlando 151 Southhall Lane, Suite 200 Maitland, Florida 32751 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Proiect Information Name: Lake Monroe Townhomes Location: South side of US 17-92, west of Oak Drive Jurisdiction Seminole County, Florida Description: 124 Multi -Family Units (Townhomes) Findings Trip Generation: 897 Daily Trips / 58 AM Peak Hour Trips / 72 PM Peak Hour Trips Access Plan: Full Access on US 17-92 Roadway Capacity: All study roadway segments will operate at acceptable level of service (LOS) at buildout. Intersection Capacity: The intersection of US 17-92 and Oak Drive will continue to operate at an adequate LOS at project buildout. The access driveway will operate at an adequate LOS at project buildout. Recommendations Turn Lane Construct a 180 -foot westbound left turn deceleration lane at the Improvements: project access driveway on US 17-92. Lake Monroe Townhomes Tm Traffic Impact Analysis Project N2 20075 Traffic & Mobility Consultants Executive Summary PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I am a Professional Engineer properly registered in the State of Florida practicing with Traffic & Mobility Consultants LLC, a corporation authorized to operate as an engineering business, CA -30024, by the State of Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Professional Engineers, and that I have prepared or approved the evaluations, findings, opinions, conclusions, or technical advice attached hereto for: PROJECT: Lake Monroe Townhomes LOCATION: Seminole County, Florida CLIENT: Beazer Homes - Orlando I hereby acknowledge that the procedures and references used to develop the results contained in these computations are standard to the professional practice of Transportation Engineering as applied through professional judgment and experience. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED BY % t%J11111111 11 XC E IV S��`S ON THE DATE ADJACENT TO THE SEAL No 56849 PRINTED COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDERED SIGNED AND SEALED AND THE SIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ON ANY ELECTRONIC COPIES. STATE OF 4 0 I TRAFFIC & MOBILITY R CONSULTANTS LLC 101V .til,,, 3101 MAGUIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 265 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32803 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION CA -30024 AYMAN H. AS-SAIDI, P.E. NO 56849 2.1 Roadway Segment Capacity --------.--------------.------.—.D 2.2 Intersection Capacity ............................................................... ..................................... 4 3.1 Trip Generation ............................................................................................................... 6 3^2 Trip ._—.._—._.__...__—_---................................. 4.1 Roadway Segment Capacity --.-------'--------------------G 4-2 Intersection Capacity ...................................................................................................... 9 4.3 Access Review ............................................................................................................. 11 5.0 STUDY CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................. 12 Appendix A Conceptual Site Plan Appendix Lake Monroe TVwnhomeoMethodology Appendix Seminole County E+CData Appendix Traffic Counts, Historical Data & Seasonal Factor Appendix F1CW1Worksheets - Existing Conditions Appendix ITE Information Sheets Appendix UUAT@K8odel Appendix HCMWorksheets - Projected COndiUOns Appendix NCHRPRepod Appendix J Exhibit 212-1 Lake Monroe Townhomes T��chm�m� � TA&C..-Project Ne 20075 Traffic & Mobility Consultants Table mfContents i Table Existing Roadway Capacity Analysis .............................................. Table 2 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis .......................................... Table Trip Generation Analysis ................................................................. Table 4 Projected Roadway Capacity Analysis ........................................... Figure1Site Location Map ............................................................................................... Figure 2Existing Intersection Volumes .... ........................................................................ Figure 3Project Trip DisthbUtk]O----------.------~.----------- TW- Traffic & Mobility Consultant —.2 5 —.7 ,10 Lake Monroe Townhomes Traffic Impact Analysis Project Ny20075 Table of Contents ii This traffic analysis was conducted to assess the impact of Lake Monroe Townhomes, a residential community consisting of 124 multi -family dwelling units (townhomes), with buildout year 2024. The site is located on the south side of US 17-92, west of Oak Drive, in Seminole County, Florida. Figure 1 depicts the site location and its surrounding transportation network. Access to the site will be provided via one proposed full access on US 17-92. A conceptual site plan is included in Appendix A. The analysis was conducted in accordance with the approved methodology included in Appendix B. The study facilities considered in the analysis are: Study Segments (w/in 1 -mile): • Airport Boulevard o AIR35 McCracken Road to SR 46 • SR 46 o 54645 Airport Boulevard to CR 15 / Upsala Road o 54650 US 17-92 to Airport Boulevard • US 17-92 o U1785 Seminole Boulevard to Oak Drive o U1790 Oak Drive to CR 15/Upsala Road Study Intersections (w/in Xmile): • US 17-92 and Oak Drive • US 17-92 and Project Access Driveway Lake Monroe Townhomes Traffic Impact Analysis 20075 Tm Project N2 Page I Traffic 5 Mobility Consukants \ /N 7 » Not to s W \ :J � � } 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS 2.1 Roadway Segment Capacity Existing roadway conditions were analyzed by comparing the existing traffic volumes on the roadway segments within a 1 -mile study area to the service volumes at the adopted Level of Service (LOS) standard for the roadway segments, as documented in the Seminole County Roadway Concurrency Information dated March 27, 2020, included in Appendix C. The daily roadway segment analyses are summarized in Table 1. The analysis indicates that the study segments are currently operating at acceptable Levels of Service (LOS). Table 1 Existing Roadway Capacity Analysis Seminole County Summary of Roadway Concurrency Information March, 2020 Seminole County Comprehensive Plan's Service Volumes Lake Monroe Townhomes Traffic Impact Analysis Project W- 20075 Traffic 8 Mobility Consultants Page 3 2.2 Intersection Capacity A capacity analysis was performed to determine the operating conditions at the study intersection during the AM and PM peak hour. The analysis was conducted using Synchro Software and the methods of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 6th Edition. Traffic counts for US 17-92 were obtained from Seminole County, taken February 18, 2020, and taken during the peak season; therefore, no seasonal adjustments were applied. Due to a roadway closure on Oak Drive at the intersection of Oak Drive and US 17-92 that is anticipated to last through August, it was agreed with Seminole County to use a trip generation for the 35 single family residences that reside on Oak Drive (using ITE trip generation rates) and assign 60% of the trips generated to the intersection of US 17-92 and Oak Drive. These counts were added as existing traffic. The T - factor was obtained from FDOT Florida Traffic Online (FTO) historical data and was divided by 2. Existing intersection volumes are presented in Figure 2. The seasonal factor report for Seminole County, historical data, and traffic counts are provided in Appendix D. The results of the intersection analysis, presented in Table 2, indicates that the intersection of US 17-92 and Oak Drive currently operates at an adequate LOS. Detailed analysis worksheets are included in Appendix E. Table 2 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Average Delay Expressed in Seconds Lake Monroe Townhomes Traffic Impact Analysis 20075 T Project N2 W Page 4 Traffic & Mobility Consultants 386 �3 US 17-92 <- 1011 �- 8 k N Not to Scale 1 M1 �U do �r%I�Iv��If�f��%��J/l,�/(Olf'/ywb6✓f //d/rA ��/�ia�; /�i„ r,d/ „,�. ,r�.,�:�� 3.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC 3.1 Trip Generation The trip generation analysis was conducted using information published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the Trip Generation Manual, 10", Edition. Table 3 summarizes the resulting trip generation calculation for the site. The ITE information sheets are included in Appendix F. Table 3 Trip Generation Analysis Trip Generation analysis based on ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. The ITE equations %ere used when R 2 was greater than 0.75 The development will generate a total of 897 new daily trips of which 58 trips will occur during the AM peak hour and 45 trips will occur during the PM peak hour. 3.2 Trip Distribution/Assignment The project trip distribution was estimated based on the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study model (OUATS Cost Feasible 2030) and modified to reflect prevailing patterns in the vicinity of the site. The OUATS model printout is included in Appendix G. The trip distribution is illustrated in Figure 3. Lake Monroe Townhomes Traffic Impact Analysis 20075 T Project N2 W Page 6 Traffic & MOODY comuhants Yr�aMmmrl; ; 25°/a SITE 476 15% 20% an7oi c& �1�6r 15 417 16A W2"5ch Sr dti�i d60. 4.0 PROJECTED CONDITIONS ANALYSIS 4.1 Roadway Segment Capacity Roadway segment analyses were conducted for the study roadway segments using the total projected daily traffic volumes. Total projected daily traffic volumes were calculated by adding the existing AADT's with the committed trips and project trips, for project buildout 2024. Projected roadway conditions were analyzed by comparing the total projected traffic volumes on the study segments to their respective service volumes at the adopted LOS standard. The projected roadway segment analyses are summarized in Table 4. Table 4 Projected Roadway Capacity Analysis Seminole County Summary ofRoadway Concurrency Information March, 2020 and FOOT Traffic Online Websile Seminole County Comprehensive Plan's Service Volumes The analysis indicates that the study roadway segments are projected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS at project buildout. Lake Monroe Townhomes Traffic Impact Analysis Project We 20075 TWLC Page 8 Traffic & Mobility Consultants 4.2 Intersection Capacity In order to assess the operations of the study intersections, a capacity analysis was conducted using the projected traffic volumes and Synchro software using the HCM procedures. Projected peak hour volumes were determined by adding committed and project trips to existing intersection volumes. Committed daily trips provided by Seminole County were converted to PM peak hour with the use of K=0.096 and D=0.568 factors. The projected AM and PM peak hour turning movement volumes are illustrated in Figure 4. The results of the intersection analysis, summarized in Table 5, indicate the intersection of US 17-92 and Oak Drive will continue to operate at an adequate LOS. The project driveway will operate at an adequate LOS at project buildout. Detailed analysis worksheets are included in Appendix H. Table 5 Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis Average Delay Expressed in Seconds Lake Monroe Townhomes Traffic Impact Analysis 20075 Project N2 Page 9 Traffic & Mobility Consultants PM Peak 822+{2}=824 (5) 2 0 L- a. 556+{1}=557 (16) tU <- 391 +{1)=392 ,�- (8) <- 386+{1}+(7)=394 � 3 17-92 820+{2}+(27)=849 F> 2+(2)=4 (0 F (0 00 0 <-1014+{2}=1016 E-1011+{2}+(27)=1040 �-- (29) � 8 US 17-92 egen : Existing + (Committed) + (Project) = Total Troffk. mbwly 550+{1)+(1 6)=567 6+(2)=8 LOU') 11 04 CV) L01 At N Nol 1. SWC 4.3 Access Review The development is proposed to be served by one full access driveway on US 17-92. US 17-92 is a 2 -lane road with a posted speed of 35 mph. A review of the warrants for a left and right turn deceleration lane on US 17-92 at the project access driveway was conducted to determine if auxiliary turn lanes are necessary to maintain the integrity of traffic flow and capacity of the road during the peak hours. Accordingly, a westbound left turn deceleration lane is warranted at the project access driveway. An eastbound right turn deceleration lane is not warranted. The review was conducted based on the methodology of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 457. The results of the warrant analyses are included in Appendix 1. Project Access Left Turn Lane The required lane dimensions are determined based on a design speed of 40 mph and Exhibit 212-1 of the FDOT Design Manual, included in Appendix J. The calculations for the left turn lane are as follows: Project Access Deceleration @ 40mph = 155 feet Queue = 2 x 25 / 60 x Left Volume = 5/6 * 29 = 24 (use 25 feet) Left Turn Lane = 155 +25 = 180 feet (includes 50 -foot taper) Therefore, it is recommended that a 180 -foot westbound left turn deceleration lane on US 17-92 at the project access driveway be added. Lake Monroe Townhomes Traffic Impact Analysis T Project N2 20075 A'C- Traffiv I. Mobility Consultants Page 11 P_111)11�3 1111l ITKONN, 159MR11561 ki This traffic analysis was conducted to assess the impact of a residential community consisting of 124 multi -family dwelling units (townhomes). The site is located on the south side of US 17-92, west of Oak Drive, in Seminole County, Florida. The study included a determination of project trip generation and a review of existing and projected roadway capacity and intersection operations. The results of the traffic analysis are summarized as follows: ® The development will generate a total of 897 new daily trips of which 58 trips will occur during the morning peak hour and 72 trips will occur during the evening peak hour. ® An analysis of roadway segment capacity indicates that the study segments currently operate adequately and are projected to continue to do so at project buildout. 0 An analysis of the study intersections reveals that the intersection of US 17-92 will continue to operate adequately at project buildout. The project access driveway will operate at an acceptable LOS. ® Construct a 180 -foot westbound left turn deceleration lane at the project access driveway on US 17-92. The proposed development does not adversely impact traffic capacity and operations on the network and the adjacent communities. Lake Monroe Townhomes Traffic Impact Analysis Project N2 20075 TA&C Traffk & Mobility Consulwnts Page 12 APPENDICES Appendix A Conceptual Site Plan - -- --•------- ------ P, R, - - - - - - - - --- - A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT G MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN 31 A * " � z TOWNES AT LAKE MON ROE p BEAZER HOMES J.' I � I S..inl. C.-ty, Fwdd. I.. I Q- I R-- — - – A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT G MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN 31 * " � z TOWNES AT LAKE MON ROE p BEAZER HOMES J.' I � PLANNED DEVELOPMENT MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN * " � z TOWNES AT LAKE MON ROE p BEAZER HOMES J.' I � I S..inl. C.-ty, Fwdd. I.. I Q- I R-- — - – Appendix B Lake Monroe Townhomes Methodology From: Cash, Michael <K4ichae|Iash@SanfordU.gov> Sent: Monday, April 26i2O211(lO4AK4 To; StephanieK4andeUo Cc: 2OO75LAKE K4DNROETOVVNHDMES;King, Arnye |FT|KHAR,B|LAL Subject- RE: 20075 Lake Monroe Townhomes Good morning Stephanie, Thank you for the Ribmitt-zfl.The miethodology isacceptable. Regards, Mike Cash, CFM Public Works Engineer p: 407.688.5087 0 �Aueq 1) From: Stephanie K8andeUn<om@trafficmobi|ity.com> Sent: Monday, April 26, 20218:56 AM To: Cash, Michael <K4ichae|.Cash@SanfordO.gov> Cc: 2OU75LAKE KAONROETOVVNHOK4E5<2OO75@trafficnnobi1ity.com> Subject: 2O075Lake Monroe Tovvnhomes Good Morning, Attached isthe Methodology that was prepared for Lake Monroe Townhomes. This development will beannexing to the City. Wanted to get your approval. If you have any questions please let me know. Thank you, Stephanie StephanieK4ande||o 7RAfFIC& MOBILITY CONSULTANTS ilC 31O1Maguire Boulevard, Suite 2GS Orlando, FL 32803 Office: /4O7\531-5]32Ext 216 Fax: (407) 531-5331 This email originated from "outside" the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 'is safe. ( \_ 1 Mandello From: Persaud, Vasu < vpersaud @semi nolecou ntyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 2:28 PM To: Stephanie Mandello Cc: 20075 LAKE MONROE TOWNHOMES Subject: RE: 20075 Lake Monroe Townhomes Stephanie, Good afternoon. After revie)N, this rnethodoiogy addresses thc,, requireinents of the County's'i-rafflc h-npact Study Gk.ftlelines for projects located in the i; UL., Please consider it apL -- "o �ed. Thank you, Vasu �A T, Frcl r) o ( t� io n A I 1 a ivs t 0'1cer1'ng Divisi(on I S N e t )cn Ybf dl FL, 32 f71. ---------- - NV , � M I�, I , �1//il V` Leo Ilk, From: Stephanie Mandello [mailto:sm@trafficmobility.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 1:23 PM To: Persaud, Vasu <vpe rsa ud @semi nolecou ntyfl.gov> Cc: 20075 LAKE MONROE TOWNHOMES <20075@trafficmobility.com> Subject: 20075 Lake Monroe Townhomes Good afternoon Vasu, 1 MEMORANDUM July 13, 2020 Re: Lake Monroe Townhomes Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology Seminole County, Florida Project W 20075 The following is an outline of the methodology for the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the above referenced project. The TIA will conform to the methodology requirements and guidelines documented by Seminole County, Proiect Description The subject property is ± 5 acres and consists of parcels 23-19-30-501-0000-0140 and 23-19-30- 300-0040-0000. The applicant is proposing to develop 124 multi -family residential townhome units. A preliminary conceptual site plan is included in the Attachments. Proiect Location The site is located on the south side of US 17-92, west of Oak Drive, in Seminole County, Florida, as shown in Figure 1. I; Figure I- Site Location Map 3101 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 2135, Orlando, Florida 32803 m P: (407) 531-5332 m F: (407) 531-5331 m wwwArafficroobility,com Lake Monroe Townhomes Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology Project N2 20075 July 13, 2020 Page 2 of 4 Project Access Access to the site is proposed via one (1) full access driveway on US 17-92, as shown in the preliminary conceptual plan. Trip Generation The trip generation analysis was conducted using information published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) in the Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. Table I summarizes the trip generation analysis. The ITE Trip Generation sheets are included in the Attachments. Table I Trip Generation Calculation The !TE equations %ere used when R 2 was greater than 0.75 The proposed development is projected to generate 897 daily trips, of which 58 trips occur during the AM peak hour, and 72 trips occur during the PM peak hour. Lake Monroe Townhomes Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology Project NL) 20075 July 13, 2020 Page 3 of 4 Trip Distribution The project trip distribution was estimated based on the Orlando Urban Area Transportation Study model (OLIATS Cost Feasible 2030) and modified to reflect prevailing patterns in the vicinity of the site. The OLIATS model printout is included in the Attachments. The trip distribution is shown in Figure 2. N % t5i 117 SITE COOL761) 40% 46, QRST,. Figure 2 - Trip Distribution Lake Monroe Townhomes Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology Project NL) 20075 July 13, 2020 Page 4 of 4 Study Area In accordance with Seminole County requirements, all roadway segments within 1 -mile of the project will be included in the analysis. Additionally, intersections within 1/4 -mile of the project will be analyzed for AM and PIVI peak operations. The following segments and intersections will be included in the TIA: Study Roadways: • Airport Boulevard o AIR35 McCracken Road to SR 46 • SR 46 • S4645 Airport Boulevard to CR 151 Upsala Road • 54650 US 17-92 to Airport Boulevard US 17-92 o U1785 Seminole Boulevard to Oak Drive o U1790 Oak Drive to CR 15/Upsala Road Study Intersections: • US 17-92 and Oak Drive • Project Access Driveway Capacity Analysis Roadway segment capacity will be analyzed for existing and buildout daily traffic volumes for the additional net new trips generated by the development. Projected peak hour volumes will be determined by adding committed and project trips to existing intersection volumes. Committed daily trips provided by Seminole County will be converted to PM peak hour with the use of K=0.096 and D=0.568 factors. The analysis will be based on Seminole County's adopted service volumes and capacities, as obtained from the County's latest available traffic data tables, included in the Attachments. The study intersections will be analyzed for AM and PM peak hour conditions using the methods of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 61h Edition. The analysis will be performed for the existing year and project buildout year (2024). Due to COVID-19 and the reduction of traffic on the study roadways, historical counts for the study intersections will be obtained. If they are unavailable, an AADT conversion method will be used, along with counts to calculate the turning movement volume. However, due to a road closure on Oak Drive at the intersection of Oak Drive and US 17-92 that is anticipated to last through August 2020, trip generation will be used to evaluate the turning movements at the intersection. Report A TIA report will be prepared outlining and summarizing the methods and findings of the traffic analysis prepared for the development. Appendix C Seminole County E+C Data Summaty ofRoadway Coneurrency Information RKEY Roadway Blame From To ACI -100 —7n–jil—or 4. flu m --osa Avll—e---"—""--,— Current Traffic Count 8,419 Roadway Link Capacity 19,360 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Ca aci 10941 ACHIO Anchor Rd S.R. 436 W Melody Ln Current Traffic Count 8,466 Roadway Link Capacity 19,360 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capacitor 10894 AIR05 Airport Blvd Mellonvilie Ave C.R. 425 Current Traffic Count 7,306 Roadway Link Capacity 19,360 Committed Trips 2,190 Net AvailableCa aciup 9864 AIRI 0 Airport Blvd C.R. 425 U.S. 'i7-92 Current Traffic Count 11,772 Roadway Link Capacity 19,360 Committed Trips 0 Available Capacity 7h588 AIR20 Airport Blvd U.& 17-92 Old Lake Mary Rd Current Traffic Count 18,415 Roadway Link Capacity 42,560 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Cap ca,�tl 24145 AIR25 Airport Blvd Old Lake Mary Rd C.R. 46-A Current Traffic Count 17,531 Roadway Link Capacity 42,560 Committed Trips 0 Net Available CaRaci --1 25 029 AIR30 Airport Bivd C.R. 46-A McCraken Rd Current Traffic Count 6,503 Roadway Link Capacity 19,360 Committed Trips 226 Net Available Capacity 12,631 Friday, March 27, 2020 Page I of 50 This information has been provided by Tony Nelson, P.E. at Seminole County Engineering and is current information as of the above referenced date, RKEY Roadway Name From To X4645 Airport Blvd C.R. 15/Upsaia rrpt,Tia#k ht '20 1 '35 4 »rrkty 4_8 �,OW 54660 B.R. 461E 25th St. C.R. 425I8anford Ave U.S. 17-92 Current Traffic Count 22,775 Roadway Link Capacity 48,000 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capacity25 225 ..A 84665 S.R. 46/E 25th St. MeHonville Ave C.R. 425/Sanford Ave Current Traffic Count 24,773 Roadway Link Capacity 48,000 Committed Trips 0 Net AvailableL Cap cty �A23227 J_ 54670 S.R. . 46 Beardall Ave It ellonville Ave Current Traffic Count 16,249 Roadway Link Capacity 18,270 Committed Trips 2,081 Net Available Cap -60 54675 S.R. 46 S.R. 415 Beardall Ave Current Traffic Count 12,193 Roadway Link Capacity 18,270 Committed Trips 1,939 Net Available Capacity 4,138 R. 46 S4680 S.Osceola R'd S.R. 415 Current Traffic Count 12,78 Roadway Link Capacity iAln Committed Trips 1,007 Net Available Capar-a"4476 84685 S.R. 46 C.R. 426 Osceoia Rd Current Traffic Count 12,195 Roadway Link Capacity 18,270 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capacity 60755 _ 84690 S.R. 46 Volusia County C.R. 426 Current Traffic Count 8.209 Roadway Link Capacity 18,270 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Cap- 10061 Friday, March 27, 2020 Page 40 of 50 This information has been provided by Tony Nelson, P.E. at Seminole County Engineering and is current information as of the above referenced date. RKEY Roadway flame From To !J 7e7o Mary Blvd Airport Blvd Current Traffic Count ALM Roadway Link Capacity 48,000 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Ca acit 6&25 UI 770 U.S. 17-92 Airport Blvd C.R. 46-A Current Traffic Count 22,192 Roadway Link Capacity 48,000 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capac!!X 25808 01775 U.S. 17-92 C.R. 46-A S.R. 46 Current Traffic Count 26,918 Roadway Link Capacity imN Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capacity 210 -82 - LH 780 U.S. '17-92 SR 46 Seminole Blvd Current Traffic Count 14,152 Roadway Link Capacity 48,000 Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capacity 33,848 ,Current'Tr affia Count Roa I d+wk 4nk Capacity 18.270 U1795 U.S. '17-92 C.R. IS/Upsaia Rd volusia County [Jne Current Traffic Count 36,226 Roadway Link Capacity 48,000 Committed Trips 35 Net Available Capacity 11 739. U41,10 U.S. 441/CBT Orange County Line Orange County Line Current Traffic Count 31,871 Roadway Link Capacity Mmg Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capacity 16129 VIROG Virginia Ave Tangerine St North St Current Traffic Count 848 Roadway Link Capacity iglN Committed Trips 0 Net Available Capaci 18512 Friday, March 27, 2020 Page 47 of 50 This information has been provided by Tony Nelson, P.E. at Seminole County Engineering and is current information as of the above referenced date. Appendix D Traffic Counts, Historical Data & Seasonal Factor Roadway Count Summary Start Date: 18 -Feb -20 Start Time: 00:00 Stop Date: 19 -Feb -20 Stop Time: 24:00 County: Seminole Station ID: 349 Location: #349: US 17-92: Seminole Blvd to Oak Dr ( 100'E of Oak Dr) 18 -Feb -20 Eastbound Volume EndTime End Time .' 00 01 02 03 04 05 , 06 07 08 09 r 101 11 112 15 13 2 7 4 4 17 80 154 204 150 86 95 30 10 8 5 7 11 52 145 157 144 95 104 119 45 18 6 5 4 17 67 174 g 151 86 88 103 120 00 6 7 5 10 26 89 1941 112 170 136 125 91 Hr Total 47 23 22 25 58 225 593 770 682 516 394 393 EndTime 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 112 122 107 96 114 133 96 74 56 38 12 18 30 95 100 114 119 124 136 121 76 44 29 17 23 45 106 118 114 109 120 139 110 49 46 43 19 12 00 112 119 139 96 128 142 96 64 47 30 26 12 HrTotal 425 459 474 420 486 86 423 263 193 140 74 65 24 Hour Total: 7,720 AM Peak Hour Begins: 7:15 AM Peak Volume: 820 AM Peak Hour Factor: 0.92 PM Peak Hour Begins: 17:00 PM Peak Volume: 550 PM Peak Hour Factor: 0.97 18 -Feb -20 Westbound Volume End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 6 1 07 08 09 10 11 15 22 13 6 4 6 16 41 1 65 W 90 114 76 30 19 6 2 4 12 20 71,74 118 91 106 95 127 45 17 4 2 1 6 24 73 1 76 114 79 112 00 12 12 12 4 4 26 60 14Z 74 66 88 102 HrTotai 70 35 22 13 28 86 245 345 347 376 376 417 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1 19 20 21 22 23 15 122 127 130 142 203 325 172 109 85 52 41 22 30 107 106 146 166 234 252 158 118 70 71 31 18 45 110 137 131 173 223 240 146 101 70 47 24 25 00 106 116 136 166 218 194 97 94 56 49 43 14 Hr Total 445 486 543 647 878 4W 573 422 281 219 139 79 24 Hour Total : 8,083 AM Peak Hour Begins: 11:15 AM Peak Volume: 463 AM Peak Hour Factor: 0.91 PM Peak Hour Begins: 16:45 PM Peak Volume: 1,035 PM Peak Hour Factor: 0.80 18 -Feb -20 Total Volume for All Lanes End Time 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 15 35 15 13 8 10 33 121 219 310 240 200 171 30 '" 29 14 7 11 23 72 216 256 248 250 190 231 45 35 10 7 5 23 91 247 327 227 200 167 215 00"' 18 19 17 14 30 115 254 313 244 202 213 193 Hr Total 117 58 44 38 86 311 838 1115 1029 892 770 810 End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 15 "' 234 249 237 238 317 458 268 183 141 90 53 40 30 202 206 260 285 358 388 279 194 114 100 48 41 45 216 255 245 282 343 379 256 150 116 90 43 37 00 218 235 275 262 346 336 193 158 103 79 69 26 Hr Total 870 945 1017 1067 1364 1561 996 685 474 359 213 144 24 Hour Total : 15,803 AM Peak Hour Begins: 7:15 AM Peak Volume: 1,206 AM Peak Hour Factor: 0.92 PM Peak Hour Begins: 16:45 PM Peak Volume: 1,571 PM Peak Hour Factor: 0.86 Ha NziJ O W � Wro ko0U xH10 H "H -a 0 O �zr=j C) In H > H r>0 11 H OHS H H > 0z �7 1n In 1000 0 'TJ w FAH> n H IM H O z NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 1 K I/I CZ 0000000000000440 1 C=J H 0 .c. Ulm w%D0YNW.taCnChJmlo i w L'7 z .. y K 0 x o NYNNNNNwNNNX.CnCna.lb 1 1 I (~] Jm w to J m to 1--0-1^ 0mmJ Cyd CSI I H 'Ti 00000aoa0ooaaaoo 1 0 O U) 00 O0000a000Ooo000o�H z � m Q C H m i m z i O W W L~ c cn c•J � � � w 11 If II zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz i t7 w H 1 H N H ftj in n I xJ ` Q 1-10:,' cnmm41mmmmmNmJJJJJ I n O HOro Cn O NIn x. to J Cn YIo O Cn to to Cn Cn 1 H :s x z C H C7H oaa000aaOa000aOot0 x�LTJ� i W H K U> I zHcn N H H 0 0 ftj m �3yC I in m H,1y CJ1 U701 C71 o1 O10161016161JJJJ J t Ci '7J H `• LTi L-' N m Y .A w N CT Cn 61 W lO m W Y ! H {n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 H a, lj 00000a000000000010 m to rn H In t z H H 1 H > II II H k N 0 I ti In H > H xJSCHt] Lj 0 H U . xxc�ro i M K K 1 u> ro 11 >> i > H H xu �u 1 1o1o10 1 0 0 H . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 H C "*mM�v OY00JO1m0000000001 0 li 0Cn co O O O l4 W 10 N 000000000 I "DC7 K �-3 1-3 H M H H 7o > l7 CT1 LTj U ! �j .... I ny .ro LTj Ln I.n Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn In Cn Cn Cn Cn Cn I LTJ>C7yin NNNNNYYNNW.A AWNNY I n y.............IH x II 11 H CJ W W.DJCn49rnmloNCnwmmko 1 0 w 0041 H Ln M Cn O 00000000 1 'o o C 'Tj zOH cxaL-1 >1zx r 0 H IH a:2 i III 110 In K I > LTJ It. 0 Cn w w Cn Cn lo. t, w to to w w.Ls .A �I n �y . . . . . . . . . . Ln(.n W.l-`s Ma, J to m N N Cn 0 m to 10 1 0 0 0 0 a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 �a tTi W H H H LTj Ha NziJ O W � Wro ko0U xH10 H "H -a 0 O �zr=j C) In H > H r>0 11 H OHS H H > 0z �7 1n In 1000 0 'TJ w FAH> n H IM H O z 2019 PEAK SEASON FACTOR CATEGORY REPORT - REPORT TYPE: ALL CATEGORY: 7700 SEMINOLE COUNTYWIDE 14-FBB-2020 I5:39:29 830DPD 5 _ 77O0 _2KSEASO0.TXT M0CF: O.95 WEEK DATES SF pSCF I 0I/01/20I9 - 0I/05/20I9 I.05 1.11 ( � 01/06/2019 - 0I/I2/2018 1.04 1.09 ` 3 01/13/2019 - 0I/19/2019 1.02 1.07 4 01/20/20I9 - 0I/26/20I9 1.00 I.05 5 01/27/28I9 - 02/02/20I9 0.99 1.04 ^ 5 02/03/2019 - 02/09/20I9 0.97 1.02 * 7 O 1.00 + �8' N0 .�5, 1.08 * 9 02/24/20I9 - 03/02/20I9 0.94 0.99 *lU 03/03/2019 - 03/09/20I9 0.94 0.99 *II 03/10/20I9 - 03/I6/2019 0.94 0.99 *I2 03/I7/20I9 - 03/23/2019 0.94 0�99 +I3 03/24/20I8 - 03/30/20I9 0.94 0.99 ^14 03/3I/20I9 - 04/06/2019 0.94 O.93 *15 04/07/20I9 - 04/I3/2019 0.94 0.99 ^I6 04/14/2019 - 04/20/20I9 0.94 0.99 +I7 04/2I/20I9 - 04/27/20I9 0.95 1.00 +I8 04/28/20I9 - 05/04/2019 0.97 1.02 19 05/05/2019 - 05/II/2019 0.98 1.03 20 05/12/2019 - 05/18/20I9 O.99 1.84 21 05/19/20I9 - 05/25/20I9 I.01 I.06 22 05/26/20I9 - 06/0I/20I9 I.03 1.08 23 06/02/2019 - 06/08/2019 1.04 1.09 24 06/89/20I9 - 06/I5/30I9 1.06 I.12 25 06/16/2019 - 06/22/2019 1.06 1.12 26 06/23/2019 - 06/29/2019 1.06 1.12 27 06/30/20I9 - 07/06/2019 1.06 1.12 28 07/07/2019 - 07/13/20I9 1.06 1.12 29 07/14/20I9 - 07/20/20I9 1.06 1.12 38 07/21/2019 - 07/27/20I9 I.05 1.11 31 07/28/20I9 - 08/03/2019 I.04 1.09 32 08/04/28I9 - 08/I0/2019 1.03 1.08 v] 08/II/20I9 - 88/I7/2019 1.02 1.07 08/18/2019 - 08/24/2019 I.02 1.07 \ j 08/35/20I9 - 08/3I/2019 I.03 I.08 36 09/01/20I9 - 09/07/2019 I.04 1.09 37 09/08/2019 - 09/14/2819 I.05 1.11 38 89/15/20I9 - 09/21/20I9 I.06 1.12 39 09/22/20I9 - 09/28/20I9 1.05 1.11 40 09/29/20I9 - 10/85/20I9 1.03 I.08 41 10/06/2019 - I0/I2/20I9 I.02 I.07 42 10/I3/2019 - I0/I9/20I9 1.01 1.06 43 18/20/20I9 - I0/26/2019 1.01 1.06 44 10/27/2019 - 11/02/2019 1.01 1.06 45 I1/03/2019 - II/09/20I9 1.02 1.07 46 I1/I0/2019 - II/I6/2019 I.02 1.07 47 11/17/2019 - I1/23/20I9 I.03 I.08 48 II/24/28I9 - II/38/2019 1.83 1.88 49 12/01/20I9 - I2/07/2019 1.84 1.09 50 12/08/2019 - I2/I4/2019 I.04 1.09 51 12/15/20I9 - I2/21/20I9 I.05 1.11 52 12/22/20I9 - I2/28/20I9 1.04 I.09 53 12/29/20I9 - 12/31/20I9 1.02 1.07 14-FBB-2020 I5:39:29 830DPD 5 _ 77O0 _2KSEASO0.TXT Appendix E HCM Worksheets - Existing Conditions 1: Oak Drive &US17-92 20075 Lake MonmTowhomes Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Lane Configurations 14 I + I F Traffic Vol, veh/h 820 2 3 388 5 8 Future Vol, veh/h 820 2 3 386 5 8 Conflicting Peds, #Ihr U O U O O O Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length ' ' 230 ' 150 O VohinMedian Storage, # O - - O O - Grade,Y6 O - - O O - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 91 91 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, Y6 2 2 2 2 2 2 MvmtFlmw 891 2 3 424 5 Q Existing AM Conflicting Flow All 0 0 893 0 1322 892 Stage - ^ ^ - 892 ~ Stage - - ' - 430 ' ChticaHdwv - ' 4.12 - 842 0,22 Critical HdwySto1 - - ' ' 5.42 ' Critical Hdwy082 - - - - 5.42 ' FVUow+upHdwY ' - 2.218 ' 3.518 3.318 Pot Cop-1Maneuver ' - 758 - 173 341 Stage ' - - - 400 - Stage - - - - 056 - Platoon blocked, Y6 - - - MuvCap'1Maneuver ' - 759 - 172 341 MovCap'2Maneuver ' - - - 172 ' Stage - - ' - 400 - Stage ' - - - 853 ' HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 20 HCM LOS C Existing AM HCM 6th TWSC 1: Oak Drive & US 17-92 20075 Lake Monroe Townhomes Int Delay, s/veh 0.2 Lane Configurations T-3. 0 1854 570 Stage 1 - - - F Traffic Vol, veh/h 550 6 8 1011 3 5 Future Vol, veh/h 550 6 8 1011 3 5 Conflicting Peds, Or 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop RT Channelized - Bone - None - None Storage Length - - 230 - 150 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 97 97 80 80 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 567 6 10 1264 3 5 Conflicting Flow All 0 0 573 0 1854 570 Stage 1 - - - - 570 - Stage 2 - - - - 1284 - Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.42 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - 5.42 Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 - 3.518 3.318 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1000 - 81 521 Stage 1 - - - - 566 - Stage 2 - - - - 260 - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver - - 1000 - 80 521 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - - 80 - Stage 1 - - - - 566 - Stage 2 - - - - 257 - HCM Control Delay, s 0 0.1 27 HCM LOS D Existing PM Capacity (veh/h) 80 521 - - 1000 - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.041 0.01 - - 0.01 - HCM Control Delay (s) 51.9 12 - - 8.6 - HCM Lane LOS F B - - A - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 0 - - 0 - Existing PM Appendix F ITE Information Sheets Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 29 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 168 Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 7.32 4.45-10.97 1.31 Data Plot and Equation 5,00 4,00 C U 3,00 F- 2,00 1,00 X= Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 7.56(X) - 40.86 R2= 0.96 X 0 x 0 0 x X X X X 0 x XX 00 100 200 300 400 500 son X= Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: T = 7.56(X) - 40.86 R2= 0.96 KA Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 42 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 199 Directional Distribution: 23% entering, 77% eAting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.46 0.18-0.74 0.12 300 U) "0 C: W .0- 200 ®R X XX X, X X x x 100 X X x x XX X�E x x x X 0 F0_0 "96-5 X= Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.96 Ln(X) - 0.51 W= 0.90 x RAultifamily Housing (Low -Rise) Avg (220) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 50 Avg. Num. of Dwelling Units: 187 Directional Distribution: 63% entering, 37% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit Average Rate Range of Rates Standard Deviation 0.56 0.18-1.25 0.16 Data Plot and Equation 400 C W .0. ;E 300 200 100 X 00 WI-XAV X Ix XX X X X X 91 MIS X X X X X= Number of Dwelling Units X Study Site Fitted Curve - - - - Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.89 Ln(X) - 0.02 W= 0.86 Appendix G OUATS Model 36 12 2 2 .36 36 36 41, "JJ, L rr �iS 2 '3 6' m 64 31 Not to scale North -th- N VI\ q k J +-.� � � j ...�_�� _'.! ' Jj, r l ,y. -i - Legend: I Lane per direction 4 7 2 Lanes per direction 3 Lanes per direction 4 Lanes per direction !)J F 5+ Lanesper direction ca, Centroid Connector I MetroPtan Orlando 2040 LRTP Model - Lake Monroe Townhomes - P20075 - TAZ 231 Project Distribution - CF2030 OUATS Model - Seminole County C:\FSUTMS\D5\OUATS,2040\Base\CF2030\P20075\Output\HRLDXY—c3O. NET (Thu 02 Jul 2020 , V171, 00 L 64 31 Not to scale North -th- N VI\ q k J +-.� � � j ...�_�� _'.! ' Jj, r l ,y. -i - Legend: I Lane per direction 4 7 2 Lanes per direction 3 Lanes per direction 4 Lanes per direction !)J F 5+ Lanesper direction ca, Centroid Connector I MetroPtan Orlando 2040 LRTP Model - Lake Monroe Townhomes - P20075 - TAZ 231 Project Distribution - CF2030 OUATS Model - Seminole County C:\FSUTMS\D5\OUATS,2040\Base\CF2030\P20075\Output\HRLDXY—c3O. NET (Thu 02 Jul 2020 Not to scale North -th- M Legend: I Lane per direction AA J 2 Lanes per direction 3 Lanes per direction 4 Lanes per direction IF 5+ Lanes per direction Centroid Connector MetroPtan Orlando 2040 LRTP Model - Lake Monroe Townhomes - P20075 - TAZ 231 Project Distribution - CF2030 OUATS Model - Seminole County C:\FSUTMS\D5\OUATS.2040\Base\CF2030\P20075\Output\HRLDXY—c3O. NET (Thu 02 Jut 2020 Or rx CIV C\I X 2 "ZI _0 < CZ)CIV 36 ct, i ir 21 2 1' 2 r4 2 2 Y" j 1, 0 C, -1010i 71 i G S Legend: I Lane per direction AA J 2 Lanes per direction 3 Lanes per direction 4 Lanes per direction IF 5+ Lanes per direction Centroid Connector MetroPtan Orlando 2040 LRTP Model - Lake Monroe Townhomes - P20075 - TAZ 231 Project Distribution - CF2030 OUATS Model - Seminole County C:\FSUTMS\D5\OUATS.2040\Base\CF2030\P20075\Output\HRLDXY—c3O. NET (Thu 02 Jut 2020 H HCKV Appendix HCM 6th TWSC " Oak Drive& US 17-92 Int Delay, s/ve—h am 0.3 PP, Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 849 4 Future Vol, veh/h 3 394 6 8 849 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 4 3 394 6 8 0 Sign Control RT Channelized 0 0 0 Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Storage Length None "None -None Veh in Median Storage, - 230 - 150 0 # o Grade, % - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor0 0 ' 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 91 91 92 92 2 Mvmt Flow 2 2 2 2 2 923 4 3 433 7 9 Conflicting Flow A'1'1" Stage 1 0 927 0 1364 92 5 Stage 2- 925 - Critical Hdwy - 439 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 4.12 . 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy stg 2 - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy - 5.42 - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver . 2218 - 3.518 3.318 Stage 1 737 - 163 326 Stage 2 - 386 - Platoon blocked, % - 650 - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 737 - 162 326 Stage 1 - 162 - Stage 2- 386 - - 647 - HCM Control Delay, s 0 110. 1 1" HCM LOS 21.4 C Capacity (veh/h) 162 'W HCM Lane WC Ratio004 . 326 0.027 737 - HCM Control Delay (s) 28.2 16.3 0.004 - HCM Lane LOS 9.9 HCM 95th We Q(veh) D 0.1A C 0.1 0 2400750 Lake Monroe Townhomes Projected AM HCM 6th TWSC 1: Oak Drive & US 17-92 Int Delay, s/veh�o .3 Lane Configurations T HCM Lane V/C Ratio Traffic Vol, veh/h 567 8 8 1040 5 Future Vol, veh/h 567 8 8 5 1040 5 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 5 Sign Control RT Channelized Free Free Free 0 0 Free Stop Stop Storage Length None - None 'None Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 230 - 150 0 Grade, % 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles, % 97 97 80 0 80 92 92 Mvmt Flow 2 585 2 2 8 10 2 2 1300 5 5 "" ConflictingFlow Al`l0 Stage age I 593 p 1909 589 Stage 2 Critical Hdwy Critical Hdwy Stg 1 12 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -I Maneuver - 2.218 5.42 - 3.518 3.318 Stage I . 983 - 75 508 Stage 2 - - 554- Platoon blocked, % - 250 - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 983 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - 74 508 Stage I - - 74 - Stage 2 - - 554 - - - 248 - HCM Control Delay, s 0 0. 1 34.8' HCM LOS D Capacity (veh1h) HCM Lane V/C Ratio 74 0.073 5'0'8' 0.011 983 HCM Control Delay (s) 57.5 12.2 0.01 HCM Lane LOS 8.7 HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) F 0.2 B 0 A 0 9A07C I i- ., - -0r%,6 mut irue i ownhomes Projected PM HCM 6th TWSC 2: EEPj2ct Access & US 17-g7 Int Delay, s/veh - —0.9 Lane Configurations T4 Y14111'11�'�M�11' AF-I'Ll I + Traffic Vol, veh/h 824 5 8 Y 392 16 29 Future Vol, veh/h Conflicting Peds, #/hr 824 5 8 392 16 29 Sign Control RT Channelized 0 Free 0 0 Free Free 0 0 0 Free Stop Stop Storage Length None - None -None Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 180 - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 0 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 92 2 Mvmt Flow 896 5 9 2 426 17 32 Conflicting Flow All 0 901 0 1343 899 Stage 1 Stage 2 - - - 899 Critical Hdwy - - 444 Critical Hdwy Stg I 4.12 - 6.42 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 2.218 - 5.42 - 3.518 - 3.318 Stage I 754 - 168 338 Stage 2 - - 397 - Platoon blocked, % - - 646 - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 754 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 166 338 Stage I - 166 - Stage 2 - 397 - - 638 - H -4140 CM Control Delay, S 0 HCM LOS 11 0,2' . ...... 23.1 C Capacity (veh/h) — 24 1 7 1 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.198 7 54' HCM Control Delay (s) 23.1 0.012 HCM Lane LOS C HCM 95th %file Q(veh) 0.7 0 ,)nn7CZ I -G- IIA_._.. - --- -- 1, ut; 1 uvvf inomes Projected AM HCM 6th TWSC 2: Proiect Access P. US 17-92 2On7l; I L -o AA,-- �- ...... 1-11— .."1111VIIJUIj ----------- — Int Delay, s/veh Lane Configurations 4 Traffic Vol, veh/h 557 16 29 1016 9 18 Future Vol, veh/h 557 16 29 1016 9 18 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 Sign Control RT Channelized Free Free Free 0 Free Stop 0 Stop Storage Length None - None - None Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 180 - 0 Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 0 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 605 17 32 1104 10 2 20 a or"If" allor Conflicting Flow All 0 0 622 0 1782 614 Stage I - Stage 2 - - 614 Critical Hdwy - 4,12 . 1168 . 6.42 - 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg I - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - 5.42 - Follow-up Hdwy Pot Cap -1 Maneuver - - 2.218 5.42 1518 3.318 - Stage 1 - 959 90 492 Stage 2 540 Platoon blocked, % 296 - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 959 87 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 492 Stage 1 - 87 - Stage 2 540 286 HCM Control Delay, s0 I "I I " 11 71z.� 11 -1 � HCM LOS 0.2 27 D Capacity (veh/h) 193 959 g HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.152 - 0.033 HCM Control Delay (s) 27 - 8.9 HCM Lane LOS D A HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 01 Projected PM Project No. 20075 Intersect- take Alonroe Tawnhornes coon Volumes z849 82D + 1 849 � 4-2+{21 �4-�_ 33 7 394 386 + {1} + (7) 0 394 0 65+11)=6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 824 822 +{2} c 824 -5) L 8 (8) 0 0 392 391 +{1} 392 0 16` 16 06) _ -- 0 0 29 29(29) 0 0 0 0 Project No. 20075 Lake Monroe Townhomes Intersection Volumes 0 o ----------- 16 567 550 + (l) + (16) = 567 2 --8 6 + (2) = 8 0 8 27 1040 loll + {2} + (27) = 1040 0 0 -- 2 53+(2)=5 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 557556+{1}=557 6 16 06) .0 29 (29) 0 10161014+(2)=1016 0 --0 9 9 -(9) 0 0 18 ---18 (18) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Project No. 20075 sake Monroe Townhomes �Intersection Volumes 0 0 16 567 550 + (1) + (16) = 567 2 86+(2)=8 0 88 27 1040 1011 + (2) + (27) = 1040 0 0 2 53+(2)=5 0 0 0 55 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _ _-"" '--- 0 557 556 + (1) = 557 16 16 (16) 29 29 (29) 0 10161014+{2)=1016 0 0 9 9 (0) 0 0 18 --18(18) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Appendix I NCHRP Report 0 11 -21 0 E 3 CD ZB 0 Volume (VO), veh/h &-:I:, -,j co C:) -0 0 CD - CD C 0 CD 0 0 F C: 3 G) 0 0 -0 > r- 3 C: --i - CI < 5 T 0 M 0. 0 o < < 0 < 0 zE CL M3 3 r - 0 (a CD z cn O< —< > z < CD < 0 to CD CD C/) > < < W (D M CD =r cr CL (D M 0 ciro CL Al 0 11 -21 0 E 3 CD ZB 0 Volume (VO), veh/h &-:I:, -,j co C:) -0 0 CD - CD C 0 CD 0 0 F C: 3 w 0 ro Right -Turn Volume, veh/h N) -P+07 co 0 NN0 0 a CD 0 0 0 0 O O CD CD O0 7 X 0 CL 0 F E3 co M 0 — 0 0 (D CL 0 0 0 CD 0 I CD p -0g: ;T,g ' 0 --i CD G 0 — > ID 0 0 U) :3 rt 0 3 CD En Appendix J Exhibit 212-1 tan b twit 4 N 0 uwi "4 ro b n 4c� tNi� c O t O H D a �° a y twig Y mon O tan O 4 4Air VNi Umi � � � ° n p m Y A O ro a z Z o` b Y � 2 2 r G N \ m a m " a rao tea' CV. 4 to to 2� T h J rn -- 4 2 Y a � d n z m mroc- Rrj ^i r rn "i DO c x z Z h n rn m n' rt, (A m m � ry by m ti a c ry a A A o 0 O 3 — V 3 ea — � a ay om zo ry 40 � N) a N m tan b twit 4 N 0 uwi "4 ro b 4c� tNi� N o O t O H D a �° a twig mon O tan O 4 4Air VNi Umi � � � ° n p m Y A O ro a z Z o` b Y � 2 2 r G m 4 4 to to -- 4 2 Y O � 2 n APPENDIX G Environmental Assessment Report Townes at Lake Monroe Page 131 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15, 2021 Blo-,it ch 00 nsfii'i/ III it ine"! Environmental and Permitting Services April 1, 2020 Matt Young Beazer Homes, LLC 151 Southhall Lane; Suite #200 Maitland, Florida 32751 Proj: Lake Monroe Townhomes — Seminole County, Florida Section 23, Township 19 South, Range 30 East (BTC File #230-72) Re: Environmental Assessment Report Dear Mr. Young: During March of 2020, Bio -Tech Consulting, Inc. (BTC) conducted an environmental assessment of the approximately 21.51 -acre Lake Monroe Townhomes project site. This site is located on the south side of W. Seminole Boulevard, just south of Lake Monroe; within Section 23, Township 19 South, Range 30 East in Seminole County, Florida (Figures 1, 2 & 3). This environmental assessment included the following elements: • Review of soil types mapped within the site boundaries; • Evaluation of land use types/vegetative communities present; • Field review for occurrence of protected flora and fauna; • Delineation of on-site wetland communities; and, • Environmental constraints. According to the Soil Survey of Seminole County, Florida, prepared by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), Natural Resource Conservation Service (MRCS), seven (7) soil types exist within the subject site (Figure 4). These soil types include the following: Orlando Vero Beach lacksonville Tamna KPV West Matt Young,- Beazer Homes, LLC Lake Monroe Townhomes; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #230-72) Environmental Assessment Report Page 2ofl] - • Adarnsville-Sparr fine sand (#2) • Arents, 0 to 5 percent slopes (#3) • Basinger and Delray fine sands (#9) • Basinger, Samsula and Hontoon soils, depressional (#10) • EauGallie and Immokalee fine sands (#13) • Felda and Manatee mucky fine sands (#15) • Myakka and EauGallie fine sands (#20) The following presents a brief description of each soil type mapped for the subject site: Adamsville-Sparr fine sand (#2) is a nearly level, somewhat poorly drained soils on low ridges on the uplands and low knolls on the flatwoods. Typically the surface layer of this soil type is grayish brown fine sand about 4 inches thick. In most years, the seasonal high water table for this soil type is at a depth of 12 to 36 inches for up to 6 months. The permeability of Adamsville soil is rapid. The permeability of Sparr soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and is slow or moderately slow in the subsoil. Arents, 0 to 5 percent slopes (43) consists of material dug from several areas that have different kinds of soils. This fill material is the result of earthmoving operations. This material is used to fill such areas as sloughs, marshes, shallow depressions, swamps and other low-lying areas above their natural ground levels, for use in land leveling operations, or as a final cover for sanitary landfills. Typically the surface layer of this soil type is 30 to 50 inches thick. It is very dark gray, dark gray, dark grayish brown, and yellowish brown fine sand or sand mixed with discontinuous strata of grayish brown and light brownish gray loamy material. The high water table for this soil type varies with the amount of fill material and artificial drainage within any mapped area. In most years, the high water table is at a depth of 24 to 36 inches for 2 to 4 months. During extended dry periods, a high water table is not within 5 feet of the surface. The permeability of this soil type is moderately rapid or rapid. Basinger and Delray fine sands (#9) are nearly level, poorly drained soils and very poorly drained soils found in sloughs and poorly defined drainageways. Typically the surface layer of Basinger soil consists of very dark gray fine sand about 5 inches thick. Typically the surface layer of Delray soil consists of black fine sand about 12 inches thick. During most years the seasonal high table for this soil type is within 12 inches of the surface for 6 months or more. The permeability of Basinger soil is rapid. The permeability of Delray soil is rapid in the upper part and moderate in the lower part. Matt Young; Beazer Hames, LLC Lake Monroe Townhoines; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #230-72) Environmental Assessment Report Page 3 of 11 Basinger, Samsula and Hontoon soils, depressional (#10) are nearly level, very poorly drained soils found in swamps and depressions. Typically, the surface layer of Basinger soil consists of very dark gray mucky fine sand about 6 inches thick. Typically, the surface layer of Samsula soil is muck about 30 inches thick. Typically, the surface layer of Hontoon soil consists of dark reddish brown muck about 18 inches thick. During most years, the undrained areas of the soils in this map unit are ponded for 6 to 9 months or more. The permeability of this soil unit is rapid. EauGallie and Immokalee fine sands (#13) are nearly level, poorly drained soils on broad plains on the flatwoods. During most years, the soils in this map unit have a seasonal high water table within 12 inches of the surface for I to 4 months. The permeability of EauGallie soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers, moderate or moderately rapid in the sandy part of the subsoil, and moderately slow in the loamy part of the subsoil. The permeability of Immokalee soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and moderate in the subsoil. Felda and Manatee mucky fine sands (#15) are nearly level, very poorly drained soils found in depressions. Typically, Felda soil has a surface layer of very dark grayish brown mucky fine sand about 4 inches thick. Typically, Manatee soil has a surface layer that is 19 inches thick. It is black mucky fine sand in the upper part and very dark gray loamy sand in the lower part. During most years, undrained areas of the soils in this map unit are ponded for 6 to 9 months or more each year. The permeability of Felda soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum, and is moderate or moderately rapid in the subsoil. The permeability of Manatee soil is moderately rapid in the surface layer and moderate in the subsoil. Myakka and EauGallie fine sands (#20) are nearly level, poorly drained soils found on broad plains on the flatwoods. Typically, the surface layer of Myakka soil consists of black fine sand about 5 inches thick. Typically, the surface layer of EauGallie soil consists of dark gray fine sand about 5 inches thick. During most years the seasonal high table for this soil type is within 12 inches of the surface for I to 4 months. The permeability of Myakka soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers and in the substratum and moderate or moderately rapid in the subsoil. The permeability of EauGallie soil is rapid in the surface and subsurface layers, moderate or moderately rapid in the sandy part of the subsoil and moderately slow in the loamy part of the subsoil. The Florida Association of Environmental Soil Scientists (FAESS) considers the main components of Basinger and Delray fine sands (#9), Basinger, Samsula and Hontoon soils, depressional (#10), and Felda and Manatee mucky fine sands (#15) to be hydric. The FAESS also considers inclusions present within EauGallie and Immokalee fine sands (#13) and Myakka and EauGallie fine sands (#20) to be hydric. This information can be found in the Hydric Soils of Florida Handbook, Third Edition, March 2000. VRIO-TOICII Call -suiting Inc. IEtn•irotxmental and Permitting Set -vices Matt Young,, Beazer Homes, LLC Lake Monroe Townhoines, Seminole County, FL (BTC File #230-72) Environmental Assessment Report Page 4 of 11 LAND USE TYPESNEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES The Lake Monroe Townhomes project site currently supports five (5) land use types/vegetative communities. These land use types/vegetative communities were identified utilizing the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System, Level III (FLUCFCS, FDOT, January 2004) (Figure 5). The on-site upland land use types/vegetative communities are classified as Temperate Hardwoods (425) and Disturbed Lands (740). The on-site wetland/surface water land use types/vegetative communities are classified as Cypress (621), Wetland Forested Mixed (630), and Vegetated Non -Forested Wetlands (640). The following provides a brief description of the on-site land use types/vegetative communities: Uplands: 425 Temperate Hardwoods The southern portion of the project site is comprised of forested uplands which are best classified as Temperate Hardwoods (425), per the FLUCFCS. Vegetation identified within this area includes camphortree (Cinnamomum camphora), live oak (Quercus virginiana), red cedar (Juniperus virginiana), slash pine (Pinus elliottii), American elm (Ulmus americana), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), American beautyberry (Callicarpa Americana), brackenfern (Pteridium aquilinum), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia), elderberry (Sambucus nigra), elephant ears (Colocasia esculenta), caesarweed (Urena lobata), geenbrier (Smilax spp.), St.- Augustinegrass (Stenotaphrum secundatum), lantana (Lantana strigocamara), common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) and tuberous sword fern (Nephrolepis cordifolia). 740 Disturbed Lands The northeast comer of the site contains a construction staging area with temporary trailer offices and construction materials. This area is best classified as Disturbed Lands (740), per the FLUCFCS. Vegetative species observed within this conmiunity consists of cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia), Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense), saltbush (Atriplex pentandra), American pokeweed (Phytolacca americana) and various herbaceous weed species. 810 -Te- Ch Paorisuffing Inc. --d Pcrmitting Services Matt Young; Beazer Homes, LLC Lake Monroe Townhonzes; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #230-72) Environmental Assessment Report Page 5 of 11 Wetlands/Surface Waters: 621 Cypress A cypress dominated wetland system exists in the northwest comer of the property and is best classified as Cypress (621), per the FLUCFCS. Vegetative species observed within this community include bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), American elm (Uhnus a►nericana), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraefflua), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), red maple (Acer rubrum), royal fern (Osmunda regalis) and marsh pennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellata). 630 Wetland Forested Mixed There is a transition from the cypress -dominated forested wetland into a mixed forested wetland between the uplands to the south and cypress wetlands along the northern boundary. This land use type/vegetative community would be classified as Wetland Forested Mixed (630), per the FLUCFCS. Vegetative species observed within this community include American elm (Ulmus americana), sweetgum (Liquidambar solraciflua), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), red maple (Acer rubrum), royal fern (Osmunda regalis), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), elderberry (Sambucus nigra) and marsh pennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellata). 640 Vegetated Non -Forested Wetlands There is an area void of canopy species surrounded by the cypress wetland located in the north portion of the site. This land use/vegetative community would be classified as Vegetated Non - Forested Wetland (640), per the FLUCFCS. Vegetative species observed within these wetlands include royal fern (Osmunda regalis), water lettuce (Pistia stratoites), common water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans), elderberry (Samhticits nigra), centella (Centella asiatica), nutsedge (Cyperus spp.), duckweed (Lemma valdiviana), marsh pennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellata) and Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana). All wetlands within the limits of the subject site have been field delineated using pink "Bio -Tech Consulting" flagging tape. Utilizing methodologies outlined in the Florida's Fragile Wildlife (Wood, 2001); Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity Standard Methods for Mammals (Wilson, et al., 1996); and Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's (FFWCC) Gopher Tortoise Permitting Guidelines (April 2008 - revised May 2017), an assessment for "listed" floral and faunal species occurring within the subject site boundaries was conducted on March 16, 2020. The survey, which Rio -Tech Consullinu Inc. 1--nviroutmental and Permitting Services Matt Young; Beazer Homes, LLC Lake Monroe Townhomes; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #230-72) Environmental Assessment Report Page d o, f l 1 covered the majority of the subject site's developable area, included both direct observations and indirect evidence, such as tracks, burrows, tree markings and vocalizations that indicated the presence of species observed. The assessment focused on species that are "listed" by the FFWCC's Oficial Lists - Florida's Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern (December 2018) that have the potential to occur in Seminole County (see attached Table 1). No plant species listed as "Threatened" or "Endangered" by either the Florida Department of Agriculture (FDA) or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) was identified on the project site during the assessment conducted. However, one (1) fern species was identified that is listed as "commercially exploited" by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS). The harvesting of this species, royal fern (Osmunda regalis), for commercial gain, is not allowed. However, the listing of this species poses no restrictions towards the development of the subject site. The following is a list of those wildlife species identified during the evaluation of the site: Reptiles and Amphibians American Bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) brown anole (1Norops sagrei) eastern racer (Coluber constrictor) Florida leopard frog (Lithobates sphenocephalus sphenocephalus) green anole (Anolis carolinensis) Birds American Crow (Corvus cattrinus) Black Vulture (Coragyps atratits) Mouming Dove (Zenaida macroura) Northern Cardinal (Cardinalis cardinalis) Mammals eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) eastern gray squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) nine -banded armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus) None of the above wildlife species, were identified in the FFWCC's Official Lists - Florida's Endangered red Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern (December 2018). The following provides a brief description of wildlife species as they relate to the development of the site. A RIO-TeCh 1101 111C. &Ern-ironmetital and Permitting Services Matt Young; Beazer Homes, LLC Lake Monroe Townhoines, Seminole County, FL (BTC File #230-72) Environmental Assessment Report Page 7 of I I Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) State protected by F.A.C. 68A-16.00.2 and federally protected by both the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (1918) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (1940) In August of 2007, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) removed the Bald Eagle from the list of federally endangered and threatened species. Additionally, the Bald Eagle was removed from FFWCCs imperiled species list in April of 2008. Although the Bald Eagle is no longer protected under the Endangered Species Act, it is still protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and FFWCC's Bald Eagle rule (Florida Administrative Code 68A-16.002 Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus Leuchocephalus). In May of 2007, the USFWS issued the National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. In April of 2008, the FFWCC adopted a new Bald Eagle Management Plan that was written to closely follow the federal guidelines. In November of 2017, the FFWCC issued "A Species Action Plan for the Bald Eagle" in response to the sunset of the 2008 Bald Eagle Management Plan. Under the USFWS's management plans, buffer zones are recommended based on the nature and magnitude of the project or activity. The recommended protective buffer zone is 660 feet or less from the nest tree, depending on what activities or structures are already near the nest. As provided within the above referenced Species Action Plan, the USFWS is the regulating body responsible for issuing permits for Bald Eagles. In 2017, the need to obtain a State permit (FFWCC) for the take of Bald Eagles or their nests in Florida was eliminated following revisions to Rule 68A-16.002, F.A.C.. A USFWS Bald Eagle "Non -Purposeful Take Pen -nit" is not needed for any activity occurring outside of the 660 -foot buffer zone. No activities are permitted within 330 feet of a nest without a USFWS permit. In addition to the on-site evaluation for "listed" species, BTC conducted a review for any Audubon EagleWatch and FFWCC recorded Bald Eagle nests on or within the vicinity of the project site. This review revealed that there are no Bald Eagle nests through the 2018-2019 nesting season, within 660 -feet of the Lake Monroe Townhome project site. Thus, no developmental constraints are expected with respect to Bald Eagle nests. Wood Stork (Myeteria Americana) Federally Listed as "Threatened" by USFWS It should also be noted that the subject site is shown to be located within a Wood Stork Nesting Colony Core Foraging Area (see Figure 6). The Wood Stork (MycteriaAmericana) is listed as "Endangered" by both the FFWCC and the USFWS. Wood storks are large, long-legged wading birds, about 45 inches tall, with a wingspan of 60 to 65 inches. Their plumage is white except for black primaries and secondaries and a short black tail. The head and neck are largely unfeathered and dark gray in color. The bill is black, thick at the base, and slightly decurved. Wood Storks Rio-recit consuiting inc. Etivir-imenual and Permitting Service,,, Matt Young; Beazer• Homes, LLC Lake Monroe Townhoines; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #230-72) Environmental Assessment Report Page 8 of 11 are birds of freshwater and estuarine wetlands, primarily nesting in cypress or mangrove swamps. They feed in freshwater marshes, narrow tidal creeks, or flooded tidal pools as well as roadside ditches. Particularly attractive feeding sites are depressions in marshes or swamps where fish become concentrated during periods of falling water levels. Based on our review of available databases, there is no record of a Wood Stork rookery on the project site or within close proximity. The USFWS and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) require that any impacts to on-site ditches and/or wetlands, which would eliminate a portion of the wood stork foraging habitat, be either mitigated through the purchase of mitigation credits or recreated elsewhere on-site so that there would be no net loss of wood stork foraging habitat. Thus, no further action will be required prior to site development related to Wood Storks unless wetland/surface water impacts are anticipated. USFWS CONSULTATION AREAS The USFWS has established "consultation areas" for certain listed species. Generally, these consultation areas only become an issue if USFWS consultation is required, which is usually associated with pennitting through the USAGE. The reader should be aware that species presence and need for additional review are often determined to be unnecessary early in the permit review process due to lack of appropriate habitat or other conditions. However, the USFWS makes the final determination. Consultation areas are typically very regional in size, often spanning multiple counties where the species in question is known to exist. Consultation areas by themselves do not indicate the presence of a listed species. They only indicate an area where there is a potential for a listed species to occur and that additional review might be necessary to confirm or rule -out the presence of the species. The additional review typically includes the application of species-specific criteria to rule -out or confirm the presence of the species in question. Such criteria might consist of a simple review for critical habitat types. In other cases, the review might include the need for species-specific surveys using established methodologies that have been approved by the USFWS. The following paragraphs include a list of the USFWS Consultation Areas associated with the subject site. Also included, is a brief description of the respective species habitat and potential for additional review: Big-Temch COFIS HIting Inc. Esivironmental and Permitting Services Matt Young,- Beazer Homes, LLC Lake Monroe Townhomes; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #230-72) Environmental Assessment Report Page 9 of 11 West Indian Manatee (Trichechus manatus) Federally Listed as "Endangered " by USFWS The subject site falls within the USFWS Consultation Area for the West Indian manatee. Currently the West Indian manatee is listed as "Endangered" by the USFWS. Manatees are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, which prohibits the take (i.e., harass, hunt, capture, or kill) of all marine mammals. Manatees are found in marine, estuarine and freshwater environments. The West Indian manatee (Trichechus inanatus), includes two distinct subspecies, the Florida manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris) and the Antillean manatee (Trichechus nianatus nianatus). While morphologically distinctive, both subspecies have many common features. Manatees have large, seal -shaped bodies with paired flippers and a round, paddle -shaped tail. They are typically grey in color (color can range from black to light brown) and occasionally spotted with barnacles or colored by patches of green or red algae. The muzzle is heavily whiskered and coarse, single hairs are sparsely distributed throughout the body. Adult manatees, on average, are about nine feet long (3 meters) and weigh about 1,000 pounds (200 kilograms). At birth, calves are between three and four feet long (I meter) and weigh between 40 and 60 pounds (30 kilograms). No West Indian manatees were observed within the subject site during the wildlife survey conducted by BTC. Although the subject site is in close proximity to Lake Monroe, which is utilized by the West Indian manatee, no wetland/surface impacts to this water body are anticipated. Thus, no suitable habitat for this species will be eliminated and no further action should be required pertaining to West Indian manatees. Florida Scrub -Jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens) Federallv Listed as "Threatened "by USFWS I Currently the Florida Scrub -Jay is listed as threatened by the USFWS. Florida Scrub Jays are largely restricted to scattered, often small and isolated patches of sand pine scrub, xeric oak, scrubby flatwoods, and scrubby coastal stands in peninsular Florida (Woolfenden 1978a, Fitzpatrick et al. 1991). They avoid wetlands and forests, including canopied sand pine stands. Optimal Scrub -Jay habitat is dominated by shrubby scrub, live oaks, myrtle oaks, or scrub oaks from I to 3 in (3 to 10 ft.) tall, covering 50% to 90 % of the area; bare ground or sparse vegetation less than 15 cm (6 in) tall covering 10% to 50% of the area; and scattered trees with no more than 20% canopy cover (Fitzpatrick et al. 1991). No Florida Scrub -Jays were observed on the project site during the cursory survey conducted by BTC. As no suitable habitat exists within the limits of the site, it is not anticipated that a fon-nal survey would be required by the USFWS or another agency to determine if any Florida Scrub -Jays utilize any portions of the site. B010 -Tech Consulting 111C. 1-invironmental and Permitting Services Malt Young; Beazer Horner, LLC Lake Monroe Townhoines; Seminole County, FL (BTC File #230-72) Environmental Assessment Report Page 10 of 11 Everglade Snail Kite (Rostritamus sociabilis) Federally Listed as "Endangered "by USFWS The subject site falls within the USFWS Consultation Area for the Everglade Snail Kite. Currently the Everglade Snail Kite is listed as "Endangered" by the USFWS. Everglade Snail Kites are similar in size to Red -shouldered Hawks. All Everglade Snail Kites have deep red eyes and a white rump patch. Males are slate gray, and females and juveniles vary in amounts of white, light brown, and dark brown, but the females always have white on their chin. Everglade Snail Kites vocalize mainly during courtship and nesting. They may occur in nearly all of the wetlands of central and southern Florida. They regularly occur in lake shallows along the shores and islands of many major lakes, including Lakes Okeechobee, Kissimmee, Tohopekaliga (Toho) and East Toho. They also regularly occur in the expansive marshes of southern Florida such as Water Conservation Areas 1, 2, and 3, Everglades National Park, the upper St. John's River marshes and Grassy Waters Preserve. Although a portion of the project site contains wetlands/surface waters, no Everglade Snail Kites were observed within the site during the wildlife survey conducted by BTC. As no suitable habitat exists within the limits of the site, it is not anticipated that a formal survey would be required by the USFWS or another agency to determine if any Everglade Snail Kites utilize any portions of the site. Permitting through Seminole County, the St. Johns Water Management District (SJRWMD) and the USACE would be required to develop the project site. The site resides in the St. Johns River (Canaveral Marshes to Wekiva) drainage basin. The wetland limits delineated in Figure 7 have not been reviewed or approved by any regulatory agencies. St. Johns River Water Management District An Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) will be required through the SJRWMD for all wetland and/or other surface water impacts (both direct and secondary) in association with the proposed development plan. Impacts to the project's wetland and/or other surface water communities would be permittable by SJRWMD as long as the issues of elimination and reduction of wetland impacts have been addressed and as long as the mitigation offered is sufficient to offset the functional losses incurred via the proposed impacts. Rlo'Tec h Consulting Inc. Environmental and Perntitting Service% Matt Young; Beazer Homes, LLC Lake Monroe Townhoines; Seminole Coun4FL (BTC File #230-72) Environmental Assessment Report Page 11 of 11 United States Army Corps of Engineers A Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 Permit may also be required for the project's wetland/surface water impacts by the USACE as the on-site wetlands are directly connected to Lake Monroe. As the ERP is no longer ajoint application between the SJRWMD and the USACE, the Corps will not be notified/copied upon submittal of the ERP application to the District. As with the District, it is anticipated that all impacts to the project's wetlands communities would be pern-iittable by the USACE as long as the issues of elimination and reduction of wetland impacts have been addressed and as long as the mitigation offered is sufficient to offset the functional losses incurred via the proposed impacts. The environmental limitations described in this document are based on observations and technical information available on the date of the on-site evaluation. This report is for general planning purposes only. The limits of any on-site wetlands/surface waters can only be determined and verified through field delineation and/or on-site review by the pertinent regulatory agencies. The wildlife surveys conducted within the subject property boundaries do not preclude the potential for any listed species, as noted on Table 1 (attached), currently or in the future. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact our office at (407) 894-5969. Thank you. Attachments Regards, David Holly Project Manager 1 Rio -Tech Consulting Inc. 1--rivironmcmal and Permitting Services Rio-Iffieli Consulting Im 1 tivironmental :until Pe rYrittil?g Services Legend 02 Lake Monroe Townhornes Site Vt Em J % Z Lake Mary Sources: Esri, HERE, Garrnin,IUSGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hongkong), , Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Lake Monroe Townhomes Site N Miles flic-Te.,ch @101"Isuffing Inc. Seminole County, Florida Project #: Environmental and Permitting Services Figure 1 < E 3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Produced By: JDH Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 s mvw.bio-techconsulting.corn Location Map Date: 2/27/2020 Ific..'rech Poe, I'll, s", tuffin g file,, L Environmental and Permitting Services 3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 mvw. bio-techconsulting. corn Legend Lake Monroe Townhomes Site (± 21.51 Ac.) Lake Monroe Townhomes Site Seminole County, Florida Figure 2 2018 Aerial Map 300 N Feet w E Project #: S Produced By: JDH Date: 2/27/2020 Legend Lake Monroe Townhomes Site dd r ^ s s a e -4010 " 0 � n ^ W 00 01 .w �lv / O y lA '"' �f,,.er 1� � 0 J 6, r VA OR t it ;4 0 �� ■ aJ ,e 71JJl%M/I1��7/r f nr s Ai y m� t �� an a ue f '4 lG %r a �a " yM. i Lake Monroe Townhomes Site N 1 1000 i -' e nsuffing [IfIcl. Seminole County, Florida � Feet Environmental and Permitting Services w E Project #: 3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Figure 3 Produced B DH Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 Six 5 Topographic Ma s Y: VAWi.bio-techconsulting.comp Date: 2/27/2020 Ir If RI" 1"I - Teperf"I (Y"I'll"Isulfifiel, Ific". Environmental and Permiffing'Services 3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 v✓Nwbio-techconsulting.corn Legend ?=--fl Lake Monroe Townhomes Site Seminole County Soils 2: Adamsville-Sparr fine sands 3: Arents, 0 to 5 percent slopes 9: Basinger and Delray fine sands 10: Basinger, Samsula, and Hontoon soils, depressional 13: EauGallie and Immokalee fine sands 15: Felda and Manatee mucky fine sands, depressional 20: Myakka and EauGallie fine sands Lake Monroe Townhomes Site Seminole County, Florida Figure 4 SSURGO Soils Map 300 N Feet w E Project #: Produced By: JDH s Date: 2/27/2020 qs� Legend TMOC;1 Lake Monroe Townhomes Site 425, Temperate Hardwoods 621, Cypress 630, Wetland Forested Mixed 640, Vegetated Non -Forested Wetlands 740, Disturbed Lands I Lake Monroe Townhomes Site N 280 I I Feet Rio-'Fecti (1,1011'sulfing I'lle, Seminole County, Florida vv_(� Project #: 230-72 Environm'ontal and Permitting Services E 3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Figure 5 Produced By: DPH Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 s mvw.bio-techconsulting.com FLUCFCS Map Date: 3/16/2020 . .... .. .. 01 Rio-'rel,ch consuffing Inc. Environmental and Permitting Services 3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 vAm. bio-techconsulting. com Legend k3 G�C1C Q30r,A Lake Monroe Townhomes Site Audubon Eaglewatch Permanent 10 330 ft. Eagle Nest Buffer Lake Monroe Townhomes Site Seminole County, Florida Figure 6 Wildlife Review Map 660 ft. Eagle Nest Buffer Bear Nuisance: 1980-2009 Wood Stork Nesting Colony Core Foraging Areas 620 N I Feet WE Project #: 230-72 -<�— Produced By: DPH s Date: 4/1/2020 1'1)." Tech Consulting Inc. ["' i E vironmental and Permitting Services 3025 E. South Street Orlando, FL 32803 Ph: 407-894-5969 Fax: 407-894-5970 vpmv.bio-techconsulting.corn Lake Monroe Townhomes Site Seminole County, Florida Figure 7 Wetland Delineation Map 280 N Feet Project #: 230-72 S Produced By: DPH Date: 3/16/2020 4 Bios 'wil Consulting life. l;•srn srsrsrrr7cnt sl and Permitting Services Table 1: 1 Potentially Occuring Listed Wildlife and Plant Species in Seminole County, Florida Scientific Name Common Name Federal Status State Status Lechea cernua e Pteronotr, is welaka bluenose shiner N ST N Alligator mississippiensis American alligator SAT FT S/A Dtymarchon corals cou eri Eastern indigo snake LT FT Ga herus polyhemus gopher tortoise C ST Lam ro eltis extenuata short -tailed snake N ST Pituo his melanoleucus mu itus Florida pine snake N SSC ,. A helocoma coerulescens Florida scrub -jay LT FT Egretta caerulea little blue heron N ST E retta tricolor tricolored heron N ST Falco s arverius paulus southeastern American kestrel N ST Grus canadensis pratensis Florida sandhill crane N ST Haliaeetus leucoce halus bald eagle N ** M cteria americana wood stork LT FT Pandion haliaetus os re N SCC* Y.<.7-7 Puma concolor coi yi Florida Panther LE FE Sciurus ni er shermani Sherman's fox squirrel N SSC Trichechus manatus West Indian manatee LE FE 71Carex cha manii Cha man's Sedge N T Centrosema arenicola Sand Butterfly Pea N E �Urbita okeechobeensis Okeechobee Gourd LE E _ J. r_ r. . A 1". AJ P -p .......» Illicium parviflorum star anise N E Lechea cernua nodding inweed N T Nolina ato ocar a Florida Bear ass N T Ohio lossunt palmatum Hand Fern N E Pecluma plumula Plume Polypody N E Ptero lossas is ecristata Giant Orchid N T P cnanthemum floridanum Florida Mountain -mint N T Salix floridana Florida willow N E FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS LE -Endangered: species in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range. LT -Threatened: species likely to become Endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. SAT -Endangered due to similarity of appearance to a species which is federally listed such that enforcement personnel have difficulty in attempting to differentiate between the listed and unlisted species. C -Candidate species for which federal listing agencies have sufficient information on biological vulnerability and threats to support proposing to list the species as Endangered or Threatened. XN-Non-essential experimental population. N -Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing as Endangered or Threatened. STATE LEGAL STATUS - ANIMALS FE- Listed as Endangered Species at the Federal level by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service FT- Listed as Threatened Species at the Federal level by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service FXN- Federal listed as an experimental population in Florida FT(S/A)- Federal Threatened due to similarity of appearance State population listed as Threatened by the FFWCC. Defined as a species, subspecies, or isolated population which is acutely vulnerable to environmental alteration, declining in jer at a rapid rate, or whose range or habitat is decreasing in area at a rapid rate and as a consequence is destined or very likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future. SSC -Listed as Species of Special Concern by the FFWCC Defined as a population which warrants special protection, recognition, or consideration because it has an inherent significant vulnerability to habitat modification, environmental alteration, human disturbance, or substantial human exploitation which, in the foreseeable future, may result in its becoming a threatened species. (SSC* for Pandion haliaetus (Osprey) indicates that this status applies in Monroe county only.) N -Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing. ** State protected by F.A.C. 68A-16.002 and federally protected by both the Migraton, Bird Treaty Act (1918) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (1940) STATE LEGAL STATUS - PLANTS E -Endangered: species ofplants native to Florida that are in imminent danger of extinction within the state, the survival of which is unlikely if the causes of a decline in the number of plants continue; includes all species determined to be endangered or threatened pursuant to the U.S. Endangered Species Act. T -Threatened: species native to the state that are in rapid decline in the number ofplants within the state, but which have not so decreased in number as to cause them to be Endangered. N -Not currently listed, nor currently being considered for listing. APPENDIX H Resolution No. 2020-R-70 Vacation of Public Right -Of -Way Townes at Lake Monroe __Page 32 Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment June 15, 2021 I \L.V i L.L. %pvo.,iv OI:UTION Nti: 2020-R 7.0 $EM7NOL• E •CUi3NTY .1h; It�DA .; RESOLUT`iQN •: ': • � •' • �,' : SEM)NEJEE• CULTmi''Y BOARI):4F• COt:tIiTT'Y GOM1t![.ISSIOIVER9 • - TAC PiTING AND. ABANDONING THE:HEREIN' DESC.M :PUSL.IC , H'T:O)'WAYW PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.: • - . • WHERI - S,. ctions.:336.09.and 336,1.0, Florida S.tattite§; authorizes: aiic).empowers'the . Boarii•ofCounty•Cominissioners (the'"Board") to�vaeate.aile�s and'righi-of'ways; anei.`-�- WHEREAS; "Michael Tower's, `petitioned tiie `Board to 'close, _vacate' and abaud' the' property-describ'ecl-k.Exiibit A and .'WHEREAS; "the Nqtiqjlxs' are the' apparent `owrieirs bf record of parcels "acljaceni to the •': ' .: r_.eq ilii ed_ right�of w4y to be vacafed- acid the vacatiori.of suclivoitzori ofilie 4gli't•-of-wap:wiil-not-..'. • " ' ' /1 affect,the right ofconvenient access Qi persons4or.cause.ata parcels tci lie•landlocked*..aiid. :.WI�EREASf notice was pVbH9he;d ffi-accordarioe with the requirements'of Sections 336:09: ' mid 336.10; •Fl6rida• Statutes;:dnd : . y : '.-V REAS,.the Boa.'rd Lias determined :tbat'tlie al iafii lent -of tfie-alioye ciesenbed fight 07.wayis.M.Ithe:best:interest ofthe:Coiwtyand the:public;.arici: .- . •WHEREAS ; all' applicable utility,:oornpnies haveprovdecl letters stating."rio .objection" " : ioihe request46..vacate; NOVA THEREFORE; $E •TT'RESOLEDaiy the;Board'of.Copity Commissioners: of ' _ ::: • , Serrunole•Co ty.; Flotida;ibat:. : : Section :1. •: Fin s • The• above recitals are true and: are 'into ` orafed :as• I : lative' _ _ :: ` : •' .: fiiadngs, on request a I'etitioner(s}; the Boardfinds,•-detearixiines: anti• cleclat es Haat the: alibye- .' •�.� : � Vacate and.A.iianddu•Ri�ht�gf'Way::�aseinezit • :. View •I7riO.e an d:Oak I7r'ige � • •,: � ' `: •„'page I of 2 • ;'..'•= descri'beii'riglit• of way'is:hdrebii closed, vacated and.abandoxietl ;arid'thai=all'rights:in'arid to the.': - ; same :ombehalf ofthe iaounty: and%the public: afire hereby disalal=d: "- Section Z:- -This Resohition sh4-becoirie'effective- ori ado tion b the Board.of Coon . . .. . . . . . . Co'i�sioners.. _ '2020.-.-- j.- : me _ : - :A'Ty.::".BO'ARD'OE G<JUNTSL'CC1NMSSTONERS: ' SEIvI Ot COY iNT i' ORYDA .-004 ee ' OWER; Chairman �erk_to the is'r`�d o; a CQ . zazn mU iers -of _ ' • :: - p'Q Q. x1u'bii A = Sketch of Legal Description. Authority: Sections 334:09 arid'336:10;'ElQr'ida_S'tat t s. - - PEClorg .: T:\Usecsli cgal Secxctary'CSB\Plamiing\2U201ROW Va"gala (Lake Viow.Ih:` agii:0ekpr.) May12(20).doox ; • :. - •• � Vacate ancT'Abanddxi•Right-of-:Way:Easement ' • ` • 'T:,ake View I?rive and teak I;rive. • • • • ' •� • • � • • •:•'Page 2 of 2 ` :, , .•' SKF —H OF �7ESG�tIFT't�?N ' • �' ' • :`� LEGAL ' DESCRXP.TXON: Aportioh of Oak bdve,(a fid toot itght of.wiy), Wolter Ulie View7eirace,'acc6rdj6Z:ro The -:Plat ther6f,• atiecorded in Plat 400k•20,page ", of thepubi cfIeeon'is of Setninote county_ - • Florida, h66g North of tot 33y South df i ct 15 and the. Westerly-eitenslori thereof, 2nd tying ,.. Stluth of a pottibn of Lot 14.of said Wolfees lake View Termce being more pardatady desatbdd as follows: : :The Wdstedy pertion'oLOak%0, Wollefs take V;ew•Tetrace, of said Pla0ying West of.the: following desa bed line; beginning at the NortheastzaYner.of t.6t b of said PlaL'thence itri. - : • " • - :.. Nbnhp& ent4cL#ar:to•the North right ofwraybne of said Oak ltiew Ddve for a distanu ct• :• 66.Wfeet and ffie Paint of Temilrius. ,• " ' " ' .: ' -'. : ; ' ' .SxicTfartds%ntatning 20,26L013puarc feet; or 0.236acres, more or less. • . •- • ' ' - fl 40: 80 `.. . OR' P iC .SCALE LOT 15'... / - . ' : w•' ' ' :. / . :i QT 14" ':: !.: LOT, WOL Ls10.�FE 1lEW» • "T LAKE �ER •E ' PL BOOK .J 33'' OO.OD' '(P). &0.00" P}' - 70(?AO'•�P). R . '�•NORTifRMLtIVE .... ' . .. » • • tyESTERLY EiciETITtOH' OF: LOT'.15 .. - NT. OF' IERMIPit)S '» ^ • • . .. »-.. _ -REMAINDER.:OE ..... POR1i0N�•OF�' E{86'R AK', •Dki,VE 66, R/ 0,26,63:St;uorp (eot,,or 0.236 acrea:� li• POINT OF BEGINt11NGVF .: CORt1ER -OF •LOT' J3 - • • - r » ' I NORTk UNE ' y/ :..i,., LOT 13 :Lo ,. '.. �� r_.. " I -VOL S =LAKE- VIEW: I ERRACE PLAT:'BQUK. ib,-PC�,.`.66 i ' s - : % - i ,'_ ,aeBltsVUTtoxs.: ;D / _ • Pe. - PCAT,B00it I �•" TD' ' Y . / PO PAGE CMTERUNE .. RIeNt Of WAY . � , .. ;I.; .. J^ ,t1lillf:i►:t; .�'` ••'. .{Pl.^PUTT' .. , 1Caa thot this dese'iiption•represented - . :: � •:.:-�5�'TRY.�s X.O,i4S �1VDTES: •: ; ..:. - ' • •' � ' . • sJ%lrue and coatet do.the beM of m - BEARlNOS-BASE4 ON 1Hi£:Na4Tt1 Rjx UNE 0:: aril O.faYF.:ribtiER'S t.AtiE; �.: .+,.: �`" ' aye In bdief.,7t has teen:prejpored 'tax .'.. . • _ . . rI FERnA.W..,y RECO%DSD IN 'PEI 19,410 Fs, mvivIX£ —TY, np,I OA • ' v. a� .. . (AN• ASSU4tA, pATtnH •PEIi,PtAT• iFi£R-£DF).. , �- • ` •,i 0: l «� o arlccWith, the Standards of Pr4ctlde sit forth to .. . y .• pteq; et7,• F.A,C...puinuont to'Cbopters ¢77 cnd' ^^ ^^ •^.1NIS'i5 NOTA B¢JNDATtY'SURVEY.' .. '.. • • • ^ .. • .:.r ; S .. ,,, :. k`IriyrdC Stainked ect OI O florido'Llcensetdnotofe .. -S . THIS Is Yi.SKEtCN or THIS Obn,Y.'NO CORNERS NYRE SET,ANO . - •,••;; ;, „.•�yp•.,o�'f"ppe.r,»thi•s. drowing,•sketch. plot or:NIETC-trITTAtER StRVEYNO ASSVlES NO RESPO9RREEIOnD ACCPTt3�'r••.�i:. oses•oni 'ad is not -. ; NAINSM11CAL CLOSURESAWBEARVCS ANDMSTANES SNOYM HEREON -ARE . . . - . ` ' SJ"CT t0 FIEtD•VMMAIIOtt: .. - •.^jsi , • . // �/j ri'ri; : S•r"" 5'/'11 L O . , •tt•t.:'.'.lR�,N• NIETt)'PSM•60Z5• •PitINT,DATE•` • • . PAiPARO'J,!'0.4: • ':.' .. •^ `..' .. : •• yHr?1.O 817. ,N/A, oATE:•4qo,--u , • " y . OAT4W001) DEVELOPMENT•& CQNSTRUCTit?N: .. ewae,a,N : Nicto-whittDker StuYej'itig LLC . ' 'LAKF. ?40NROE TNN'&.BAR OUIBACIC : \HI 1726 N.' Rasa d Rue �Hh-{taegaobd, FL32710 _ DRAWN BY. BPS. - 13- ' SCAtE' 1`.40'• • SNEET :2485 Niy 1T•92NWY SAWORD. 'FLLB'ttia77ii ' . . .,, ... .' ':: =;,aytts^atativraHweaaxofivAD.cr�n+,a�xewarnuozorr:osas ', . ' • .. x'tiibit A ::: ; ::. •_ :';" t-of-Wa}�'Easrmenit ;Vacate and Abandon . ' - - • ' - ' : LW View. Drive and Oak'T7rive: It Rau utt LCl ttif• GVGVV003LV :.-. �,: � ••`•..''•• ST{;8TGOF MSCR.TRT%gN.'".. �j • - : ••g? • • � - ": : `' ' :. » laireViewDriye(a•33 foot tight of vray}� Woifefs lake•V(ew » :. • . • " ' : .�`'. � '; '�.'' .•TetrSce,atcordhtgtottie•Plattherdof,as•recSrtledloPfat. QO�s \ , 8swk 30 page 65, of t{re PuhliaRecritds of Seminole S purity, ,: :. ; J j Piorlda, being more particulatiydescabedis-6tlows:, - : �i�srsOo, ' • ' oc the pla otf Wo fees landd vdiewTenate als rkorrd d bi � 'P1aEBook;%page.66, of the Publte Iterords of Seminole`. - ..: : di a,' id tvA serttofWn Fjing• ". e �A'..�d' "Countxh]a 33.�40o d d '.. •' . of to 15 through'24, of said Ifer's Lake•wew '14t . � �9 '(errite,�yld3:3.DD foot wt� rjght rrf Yiav also lying Sovth of O O�c • : ,s :UA.Hl 27=$2 also ki,oigm as Seminole goulevacd,as ' -3sOD toot wldo itght•ot wayalso . OG ',ry shctm�n.satd plat; said ' �° V .` '0 10 ��G ''„ r�o�o h�FRB"North'of Oak Drive (a 6y.DD fnot wi$edBht cf wall{ .as , : _ qQ• .. refolded iilsald 4}Totfei's ta%.Ylevixesraco apd e tY to _ Oj ' ?� ' : Westedyettenston of salt{ NaGh'dghf o[vraytlne of Oak > .:. w to "Drifre tothe Wpst tine of said takc.Vtew Drive. • ; • " a •r .. : OR .. Ilidrelo ds ntalning 22,3{3 8SSquare fger ;orq.S .saes, _ W61 to `SO'. _,0. :• ~. yi .. ., tn ••.. • 5 PS- PIAT BOOK• ¢ tL - � • , o '�. " . PC .PAGE . .., O " ••Y (NR) a NON RE - :: It f WAY o PLAT .. - '; •"»,... S Wit" ..., . . ''.•o. .i�rl a. ... ,. . - •.'«o'•,. , .eft.. . •� .'SiiRVL;I'Q:RS-1YU7'tsS'. • •"... .-•BEAPMb 8ASE0'ON• THE NORTH R/W UNE OF dAk OHIt+>;10. , ~ , -•S - . . .., .. - . �• ' . .. d: •.. : � �S COi1NiY� .. PtR'PtAT�' • •TERRACE. AS RECOROED'tti't?8 . ' • • ' ' . tT.Oh1OA. (AH ASSLMED DAitJlr' E 'E>r : ': jtas.rs'NOi"A. 80UNOARY'StlRYEY.' .. _ • - TtnS 1S.A SKETCH•OF LitSCRRP . : r`Ii, TKt,N A.4tY.' NO CORN-P,RS MERE - • ,. ' ct: • • • .. • '. MES RRtSPONSIBR� B�EVROO-AOCTrAKCR E TED NATN�ATICAAL.NCXML ES. . . • n , : , ,• _ ",ALL A � T OISTANES.SHOWI Heff= An SUBJECT TO $A1cr7rAy'rfm,: {not tnls deeenptton representT:d . .harcis•Ug(rt and correct td tie beat of my . . 43��F(Qk baa @ :nwtib liPe 5t has been e of ocuee eo"t forth in " " ORTH p ifNE� +- . a' dlutas oni4ravont to'picpten't77 bnd'". /Y(' s -'Ay 1 eoristq taiutos ,and untess'tt bears- the„stgnohitp • - • .XESTiW.Y'EXiF7trRON'OF ;;i �tA • .$irRd 1(iO netgji1oFr Hui •seal bf a •Rorldo Uaeneed • .. . - - • NOirCet RK:tn' Of•,1YItY 1LNE• .. • • _ ' • . �' .. irrVe r'ttirR¢tAapper„this droving, •skoteh. plot dr . . +"�' �' 'Map ts�foY'b}foY, ptidona!'p ses•onty•on'd d. -Its not ' .. •• - •• ' flAK' 17E2iyE 6f'R • • : • :.. .. � a�*N � • , �tF�.,� ; .. •WOLFER'S:LAKE MEW TERRACE' S��"JJJz c? 1r,: °Tat Fi :•NIETD PStd'802 L'' ' .: • ' . : PLAfi QpOK tn,•PG,:.66 .%3,`..: ur •.tr PL3WT,DA7E: , : ” . : : _ :..:• - . : - _ . • .., AADA OATEr•</p.. -OAKWOODDE4noPMENT&,•CQNSTRUbnON: oRA BPs ,,,,• N NictcfNvhifiai:er$eLr _S_-gLLC'. ' -L. k ttddNROEitfN&BAROUTBAml : w+v13-3is' . • . p�' tnaN:xandId. ugmDhit•tvaea*64F;327so:' ..2485. NW: E7� 92 N!'/Y:SANFORti. FL. ' suit t :50°• WE= f AF t, PtLcf4077?35SBAa7;t+07)6lGWGI, - _ '... tlwraota tArsEtnEMrvAo„:�anvra�3aaxs!7tza�crrss+�ta .. - - , E7c1ii`bii A ,Vacate• li)d Aiianclon_R.ight. df•Way'E §6iie it ” Ni w I?rive and.(ak'T3r ve" 0 A S dando _ • Publication Date: 05/2812020 Ad Number: Insertion Number: Size: Color Type: This E. Sheet(R) is provided as conclusive evidence that the ad appeared in The Orlando Sentinel on the date . �».._... ..� a tit c 3 O t O :w vF ! 9. 1 j _g i! R R3 iii' F R Fg IL —0 IL N9 vim 20 h I Ig 0 ax Pr Fir C3 to rl a g ' sl�id- $im °tea_° ell IN $��aaI D- ,1 IT• �h 3� fir " J Y.3 `g' =a�� O a lt I S Yi��rgyg�, S�rp7y gi`<3 $g"";;9� G >y tl'°Mq:' g a�cq_ gg a ni o a �fF�i}I SRSIRA Z w♦ad e a�.e._�sc��o a00•tRH n g Y }111 s >R-,o7oeov nr0-tao < Y am �g� �e .'� gp ocnorsigzg� $''�3 g$''� jt �$B xax•uaaa+no'>o �_ g'C'$ $...3..i 3�uu �s 8$i��si a 3 , § 4e .°,y,,. ntvm� 'o ao op m.�y.X�y a _ �yg gg33 `y� 8 g .�D Sig 1 1 .4 1 448- I. w- x^ �'� °�." ��. OA 2m. � � a O 'n e < �i�TM^aR • � � �5 ��g �. 'gi_Y �grg c�y� 000 �sttzc3 a3$ = a�iaomx m° a §3 rs S gg�uc,rs Q Oa . a o■,f°OM. Y' WIis 3� Omso S y� � 4 ,^ 8�' ^S nm pOH 15 S '� �•ue$ c�.+ . AWN. ,� _ ^-`�v-" 3 fl n $�� 3 wvc am�v^"m z v 8�n' S g c Y° _ A3. gam•$ '�C^x $' av o �^ n 3 Laws � :r q 9-w A -mm -a °^n 8 $ bA 3i�= c d 'aa ss g e fig? Rg a� A z O 5°3 g e g •+m^' m o yTa- 93 R =3# S a +� S g_� 11. z° ' 7y�aSR:t--! •'9�S'g �a m$� 8 � id8`�s• ;�m•g •"$ ' S33a• ° 7tav+tzo•afl�a`i' S i 9[8 ":3° a..YSi!.y.3°.si $ a »S. 'w•.�:S'i Td•3 rw°� m ,ry _� m°�cw°_��o,� pm�,a�°rm�?�_�'p$ #m'9c5g1i g QL�a°x,3 _tee �]ppr•�O.O @ 400>O x'^3 n 3 as$� jr% ' '. 3" 8_ ({.'7`�•p s >�.e�Msm3S O j>��;�i�d�•,'i"m(1�9 A 6 k ^ti '"tom T1 alm =O< zmr a r" �-nac, N, ca v a�#�4a-Sy Mw3�� Q� � �� 3 ys'�c�-�E�3 �� a4 ; S w-mER 8 Qn .,Sj ��c�`�w $ >��a A� ' � �em�'$ I.. 'T 'n° ►#' ' -,>� m - I � i $_ ro � $�;fl�+ a '"5^ �O ��:a�$v� °K Oa T�oS L mm�° 3 ,,Sm.$ n L 3L 3 Na �.•".�� 38 >fCga,3,�S��s� � 4§7� ��°g' ��a a �g SAm 5.�_-.g - .3• z..�. �_ B�S 8 -a ° ° EARN d. °u aa=»ima °ai'mwa° �$��to, E -MM 00 w +qq q tt j ,. $g'O M, 3 5 23 of — 2 i, -,ea _ ri in- Ms a12 t A CO)�T r9 . � 4. Cr"'s � fagla ai s5a 7�98•'l S01 Client dame: Advertiser: Seminole County Planning Offices o 10.07 Section/Page/zone: GLJV/D0041FLAm LW Description: Lake View &Oak Dr ROW Vacate 6.2 00 m page indicated. You may not create derivative works, or in any way exploit or repurpose any content. M I Or "J1 r IN�" gm i3e € S 333R �S R1 °` roc r iaD� � c s P � rr�3 g s -as 8'Ir�2-1 gS. STs L 1 19 Eli IFlp xi graa l -1 all::� t �4g 'say-p $� �g L a y ME RUN -r- n g 70 S RNO^o'.umm'�a° (n eS�ro y i°ngo Foo md Q Pig aao� a°�°� iaoacwmM , m v H 'a 0 y m 3 C 7 m 0 C Published Daily ORANGE County, Florida ta -offfmois County Of Cook Before the undersigned authority personally appeared lea= Gates who on oath says that he or she is an Advertising Representative of the ORLANDO SENTINEL, a DAILY newspaper ORLANDO SENTINEL in ORANGE County, Florida; CD published at the C— - VOF that the attached copy of advcrtisement, being a Legal Notice in the matter :K of 11150 -Public Hearing Notice, June 9, 2020 Resolution Adopted was published in said newspaper in the issues of Jun I8,2020. r— rn Affiant further says that the said ORLANDO SENTINEL is a newspaperC') -J:Y. C:) r. Published in said ORANGE County, . Florida,, and that the said newspaper � nrn has heretofore been continuously published in said ORANGE County, E5 CD � Florida, each day and has been entered as periodicals matter at the post f C= office in ORANGE County, Florida, in said ORANGE County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he or she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Jeremy Gates Signature of Affiant Name of Affiant Sworn to and subscnW before me on this 18 day of June, 2020, by above Affiant, who is personally known to me (X) or who has produced identification RECEIVED Signature of Notary Public JUN 2 2 2020 COMMISSION RECORDS Name of Notary, Typed, Printed, or Stamped Sold To: Seminole County Planning Offices - CU.Q0106427 1101 B 1st St Rm 2208 SANFORD, Fl, 32771-1468 Biro: Seminole County Planning Offices - CU00106427 1101 E 1st St Rm 2208 SANF0RD;-FL;3277I--17468 6694495 VACATING, CLOSING . . AND ABANDO,NI-NG :UNCUT PORTIONS OF THE:`PUBLIC *RIGHTS- F; KNOWN AS. LAKE V IVE passed '.dad udopWd -a' R6901utlon . lsslpniis .~,_-__ ._- -- day-of JLifie).202M = 11,01't'F(r.st Street Sanford, FL :32771 mW94S MR= tr L 1Ez11 < RR� fill If O a 101, RIN C R b^ psY31f8 °.iS35SR° a .» aac x 1 g °� y4 ¢1111 ilQb;cc D Tag 9 tj pp�'gER84%B°@ to t. gggg -M S g. • E%E ¢ iA'83 �< E. ° g�$�Y��Pabikykyg� � YI b1§13.10210X i _ eh i �,yyS� b ggg 511 952 -Nall �a m .q s�bN,11 p ytBB& dgg ��del o�a. OR E�r��ti g�A 834�� 6 o C W 3 [�►'! o ZLU� o0 � Q "m<� 05ei' o i �'b` ' a ' �,.• � � � Z Z c'o o '\jy {Q v d IL �- 0 0 0 �a dl'J� O J M fh N WLLJ 3t Ui W ri a �a c ; d g p co T" CO ll1 V C� Z W V G 45 UM Q �v 6 AIc mh no: IL Z 112p, IL 119111 11 15M Hill zw ffi M 21 c 01j: C Z _ w w Q ±x �4� d lm IiI � �� a � �� -wow 'AU -0 cpw�s SSWOH M3ZVSS SONNOW 3XV'lXV SBNMOI z SdVW.&UII.Ln OW HdVUSOIOHcl JVjtj3V Q. SdVW S11OS'Nrv-id 000i=rssn ON,.q suniru'ONINOZ 9 IL 9 L UhWAW o m jp cS3WOH'daZV39 d 30aNOY BWI lV SaNMOI S LUMNVld U31SM N Yn eIlk RRRR9gg r € a ! sw lit � Y sSiet:«�Ra�ii� a^at« 4!g 0 W o Z J k 4c co a a the � 11+,� , ]� Yt 3 # Y , i ;� �� ! �I ; •Y e3 � ' �ilf i �ilf S3V40H uazvse 3OHNOW aMV*1 JLV SSNMOI NVId ONrd33N1SN3,kt"1M`1321d g. ti ME .......... 4 Idp- — ---------"'—'---------^'^---------^ I . — — — — — — — — — — - 2!j Gig - It —u'- I I I V:j I{ ' i Si yY 4 Idp- — ---------"'—'---------^'^---------^ I . — — — — — — — — — — - 2!j Gig - It —u'- I I I V:j i Si 4 Idp- — ---------"'—'---------^'^---------^ I . — — — — — — — — — — - 2!j Gig - It —u'- I I I V:j unawn.vnai ua. V7 ® •tea aWufunS S3WOH N3Td39 e to $� tttfit €M° 3011NOW3NV1lt/S3NM01 z ® SN01103SSSOUO+S1d3ON003dVOSONV7 MCL'bft Ql I Al RaA6 ,Ntt :f +aIYJF yYxl+a%al'IM1an aabru lraYJ „la9(blr ML.Vr a'L'Ytd Y i4rl9LOtun)xra 0.^Ya$(a ttar)iN ouxcv'w�.Twt7wam*wm®axaut m oaf-ar.a?1�V81.i702iV8�8'AINIH02lAt0Y13?Tti7 �TI�!�S�fin!9N�.K _ N •axa7mo s•�ua,wran lT�n.�'7�7 !TT�T LTV �7 rr1[ atro ro :Ye ow OCNY MO�SA.a' 4OH cia'�• Q 3 [ �aoi aaava3ad a p $psg$:�L Og f�tt .Y.}`Ragy� IRP 3pgp$p 9r q Esc Eil�k8 ayp 9 8�yfi�pb a''Y13 i�p. b T 3Y Fg[E" 8 �3apg$ba� $ g3Mt. Y� 8b�j9 66�`8E$ Yh 5II-y�sp`�# BSS n k tl a pc k44s r� a� a i dk;e42s k11 E#` '1C�$ $i C�qa � of � abQ• b3 �` � p $a-iti 7 a ba4 Y a a$�• ¢�y k_.k. s ka i a. 'agb� gag- ggggg;•gYh._«ol; ISy fR7gg�. Pit; 0,111J.16 1$A"gd�i8Y25bbp`$ g 4 4: TiR ; gig „Z,�.. ya� a 2 h..g$9 by R@;y b pial aiCD:Ring.' +?� � L �aat 3 g}��$j s I� # = YR$=s 7k' YY'� XS x 3YY� s'-s� n ak " `k =�#, ii a-� a� ¢ y .✓ v] a C n i9ppk gpk 3 k$r3k.. gpyt13t = b% '- p; i gbIR �g3<Y i' ,l8lktl2 HIP $ 7 7 `a �g C @ ' $ k °q g p a g995gc pY9Y� t$§ gkA ani qg9.. s ill I ill gfill •1t Ya?� , 4 a^X p Sd..�..naap g63w;IY� L=SZD KSk G.aS '� a a{)" ilia TZ T y 7 �tY@ $4�i Y gK- .6 p,7y np Q_ tli i.p ti4'8 8(-yai g@bb��Ceg b_ 6Gg MIA E p g< C o $¢ �p $aa` Y ealpl Y 3I5��•$ �k a�E�Q��yr�pp}}tbttt'i� K S{s p i R a- Y �8�D �^ a: `a^ 7SSe�9�4 $ $ YE ;w� € HZ O'~ p a r E< a �ec 7 R+ =tlRk$4 7S $� 2 Y7 k$ §° izag q tl Sg ps 3sigsi e3k 'e( d� g§=_a: b g No Ell a O p Y 1�¢ p n$$a,YY ttY�`i8 kgs nA Yq s g $ s3_ �eBl < O N .g n - $t b' 1@15 a gum qq nay k k k SEE YH :&� kgag6a k $=k kY app n y by n of g ^Y Y kt9k kk<¢`2 a°fnenggk* Ynatl�kF �kkQQ�gg . Eac g€ q{�raY qy p� �&ra� � �g-°� � y y Ale $ o.- lb Nei � Sa '�k S 4$ g Y a Y B gg g et o ItnQSa$ap Y k# g g$g $ pa gig EMS p- ag`- a Yz ag$& a a� $#$ e8 $ E �I «nYY Tb $ ffi = Ye �3y paag ak 7 E$g g$7 8Y4c' 0.s ^$��ga 32 oil ESTE $ <" � Y & ?59s JIM 1-1 S d 6f i R YID g$ gg @YF �tE6¢t 9 y _ £ g j = a Sa 4 yd g"S 3� a FSpYp ae'$ k'gag�'I€ 3 tn :l E �AjQ"� 3yL t1 H� k5 5 y FYgg�E`7 S b W ggg 4 b Saar( P}}$E. Rg n I ttyp(k6`�Ay g¢* T$� py .. Y� i• , j: zg8$!$Aj � 6 w� ��t$ ��$YYY� a3 h �E$ Sig o Viz' Y k q9$r H �Ya g Y Y ¢ Ili, Hill Sig � Ho' 8$a2l 9a $ S $ a Ya$ YE :CR � a Rix I -pa F aYe g sE:low K S$�3�° QYS§. d�5�ii $E.4'I tl .st.am S7 a�� t t a' 9 � map $ $ * .PN soi pr •� 9 � I A A` tv� • $ $ a• q I C }.° lY� 't ` � s - 3_..._. ^ ..� - w � ' � try � �+i O m... ! I t t �s�d R�•� g I s f� I g I� s `y I g I 3 I�! 9 I� I g g � mi- P-__-CnF6-mr.�FoT:T Zw :—s•s .—'�'m'�---- f i i i i t"n �µ I ! 1 I ! � / 8 tv alma}` a��toos-- _ i Wartm li.fetlaa;r. � i , to i.$ ,C S g aVa.asvwaa+m�iauvavn r `'> s � A l�[ j:e a g g ry fo} f luaae ,.,.. �. F .r loN ambeagq%-aro.t 0 Tmr, lai? �}f 03t1W lO twrsatunlxva w)wm(m):xb]1/��V,B]1r10�1�3VH��r'!NN��I30v'l3htVO!N7lr�?T�Y'1�{ dttit'LIS•^■Xo•Y•9•1H YPerooa'lt Ret M t xap ap nrrW WA OCN MO-S'lY` OH QRZVaC1 yTTa>��,+s�vrn x aJi atro ,■oxe oar -W! 03tNd3t7d uF Y. N•y G 00 m IS W L— j a ark :sl; say ass • %bb 4:, tyi — E f= f P 3 / I ' p f All F,Z,,%1zjdL11qm, R."- • +per ry '' � • �. � a A »• uwxn xawac ap•a Cron-Fpl-pF-Ot 1 1 p Cwt MUMpM 77 • c«�= y�i.•• alp � ��4 � • � —• • W _ U z o a 0 3 A »• uwxn xawac ap•a Cron-Fpl-pF-Ot 1 1 p Cwt MUMpM �.ti b+aa� •z nn nr:e4ee2e�"ePe"'vi.�eneneni eeH'e s : � � • M• n ttq]'btW't4-Ct-U^KY / Q T v1 > OJ11'Ild 10.V 3 — M/a ,99 3Ala0 M3U a3Ai8 — — — — — 99 'Jd '0l X008 1V3d I 30Vaa3lFM31K 3XVl 6,a331OM u7 N I I I *•11 T IAi i I:qWQ I I is i a J n � 9l�� a �!� •a ? ? a ? as e Yt`7~ z ` ay n ttq]'btW't4-Ct-U^KY / Q T v1 > OJ11'Ild 10.V 3 lwmm�wl 0 Pre Cast Wal' MPicket Fence or Black Aluminum Fence Note Diagram provides Pre -Cast Wall, Picket Fence orBlack Aluminum Fence locations ao described inemail toRob Campbell, dated August 6,2O21. Townes atLake Monroe unm '------ / LOT / | { � / -_ /CI u3Tm ' | LOT � / -- ' '-- / � ' -| uOTm -- -- —'' . ! � ' 0 Pre Cast Wal' MPicket Fence or Black Aluminum Fence Note Diagram provides Pre -Cast Wall, Picket Fence orBlack Aluminum Fence locations ao described inemail toRob Campbell, dated August 6,2O21. Townes atLake Monroe RE: Townes at Lake Monroe / Approx 22 acres, Sanford Injunction Please help, My wife and I live at 410 Oak Drive, a home that was built when Sanford was celery farms. But now, uniquely, our home will border within feet on two sides by the above captioned new development. Any party providing approval for said development will be considered liable as applicable and we are enlisting your support and help in seeking an injunction against development for the following reasons: 1.) Our water line, which is legally permitted, lies adjacent in the property to be developed near the surface and is labeled by the developer as a nature walk and will likely be destroyed 2.) Heavy machinery will be immediately adjacent to our home creating a health hazard from dust, a nuisance from noise, and physical damage or personal injury from falling oak tree limbs as we share several large Live Oak trees 3.) We currently enjoy an unobstructed view of Lake Monroe which will be blocked due to the installation of a 6 ft vinyl fence per the developer thereby diminishing the view and property value 4.) Development will require the destruction of a natural habitat which includes SO+/- large Live Oak trees that should be protected 5.) Immediate access provided by Riverview Drive 'pass-thru' runs through a residential neighborhood which includes a Church, 2 school zones and a Day Care fronting the road. It can barely handle the traffic now and any new development would create a major hazard 6.) A new development within feet of our property would likely inflict excessive water retention and power problems to our property Thank you, cc: Harry Reid, Reverend Marc, Beazer Homes, County Commission, Dan and Diana Garris cph Corp, City Planning, ISA, Castello, Frank Jr/Sr, Jim Barks, Ch 6 news * Please Select one Public Hearing Item * Name Robert Campbell * Address 656 Riverview Ave. Sanford FL 32771 We ask for your phone number and email so that we may contact you if we have any questions -this is optional. Phone (407) 808-0770 Etnall rob.campbell.ert@gmall.com Briefly state issue you wish to discuss at meeting: Would like to present a short ppt presentation at the meeting on 10/7 at 1000 regarding the "Townes at Monroe° development on Seminole blvd. Page ( i W N N CSS b.A �JJ 4? ) / W '0 e OC ,F r,� ,;. �, -�a a � a al r+ M � �:�; '� � c� �g> a: v� Y � � � f r'f '� b I. i �� m; i �� ti itei t�� .4e,}� ��3�F � � ` x� w ¢ q '.Xp C � � 4 `� ti 1 �� z� x � t. � t �-'� � �..� ; 'Kr''�r `� 7'r a % R � i'^ L` sky � '� sf�°,y� ..M � � �4 Y � .Ss. i'i4 ..� 3 �� `� +t s % �� `34� s �,, 11 � ,�� °` Y ," , { � � �� . � �� r h � {�� ,,�� s � � x "" �z ' � '�� ,� � � �. Y S^� V) 0 S� IL 4-J �J 0 a PARCEL 2519-30300A040-0000 LEO C. THERANIER REVOCABLE TRUST 286 CLUBHOUSE BOULEVARD NEW SMYRNA BEACH, FL 321684910 ATTN: CAROL T. CASTELLO PARCEL 23-1930-501-0000-0140 TRIPLE B ACQUISITIONS, LLC 120 STONE POST ROAD LONGWOOD, FL 32779-2745 LAND PLANNER CRH, INC. 1117 EAST ROBINSON STREET ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32801 ATTN : JAVIER E. OMANA, CNU-3 EMAIL: JOMANA@CPHCORP.COM PHONE: (407) 4250452 FAX :(407)A-1036 CIVIL ENGINEER CPH, INC. 500 WEST FULTON STREET SANFQRD, FLORIDA 32771 ATTN: JEREMY OW ENS, P.E. EMAIL: JOWENS@CPHCORP.COM PHONE: (407) 322-6841 FAX: (401) 330-0639 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT CPH, INC. 500 WEST FULTON STREET SANFORD, FLORIDA 32771 AIiN: MAX SPANN. P.L.A. EMAIL: MSPANN@CPHCORP.COM PHONE: (407) 322-6- FAX:(407)3300639 ARCHITECT JEFFREY DeMURE+ASSOCIATE'S 5905 GRANITE TAKE DRIVE, # 140 GRANITE BAY. CALIFORNIA 95746 ATTN: CHELSEA RICHARDSON EMAIL: CRICHARDSON@JDARCH,COM PHONE:(906) 7833700 Tc)w ses at LaLe Monroe City of Sanford, Florida APPLICANT/ AUTHORIZED AGENT BEAZER HOMES 151 SOUTH HALL LANE, SUITE 200 MAITLAND, FL 32751 ATTR MATT WANZECK EMAIL: MATTHEW. WANZECK@BEAZER COM PHONE: (407) 4460276 SURVEYOR NIETO-WHITTAKER SURVEYING, LLC 1728 NORTH RONALD REAGAN BLVD. LONGWOOD, FL 32750 ATTN: RALPH A. NIETO. PSM EMAIL: RALPH@NIETOWHITTAKERSURVEYING.COM PHONE: (407) 636-8460 TRAFFIC/ YRN—S-PPZIRTATION ENGINEER TRAFFIC & MOBILITY CONSULTANTS 3101 MAGUIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 265 ORLANDO, FL 32803 ATTN: AYMAN H. AS-SAIDI, P.E. EMAIL: AHA@TRAFFICMOBILITY.COM PHONE: (407) 531-5332 BIOTECH CONSULTING, INC. 3025 EAST SOUTH STREET ORLANDO, FL 32803 ATTN: MARK PUSLEY EMAIL: MARK@BIO TECHCONSULTING.COM PHONE: (497) 894-5969 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT REZONE MASTER PLAN 2485 W. SEMINOLE BOULEVARD Parcel ID No.: 23-19-30-300-0040-0000 23-19-30-501-0000-0140 June, 2021 u ._Haut Fl_ a;la Subject Site rr_ V �S. 6. VICINITY MAP PROJECT DESCRIPTION THE SUBJECT SITE IS APPROXIMATELY 21,56± ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SEMINOLE BOULEVARD AND WEST OF OAK DRIVE, THE CURRENT ZONING IS-� AGRICULTURE. C-1: RETAIL COMMERCIAL AND RI -A: SINGLE FAMILY (SEMINOLE COUNTY). THE CURRENT THE FUTURE LAND USE IS SE: SUBURBAN ESTATES. COM: COMMERCIAL AND -DR: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (SEMINOLE COUNTY). ON JUNE 15 & 16, 2021 ANNEXATION AND FUTURE LAND USE AMENDMENT APPLICATIONS WERE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF SANFORD, LEGAL DESCRIPTION iT 1/1 a' s[cnox R], iow 1 tx swix. wrvct ]o arsi (stwoi9/soo)Fsfu xa[ eW�Evwnno i¢.aT'niE n o o[PnaluFxiSmix[saoRi�nou T� wnv GST, Huixp.E text, rtoa_ P_ uppE^VM_Ly DES K.A Al i.1— RaICE 30 - COVER SHEET P-2 ZONING,FLU, FLOOD PLAIN, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH, SOILS AND UTILITY MAPS P-3 MASTER PLAN P-4 PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLAN P-5 LANDSCAPE CONCEPTS *CROSS SECTIONS P 6 ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPTS P-7 CONCEPT AMENITY DETAILS S-1 BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY o13) $2 BOUNDARY ANO TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (2 of 3) S1 BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY (A of 3) P-1 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH FUTURE LAND USE MAP (Seminole County) N, - FLOOD ZONE MAP ZONING MAP (Seminole County) .,T,. SOILS MAP UTILITY MAP U) .g . :2 z 0 0 0 2i W 0 0 z 2i - � < YO 7 < T < F- w < � w w Z 0 w <� F-, z 0 3: W T 0 (L < W Z 0 N Sheet No. P-2 A o fio f21 V+XEMONROE $CAL1711 O\`\ ATED ACCESG � � PROJECT BOUNDARY psIGNAGE '�' AMFNIttAREA B � �. LANE MONROE ®v/ �OTxz _=sE E,U„M S POSED ZON UG', EX STING FUTUPE' LAND USE: POSED PERn ZA. USE: gDAWo to (sEMMO EaCOUNtt) � PO(C"oF FACTOR.) OR (SEMINOLE COU—) INGLE FAMILY ESIDENTTAL HOMES ITOWNNOMES) ANO THEIR CUSTOMARY ACCESSORY USES DENSITY AULOWED, E2E. IGNT "PROVIDE DUFF o ; � � S IRAN I Im i� i tots .1 NO R.Tn I ime STREET . o REAR YARD .. tO FT LOTS „DFT 1-11 SANE VIEW TERFRAC ) .... tO FT LOTSTR t AND (tA VI M ...1— j � was I _ k I p i I i ! D UryNAMIGS 11T.- i I RD (EANFORD) ONINA AG(EANFDRD) p E Y _=sE E,U„M S POSED ZON UG', EX STING FUTUPE' LAND USE: POSED PERn ZA. USE: gDAWo to (sEMMO EaCOUNtt) � PO(C"oF FACTOR.) OR (SEMINOLE COU—) INGLE FAMILY ESIDENTTAL HOMES ITOWNNOMES) ANO THEIR CUSTOMARY ACCESSORY USES DENSITY AULOWED, E2E. IGNT "PROVIDE UNTSPERACRE I" U111 GENAS (INTERIIOR UNIT)/ 52t END UNIT) ATH=FEDERAL FLOOD INFORMATION. vIOED. -EG .I.G—ER EMERGENCY MANAGEMENTAGFNG1 FLOOD RATE INGURANCE MAP PANEL NO. 11, 110-1 HAVING A REVISION DATE 01 SEPTEUDER 28.200T TIE PROPEOFY LIES IN UNGRADED GONE - AN AREA DETERUIRE1 To 'E OUTSIDE ELF -11 OF E0F1 THE — ANN— CHANCE 1 511111 — 'I All IGIE -AE' HAVING A RACE FLOOD EFT PACES PEP UNR(GARAGE AND DIYNEWAYCOUNiAS 2 PARNNGSPACES) PWEOVERFLOW PARKING E TO DE SDOMITTED WITH CONSTRUCTION PIANS TIE 'RopoSE, STORM -1 FUNDS GE DESIGNED 10 MEET THE ST, JOHNS R V R —TER —AGSUINN RIATUR DISTRICT AND CITY OF 1AN101D GET C111 'No' AND WILL SE THOUGH E.TU SJRWMD AND— of SANFORD, THEFPONDSWEI E "SIGNED TO 1-111E THEEEVOSiDISCHARGE FUR THE STREET . o REAR YARD .. tO FT LOTS „DFT 1-11 SANE VIEW TERFRAC ) .... tO FT LOTSTR t AND (tA VI M ...1— TOWNHOME LOT DETAIL 1..11 V1 oEE Mrx11naan,xs1.-V wM.EV, N—¢g ` �oraA.,,,�nPM„a>�� ua�as.s,r., ��an�nsro��,.ernaE..xwnwu,�,«ou�aE�EPMA,Ea�,o�x�PraM,.. nwE,.r.r,o Nao,ro,axzoxr.w. aes.oaEova.oa,ououor oV�,o�xo vvaM�,. en„rn,nes.:,+""a` Graphic Scale In Feet zov.rvnn,.n RIVERVIEWAVE. AT NARCISSUS AVE. TAP 1 1 [ I E`E 1 i �g I CENTF,AL POND 1 (tl G1I 1 a I' 16,786, SC SF 1.85 AC -FT -FT 1 s anex I I I 1 0 1 ,- I E I 1 z I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I I I I j 1 1 1 I I I I( 18 18 6 14 12 o _ to 10 8 8 2 o 6 mm� eV I 2 o -6 scAIEI 1. 8'VERT SECTION'A' -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I I I” bx I I I I I I I M I I I I I I I I I J L�Ij - L iI _ L_ I I z � iv SCALso .0o zoo Q ` E. 1° 100' LE V< \ une Monaos .....cess B sem: aA. aoNao. B� �;;�,A\ wn.coc0awsc. � � e —, E Tsar Po.. eo.o � .. G] A PASSIVE & ACTIVE SPACE KEY MAP FENCE .o„ * A-11Aa... 6—YL FENCE ,a9 . zo.Uc a,A oA cAwAcerrt To, *, ,UI—R1_1',SallU_'S.On. CROSS SECTION A -A' `O1 ,s co„0P �xn retic. T— A' 11AN-115 FC CROSS SECTION B -B' , *IMAM SEMINOLE BOULEVARD LANDSCAPE BUFFER SEMINOLE BOULEVARD LANDSCAPE BUFFER 7t Y TYPICAL BUILDING ELEVATIONS TYPICAL BUILDING CLUSTER END UNIT PERSPECTIVE TYPICAL BUILDING CLUSTER FRONT PERSPECTIVE -1- TYPICAL BUILDING CLUSTER FRONT ELEVATION -1-1 TYPICAL POOL CABANA I RESTROOMS TYPICAL POOL & CABANA AREA -1-- TYPICAL AMENITY BENCH -1-- TYPICAL WATER FOUNTAIN TYPICAL MAIL BOX CENTER C � t16.z'Roor 55 2'4"E 022' (M) oosfi44 Rio <\ \ 60ry �O qd rse F LOT 19 IL n ev' I �Ol wETLPARCEL "2 al ANO AREA a LOT 20 '0 VACANT 61 , a >o so moo- -,' to x�e lOT J ° 31 t W-�tiRPCE LOT 21 G. 6E a LOT 22 i LOT 16 Io 0 69 E -vE 6 I 55 0 x'^� f a 'W 805329{M(Y LOT 15 LOT I. .� LOT IA LOT 25 e, 1 noi0xa2o I f4:. POINT 0 _ x OAK NEW DRIVE ulm BEGINNING 9''�_e - «.0 <w.w a.x ns, 66' R a�« /W �" x."ax..a. ..� -- €15a'� s IR-I"S8" z . z D LOT , 25'1.66' 4O) - ..G 32" E N x v 9 LOT 12 PARCEL 1 W I se9'srza"w ss.ez•(, .. _.._. ... 155 a0'(pS � I n r VACANT R N LOT n m WOODED >.a<ft to a LOT To i z Sm a PnNU AREA LOi 9 E YlOOCEO � I I LOT 8- ` u _ o a LOT I LOT 6 oUG zoo LOT s I CRAPRIC SCALE t"=.100' I I I I I I ` [Ip POINT OF BEG NENNC PEANRCEPRCEL 2 m �'IWEST 11,00' (1) •••• •"" N 89'45'53" V R/w x01 OPEN ,� TIS soft v„v w SITE ALI 11 1111 `4 Ill Tl I I IGG 11.11ITILI IAS .01 11111 -11 — 1111t IC1 D .1 11 1111.1- 1 nuEs. ovfau pMaa xwlusES eE'rwEEu PutcEt , nu° r,.vcEl ]. III ALTA/NSPS LAND "TITLE BOUNDARY SURVEY AND TOPOGRAPHIC x SURVEY LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS & 1211211 nwo v1 *.vt sono acx, or wnr 1 Ll 6 6w[Evn oEEsS axo ”` IC seN ax[. rwa oA. x areAl afeoaoI aon. ne PAnf ,m, Poxxc aceenos or NIH IASI III— Il IAII si is-<wIII soolar<u°x"ocwxff lI oo' E�:.` o aE�R ;o 0A% "I'LL 11" 11111 .11 ALIIS IIIC 1.11�IIN E soumwEST / sfcxox 1', 7owx1xc,5 xutx SANT.[ Je SHEETI OF N07' VALID WITHOUT SHEETS 2 & 3 SHEET I- BOUNDARY INFORMATION SI IEET 2 - TOPOGRAPIC INFORMATION SHEET 3 - T'OPOGRAPIC INFORMATION 1.1 sumer ut rzCI 11 1 111 IN- SILL—I) mrusu to 1-1 c BE rvfc[ssnav To Lout[ I'll nctxnl rwnl -11.11 or 111 f, , 1I.t[ _ r c 1 ': S ,� .. 26 owxErts,P nr rexas a<oxo r6oP_ Lx xoT to eE I.Ertxxfo G, txs armxo coxsuu xc xc. Trus [. sootx STrtEn on,Axc6 fL saeo° ,Or ov< svis�sE+ H MM L TS IS I Si 5'�. -I,i'a+.; xo oI—xcn -IS —1 IS '-Inx T Jnr ofrxxc a ux[ e[o ww. a65[av[o ou Tr[ °ar snE_ A SA, A.xECWEafo ,noxuu[xTae nx wx xF. - _ os2 Fri WiC 20 / uIll 641 111F 011 U-6 x�r of 11 [ =4 ti 66'€ i� jj 3 [ T 53 5r iIn[auu L t try nu. _,,CC To xE roMwuaus w a a t. x oa oTr Eus, w< e11 r s us[o As9as5 1C =lLATE m5 SUnvfv rzs xaxttuetoxs 11 wntu+o Duns. �P or ix.11 _LA x6w trws e[T"E wun xiox wntEx urvf ou wnwri un 811 ILAW, xin[o 1, 1., suavttoa, info wr AITox snE u+o xor LACj,C Al mE ont or nns wxr[v_ uuP/oR,wxc snowx nfx°[ax s to BN sPuv[o nt n x a o a Pa cT o,s unnt. Evorn rxwTs 5 i/wur uifarztx[[icnc[LorrovEf oaAw nnnns owE�� x0 e 10 o -A•— s„m t Paoo[a.. cwnn xs x,.ea ,.cats _ oo EL[.aT ox or e t[[t. c, ana n.uoox,a +. .raofo 1111 Al or is Prt'ono c/I. of °%w IIAL Ery nrc. ttoo s. PNMT Opa EG NNNG PMN CE CEL 2 G SREE — .._. �c PER OE COMMENCEMENT ��T� P,.•no..E oAI .w..E o,0axl1 oEo. ALTA/NSPS LAND "TITLE BOUNDARY SURVEY AND TOPOGRAPHIC x SURVEY LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS & 1211211 nwo v1 *.vt sono acx, or wnr 1 Ll 6 6w[Evn oEEsS axo ”` IC seN ax[. rwa oA. x areAl afeoaoI aon. ne PAnf ,m, Poxxc aceenos or NIH IASI III— Il IAII si is-<wIII soolar<u°x"ocwxff lI oo' E�:.` o aE�R ;o 0A% "I'LL 11" 11111 .11 ALIIS IIIC 1.11�IIN E soumwEST / sfcxox 1', 7owx1xc,5 xutx SANT.[ Je SHEETI OF N07' VALID WITHOUT SHEETS 2 & 3 SHEET I- BOUNDARY INFORMATION SI IEET 2 - TOPOGRAPIC INFORMATION SHEET 3 - T'OPOGRAPIC INFORMATION u BOUNDARYSURVEY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY vip so so i5 c O SHEET 30T3 ,., VALID WITHOU 1. SHEETS I&2 " SHEET -1NF 1UNDARYIoR—I.N 'S 'T _ HFI, - lOPOGRAPICINloR.AUoN LIFET3 _ I DPOGRAPIC INFORMATION 6 -97C -E- S LEGEND AND ABBREKAWNS W 8 1-2 wl NO VERTICAL DATA IN THIS AREA COLLECTED WI -24 � oh� 0ff1 9 PARCELh.. EL 20 20 PAL WETLAND AREA WOODED � ut" % ele LOT 11 ha L wl 161 OT 16 15 LOT 22 7 wi- GT. LOT 15 vy. 13 w -12 L LOT '�O. T LOT 23 'LOT 2 Loa . ......... otio _ _ST- wl lo// �_ �` BOUNDARY SURVEY AND U N TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY �g 1� 41- 11 ....................... L. -Sig -d ly z BBE80.55d9]GJ41 E... SHEET 2 OF 3 NOT VALID WITHOUT SHEET'S I & 3 SHEETI -BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHEET2. I"OPOGRAPIC INFORMATION SHEET 3 - TOPOGRAPIC INFORMATION CITY OF WS RM X i SkNFORD FLORIDA Item No."� CITY COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 21.241 NOVEMBER 8, 2021 AGENDA TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission PREPARED BY: Eileen Hinson, AICP — Planner Manager SUBMITTED BY: Norton N. Bonaparte, Jr., City Manager SUBJECT: Application to Rezone approximately 21.56 acres from Seminole County's R -IA, Single Family Residential, A-1, Agriculture and C-1, Retail Commercial Commodities to City of Sanford PD, Planned Development for the Townes at Lake Monroe at project address 2485 W Seminole Boulevard. THIS IS A QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTER AND, AS SUCH, REQUIRES DISCLOSURE OF ALL EX -PARTE COMMUNICATIONS, INVESTIGATIONS, SITE VISITS AND EXPERT OPINIONS REGARDING THIS MATTER. STRATEGIC PRIORITIES: ❑ Unify Downtown & the Waterfront ❑ Promote the City's Distinct Culture ❑ Update Regulatory Framework ❑ Redevelop and Revitalize Disadvantaged Communities SYNOPSIS: A request to change the zoning of approximately 21.56 acres from. Seminole County's R -IA, Single Family Residential, A-1, Agriculture and C-1, Retail Commercial Commodities to City of Sanford PD, Planned Development for the Townes at Lake Monroe at project address 2485 W. Seminole Boulevard has been received, F'ISCALISTAFFING STATEMENT: According to the Property Appraiser's records, the two properties are vacant, with an assessed tax value and total tax bill for 2020 shown below: Parcel Number Assessed Value (2020) Tax Bill (2020) Property Status 23-19-30-300-0040-0000 $199,823 $2,780 Vacant Waterfront 23-19-30-501-0000-0140 $470,274 $6,543 Vacant — Commercial If the amendment is approved and subsequently developed, the property will continue to be assessed the City's millage rate for the proposed use. No additional staffing anticipated if the amendment is approved. -• r The 21.56 -acre property is located on the southwest side of East Seminole Boulevard and Oak Avenue just south of Lake Monroe. The property owners are Triple B Acquisitions, LLC and Leo C Trepanier Revocable Trust. The applicant is Javier Omana with CPH, Inc. who was responsible for completing the Citizens Awareness and Participation Plan (CAPP) requirements of the City's LDRs. The Affidavit of Ownership and Designation of Agent forms are attached and other information is available in order to ensure that all potential conflicts of interests are capable of being discerned. The property is currently assigned the R -IA, Single Family Residential, A-1, Agriculture, C-1, Retail Commercial Commodities zoning classification/district under the Seminole County's Land Development Code (LDCs) with the underlying future land use designations of SE, Suburban Estates; COM, Commercial and LDR, Low Density Residential under the County's Comprehensive Plan. The applicant has submitted a petition for annexation to bring the property into the City of Sanford in order to receive City services. Upon annexation, the site will maintain its current land uses as assigned by Seminole County, until an amendment is processed to incorporate the property into the City's Comprehensive Plan. In addition to the annexation and in conjunction with this rezone, the applicant has submitted a request to amend the Comprehensive Plan from Seminole County's land use classifications of SE, Suburban Estates; COM, Commercial and LDR, Low Density Residential Future Land use to the City of Sanford's WDBD, Waterfront Downtown Business District. The property is not located within any of the overlay zoning districts associated with the downtown and riverfront; however, it is located within Sub Area 9 of the 2015 City of Sanford/Seminole County Joint Planning Agreement. Sub Area 9 dictates that all parcels between the railroad and US 17-92 from Mellonville Avenue to 1-4 will be assigned the Future Land Use designation of WDBD, Waterfront Downtown Business District as they are annexed into the City. As outlined in the City's Comprehensive Plan, the WDBD is designed to provide centralized residential, governmental, cultural, institutional, and general commercial activities within the downtown and waterfront urban area, while preserving the City's historic character and cultural heritage through context -sensitive design. The designation provides a planning and management framework for promoting the revitalization, development and redevelopment of the historic downtown commercial area. The purpose of the WDBD is to: • Generate a revitalization effort that attracts private sector investment and strengthens the City's economy; • Establish the district as a Regional center; • Strengthen public/private partnerships; • Enhance the livability of North Seminole County by encouraging improved residential, retail, educational, cultural and entertainment opportunities; and • Provide the framework for redevelopment and infill. The applicant has submitted a request to rezone the property from Seminole County's R- I A, Single Family Residential, A-1, Agriculture, C-1, Retail Commercial Commodities zoning classification/di strict to a City of Sanford PD, Planned Development to establish a proposed 04 - unit single Family attached, residential development. A rezoning of the property to PD to establish the proposed attached Single Family Residential use (townhomes) as specified on the Townes at Lake Monroe PD Master Plan provides the improved residential component to enhance the livability of North Seminole County in accordance with the requirements of the WDBD future land use designation and is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan in that regard. The consistency review of the request with the goals, objective and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan predominantly assesses whether the request is consistent with the intended designation, discourages urban sprawl, creates neutral or minimal concurrency impacts and has minimal impacts to natural systems. Policy 1. IL 2 of the Future Land Use Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan: The City shall apply performance criteria objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan to developments and all new development shall comply with the following criteria, all of which shall be implemented through mandatory site plan review of new development: 0 Parking Provisions: New development within the WDBD shall be served by adequate parking resources. New development shall provide off-street parking sufficient to serve each proposed new development either on site or through the provision of a shared parking agreement. • Urban Design Amenities: Proposed new development shall provide a higher level of urban design amenities including landscaping, compatible signage, and pedestrian linkages together with a broader mix of land uses attractive to potential users of the downtown area. 0Mix of Land Uses: Achieve a higher level of urban design amenities together with a broader mix of land uses attractive to potential users of the downtown and waterfront area. As the project is proposed as Townhomes, each lot will provide parking in the form of garages and tandem driveways. In addition, the area adjacent to the amenity area is proposed with additional parking for guests and overflow parking in addition to parking for those utilizing the amenity space. The townhome use is an appropriate transitional use, meeting the requirements of the higher density and more urban form, while maintaining the single-family element that surrounds the property on the east and the south. Policy FLU 1. IL 3 of the Future Land Use Element of the City's Comprehensive Plan: The City shall establish aesthetic cohesiveness in the City's Lake Monroe Waterfront Corridor and Historic Downtown District through an architectural design program. The City shall continue to enforce the City's LDRs to enhance the identity design, and vitality of the Lake Monroe waterfront commercial area and the Commercial Historic District. The Lake Monroe Waterfront Corridor and Historic Commercial District shall continue to be part of an architectural design program that shall be coordinated closely with the public and private special interest groups concerned with promoting the central traditional neighborhood. The Master Plan as shown minimizes impacts to wetland and flood areas as well as proposes a creative architectural element to the townhomes proposed. Given the urban character encouraged within the WDBD and while considering the impacts to the neighboring subdivision and the environs that surround the site, staff finds the proposed attached single family development and associated master plan to be consistent with the criteria noted above, previous approvals and the goals, objectives and policies set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan. A Citizens Awareness and Participation Plan (CAPP) was held on Tuesday, July 27, 2021, from 6:30 to 8:30 PM. A total of 76 invitations were mailed out including all the owners of properties within 500 feet of the subject parcels. A CAPP report is attached. In addition, the applicant has proposed modifications to the master plan based on the feedback received from adjacent neighbors and has provided revised concepts to the plan associated with that input, which are included as an attachment to this report. In addition, additional attachments include submittals from nearby property owners including emails and a PowerPoint presentation that was mailed in and later presented at the P&Z. The presentation given to the P&Z included a few additional slides; however, the packet contains that which was provided to the P&Z. The item was presented for consideration to the Planning and Zoning Commission on October 7, 2021. Lengthy testimony was given by the adjacent neighbors and other interested parties as well as a presentation by the applicant Javier Omana. After hearing the testimony and presentations, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended the City Commission approve the request to Rezone approximately 21.56 acres from Seminole County's R -1 A, Single Family Residential, A- 1, Agriculture and C-1, Retail Commercial Commodities to City of Sanford PD, Planned Development for the Townes at Lake Monroe at project address 2485 W Seminole Boulevard subject to a Development Order containing all recommendations of staff and the following additional condition: The action was by a vote of 6 to 1, Dominick Fiorentino dissenting, citing Future Land Use Policy 1.11.2, stating the development does not provide for a mix of land uses needed along Lake Monroe. LEGAL REVIEW: The City Attorney has not reviewed the staff report and the specific analysis provided by City staff, but has noted the following: Section 166.033, Florida Statutes, provides as follows (please note emphasized text): "(1) When reviewing an application for a development permit that is certified by a professional listed in s. 403.0877, a municipality may not request additional information from the applicant more than three times, unless the applicant waives the limitation in writing. Before a third request for additional information, the applicant must be offered a meeting to attempt to resolve outstanding issues. Except as provided in subsection (4), if the applicant believes the request for additional information is not authorized by ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority, the municipality, at the applicant's request, shall proceed to process the application for approval or denial. (2) When a municipality denies an application for a development permit, the municipality shall give written notice to the applicant. The notice must include a citation to the applicable portions of an ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority for the denial of the permit. (3) As used in this section, the term "development permit" has the same meaning as in s. 163.3164, but does not include building permits. (4) For any development permit application filed with the municipality after July 1, 2012, a municipality may not require as a condition of processing or issuing a development permit that an applicant obtain a permit or approval from any state or federal agency unless the agency has issued a final agency action that denies the federal or state permit before the municipal action on the local development permit. (5) Issuance of a development permit by a municipality does not in any way create any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the municipality for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. A municipality shall attach such a disclaimer to the issuance of development permits and shall include a permit condition that all other applicable state or federal permits be obtained before commencement of the development. (6) This section does not prohibit a municipality from providing information to an applicant regarding what other state or federal permits may apply." The above -referenced definition of the term "development permit" is as follows: "(16) 'Development permit' includes any building permit, zoning permit, subdivision approval, rezoning, certification, special exception, variance, or any other official action of local government having the effect of permitting the development of land." (Section 163.3164(16), Florida Statutes). Thus, if this application is denied, a denial development order must be issued which must cite to the applicable portions of each ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority supporting the denial of the application. For example, if a goal, objective or policy of the Sanford Comprehensive Plan were to be the basis for a denial, then such goal, objective or policy must be part of the motion proposing the denial. A denial development order would be drafted to implement the actions of the Planning and Zoning Commission in the event of such occurrence. Accordingly, any motion to deny must state, with particularity, the basis for the proposed denial. The term "development order" is defined as follows and, as can be seen, refers to the "granting, denying, or granting with conditions [ofl an application": "(15) 'Development order' means any order granting, denying, or granting with conditions an application for a development permit." (Section 163.3164(15), Florida Statutes). The City Commission approved the first reading of Ordinance No. 4637 on October 25, 2021, with modifications to be considered on second reading as follows: 1. The applicant shall remove the sidewalk/trail along the east to limit the removal of the existing trees and reduce the impervious in the natural buffer. 2. Staff shall work with the applicant to add additional trees to fill in any gaps in the existing buffer created by the installation of the fence. 3. That the separation between townhomes be increased to 25 feet not 20 feet as requested in the waivers for the project. The City Clerk published notice of the 2°a Public Hearing in the Sanford Herald on October 31, 2021. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommend the City Commission adopt an ordinance rezoning approximately 21.56 acres from Seminole County's R -IA, Single Family Residential, A- 1, Agriculture and C-1, Retail Commercial Commodities to City of Sanford PD, Planned Development for the Townes at Lake Monroe, a proposed 104 unit attached single family townhome development at project address 2485 W. Seminole Boulevard based on consistency with the goals, objectives and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan, subject to annexation and land use amendment, and subject a development order containing the following conditions as recommended by staff- 1 . Pursuant to Section 4.3.G of the City's LDRs, this rezoning shall expire 3 years from the effective date of this Ordinance if not all improvements have been completed or an extension granted. 2. All development shall be consistent with the Townes at Lake Monroe PD Master Plan, revision dated July 20, 2021, unless otherwise specifically set forth in any associated development order; provided, however, that all subsequent development orders shall be consistent with the provisions of this Ordinance. 3. Unless specifically requested and approved on the referenced PD Master Plan, any required elements missing from or not shown on the PD Master Plan shall comply with the City's LDRs. 4. The final design and location of all driveways and access points including, but not limited to, cross access locations, shall be proposed within and shall be subject to City approval during, the development plan review and approval process. 5. A decorative and functional fountain shall be installed in all wet retention ponds as part of development approval which approval shall provide for ongoing maintenance requirements and responsibilities upon the appropriate party, but not the City. 6. A dog walk area with waste collection receptacles shall be provided as determined by the City for use by residents of the development. 7. A comprehensive signage program meeting the standards of the City's LDRs, shall be required for the entire development including, but not limited to, the commercial and multiple family residential uses. 8. Unless specifically requested and approved on the Townes at Lake Monroe PD Master Plan or the associated PD Development Order, all development shall comply with: a. Lighting and pedestrian amenities shall be included to improve the overall image of the pedestrian network. b. A comprehensive landscape design, including landscape and hardscape elements shall be provided to complement the existing Riverwalk improvements. The comprehensive landscape design shall incorporate landscape/hardscape elements to screen any mechanical equipment/ appurtenances from the public right of way. 9. A preliminary subdivision plan and subdivision improvement plan shall be submitted, subject to approval by the City with all construction activity being subject to approval by the City, and a subsequent subdivision plat being reviewed, approved, and recorded, in any certificates of occupancy. 10. The Owner shall install a minimum of 5 -foot wide sidewalks on both sides of the streets. 11. A School Capacity Availability Letter of Determination letter shall be required from the Seminole County School District prior to the recording of the final plat. 12. If City staff and the property owner are unable to agree to the details of this Development Order in any way, the matter will be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission for resolution at a public hearing, and the matter will be adjudicated by means of a development order or denial development order relating thereto. And the following additional conditions as added at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting: 13. A new traffic study shall be accomplished at the time of Engineering Review of the project based on the timing of the original study not accurately reflecting traffic counts. In agreeing to the above conditions, the property owner will agree that, in accordance with the provisions of Section 70.45, Florida Statutes, pertaining to governmental exactions, the City has not imposed any prohibited exaction. The term "prohibited exaction" is defined by that statue to mean ". . . any condition imposed by a governmental entity on a property owner's proposed use of real property that lacks an essential nexus to a legitimate public purpose and is not roughly proportionate to the impacts of the proposed use that the governmental entity seeks to avoid, minimize, or mitigate." SUGGESTED MOTION: "I move (approve/deny/approve with conditions) to adopt Ordinance No. 4637." Attachments: 0). Project Information Sheet. (2). Site Zoning Map. (3). Site Aerial Map. (4). Citizen Awareness and Participation Plan Report (5). Large Scale Future Land Use Amendment dated June 15, 2021 o Table of Contents / Figures/Appendices o Property Owners / Applicant -Authorized Agent / Consultants o Project Overview ■ Location Map ■ Aerial Photograph ■ Existing Future Land Use Map (Seminole County) ■ Existing Zoning Map (Seminole County) ■ Future Land Use Map (City of Sanford) ■ Zoning Map (City of Sanford) o Demonstrate Compatibility with Adjacent Land Uses o Demonstrate the Changes in Character to the Surrounding Area o Demonstrate the Support and Furthering of City Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies o Policies of the East Central Florida Strategic Regional Policy Plan o Facility Capacity Impact Assessments o School Board Assessment o Transportation Assessment o Conclusion o Appendices A. Property Appraiser's Property Card Printouts B. Affidavit of Ownership & Designation of Agent Forms C. Boundary & Topographic Survey D. Legal Description E. School Impact Analysis F. Traffic Impact Analysis G. Environmental Assessment Report H. Resolution No. 2020-R-70 Vacation of Public Right -Of -Way (11). Reduced copy of the Townes at Lake Monroe PD Master Plan, Revised July 20, 2021. (12). Email from Mr. Rob Campbell (13). Revised Amenity Exhibit per neighbor Input (12). Letters from Dan and Diana Garris containing concerns about the development (13). Email to the City from Mr. Rob Campbell and PowerPoint slides proposed for presentation (14). 11 x 17 Copy of the Townes at Lake Monroe PD Master Plan, Revised July 20, 2021. (15). Ordinance No. 4637 T:\Development Review\03-Land Development\2021\2485 W. Seminole Blvd\Rezone\CC\CC Memo - 2485 W Seminole Blvd - PDRZ.docx PROJECT INFORMATION — 2485 W. SEMINOLE BOULEVARD PD REZONE Proposed Use Project Address: Current County Zoning: Equivalent City Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Existing Land Use: Tax Parcel Numbers: Site Area: Property Owners Applicant/Agent: Rezone approximately 21.56 acres from Seminole County's R -IA, Single Family Residential, A-1, Agriculture and C-1, Retail Commercial Commodities to City of Sanford PD, Planned Development for the Townes at Lake Monroe Single Family Attached – Townhomes 2485 W. Seminole Boulevard R -IA, Single Family Residential, A-1, Agriculture, C-1, Retail Commercial Commodities SR -IA, Single Family Residential, AG, Agriculture, RC -I, Restricted Commercial PD, Planned Development Vacant 23-19-30-501-0000-0140 and 23-19-30-300-0040-0000 21.56 acres Triple B Acquistitions LLC 120 Stone Post Road Longwood, FL 32779-2745 Javier Omana - CPH, Inc. 1117 E. Robinson Street Orlando, FL 32801 Trepanier Leo C Rev Trust C/O Castello, Carol T 286 Club House Blvd New Smyrna, FL 32168-7910 Phone: (407) 425-0452 Email: jomana@cphcorp.coi-n CAPP Meeting: A CAPP meeting was held on July 9, 2021. A copy of the report is attached. ZoninE Future Land Use Current Use North N/A N/A Lake Monroe South R -IA (County) LDR Single Family Residential AG (City) East R -IA LDR Single Family Residential West A -I PUBC Conservation/Vacant COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE REVIEW Planning staff has reviewed the request and has determined the use and proposed improvements to be consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Current Future Land Use Proposed Future Land Use IND, Industrial 1, Industrial TADevelopment Review\03-Land Devclopnieilt\2021\3851 E Lake Mary Blvd\Rezone\PZC\Project Info - 3851 E Lake Mary Blvd - Rezone.doc