The URL can be used to link to this page

4644 Amend the PD Zoning 23.54 acres - 1751 Rinehart RoadWS RM CITY OF Item No. Sk�4FORD FLORIDA CITY COMMISSION MEMORANDUM 21- 267 DECEMBER 13, 2021 AGENDA To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Commission PREPARED BY: Eileen Hinson, Acting Planning Director SUBMITTED BY: Norton N. Bonaparte, Jr., City Manager SUBJECT: Amend the Planned Development zoning of approximately 23.54 acres to modify land use design standards for a portion of the Paulucci PD, and establish the Carter Acquisitions PD, a proposed 320 -unit multiple family residential development, including a single commercial outparcel at 1751 Rinehart Road. THIS IS A QUASI-JUDICIAL MATTER AND, AS SUCH, REQUIRES DiscLosuRE OF ALL EX -PARTE COMMUNICATIONS, INVESTIGATIONS, SITE VISITS AND EXPERT OPINIONS REGARDING THIS MATrER, STRATEGIC PRIORITIES: ❑ Unify Downtown & the Waterfront ❑ Promote the City's Distinct Culture ❑ Update Regulatory Framework ❑ Redevelop and Revitalize Disadvantaged Communities SYNOPSIS: A request to amend the Planned Development zoning of approximately 23.54 acres to modify land use design standards for a portion of the Paulucci PD, and establish the Carter Acquisitions PD, a proposed 320 -unit multiple family residential development, including a single commercial outparcel with a project address of 1751 Rinehart Road has been received. The property owner is Paul V. Mellini, Successor Trustee. The applicant is Nicole Martin with Madden, Moorhead, and Stokes, LLC. Chad Moorhead, P.E. with Madden, Moorhead and Stokes was responsible for completing the CAPP requirement. The Affidavit of Ownership and Designation of Agent form is attached and other information is available in order to ensure that all potential conflicts of interests are capable of being discerned. FISCAL/STAFFING STATEMENT: Based on the 2020 property tax roll of Seminole County, Parcel 28-19-30-506-0000-0250 had an assessed value of $1,331. The total tax bill in 2020 was $24.44 based on the existing tax exemptions. Based on the 2020 property tax roll of Seminole County, the remaining portion of the PD is proposed on a portion of Parcel Portion of 28-19-30-506-0000-0270 had an assessed value of $1,996. The total tax bill in 2020 was $36.65 based on the existing tax exemptions. Pagel of If the Carter Acquisition's PD is approved and subsequently developed, the property will be assessed the City's millage rate for the commercial/multi-family and commercial uses and generate ad valorem and utility revenues for the City accordingly. No additional staffing is anticipated if the Planned Development is approved. BACKGROUND: The subject property is on the east side of Rinehart Road, and south of Flagship Drive. The City Commission adopted Ordinance No. 3499 on August 9, 1999 rezoning approximately 45 acres of property to Planned Development for the Paulucci PD. The Carter Acquisitions PD totals approximately 23.54 acres consisting of one parcel fronting Rinehart Road on the west and a portion of a parcel fronting Upsala Road to the east of which the remainder was recently approved as the NRF St Johns PD. The existing Paulucci PD totals approximately 45.17 acres consisting of both parcels, one fronting Upsala Road to the east and one fronting Rinehart Road to the west. The current PD Rezone request is to modify the land use design standards for the remainder of the Paulucci PD, and establish the Carter Acquisitions PD, a proposed 320 -unit multiple family residential development with a commercial outparcel fronting Rinehart Road. The underlying Future Land Use of the property is WIC, Westside Industry & Commerce, a mixed use designation intended to promote the development of employment centers in the vicinity of the West SR 46 corridor and the commuter rail station. The corridor's proximity to 1-4 as well as SR 417 and the SunRail commuter line provides access to regional markets and a substantial labor force. The CSX Main Rail Line also provides a transportation amenity of regional significance. The WIC designation permits both a vertical and horizontal land use mix of industrial, commercial, office and residential. The maximum intensity for commercial, office, and industrial development is a floor area ratio of 0.50. The maximum residential density is designated to be 20 dwelling units per acre. In addition, the subject property is within Sub -Area 8 of the 2015 Seminole County/City of Sanford Joint Planning Agreement. This area should be reserved for target industry and SunRail supporting development as there is limited vacant acreage available on which target industry will site. Single -Family and low-density residential developments are not compatible within this area. The applicant has submitted a request to amend the remaining 23.54 acres of the Paulucci Planned Development and propose commercial and residential usage fronting Rinehart Road. The proposed development is for 320 multi -family residential units with a density of 15.4 dwelling units per acre and 2.76 acres of commercial property. Along with the development standards specific to the type of multi- family development proposed the applicant has provided a detailed explanation of the requested deviations to the multiple family housing design guidelines per Schedule E. The PD amendment supports the Update Regulatory Framework and Redevelop and Revitalize Disadvantaged Communities strategic priorities. In addition, the currently vacant property would potentially be assessed the City's millage rate for the multi -family use and generate additional ad valorem and utility revenues for the City. A Citizens Awareness and Participation Plan was completed by the applicant. The applicant sent a notification letter to property owners within a 500 -foot buffer on July 13, 2021. A summary of the CAPP meeting has been provided and is attached. Page 2 of 5 Staff finds that the amended Carter Acquisitions Planned Development and associated master plan establishing the Carter Acquisitions PD is consistent with the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan. LEGAL REVIEW: The City Attorney has reviewed the staff report and has noted the following: Section 166.033, Florida Statutes, provides as follows (please note emphasized text): "(1) When reviewing an application for a development permit that is certified by a professional listed in s. 403.0877, a municipality may not request additional information from the applicant more than three times, unless the applicant waives the limitation in writing. Before a third request for additional information, the applicant must be offered a meeting to attempt to resolve outstanding issues. Except as provided in subsection (4), if the applicant believes the request for additional information is not authorized by ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority, the municipality, at the applicant's request, shall proceed to process the application for approval or denial. (2) When a municipality denies an application for a development permit, the municipality shall give written notice to the applicant. The notice must include a citation to the applicable portions of an ordinance rule statute or other legal authority for the denial of the permit. (3) As used in this section, the term "development permit" has the same meaning as in s. 163.3164, but does not include building permits. (4) For any development permit application filed with the municipality after July 1, 2012, a municipality may not require as a condition of processing or issuing a development permit that an applicant obtain a permit or approval from any state or federal agency unless the agency has issued a final agency action that denies the federal or state permit before the municipal action on the local development permit. (5) Issuance of a development permit by a municipality does not in any way create any right on the part of an applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the municipality for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. A municipality shall attach such a disclaimer to the issuance of development permits and shall include a permit condition that all other applicable state or federal permits be obtained before commencement of the development. (6) This section does not prohibit a municipality from providing information to an applicant regarding what other state or federal permits may apply." The above -referenced definition of the term "development permit" is as follows: "(16) 'Development permit' includes any building permit, zoning permit, subdivision approval, rezoning, certification, special exception, variance, or any other official action of local government having the effect of permitting the development of land." (Section 163.3164(16), .Florida Statutes). Thus, if this application is denied, a denial development order must be issued which must cite to the applicable portions of each ordinance, rule, statute, or other legal authority supporting the denial of the application. For example, if a goal, objective or policy of the Sanford Comprehensive Plan were to be the basis for a denial, then such goal, objective or policy must be part of the motion proposing the denial. A denial development order would be drafted to implement the actions of the Planning and Zoning Commission in the event of such occurrence. Accordingly, any motion to deny must state, with particularity, the basis for the proposed denial. Page 3 of 5 The term "development order" is defined as follows and, as can be seen, refers to the "granting, denying, or granting with conditions [of] an application" "(15) 'Development order' means any order granting, denying, or granting with conditions an application for a development permit." (Section 163.3164(15), Florida Statutes). The City Commission approved the first reading of Ordinance No. 4643 on November 8, 2021. The City Clerk published notice of the 2nd Public Hearing in the Sanford Herald on December 1, 2021. RECOMMENDATION: On October 21 2021, the Planning and Zoning Commission, based on a recommendation of staff, unanimously recommended the City Commission approve the request to amend the Planned Development zoning of approximately 23.54 acres to modify land use and design standards for a portion of the Paulucci PD and establish the Carter Acquisitions PD, a proposed 320 -unit multiple family residential development and 2.76 acre commercial development with a project address of 1751 Rinehart Road based on consistency with the goals, objectives and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan, and subject to a Development Order with the following conditions: 1. Pursuant to Section 4.3.G of the Land Development Regulations (LDR) of the City of Sanford, this rezoning shall expire 3 years from the effective date of this Ordinance if all improvements have not been completed or an extension granted. 2. The property shall be developed generally in accordance with the land uses and development standards identified on the Carter Acquisition's PD Master Plan dated June 7, 2021, and associated deviation sheet for Section 16.0 Multiple Family Housing Design Guidelines, unless otherwise specifically set forth in any associated development order; provided, however, that all subsequent development orders shall be consistent with the provisions of this Ordinance. 3. Unless specifically requested and approved on the PD Master Plan, any required elements missing from or not shown on the PD Master Plan shall comply with the City's LDR. 4. A development plan prepared and sealed by a licensed Florida professional engineer meeting the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations must be submitted and approved prior to any construction on site. 5. The final design and location of all driveways and access points including, but not limited to, cross access locations, shall be proposed within and shall be subject to City approval, during the development plan review and approval process. 6. All requirements relating to tree mitigation as established in the City's LDR shall be met prior to development of the site. 7. A decorative and functional fountain shall be installed in all wet retention ponds as part of development approval; which approval shall provide for ongoing maintenance requirements and responsibilities upon the appropriate party, but not the City. 8. A dog walk area with waste collection receptacles shall be provided as determined by the City. 9. Pedestrian connectivity shall be provided between commercial and residential usages. 10. Hardscape elements that complement the overall site layout and architecture shall be provided as follows: a. Architecturally compatible wing walls on any monument signs fronting a right of way. b. Hardscape elements including decorative pavers, colored concrete and/or stamped concrete deemed acceptable by the City Commission shall be provided at the primary entrances and pedestrian nodes within the development. Page 4 of 5 11. A comprehensive signage program meeting the standards of the Land Development Regulations shall be required for the entire development including, but not limited to, the commercial and multiple family residential uses. 12. The property owner shall coordinate with LYNX to determine the possible addition of a bus stop and shelter and/or the extension of bus or transit services to the site; provided, however, that this condition shall not delay the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 13. Unless specifically requested and approved on the Carter Acquisitions PD Master Plan or the associated PD Development Order, all development shall comply with: a. The Multiple Family Housing Design Guidelines within Schedule E, Section 16.0 of the City's LDR. b. Tree mitigation per Section 4.2 Criteria For Tree Removal, Replacement And Relocation c. Light source setback for site lighting shall be no less than 75 percent the width of the buffers identified on the PD Master Plan. 14. If City staff and the Property Owner are unable to agree to the details of this Development Order in any way, the matter will be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission for resolution at a public hearing, and the matter will be adjudicated by means of a development order or denial development order relating thereto. SUGGESTED MOTION: I move to adopt Ordinance No. 4644." Attachments: Project Information Sheet Site Map Aerial Map Owner Authorization Letter Capp Summary Multiple Family Housing Design Guidelines Explanation Traffic Impact Analysis School Impact Analysis Carter Acquisitions PD Engineering Master Plan and Survey, Dated June 7, 2021 Carter Apartments Renderings Ordinance No. 4644 TADevelopment Review\03-Land Development\' -021\1751 (1710 by application) Rinehart Rd - PD Rezone\CC Memo - 1751 Rinchard Road.docx Page 5 of 5 Ordinance No. 2021-4644 An ordinance of the City of Sanford, Florida relating to the rezoning of approximately 23.54 acres of real property located at 1751 Rinehart Road (Tax Parcel Identification Number 28-19-30-506-0000-0250 and a portion of 28-19-30-506-0000-0270) to create the for Carter Acquisitions Planned Development (PD) out of a portion of the Paulucci PD) (map of the property attached); rezoning the property to a PD zoning district/classification master plan; providing for approval of the Carter Acquisitions PD Master Plan; providing for the taking of implementing administrative actions; providing for conflicts; providing for severability; providing for non -codification and providing for an effective date. Whereas, Paul V. Mellini, Successor Trustee, is the owner of the property which is the subject of this Ordinance (Tax Parcel Identification Number 28-19-30-506- 0000-0250 and a portion of 28-19-30-506-0000-0270) as assigned by the Seminole County Property Appraiser); and Whereas, the subject real property (a site 23.54 acres in size) is located on the east side of Rinehart Road and south of Flagship Drive and is generally addressed as 1751 Rinehart Road; and Whereas, the subject real property is located within sub -area 8 of the 2015 Seminole County/City of Sanford Joint Planning Agreement which is an area planned to be reserved for target industry and SunRail supporting development as there is limited vacant acreage available on which target industry will site with single-family and low density residential developments incompatible within the area; and Whereas Nicole Martin and Chad Moorhead, P.E. of Madden, Moorhead & Stokes, LLC, located in Maitland are serving as the applicant and representative of the property owner; and 1 1 P Whereas, on August 9, 1999, the City Commission enacted Ordinance Number 3499 which rezoned approximately 45 acres of property, including the subject property, to Planned Development (PD) to establish the Paulucci PD; and Whereas, the proposed action would rezone part of the Paulucci PD as the Carter Acquisitions PD to authorize a 320 -unit multiple family residential development which would include a single commercial outparcel; and Whereas, a modified Citizen Awareness and Participation Plan (CAPP) process adhering to the requirements of the City has been accomplished by Mr. Summit to the satisfaction of the City; and Whereas, the real property which is the subject of this Ordinance is assigned the WIC, Westside Industry & Commerce, future land use designation which is a mixed use designation intended to promote the development of employment centers in the vicinity of the West State Road 46 corridor and the commuter rail station as the corridor's proximity to Interstate Highway 4 as well as State Road 417 and the SunRail commuter line provides access to regional markets and a substantial labor force with the CSX Main Rail Line also providing a transportation amenity of regional significance; MES Whereas, the WIC, Westside Industry & Commerce, future land use designation permits both a vertical and horizontal land use mix of industrial, commercial, office and residential uses with the maximum intensity for commercial, office and industrial development being a floor area ratio of 0.50 and the maximum residential density being 20 dwelling units per acre.; and Whereas, the property owners are requesting that the subject property be 2I rezoned from the Paulucci PID to the Carter Acquisitions PID in order to create the Carter Acquisitions PID from part of the acreage of the Paulucci PID and City staff has reviewed the requested PID Rezone in relation to the goals, objectives and policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan and determined that the allocation of land for mixed-use development including commercial and residential are compatible with goals and objectives identified in the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, on October 21, 2021, the City's Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing and recommended that the City Commission approve this Ordinance; and Whereas, this Ordinance is enacted pursuant to the home rule powers of the City of Sanford as set forth at Article VIII, Section 2, of the Constitution of the State of Florida; Chapter 166, Florida Statutes, and other applicable controlling law; and Whereas, the City Commission of the City of Sanford has taken all actions relating to the Carter Acquisitions PID rezoning action set forth herein in accordance with the requirements and procedures mandated by State law. Now, therefore, be in enacted by the People of the City of Sanford, Florida. Section 1. Legislative findings and intent. (a). The City Commission of the City of Sanford hereby adopts and incorporates into this Ordinance, as legislative findings and intent, the above recitals (whereas clauses). (b). The approval set forth in this Ordinance is subject to the specific conditions that are set forth subsequently in this Ordinance and the property owners have agreed that no requirement herein lacks an essential nexus to a legitimate public purpose and is not roughly proportionate to the impacts of the proposed use that the City seeks to avoid, minimize, or mitigate. Section 2. Rezoning of real property/implementing actions; Carter Acquisitions PD. (a), Upon enactment of this Ordinance the property, as depicted in the map attached to this Ordinance shall be rezoned from the zoning classification resulting from a separate and distinct Carter Acquisitions PD consistent with the provisions of this Ordinance. (b). The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to execute any documents necessary to formalize approval of the Carter Acquisitions PD rezoning action set forth herein action taken herein with regard to the Carter Acquisitions PD and to revise and amend the Official Zoning Map or Maps of the City of Sanford as may be appropriate to accomplish the action taken in this Ordinance. (c). The conditions to be incorporated into the pertinent development order relating to the action taken in this Ordinance include the following: (1). Pursuant to Section 4.3.G of the City's LDRs, this rezoning shall expire 3 years from the effective date of this Ordinance if all improvements have not been completed or an extension granted. (2). All development shall be consistent with the Carter Acquisitions PD Master Plan, revision dated June 7, 2021, unless otherwise specifically set forth in any associated development order; provided, however, that all subsequent development orders shall be consistent with the provisions of this Ordinance. (3). Unless specifically requested and approved on the 4 1 P -3 g referenced Carter Acquisitions PID Master Plan, any required elements missing from or not shown on the Carter Acquisitions PID Master Plan shall comply with the City's LDRs. (4). A development plan prepared and sealed by a licensed Florida professional engineer meeting the requirements of City's LDRs must be submitted and approved prior to any construction on site. (5). The final design and location of all driveways and access points including, but not limited to, cross access locations, shall be proposed within and shall be subject to City approval, during the development plan review and approval process. (6). All requirements relating to tree mitigation as established in the City's LDRs shall be met prior to development of the site consistent with the requirements of controlling State law. (7). A decorative and functional fountain shall be installed in all wet retention ponds as part of development approval; which approval shall provide for ongoing maintenance requirements and responsibilities upon the appropriate party, but not the City. (8). A dog walk area with waste collection receptacles shall be provided as determined by the City. (9). Pedestrian connectivity shall be provided between commercial and residential usages. (10). Hardscape elements that complement the overall site layout and architecture shall be provided as follows: (a). Architecturally compatible wing walls on any monument signs fronting a right of way. (b). Hardscape elements including decorative pavers, colored concrete and/or stamped concrete deemed acceptable by the City shall be provided at the primary entrances and pedestrian nodes within the development. (11). A comprehensive signage program meeting the standards of the City's LDRs shall be required for the entire development including, but not limited to, the commercial and multiple family residential uses. (12). The property owner shall coordinate with LYNX to determine the possible addition of a bus stop and shelter and/or the extension of bus or transit services to the site; provided, however, that this condition shall not delay the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. (13). Unless specifically requested and approved on the Carter Acquisitions PD Master Plan or the associated PD Development Agreement, all development shall comply with: (a). The Multiple Family Housing Design Guidelines within Schedule "E", Section 16.0 of the City's LDRs. (b). Tree mitigation per Section 4.2 Criteria For Tree Removal, Replacement And Relocation, of the City's LDRs. (c). Light source setback for site lighting shall be no less than 75% the width of the buffers identified on the Carter Acquisitions PD Master Plan. 6 (14). If City staff and the property owners are unable to agree to the details of this Ordinance and its implementing development order in any way, the matter will be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission for resolution at a public hearing, and the matter will be adjudicated by means of a development order or denial development order relating thereto. Section 3. Incorporation of map and Carter Acquisitions PD Master Plan. The map attached to this Ordinance is hereby ratified and affirmed and incorporated into this Ordinance as a substantive part of this Ordinance amending the Carter Acquisitions PD. Section 4. Conflicts. All ordinances or part of ordinances in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby repealed. City staff shall harmonize the approval and actions set forth herein together which those taken relative to the Carter Acquisitions PD with all past actions of the City relative to the property being hereby ratified and affirmed. Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence, phrase, word, or portion of this Ordinance is determined to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional, said determination shall not be held to invalidate or impair the validity, force or effect of any other section, sentence, phrase, word, or portion of this Ordinance not otherwise determined to be invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional. Section 6. Non -codification; Implementation. (a). This Ordinance shall not be codified in the City Code of the City of 7 ai e Sanford or the Land Development Code of the City of Sanford; provided, however, that the actions taken herein shall be depicted on the zoning maps of the City of Sanford by the City Manager, or designee. (b). The City Manager, or designee, shall implement the provisions of this Ordinance by means of a non -statutory development agreement which shall be executed by the property owners, or their successor(s) in interest within 60 days of the effective date of this Ordinance or the Carter Acquisitions PD property's zoning classification shall revert to an un -zoned property status. Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon enactment. Passed and adopted this 13th day of December, 2021. Attest: &0a6"_RN Traci Houchin, MMC, FCRIVI City Clerk City Commission of Sanford, Florida Nay& Approved as to form and legal su ciepqy,;,_,,-,` "CbeColbert, tLIY A ney ty of 8 1 P a g e PROJECT INFORMATION 1751 RINEHART Rarit Z' PD AmENDMENT Requested Action: Amend the Planned Development zoning of approximately 23.54 acres to modify land use design standards for a portion of the Paulucci PD, and establish the Carter Acquisitions PD, a proposed 320 -unit multiple family residential development, including a single commercial ,outparcel with a project address of 1751 Rinehart Road. Existing Uses: Vacant Project Address: 1751 Rinehart Road Current Zoning: AG, Agriculture & PD, Planned Development Tax Parcel Numbers: 28-19-30-506-0000-0250 Portion of 28-19-30-506-0000-0270 Site Area: 23.54 acres Property Owner: Paul V. Mellini, Successor Trustee 201 W. V Street Sanford, Florida 32771 Applicant/Agent: Nicole Martin Engineer: Chad Moorhead, P.E. Madden, Moorhead & Stokes, LLC 431 E. Horatio Avenue, Ste. 260 Maitland, Florida 32751 CAPP Meeting: A CAPP notification letter and conceptual site plan were sent to all property owners within a 500 -foot buffer on July 28, 2021. A CAPP summary is attached. Commission District: District 4 — Patty Mahany COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLIANCE REVIEW Planning staff has reviewed the request and has determined the use and proposed improvements to be consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Future Land Use: WIC, Westside Industry and Commerce Existing Land Use: Vacant Surrounding Uses and Zoning: Uses Zoning North U -Haul Storage PD, Planned Development South Vacant PD, Planned Development East Vacant PD, Planned Development West Mixed -Retail PD, Planned Development CONCURRENCY Concurrency is a finding that public facilities and services necessary to support a proposed development are available, or will be made available, concurrent with the impacts of the development. The concurrency facilities Page 1 of 2 evaluated by the City of Sanford include the following: Drainage Roadways Water: Sewer: Potable Water: Sanitary Sewer Solid Waste: The existing stormwater pond was constructed as part of existing site improvements in accordance with St. Johns River Water Management District. The predevelopment drainage flow is to the north into the Smith canal/511' Street ROW. The average daily trips estimated for the overall project is 1,918 trips with 155 PM peak hour trips. A traffic impact analysis was completed February 2021. Water services will be provided by the City of Sanford. Sewer services will be provided by the City of Sanford. LOS Standard 144 gal/capita/day 132 gal/capita/day 2.46 lbs/capita/day Proposed Overall Demand 123,200 gals/day* 105,600 gals/day* 2,130 lbs/day* Facility Capacity** 9.02 MGD (CUP Capacity) 9.3 MGD 21.5 million tons The City's Utility Department tracks water and wastewater capacities for all projects once a Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) permit has been obtained. The available capacity for a proposed project is verified but will not be reserved until a FDEP permit is obtained. Below is a breakdown provided by the City of Sanford Utility Department for current usage within the City: Potable Water Sanitary Sewer Recorded 3 -month Average daily flow: - 6.73 MGD Recorded 12 -month Average daily flow: 7.504 MGD - Projects with FDEP permits (not in service): 0.806 MGD 0.624 MGD ** As provided by the City of Sanford's Utility Department. (CUP — Consumptive Use Permit) \\COS-FILE-011Planning_and_Engineering\Development Review•\03-Land Development\2021\1751 (1710 by application) Rinehart Rd - PD Rezone\Project Info Sheet - 1751 Rinehart Road.doc Page 2 of 2 Re: Parcel IDs: 28-19-30-506-0000-0260 & portion of 28-19-30-606-0000-0270 I hereby authorize Carter Acquisitions, LLC (Applicant) and Madden, Moorhead & Stokes, LLC (Engineer) to apply for and obtain permits and approvals from County/City Government, Water Management District, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Department of Transportation, Army Corps of Engineers and any other municipality or regulatory entity requiring permits be issued. Owner Signature Tate Paul V. Mellini, Successor Trustee of the Jeno, Paulucci Revocable Trust & Lois Mae Paulucci Revocable Trust 201 West 1st Street Sanford, Florida 32771 Email: Sworn to and subscribed before me this — ',)" day of 2021, by He/She is personally known to me or has produced identification. Type of identification Notary RUbric Signature Iry 4p Notary Public State of Florida Chase C Forlosis Name: �,,Y 20 OF'/ EMXYPCOSmr'OnOHH 034 709 ,re Commission No: 12 24 Commission Expires: ,./.,.,MADDEN I a I • E S, LL CIVIL ENGINEERS August 18, 2021 City of Sanford Attn: Sabreena Colbert 200 North Park Avenue Sanford, FL 32771 RE: Rinehart Road PD — CAPP Summary PDR21-000005 Dear Sabreena: We sent out the attached notice on July 13, 2021, and held the CAPP meeting on July 28, 2021 at the County library in downtown Sanford. We had one attendee, Tammy Scalise 1830 San Jacinto Cir,. Tammy was concerned about the tree buffer between the proposed development and her home to the north. We assured her that we would do everything possible to save existing trees along the southern edge of the Lightwood Know Canal that runs along our northern border. I further explained that Seminole County will require a drainage easement over the canal, but we would save existing trees as long as the County was amenable to it. We explained that we wanted to buffer our project from her neighborhood as much as she did. I also had a phone call from another person in this neighborhood who couldn't attend the meeting, Kim Adair, who had the same concerns. If you have any questions or need further information, please do not hesitate to call our office at 407-629-8330. Sincerely, &4d Oroft&id Chadwyck H. Moorhead, P.E. President CHM:nwm HAData\20076\Cor\CAPP Summary.doc 431 E. Horatio Avenue ■ Suite 260 ■ Maitland, FL 32751 ■ 407-629-8330 ■ FAX 407-629-8336 Si,I.LC, Dear Neighbor: This letter is to inform you of a community meeting to discuss the future development of 20.76 Acres located at 1710 Rinehart Road, Sanford, FL 32771, identified as Parcels 28-19-30-506-0000- 0250 and a portion of 28-19-30-506-0000-0270 per Seminole County Public Records. The meeting will be held at the Seminole County North Branch Library, ISO N. Palmetto Ave, Sanford, FL 32771 on Wednesday, July 28, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. The subject property is currently zoned Planned Development (PD) with a future land use designation of Westside Industry and Commerce (WIC) and could be entitled for up to 415 units. Our development application will request a revision to the Planned Development and propose 320 multi -family units and up to 25,000 s.f. of commercial/retail uses. The proposed site improvements will consist of 3 and 4 story buildings, retention ponds, and amenities to serve the development. If you have any questions and/or require additional information, please don't hesitate to contact me at: Mr. Chad Moorhead, PE President Madden, Moorhead & Stokes, LLC 431 E. Horatio Avenue, Suite 260 Maitland, FL 32751 407-629-8330 chadprna Liden-en&xom Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, 614d W&M&1d Chad Moorhead, P.E. President H:\Data\20076\Cor\CAPP MEETING\Community Meeting Info Letter-07-09-2021.doc 431 E. Horatio Avenue a Suite 260 ® Maitland, FL 32751® 407-629-8330 ® FAX 407-629-8336 t5faCK sear Wilderness Area Star Farris Ison Corner eloilte MADDEN CIVIL ENGINEERS 431 E. HORATIO AVE, STE. 260, MAITLAND, FL 32751 1 (407) 629-8330 SEC. 28, TWP. 19S, RANGE 30E DRAWN BY: FM APPROVED BY: CHM LOCATION DATE: 07/08/2021 Scale: 1" = 3000' GOOGLE MAPS -n -n gig RINaMT ROAD RINEWT ROAD E > 71 65 -J, FA -n -n gig RINaMT ROAD RINEWT ROAD J H n 15 1, AN 8 E > 71 m F -------------- A > D P L A r— it — ------- ii II II jl II— J H n 15 1, AN 8 14 — A — — — — "71 Po 81>81 ACQUISITIONS, LLC yp FOR MASTER PLAN RINEHART ROAD t! --- n; I In ', lid DA� RE -9.5 -za'aw arr or S"m FLCVO 1 71 m -------------- A 14 — A — — — — "71 Po 81>81 ACQUISITIONS, LLC yp FOR MASTER PLAN RINEHART ROAD t! --- n; I In ', lid DA� RE -9.5 -za'aw arr or S"m FLCVO E-111111 E 0 CONCEPT PLAN FOR RINEHART ROAD am ni F�n -.1 -FORp ft.,OA lz SECTION 16.0 MULTIPLE FAMILY HOUSING DESIGN GUIDELINES. 1. Project Entries. The project entry provides the resident and visitor with an overview of the project. Special attention should be given to hardscape and landscape treatments to enhance the overall project image. A project directory shall be provided near the entry to direct residents and visitors to recreational facilities, manager's offices, clubhouses and residential buildings. The entry shall be gated. The development shall comply with Sections 3.3 and 3.4 of Schedule J, Landscape, Buffer and Tree Requirements ofthe Sanford Land Development Regulations. In addition, a minimum four (4) foot masonry wall shall be constructed along all property lines that are not required to have a visual screen pursuant to Sections 3.3 and 3.4 of Schedule J, Landscape, Buffer and Tree Requirements of the Sanford Land Development Regulations. Explanation: The proposed project will comply with this provision except as noted. Ungated access and limited parking will be available to visitors and potential residents at the clubhouse and leasing center. Due the fact that the apartment area is far from the Rinehart Road frontage we feel that the 4' wall along the frontage would not provide the visual buffer that is intended by these standards. 2. Entry Drives. The principal vehicular access into and through a multifamily housing project shall be by means of an entry drive rather than a parking drive. The entry drive shall be similar to a roadway in a single-family subdivision. The entry drive shall provide access to driveways and parking courts. A colored and/or textured paving treatment at the entry to the development is encouraged. Explanation: The proposed project will comply with this provision except as noted. The main entry drive is parking free to the clubhouse. Due to the fact that we are providing detached parking garages on the site the parking courts are inefficient and cannot be provided. The parking areas will be heavily landscaped and we will be using our best efforts to save large trees on the site. 3. Building Siting. Residential buildings shall be sited to relate to the entry drives, so that their `best' side is facing the entry drive. All facades that face a curb or roadway shall be a single- family elevation. Explanation: The proposed project will comply with this provision. All building facades will look similar on all four sides. Clustering of Units. Clustering of multifamily units shall be a consistent site planning element. Structures composed of a series of simple yet varied planes assure compatibility and variety in overall building form. Explanation: Units are arranged to allow for varied planes on the exterior of the buildings. 4. Parking. Parking for residential buildings shall be either in garages, driveways or parking courts that are accessed from the main entry drives. Multiple, small parking courts shall be constructed in lieu of large lots. Parking areas shall be adjacent to, and visible from, the residential buildings that use them to allow for casual surveillance. Parking courts should be separated from each other by dwelling units or by a landscaped buffer not less than thirty feet wide. There should be no more than an average of ten spaces of uninterrupted parking, whether in driveways or open parking areas. Explanation: The proposed project will comply with this provision except as noted. Due to the fact that we are providing detached parking garages on the site the parking courts are inefficient and cannot be provided. The parking areas will be heavily landscaped and we will be using our best efforts to save large trees on the site. Open Space. There shall be a minimum of fifty percent (50%) open space in each multifamily development. Locate public open spaces so that they can be viewed from individual units. Explanation: The proposed project will not comply with this provision. Due to the current multi -family market the typical multi -family site has approximately 30% open space. We have attempted to provide as much open space as possible by utilizing 3 and 4 story buildings. We will have the required 200 s.£ of recreation area required by the LDC. 5. Mechanical Equipment. All mechanical equipment, whether mounted on the roof or ground shall be screened from view. All screening devices shall be compatible with the architecture and color of the dwelling structures. Explanation: All ground floor equipment will be screened with landscape material. 6. Common Facilities. Common facilities, such as club houses, laundries and management offices, shall be located centrally in the interior of the development and shall be linked to the residential buildings by lighted pedestrian pathways and common open space areas. Street signs and street lights shall be of a uniform and decorative design. All dwelling units shall have individual street addresses. All multifamily developments shall provide a covered shelter at the entrance to the development where children can wait for the school bus. The design and material of the shelter shall be consistent with that of the dwelling unit buildings and/or of the surrounding decorative wall. Mail delivery areas shall be covered and conveniently located to the residential buildings. Trash and recycling areas shall be landscaped on three (3) sides and shall be located at convenient walking distances to each dwelling unit. All multifamily developments shall contain recreational facilities for the enjoyment of the residents and their guests at a rate of two hundred (200) square feet per dwelling unit. Playgrounds shall be centrally located to allow for adult supervision from dwelling units or from a central facility such as a laundry. All multifamily developments with more than 20 residential units shall contain an area designated and designed as a car wash facility. Explanation: The proposed project will comply with this provision except as noted. All residential buildings will have individual street addresses. All dwelling units in each building will have an individual unit number associated with the building address. The clubhouse will serve as the bus shelter required. Due the proximity of the site to a carwash we feel that this provision is not necessary. D. Building Design. There is no particular architectural style proposed by these regulations for multifamily residential structures. The primary focus should be on constructing a high quality residential environment. The design of multifamily developments shall consider compatibility with the single-family character and scale of the City's residential areas. 1. Units per Building. There shall be no more than eight (8) dwelling units per building. Explanation: Buildings will have the following units per Building: - 3 -story buildings — 30 units - 4 -story buildings — 40 units 2. Building Articulation. Long, unbroken facades and box -like forms shall be avoided. Building facades shall be broken up to give the appearance of a collection of smaller structures and each of the units shall be individually recognizable. This can be accomplished with the use of balconies and varied setbacks and projections which help articulate individual dwelling units or collections of units, and by the pattern and rhythm of windows and doors. The use of rows of balconies which give the building a 'motel' look shall be avoided. Explanation: The facades are articulated with balcony and unit projections to create interest in the elevations. Additionally, the elevations are accentuated with varied roof forms — gables and hips. I Dwelling Unit Access. Breezeways shall be prohibited. Each dwelling unit shall be accessed by a private exterior entry. Entries shall be prominent and visible. This shall be accomplished through the use of distinctive architectural elements. Clusters of entrances shall be avoided. Ground -level entries are preferred for all units. Where exterior stairs are used to access upper -story units, they should be simple and clean and complement the architectural massing and form of the structure. Stairs should be made of smooth stucco, plaster or wood with accent trim of complementary colors. Thin -looking, open metal and prefabricated stairs are prohibited. Explanation: Each of the units have individual entries accessed through internal open breezeways. 4. Building Height. The overall height of the buildings should be similar to that of other buildings in the neighborhood. Buildings shall be no more than two stories on properties adjacent to single-family dwelling units or single-family zoning districts. On other properties, buildings interior to the development and separated from adjacent properties by two hundred (200) linear feet and a two (2) -story building may be three (3) stories. Building roof lines may exceed thirty-five (35) feet in height provided that the height above thirty-five (35) feet is for decorative purposes only and does not include habitable space. Roof lines should be varied in height and plane and contain dormers, pediments, chimneys, secondary hipped or gabled roof lines or other decorative embellishments to create visual variety and interest. The height of the roof shall be proportionate to the height and mass of the building. Explanation: The buildings are 4 -stories in height and the top of the ridge is approximately 63' above grade. Rooffines are varied with a mix of sloped roofs with gables and hips to create visual interest. 5. Balcony/porch Requirement. All dwelling units shall have a useful private open space such as a balcony, porch, deck or patio. Explanation: All dwelling unit have private porches or balconies. 6. Garages and Storage. At least 50% of the dwelling units in each building shall have garages accessed directly from the dwelling unit. Garages shall be counted toward the parking requirement. Detached garages and storage units shall be designed in the same style and with the same materials as the dwelling unit buildings. Detached garages or storage units shall be provided in an amount not less than twenty (20) percent of the total number of dwelling units. All garages shall have sectional roll -up doors with automatic openers. Explanation: There are ten one-story detached garage buildings — all of the garage buildings have 5 individual garages. The detached garages are treated in the same style and materials as the buildings. h:\data\20076\cor\Tnf standards responses 6.7.21.docx RINEHART DEVELOPMENT Project N!? 21061 June 2021 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF SANFORD FLORIDA Prepared by. 3101 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 265 Orlando, Florida 32803 www.trafficmobility.com (407) 531-5332 Prepared for. Carter & Associates, LLC 1440 Dutch Valley Place, Suite 1200 Atlanta, Georgia 30324 Proiect Information Name: Location: Jurisdiction: Description: Findings Trip Generation: Access Plan: Roadway Capacity: Intersection Capacity: Access Review: Recommendations EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Rinehart Development Rinehart Road, north of St Johns Parkway City of Sanford, Florida 320 Apartment units 25,000 Square feet of retail 3,050 Daily Trips / 124 AM Peak Hour Trips / 245 PM Peak Hour Trips Full access driveway on Rinehart Road All study roadway segments have adequate capacity under the existing and projected conditions. All study intersections and the project access driveway are projected to operate at an acceptable overall LOS. Northbound right turn and Southbound left turn lanes are warranted on Rinehart Road at the project access driveway. Turn Lane Review: Construct a 240 -foot southbound left turn lane at the project access driveway. Construct a 315 -foot southbound right turn lane at the project access driveway. Rinehart Development T Traffic Impact Analysis Project N-0 21061 Traffic & Mobimlity Consultants Executive Summary PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I am a Professional Engineer properly registered in the State of Florida practicing with Traffic & Mobility Consultants LLC, a corporation authorized to Operate as an engineering business, CA -30024, by the State of Florida Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Professional Engineers, and that I have prepared or approved the evaluations, findings, opinions, conclusions, or technical advice attached hereto for: PROJECT: Rinehart Development LOCATION: City of Sanford, Florida CLIENT: Carter & Associates, LLC I hereby acknowledge that the procedures and references used to develop the results contained in these computations are standard to the professional practice of Transportation Engineering as applied through professional judgment and experience. THIS ITEM HAS BEEN DIGITALLY SIGNED AND SEALED BY ON THE DATE ADJACENT TO THE SEAL PRINTED COPIES OF THIS DOCUMENT ARE NOT CONSIDERED SIGNED AND SEALED AND THE SIGNATURE MUST BE VERIFIED ON ANY ELECTRONIC COPIES. TRAFFIC & MOBILITY CONSULTANTS LLC 3101 MAGUIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 285 ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32803 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION CA -30024 AYMAN H. AS-SAIDI, P.E. NO 56849 Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................1 1.1 Study Area................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS............................................................................. 4 2.1 Roadway Segment Capacity........................................................................................ 4 2.2 Intersection Capacity................................................................................................... 5 3.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC....................................................................................................... 9 3.1 Trip Generation............................................................................................................ 9 3.2 Trip Distribution/Assignment........................................................................................ 9 4.0 PROJECTED CONDITIONS ANALYSIS.......................................................................11 4.1 Planned/Programmed Roadway Improvements..........................................................11 4.2 Roadway Segment Capacity.......................................................................................11 4.3 Intersection Capacity..................................................................................................13 4.4 Access Review...........................................................................................................17 4.5 Turn Lane Length.......................................................................................................17 5.0 STUDY CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................18 APPENDICES...........................................................................................................................19 Appendix A Preliminary Development Plan Appendix B Approved Study Methodology Appendix C Seminole County Roadway Concurrency Information Appendix D Turning Movement Counts & Seasonal Factor Data Appendix E HCM Analysis Worksheets — Existing Conditions & Signal Timing Sheets Appendix F ITE Information Sheets Appendix G Model Output Plot Appendix H Projected Intersection Volume Calculations Appendix I HCM Analysis Worksheets — Projected Conditions Appendix J NCHRP Tum Lane Review Appendix K FDM Exhibit 212-1 Rinehart Development TW& Traffic Impact Analysis Project N-0 21061 T'°ffi` s Mcwl'+r `'"submts Table of Contents i LIST OF TABLES Table Existing Roadway Capacity Analysis --.—.-----...-----.----.—..---..—.4 Table Trip Generation Analysis .............................................................................................. 9 Table Projected Roadway Capacity Analysis .--..--.--..--..-----------.—.--.12 LIST OF FIGURES FigureSite Location Map ....................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2 Existing AWPeak Intersection Volumes ...................................................................... 0 Figure 3 Existing PM Peak Intersection Volumes ...................................................................... 7 Figure Project Trip Distribution .............................................................................................. 1O Figure Projected AMPeak Intersection Volumes .................................................................. 14 Rinehart Development Traffic Impact Analysis TA&.C.. Project N2 21061 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was conducted to assess the impact of the proposed Rinehart development. The proposed development consists of 320 apartment units and 25,000 square feet of retail, with anticipated buildout year 2023. The site is located on Rinehart Road, north of St Johns Parkway, in the City of Sanford, Florida. Figure I depicts the site location and the surrounding transportation network. The development is proposed to be accessed via a full driveway on Rinehart Road, across from the private driveway to the retail parcels. The preliminary development plan is provided in Appendix A. The analysis was prepared in accordance with the approved methodology, included in Appendix B. Data used in the analysis consisted of site plan/development information provided by the project engineers and AM and PM peak hour intersection traffic counts obtained by Traffic & Mobility Consultants LLC (TMC). Roadway capacities, traffic counts and committed trips were obtained from the Seminole County Summary of Roadway Concurrency Information. Seasonal factor data was obtained from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) 2019 Florida Traffic Online (FTO). A Rinehart Development TW& Traffic Impact Analysis Project N12 21061 Traffic & Mobility Consultants Page 1 , q b w TO H nn ,ar wun, Golfa,ltd Cauntry OU",11 1.1 Study Area In accordance with the City of Sanford requirements, all roadway segments within 1 -mile of the project will be included in the analysis. Additionally, major signalized and unsignalized intersections within the study area of the project will be analyzed for AM and PM peak hour operations. The following roadway segments and intersections will be included in the study: Study Roadways 4111 Upsala Road o SR 46 to Coastline Road o Coastline Road to Central Park Drive • Rinehart Road • SR 46 to St Johns Parkway • St Johns Parkway to SR 417 • SR 46 o Rinehart Road to 1-4 • Upsala Road to Rinehart Road • Airport Boulevard to Upsala Road • St Johns Parkway o Upsala Road to Rinehart Road Study Intersections • SR 46 & Rinehart Road • SR 46 & Town Center Boulevard • Rinehart Road & St Johns Parkway • Town Center Boulevard & St Johns Parkway • Rinehart Road & Project Access Driveway MIL Rinehart Development Traffic Impact Analysis TWLC Project N2 21061 Traffic & Mobility Consultants Page 3 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS 2.1 Roadway Segment Capacity Existing roadway conditions were analyzed by comparing the existing traffic counts on the roadway segments within a 1 -mile study area to their respective capacities at the adopted level of service (LOS) standard, as documented in the Seminole County Summary of Roadway Concurrency Information dated March 2021, included in Appendix C. The roadway segment analysis is summarized in Table 1. The analysis indicates that the study segments are currently operating adequately. Table I Existing Roadway Capacity Analysis 510 Upsala Rd Upsala Coastline SR 46 to Coastline Rd Coastline Rd 7Dr 7E 19,360 8,846 A C1515 Upsala Rd Coastline Rd oCentral Park 2 E 19,360 7,167 A RNHI 0 Rinehart Rd SR 46 to St John's Pkwy 4 E 42,560 20,785 C RNH20 Rinehart Rd St John's Pkwy to SR 417 4 E 42,560 29,264 D S4625 SR 46 Rinehart Rd to t-4 6 E 60,000 40,326 C 54635 SR 46 Upsala Rd to Rinehart Rd 6 E 60,000 36,287 C 54645 SR 46 Airport Blvd to Upsala Rd 4 E 48,000 40,551 E STJ 10 St John's P" Upsala Rd to Rinehart Rd 4 1 E 42,560 1 13,690 B Source: Seminole County Summary otHoadymyC;oncurrencylntonna&on, March 1, ZUZI Rinehart Development TW& Traffic Impact Analysis Traffic & Mobility Consultants Project N12 21061Page 4 2.2 Intersection Capacity The intersection capacity analysis was performed for the AM and PM peak hours using Synchro software and the methods of the Highway Capacity Manual, 61h Edition (HCM). The analysis was based on intersection geometry, existing intersection control and turning volume. The turning movement counts for the intersection of Rinehart Road and St Johns Parkway were seasonally adjusted using a seasonal factor of 1.04, obtained from the FDOT Florida Traffic Online (FT0) website. The remaining intersection counts were collected during a peak season; therefore, a seasonal adjustment factor was not applied. The existing (2021) AM peak and PM peak intersection volumes are presented in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively. The turning movement counts and the seasonal factor report for Seminole County are included in Appendix D. A summary of the intersection capacity analysis is shown in Table 2. Detailed HCM analysis worksheets and signal timing sheets are included in Appendix E. Table 2 Existing Intersection Capacity Analysis Average daley Is in seconds Rinehart Development TMC Traffic Impact Analysis Too ffic & Mobility Consultants Project N12 21061 Page 5 k N Not b SW. " � a' ,e' a n e, � �rlr �i,��/l ur�/�,�leoi�/i�aic, /r�✓/ �„! ` �� N No b Scala I The results of the analysis reveal that all study intersections are currently operating at acceptable overall LOS. The following intersections approaches are currently experiencing minor delays: o SR 46 and Rinehart Road on the southbound approach during the PM peak hour o SR 46 and Town Center Boulevard on the northbound approach during the AM peak hour o Rinehart Road and St Johns Parkway on the westbound approach during the PM peak hour However, all intersection approaches have adequate capacity with the volume to capacity (V/C) ratio less than 1.0. ML Rinehart Development TM Traffic Impact Analysis Project N2 21061 Traffic & Mobility Consultants Page 8 3.0 PROJECT TRAFFIC 3.1 Trip Generation The trip generation analysis was conducted using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. Shopping center pass -by trips and the internal capture percentages were calculated based on the methods of the Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. The ITE information sheets, along with the internal capture calculations, are included in the Appendix F. Table 3 summarizes the resulting trip generation analysis. Table 3 Trip Generation Analysis Regression Equation used to calculate rates Men R2 is greater than 0.75 or has more than 20 studies The development is projected to generate a total of 3,050 new daily trips of which 124 trips occur during the AM peak hour and 245 trips occur during the PM peak hour. 3.2 Trip Distribution/Assignment The Central Florida Regional Planning Model (CFRPM v6.1) was utilized as a base for estimating the trip distribution pattern. The model distribution was manually adjusted to reflect prevailing travel patterns on the transportation network. The final trip distribution is presented in Figure 4. The model output plot is included in Appendix G. Rinehart Development Tm Traffic Impact Analysis N2 TraffTraffica MaWlity Consu4anft Project 21061 Page 9 Sol t 25% 4 z- 417N 141 1' (2%) 5% "ill I F 46A] 4.0 PROJECTED CONDITIONS ANALYSIS An analysis of projected conditions was conducted to determine the impact of the proposed development on the roadway segments and intersections capacities for the 2023 project buildout year. 4.1 Planned/Programmed Roadway Improvements The 2020121-202412024 Orlando Urban Area Transportation Improvement Program was reviewed to determine if there are any roadway or intersection improvements funded for construction within the Seminole County in the study area. No funded improvements were identified in the published information. 4.2 Roadway Segment Capacity A roadway segment capacity analysis was conducted for the study roadway segments using the total projected traffic volumes. The total projected traffic was calculated as the sum of current traffic counts, committed trips and trips generated by the proposed development. Projected roadway conditions were analyzed by comparing the total projected traffic volumes on the study segments to their respective capacities at the adopted LOS. The projected daily capacity analysis is summarized in Table 4. The results indicate that the study roadway segments will operate within their capacity at the project buildout. Rinehart Development TW& Traffic Impact Analysis 21061 Traft & Mobility Consufterft Project Wo Page 11 w v Z n (3)0)Z O ()1 Cr CTI O O CJt O cn t/) cn Cl) x C C C- U) X a) a X rn X Al > :- to > r = 0) w w 0 a� a� X a � CL a C C ;C7 CJ) CO 0 to CA ;o CL o X m = CL O a 07 < a ° a 0) ;1 C g X° to m CL CD ;:L ° O = v; -0n _ ° C X A- i X -N(-% a) ° 0 0 N C CL o m @ X m ° s°v m a Q P P C7) O •A � N N m m m m m m m m o N O O O N N (L7 CU tTt O O O f37 C71 GJ GJ a) O O O a) a) a) a) O O O O O O O O Cr) O Chi) O p V 00 COO O cn -► tNa� N) 'J N a) P -4O til -4 m � W � �► to O O Cat N a) Ca ' CJt O 0 O 0 to -00- CN)) O O w W COS) W cn A. coh �! W N O W O W W 00 ? Ol) C Cil � O to O m m 0 n 0 n D D 4.3 Intersection Capacity In order to assess the future traffic operations of the study intersections, a capacity analysis was conducted using the projected traffic volumes and Synchro software using the procedures of the Highway Capacity Manual, Fish Edition (HCM). Projected peak hour volumes were determined by adding committed and project trips to the existing intersection volumes. Committed daily trips, provided by Seminole County, were converted to peak hour with the use of peak hour factor K of 0.09 and a peak hour directional factor D of 0.568, and were included in the turning movements at the intersections. The projected AM and PM peak hour turning movement volumes are illustrated in Figure 5 and Figure 6, respectively. The intersection volume calculation spreadsheets are included in Appendix H. Table 5 summarizes the intersection analysis results, and the detailed analysis worksheets are included in Appendix 1. Table 5 Projected Intersection Capacity Analysis AVUrBgd May 1S In SeCOMS Rinehart Development Tm Traffic Impact Analysis Traft & Mobility Consultwits Page 1Project N2 21061 3 R46& SR 46 S 7Rineha't AM 27.1 C 55.7 E 69.4 E M6 F 47.6 D Rd Signal PM 49.3 D 61.1 E 70.6 E 168.4 F 67.1 E SR 46 & AM 19.6 B 34.9 c 81.8 F 69.4 E 32.3 C Signal Town Center Blvd PM 30.3 C 101.2 F 77.5 E 78.9 E 70.9 E Rinehart Rd & AM 43.0 D 38.5 D 9.7 A 8.3 A 14.5 B Signal St Johns Pkwy PM 46.6 D 85.1 F 16.6 B 14.1 B 31.4 C St Johns Pkvo, & AM 32.6 C 33.4 C 10.0 A 8.9 A 12.6 8 Town Center Blvd Signal PM 32.1 c 35.9 D 16.3 B 13.1 B 21.3 C Rinehart Rd & 19.0 C 26.6 D 8.8 A 9.0 A - TWSCAM Project Access PM 71.8 F 62.2 F 11.1 B 12.0 B - AVUrBgd May 1S In SeCOMS Rinehart Development Tm Traffic Impact Analysis Traft & Mobility Consultwits Page 1Project N2 21061 3 SR 46 87 --� 62 04 <— 1271+(117)+(21)=1409 " - rn <— 1004+{64}=1068 tJ L> 41 <J � 4 T 253+(6)=259 130- T 1328+{154)+(10)=1492--3► o C�'rl I 160—;, + �- 20+(1)=21 CO r- + v CTy M <-4+(5)=9 � T 11+(2)=13 St Jahns Pkwy 8-J '-I T Imo` 6+(2)=8—> N r 00 T I� 1168+{85)=1253--> 0 T o M 207+(10)=217--�;4 —,, 'V r d- CO Qf NCOr 'C + + + M d O) cY .ri NDN ' +87+(4)=91 y F23 !r T119 C>ri 25—> eh CY. 3 T u� TLO 87 --� 62 04 <— 1271+(117)+(21)=1409 " - rn <— 1004+{64}=1068 tJ L> 41 <J � 4 T 253+(6)=259 130- T 1328+{154)+(10)=1492--3► o C�'rl I 160—;, + �- 20+(1)=21 CO r- + v CTy M <-4+(5)=9 � T 11+(2)=13 St Jahns Pkwy 8-J '-I T Imo` 6+(2)=8—> N r 00 T I� 1168+{85)=1253--> 0 T LO CO II r L 00 5N. I� coCp�, (34)+[3]=37 <J" (51)+[2]=53 Private Drivewav PrniA •-- 119 <-1 t F* 1168+{85)=1253--> i1 E o M 207+(10)=217--�;4 —,, 'V r d- CO NCOr CO LO I + + + M d O) cY r- NDN LO CO II r L 00 5N. I� coCp�, (34)+[3]=37 <J" (51)+[2]=53 Private Drivewav PrniA Legend. Existing + (Committed) + [Pass by] + (Project) = Total SITE k N NW to ScW. SR 46 •-- 9^""I v t0 r LO CO Cq W i1 E �f CO Bch + V T CO LO I M + CO i ' +87+(4)=91 F23 +J T119 10+(4)=14-j 25—> NCO "0000 20-, L, T u� TLO n ar V + Cq Legend. Existing + (Committed) + [Pass by] + (Project) = Total SITE k N NW to ScW. SR 46 (a C) 00 GCl) c*4 4 SR 46 + y L> t-105 "- 1676+{154}+(28)=1858 T 92 188 <1 T 1158+{117}+(33)=1308--> cc,4' n' 426, M T T T r� N SNP St Johns Pkwy L d' � 2 49 04 � LO k--1205+{85}=1290 tJ � �-438+(20)=458 151 -1 '-1 T F' 1022+{64}=1086-> LO � v 296+f55)+(33)=384--, L101 1-1 If co c0 t0 N T T 0) ^ (0 O T (Si � � N M T II + N CLQ T F7 T T N' 4 `DCOLO C� Ln T- (44)+[17]=61 tJ I L>� (67)+[16]=83 Private Drivewav 73 Prniprl 64+(1)=65 •F-111+(7)=118 39+(3)=42 72--t *1 T 98+(8)=106> o CO 42-1, ,N M I rn 62ff' +I t F' 63--� CO rn rn i.1 GT_ CO + + 0 d CO 4 b' d7 T U -- Li) r d C0 M T 00�- T M T + o COCA IL 123+(13)=136 <- 125 �- 312 55+(13)=68-t *1 T F> 124- 127-, c'4 CO co V rn V L 00 M 3 Legend: Existing + (Committed) + [Pass by] + (Project) = Total SITE The results of the analysis reveal that all study intersections are currently operating at acceptable overall LOS. The following intersections approach are projected to experience minor delays at project buildout: o SR 46 and Rinehart Road on the southbound approach during the AM and PM peak hour o SR 46 and Town Center Boulevard on the northbound approach during the AM peak hour and on the westbound approach during the PM Peak hour o Rinehart Road and St Johns Parkway on the westbound approach during the PM peak hour Additionally, the project access driveway on Rinehart Road is projected to experience delays; however, it should be noted that all approaches are projected to have adequate capacity with (V/C) ratio less than 1.0. Rinehart Development Traffic Impact Analysis TACC Traffic & Mobility ConsultantsProject N2 21061Page 16 4.4 Access Review The development is proposed to be served by a full access driveway on Rinehart Road, across from the private driveway to the adjacent retail development. Rinehart Road is a 4 -lane divided facility with a posted speed of 45 mph near the proposed access. A review of the need for turn lanes on Rinehart Road at the project access driveway was conducted based on the methodology of the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 457. Accordingly, a northbound left turn lane and southbound right turn lane are warranted at the project access driveway. The results of the warrant analyses are included in 4.5 Turn Lane Length The turn lane lengths were calculated based on the FDOT Design Manual (FDM) Exhibit 212-1, included in Appendix K. For a design speed of 50 mph, the required right and left turn lane lengths are calculated as follows: Northbound RLqht Turn Lane Deceleration Length @ 50 mph design speed = 240 feet Right Turn Lane = 240 feet (including 50 feet taper) Southbound Leff Turn Lane Left Tum Lane = Deceleration Length (including taper) + Queue Length Queue Length = (Peak Hour Volume/60) x (2 vehicles x 25 feet) _ (70/60) x 50 = 58 feet (use 75 feet) Left Turn Lane = 240 + 75 = 315 feet (including 50 feet taper) The recommended lengths of the right turn lane and the left turn lane at the full access driveway are 240 feet and 315 feet, respectively. Turn lane lengths include a 50 foot taper. Rinehart Development Traffic Impact Analysis AC Traffic 8 Mobility consultants Project N2 21061 Page 17 This Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) was conducted to assess the impact of the proposed Rinehart development. The Rinehart development will consist of 320 apartment units and 25,000 square feet of retail with a buildout year of 2023. The site is located on Rinehart Road, north of St Johns Parkway, in the City of Sanford, Florida. The analysis included a determination of project trip generation, a review of existing and projected roadway and intersection capacity, and an access review. 0 The development is projected to generate a total of 3,050 new daily trips of which 124 trips occur during the AM peak hour and 245 trips occur during the PM peak hour. • Study roadway segments are currently operating adequately and are projected to continue to do so at the project buildout. • All study intersections are currently operating at acceptable overall LOS and are projected continue to do so at the project buildout. • The proposed access driveway on Rinehart Road is projected to operate with adequate capacity. • An exclusive northbound right turn lane and southbound left turn lane are warranted on Rinehart Road at the project access. • The recommended northbound right turn lane length is 240 feet, and the recommended southbound left turn lane length is 315 feet. Turn lane lengths include a 50 -foot taper Rinehart Development TM Traffic Impact Analysis Trcffk & MaWlify ConsultantsConsultantsPage IProject W 21061 8 APPENDICES Appendix A Preliminary Development Plan CONCEPT PLAN -CARTER #5 T NAP HOLWsl LLO SEMINOLE ST JOHNS APARTMENTS m cl, � I , �� I' Appendix B Approved Study Methodology April 13, 2021 Re: Rinehart Development Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology City of Sanford, Florida Project Ng 21061 The following is an outline of the methodology for the proposed Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the above referenced project. The study will conform to the City of Sanford TIA procedures and requirements. Promect Description The proposed development consists of 320 apartment units and 25,000 square feet of retail with anticipated buildout year 2023. The site is located on Rinehart Road, north of Saint Johns Parkway, in the City of Sanford, Florida, as shown in Figure 1. Proposed access is via a full access driveway on Rinehart Road. The preliminary site plan is provided in the Attachments. Trip Generation The trip generation analysis was conducted using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. Shopping center pass -by trips and the internal capture percentages were calculated based on the methods of the Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. The ITE information sheets are included in the Attachments. Table I summarizes the resulting trip generation analysis. Table I Trip Generation Regression Equation used to calculate rates when R2 is greater than 0.75 or has more than 20 studies The proposed development is projected to generate 3,050 new daily trips, of which 124 trips occur during the AM peak hour and 245 trips occur during the PM peak hour. 3101 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 265, Orlando, Florida 32893 a P: (407) 531-5322 a F: (4071531-5331 a www.trafficmobility.com 782221 Apartments 320 DU 5.44 1,741 0.36 115 30 85 0.44 141 86 55 0 Shopping Center 25.00 KSF 93.69 2,342 0.94 24 15 9 7.79 195 94 101 Gross Trips 4,083 139 45 94 336 180 156 Pass By Trips (34Yo) 796 9 4 5 67 34 34 Internal Pips (5.856, 4.3%, 7.3%) 237 6 2 4 24 13 11 Net New Trips 3,050 124 39 85 245 133 111 Regression Equation used to calculate rates when R2 is greater than 0.75 or has more than 20 studies The proposed development is projected to generate 3,050 new daily trips, of which 124 trips occur during the AM peak hour and 245 trips occur during the PM peak hour. 3101 Maguire Boulevard, Suite 265, Orlando, Florida 32893 a P: (407) 531-5322 a F: (4071531-5331 a www.trafficmobility.com jF ■ . .. . .. . .. .. ...... ....... ....... ..... . le sl TE,', 4F jF Rinehart Development Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology Project Ns 21061 April 13, 2021 Page 3of5 Trip Distribution A trip distribution pattern was estimated using the Central Florida Regional Planning Model (CFRPMv6.1). The model distribution was manually adjusted to account for interacting local activity centers and to reflect the local network, as well as prevailing traffic flow patterns. The raw model output is included in the Attachments and the adjusted general distribution is shown in Figure 2. Study Area In accordance with the City of Sanford requirements, all roadway segments within 1 -mile of the project will be included in the analysis. Additionally, major signalized and unsignalized intersections within the study area of the project will be analyzed for AM and PM peak operations. The following roadway segments and intersections will be included in the study; Study Roadways • Upsala Road o SR 46 to Central Park Drive (C1515) • Rinehart Road o SR 46 to Saint Johns Parkway (RNH10) o Saint Johns Parkway to SR 417 (RNH2O) • SR 46 o Rinehart Road to 1-4 (54625) o Upsala Road to Rinehart Road (S4635) o Airport Boulevard to Upsala Road (S4645) • Saint Johns Parkway o Upsala Road to Rinehart Road (STJ10) Study Intersections • Saint Johns Parkway & Town Center Boulevard • Saint Johns Parkway & Rinehart Road • SR 46 & Rinehart Road • SR 46 & Town Center Boulevard • Project Access Driveway m O,OW6- LD p 41 Z 5% Z1 , SITE ( 25%t. RA,17 Iq (15% F 46A] N 46 -1--.. 0 FM7 At N 1041 15 L I Rinehart Development Traffic Impact Analysis Methodology Project Ng 21061 April 13,2021 Page 5 of 5 Capacity Analysis Roadway segment capacity will be analyzed for existing daily traffic and buildout daily traffic volumes with the additional net new trips generated by the development. Projected peak hour volumes will be determined by adding committed and project trips to existing intersection volumes. The analysis will be based on Seminole County's latest adopted service volumes and capacities. Study intersections will be analyzed for AM and PIVI peak hour conditions using the methods of the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 6h Edition. The analysis will be performed for the existing year and project buildout year (2023). Planned Improvements Transportation improvement programs for the City, County, and FDOT will be reviewed to determine if any roadway or intersection improvements are funded for construction within the next 3 years. If available, the planned improvements will be incorporated in a roadway and intersection capacity analyses. Report A TIA report will be prepared outlining and summarizing the methods and findings of the traffic analysis prepared for the development. T, V n% 4 rn uz rm Mril rm Ln Ln o. 44 a y4 Ki C/3 co tj m 0 "Taff EWSTMW School Impact Analysis School Capacity Determination Cece Martin, Madden, Moorehead & Stokes °407-629-833O ° Annve King/Eileen H|nmon/SobreenaColbert ° CUvofSonford Jordan Smith, A|CP.Facilities Planner, Seminole County Public Schools June 23.2O21 Rinehart Road Property Seminole County Public Schools (SCPS). in reviewing the above request, has determined that if approved, the new FLUKAdesignation and/or zoning will have the effect cfincreasing residential density, and aearesult generate additional school age children. Description: Proposed Rezone from PD' Planned Development to PD, Planned Development of +1-23.54 acres generally located ADJACENT TO east side of Rinehart Road, north of St. Johns Parkway (for Find My School reference) within the jurisdiction of the City of Sanford, FL. The applicant is requesting a change to the zoning designations to allow a maximum of 320 Multi -Family residential units, to be developed within the proposed land use and zoning Parcel ID (s) #: 28-19-30-506-0000-0250 and portion of 28-19-30-506-0000-0270 This review and evaluation is performed on proposed future land use changes and rezones, unolattedparcels, or projects that have not received final entitlement approval. This evaluation does not guarantee that the developments subject to this declaration are exempt from, or determined to meet the school concurrency requirements effective as of January 1, 2008. Changes in exroUrnent, capac)ty, any newly platted deve|opments, and any subsequent final development approvals may affect the provision ofconcurrent school facilities at the point offinal subdivision approval, including the potential of not meeting statutory concurrency requirements based on future conditions. Based on information received from the jurisdiction and the application for the request,SCPS staff has summarized the potential school enrollment impacts in the following tables: CSA Capacity DEVELOPMENT IMPACT ON STUDENT GENERATION BY CSA CAPACITY 5,806 5,894 8,627 3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY 308 150 2,706 4,875 7,904 ,ENROLLMENT AVAILABLE CAPACITY 3,408 1,019 873 SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE 517 499 654 SIA Rinehart Road Property 54 22 28 REMAINING CAPACITY 2,837 1(-,) 4 9 8 1911 Comments CSA Evaluation: Atthis point, the students generated at the three CSA levels would be able to be accommodated without exceeding the adopted levels of service (LOS) for each CSA by school type, or there is adjacentmeet LOS maallowed bv inba/|ona| egnaernont Any planned expansions/additions in the current five-year capital plan would provide additional student capacity bo relieve the affected schools is reflected in this review. ^./""/w"/"a""x"^°sh""roi"/ca°isi.es/F"axtiesnan"myo^ntedm^""en`VNo~o^"u�Ls°/"""`ng/D=a�men..=w"*mxumuzoovv"*anRoad ,.°penyzu,fN°'='SIA m""hartRoad Zoned School Enrollment: For informational purposes, the below table indicates the analysis based on the individual school zones within the CSA under current conditions. At this point, the potential students generated MAY NOT be able to be accommodated without exceeding the adopted Levels of Service (LOS) for the currently zoned schools. Any planned expansions/additions that would provide additional student capacity contained in the current five-year capital plan and scheduled to be completed within the next three years are included in this review. ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS ZONED SCHOOL Region 1 Bentley 60% Region 2 Crystal Lake Wicklow Goldsboro C$AJE4 CAPACITY 2.483 499 879 843 1,102 5,806 3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY 308 - - ENROLLMENT 1,051 308 ENROLLMENT - 478 704 682 842 2,706 AVAILABLE CAPACITY 2,791 21j-- 175, ..161 260, 3,408 SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE 438 22 _ 79 - I 517 SIA Rinehart Road Property 54 - 1 54 REMAINING CAPACITY 2,299 10 175 10 161 1() 26010� 2,837 Region 1 Elementary Schools include Bentley, Idyllwilde, and Wilson ZONED SCHOOI MIDDLE SCHOOLSI Markham Woods Greenwood Millennium Sanford CAPACITY CAPACITY 1,260 1,266 1,743 1,625 5,894 3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY 150 - ENROLLMENT 4,303 2,861 ENROLLMENT 1,051 998 1,403 1,423 4,875 AVAILABLE CAPACITY 209 268 340 202 1,019 SCALD RESERVATIONS TO DATE 9�1, 35 173 1 1971 4991 ISIA Rinehart Road Property 22 _ - I .. - I 22 REMAINING CITY 93 233 1( 167 5 1t 498 ZONEDSCH00i HIGH SCHOOLS Seminole Lake Mary Crooms 4SAA-1 CAPACITY 4,868 2,948 811 8,627 3 -YEAR PROGRAM CAPACITY - - 150 160 ENROLLMENT 4,303 2,861 740 7,904 AVAILABLE CAPACITY 565 87 221 873 SCALD RESERVA71ONS TO DATE 637 1 171 - 664 U ,SIA Rinehart Road Property 28 1 - I 218 IREMAINING CAPACITY if"D (100)[c) 7011 191 Terms and Definitions: Capacity: The amount of satisfactory permanent student stations as calculated on the date of the second FDOE count in October of the current school year. The number of students that can be satisfactorily accommodated in a room at any given time and which, is typically a lesser percentage of the total number of student stations. NOTE: Capacity is ONLY a measure of student stations, not of enrollment. Concurrency Service Area (CSA): A geographic unit promulgated by the School Board and adopted by local governments within which the level of service is measured when an application for residential development is reviewed for school concurrency purposes. The CSA listed represents the area that time capacity is corisidered and student assignment may be in a CSA adjacent to the project. Enrollment: For the purposes of concurrency review, the enrollment level is established each year as per Public School Interlocal Agreement Section 12.4 A, which sets the level on the date of the second full time equivalent (FTE) survey for FDOE, generally taken in mid-October. Programmed 3 Year Additions: New permanent school capacity within the CSA, which will be in place or under actual construction within the first three years of the current SCPS Capital Improvement Plan. haps /AminoIcschools.sharpoint comisitesfFacilitiesillanning/Shartd DocumentsrNew Dirworic-dPlanninglDmclopnivit tracLingfO SlAsISIA 202IMneharl Road Propcny 21-15fNoticc- STA Rinehart Road Property docm Remaining Capacity: The capacity available for future development after the addition of any programmed capacity and less the reserved capacity. Reserved Capacity: The total number of student stations reserved in the respective CSA's that are assigned to projects via a SCALD certificate. School Size: For planning purposes, each public school district must determine the maximum size of future elementary, middle and high schools. Existing school size is determined solely through FISH data. Seminole County Public Schools has established the sizes of future schools (with the exception of special centers and magnet schools) as follows: i) Elementary: 780 student stations ii) Middle: 1500 student stations iii) High: 2,800 student stations School Attendance Zone: The established geographic area that identifies school assignments pursuant to Board Policy for each District school or region of schools, other than county wide magnet schools. Students shall attend the school(s) serving their residential or regional attendance zone unless otherwise permitted by Board Policy Students Generated by Project: is determined by applying the current SCPS student generation rate (calculated in the 2017 Impact Fee Study) to the number and type of units proposed. The number of units is determined using information provided by the jurisdiction and/or from the applicant's request. If no actual unit count is provided the unit count is then estimated based on the maximum allowable density under the existing/proposed future land use designation. Eventual Student assignnaent rnay riot, lie to the school in closest proximity to the proposed residential development. Utilization: A State Board Rule prescribed percentage of student stations that a room (and proportionately, a school and school district) can satisfactorily accommodate at any given time. From a school/campus analysis perspective, .,utilization" is determined as the percentage of school enrollment to capacity. Current DOE established K-12 utilization factors are as follows: Elementary 100%, Middle 100%, High 100% NIPS I/Scroinoleschools sharepoint coiii/sitcs/FaciliticsllianninF/Shared Docoments/New Directorics/Planiiinpq)c%,clopmcni trackinglO SlAs/SIA 202111tinchart Road Property 21-151,\Ioticc - SIA Rinchart Road Property doc.x