DO #22-07_114 North Park Avenue_RecordedThis Instrument Prepared By and Return To:
Julie Adams Scofield, AICP
Historic Preservation Planner
Planning and Development Services Department
City Hall
300 North Park Avenue
Sanford, Florida 32771
Tax Parcel Identification Number: 25-19-30-5AG-0204-002A.
File #: 22-000761
Permit #: COA22-000039
GRANT MALOY, SEMINOLE COUNTY
CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER
CFN# 2022039987 Bk:10208 Pg:974-982(9Pgs)
REC: 04104/2022 8:42:38 AM by cjones
RECORDING FEES $78.00
HISTORIC PRESERVATION BOARD OF THE CITY OF SANFORD
DEVELOPMENT ORDER NO. 22-07 RELATING TO 114 NORTH PARK AVENUE
APPROVING CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS
The Historic Preservation Board (HPB) of the City of Sanford issued this
Development Order relating to an application for a certificate of appropriateness under
the provisions of Schedule "S" of the City's Land Development Regulations (LDRs) and
controlling Florida law relating to and touching and concerning the following described
property: 114 North Park Avenue, which is assigned Tax Parcel Identification Number:
25-19-30-5AG-0204-002A by the Seminole County Property Appraiser.
FINDINGS OF FACT
Property Owner: Borman Land & Development, LLC
114 North Park Avenue
Sanford, Florida 32771
Applicant: Jerry W. Mills
Milzarch, LLC.
701 West Third Street
Sanford, Florida 32771
Project: Approval of the HPB to construct a 2 -story addition relative to property
located at 114 North Park Avenue.
Requested Development Approval: The Applicant requested approval of the HPB
to construct a 2 -story addition relative to property located at 114 North Park Avenue.
I11)a-e
Details were provided in drawings, a site plan, a floor plan, notes and photos.
Additional Findings: The project is located at 114 North Park Avenue in the City's
Downtown Commercial Historic District as described as depicted in Schedule "S" of the
City's LDRs.
The masonry commercial building is a non-contributing structure that was constructed
in about 1920. the building has been modernized to such an extent that the historic
features are unrecognizable. Character defining features are the aluminum windows on
the front and south elevations. The south side of the building can be seen from 1st
Street, as the historic building to the north was demolished and is now a parking lot.
The adjacent building (north side) is a single story structure connecting with a 2 -story
building directly behind. Surrounding historic buildings on 1st Street and Park Avenue
are 2 -story.
The Property Owner is seeking approval to construct a 2 -story addition behind the
existing building with a balcony with a cable railing system, aluminum window groupings
matching the existing windows and storefront type door matching the first floor
entrance. The first floor south elevation includes sectional garage doors with windows
and a glass storefront type door. Horizontal bands tie the two buildings together. The
west elevation has a service door and fixed windows. The design focuses on the spare
details of the existing structure, but provides interest on the first and second floors
referencing Art Moderna style, featuring horizontal bands of windows, glass doors, and
aluminum and glass windows and doors. The existing aluminum windows are to be
repaired and the frames powder -coated black to match the proposed addition windows.
2 1 P a g e
The applicant is also requesting sign review for a business identification sign on the
south elevation as an architectural element.
The original building materials are no longer intact. The addition is substantial, but
compatible with surrounding buildings. The unifying design is similar to other
commercial buildings in the district built in the 1940s and 1950s. The proposal is to
fabricate the horizontal banding using architectural foam, smooth finished and coated
with a sand finished stucco to match the existing building's exterior coating. The
proposed cable balcony railing is not currently utilized in the Historic District, but is
appropriate to the style of the building. The proposed windows, doors and garage
doors are appropriate to the style of the building. The proposal included the installation
of relief lettering, finished to match the exterior stucco, 10" high. The horizontal detail
brings additional interest to the exposed south elevation.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
(a). Pursuant to Section 8.0 of Schedule "S" of the City's LDRs, the HPB has
reviewed the proposed certificate of appropriateness and all application documentation
and matters relating thereto in accordance with the procedures for altering historic
landmarks or structures within historic districts as set forth in Schedule "S".
(b). Specifically, Schedule "S" and Schedule Wl of the City's LDRs provide
as follows:
(1). New additions, exterior alterations, or related new
construction shall not destroy historic materials that characterize the
property.
Signate regulations were recently consolidated into Schedule "K71 of the City's LDRs.
31Page
(2). New work shall be differentiated from the old and shall be
compatible with the massing, size, scale and architectural features to
protect the architectural integrity of the property and its environment.
(3). New buildings shall be designed with architectural
features and patterns that provide visual interest from the
perspective of the pedestrian, as well as vehicular traffic.
(4). New building placement and massing shall relate to
nearby buildings and to the urban context.
(5). New buildings and additions shall include substantial
variation in massing such as changes in height and horizontal plane.
(6). New buildings shall have a recognizable top consisting of, but
not limited to, cornice treatments, roof overhangs with brackets,
stepped parapets, richly textured materials and different colored
materials.
(7). Colored stripes are not acceptable as the only treatment.
(8). Alterations and additions to contributing structures shall
be compatible with the color, material, and character of the structure,
neighborhood or immediate environment.
(9). Building features within new construction shall be
compatible with the color, material and character of the property,
neighborhood and immediate environment.
(10). For new construction, additions and alterations, use the
wall finish most acceptable for the architectural style.
41Pa e
(11), Synthetic materials can be allowed for trim details and
architectural elements on new construction.
(12). All new windows shall have mullion profiles similar to
contributing structures.
(13). If single hung or double hung windows are placed in
groupings, a 4" to 6" trim piece shall separate the windows.
(14). If a window contains divided lites, true muntins or
simulated true -divided lites (where a wood frame is glued to the
exterior of the glass with a very hgh bond (VHB) adhesive system)
shall be used.
(15). If double pane windows are installed, an internal shadow
bar shall also be used between the glasses. Inserted or removable
grilles and flat grilles that do not replicate the profile and
characteristics of the original window are prohibited on the exterior of
the window pane.
(16). The interior of the window pane may have an inserted or
removable grille provided that the grille is not flat and has a profile.
(17). Windows and doors shall be glazed in clear glass with no
more than 10% daylight reduction.
(18). The use of reflective glass and reflective film is prohibited
and unlawful on all buildings.
(19). Rectangular windows shall be casement and single or
double hung; circular and hexagonal windows may be fixed or pivot.
5 1 P a g e
(20). Doors with modern designs, flush or sliding glass doors,
or any type of door that is inappropriate to the style or period of the
structure are prohibited and unlawful.
(21). Up to 2 business or use identification signs are
permittable per business or use with an additional business or use
identification permittable for a business use located on a corner lot.
(22). Signs shall not cover architectural detailing on historic
properties.
(23). A single business or use identification shall be allowed for
each sign.
(24). Internally illuminated signs are prohibited and unlawful.
(25). Signs may be lit from an external projected light source.
(26). Roof signs are prohibited and unlawful in historic districts.
(27). Wall signs shall be limited to a single business or use and
shall not exceed 18" in height and 50% of the primary frontage of the
tenant space.
(28). Wall signs shall be placed parallel to the building wall.
(29). Wall signs shall not be painted directly on the surface of
the building.
(30). Signs shall be constructed with and composed of
permanent material.
(31). Signs shall be made of durable material that retain their
6 1 P a g e
appearance for the anticipated life of the sign and contemporary
materials are acceptable, but their appearance shall be visually
compatible with the surrounding area.
(32). Flat signs in shiny or reflective materials, such as plastic
or anodized aluminum are prohibited and unlawful.
(33). New signage, when attached to the building, shall be
capable of being removed without causing damage to the building
and fastens shall be placed in mortar joints and shall not damage
bricks.
(c). To the extent that a conclusion of law as set forth herein also constitutes a
factual finding, then such shall be taken to be so as part of this Development Order.
(d). The proposed Certificate of Appropriateness is hereby found and
determined to comply with the aforestated.
(e). Additionally, the Certificate of Appropriateness sought is hereby found and
determined to be consistent with the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan and
development of the property as proposed would be consistent with and in compliance to
applicable land development regulations and all other applicable regulations and
ordinances as set forth in the Code of Ordinances of the City of Sanford.
(f). This is a development order and shall not create contractual rights of the
property owner against the City nor contractual obligations of the City to the property
owner and, to that end, the property owner shall have no contractual rights or remedies
against the City with regard to any land use action of the City.
(g). The City has not waived any rights or remedies by taking the action set
71Page
forth herein or any successive development orders and reserves any and all rights and
iffiffllffil IMPORT
MEM=
(1). The aforementioned application for a Certificate of Appropriateness, as
(2). This Development Order granting approval of a Certificate of
�ll�ililli�ll�iiiiiiii��l�iiiiiiI iiiiiiii iiiiiiiTillill III I 11: 1 11 1 ill I III I I !ill I I I li�y 1111 ;r; 1; M=
i
I I I I I 1 11 1
I I I I I I I I Ili I iI I•I I I III I I "I I I I rIff so * .
As approved and authorized for execution by the Hiistoric Preservation Board of
the City ofSanford at its meeting of February 16, 2022.
0
Al a go MM III WROUM-11 L, I -Is
i 1oliubhin, MM " C, Fr� RM, CiVer Mary%Moskowitz, Chair
I I --
erk Date: 3
Nunc pro tunc to February 16, 2022
El
III 191 -1111111111 [01 IL F-11 w"I rM L,
9,
4914
these presents the day and year written below and AGREES to all of the terms and
conditions of this Development Order the undersigned named persons having fulll
authority to execute this document,
ATTEST.
Signature Witness # 106n A. Borman, Manager
Printed Name Witness # 1
Signature Witness# 2 Claire S. Borman, Manager
Printed Name Witness # 2-�'--" i"
STATE OF FLORIDA
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of physical
I
presence or 0, onfine notarization, thisRay of February, 2022 by Brian A. Borman
and Claire S. Borman. They
�qwn to me or produced
as identification,
/—V
AOTART PJ(BUC
Notary loulolic
AdIll, Stale of
Fl
orida
Stephanie S Cushman
MCommission
y s
H H 114
Exp. 11t712025
9 � 11 a g e