4221 Comp Plan AmdmtOrdinance No. 4221
An Ordinance of the City of Sanford, Florida amending
the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan, as previously
amended; providing for amendment of the Future Land
Use Map of the Future Land Use Element of the City of
Sanford Comprehensive Plan; providing for legislative
findings and intent; providing for amendment of the land
use designation assigned to various properties as
described in this Ordinance and depicted in the exhibits
to this Ordinance; providing for a text amendment to
Policy 1 -2.5.4 which relates to multimodal supportive
densities /intensities; providing for implementing
actions; providing for severability; providing for
ratification of prior acts of the City Commission;
providing for conflicts; providing for codification and
directions to the Code codifier and providing for an
effective date.
Whereas, the City of Sanford's Planning and Zoning Commission, as the City's
local planning agency, held a public hearing on August 19, 2010, to consider amending
the Future Land Use Map of the Future Land Use Element of the City of Sanford
Comprehensive Plan and recommended denial of the request to change the Future
Land Use Map Amendment for Site 17 located at 1700 Lowe Avenue and
recommended that the City Commission approve the remainder of the proposed Future
Land Use Map amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and one text amendment to
Policy 1 -2.5.4 of the Future Land Use Element; and
Whereas, Section 163.3187, Florida Statutes, relates to the amendment of
adopted local government comprehensive plans and sets forth certain requirements
relating to small scale amendments and which are related to proposed small scale
development activities and provides, among other things, that such amendments may
be approved without regard to statutory limits on the frequency of consideration of
amendments to the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan; and
1
Whereas, on September 13, 2010 for the purpose of transmitting to the
Department of Community Affairs (FDCA) for compliance review; and
Whereas, the Comprehensive Plan amendments considered consists of 17
Future Land Use Map amendments with a total land area of approximately 45.74 acres
and one text amendment to Policy 1 -2.5.4 which relates to multimodal supportive
densities /intensities of which Policy is part of the Future Land Use Element and which
amendment creates consistent minimum densities and intensities in the US 17/92
Transportation Concurrency Exception Area in set forth in Policy 1 -2.5.2 and Policy 1-
2.5.4 as the Evaluation and Appraisal Report -based amendments adopted in
November, 2009 erroneously listed the density as 7 units per acre and the intensity as
.25 floor area ration (FAR) in Policy 1 -2.5.4 when the figures should have been 10 units
per acre and .35 FAR as set forth in Policy 1- 2.5.2; and
Whereas, 14 of the Future Land Use Map amendments result from annexations
and will have the equivalent future land use designation in the City as in the County and
the impacts of development on public facilities and services have already been
accounted for in the County for all amendments resulting from annexations; and
Whereas, amendments 15 and 16 are proposed by the City's Planning
Department in an effort to ensure that future land use designations and zoning
designations are consistent for all properties in the City; and
Whereas, an application was received to amend the land use designation of
the property located at 1700 Lowe Avenue (Site 17) from WIC, Westside Industry &
Commerce, to HI, High Intensity which amendment application was withdrawn by the
property owner on August 24, 2010; and .
Whereas, the City Commission, as the City's governing body, held an adoption
E
public hearing on December 13, 2010, to consider the amendment set forth herein to
the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan after all reviews have occurred in accordance
with the controlling provisions of State law; and
Whereas, the City of Sanford has complied with all requirements and procedures
of Florida law in processing this amendment to the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan
including, but not limited to, Section 163.3187, Florida Statutes; and
Whereas, underlined words shall constitute additions to the original text of the
Comprehensive Plan and StFike thmug4 shall constitute deletions to the Comprehensive
11FTi1
Now, therefore, be in enacted by the People of the City of Sanford, Florida:
Section 1. Legislative findings and intent.
(a). The City Commission of the City of Sanford hereby adopts and
incorporates into this Ordinance the City staff report and City Commission agenda
memorandum relating to the application relating to the proposed amendments to the
City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan relating to the subject properties to include, but not
be limited to, the text, publications and maps relating to the Comprehensive Plan
amendments set forth herein.
(b). The City of Sanford has complied with all requirements and procedures of
Florida law in processing and advertising this Ordinance.
(c). This Ordinance is internally consistent with the goals, objectives and
policies of the Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sanford.
(d). The exhibits to this Ordinance are incorporated herein as if fully set forth
herein verbatim.
3
Section 2. Amendment to Future Land Use Map.
(a). Those parts and portions of the Future Land Use Plan Element of the
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sanford and referenced as the Future Land Use
Map are hereby amended by changing Future Land Use Plan Element as set forth in
the Future Land Use Map as attached hereto as Exhibit "A which the changes made
hereon hereby made a part of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan.
(b). The property which is the subject of this Comprehensive Plan amendment
is described and referenced in the exhibits to this Ordinance.
Section 3. Implementing Administrative Actions. The City Manager, or
designee, is hereby authorized to transmit copies of the proposed amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan to the appropriate agencies and to any other unit of local
government who has filed a written request for a copy in accordance with the provisions
of Section 163.3184(7), Florida Statutes.
Section 4. Ratification Of Prior Actions. The prior actions of the City
Commission and its agencies in enacting and causing amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan of the City of Sanford are hereby ratified and affirmed.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence, phrase, word, or portion of
this Ordinance proves to be invalid, unlawful or unconstitutional, it shall not be held to
impair the validitrdinorce or effect of any other action or part of this Ordinance.
Section 6. Conflicts. All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith
are hereby repealed.
Section 7. Codification /Instructions to Code Codifier. It is the intention of
the City Commission of the City of Sanford, Florida, and it is hereby ordained that the
provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the codified version
4
of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan and /or the Code of Ordinances of the City of
Sanford, Florida. The actual text of the sections to this Ordinance need not be codified.
The Code codifier of the City is given broad and liberal authority to appropriately codify
the provisions of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan in a format that can be
readily published and distributed in a useable and manageable format. The City
Manager, in conjunction with the City Clerk and the City Attorney, are hereby granted
the authority to take any and all necessary and appropriate actions to accomplish the
provisions of this Section.
Section 8. Effective Date. The Comprehensive Plan amendments set forth
herein shall not become effective until the State Land Planning Agency (the FDCA)
issues a final order determining the adopted amendments, or individual amendments,
to be in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184(9), Florida Statutes, or until
the Florida Administration Commission issues a final order determining the adopted
amendment to be in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184(10), Florida
Statutes.
Passed and adopted this 13 day of December, 2010.
City Commission of the City of
Sanford, Florida
Attest:
aa A/W
Janet Dougherty, &ty Cler
Linda Ku n, Mayor
as to form and
Attorney
tJrJi� � • ��l
5
City of Sanford
Comprehensive Plan Amendment — 2010
Per Ordinance No. 4221
Department of Planning and Development Services
December 13, 2010
City of Sanford
First Comprehensive Plan Amendment - 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Text Amendment: Policy 1 -2.5.4 .................................. ............................... Page 3
Justification for Text Amendment ................................. ............................... Page 4
Table 1: Future Land Use Map Amendments .............. ............................... Page 5
Data, Inventory and Analysis of Map Amendments ..... ............................... Page 7
Impacts of Proposed Amendments on Public Facilities .............................. Page 13
Attachments:
Location Map of the 16 Amendment Sites
Existing Land Use, Current and Proposed Future Land Use Maps
Exhibit A — List of Property Owners for Map No. 7 (Tusca Place North)
Exhibit B — Future Land Use Equivalency Chart
Pac 2
City of Sanford
First Comprehensive Plan Amendment - 2010
Text Amendment
Chapter 1: Future Land Use Element
Policy 1- 2.5.2: Mixed -use Future Land Use for the US 17 -92 Corridor TCEA. The City
shall evaluate the feasibility of amending the Comprehensive Plan to adopt a mixed use
future land use designation for properties within the US 17 -92 TCEA to promote high quality
mixed use developments at appropriate densities and intensities that can adequately to
support public transportation and promote the use of and bicycling and walking bicycle and
pedestrian modes. Development and redevelopment within the TCEA shall occur at
densities and intensities that support multi -modal transportation services. The minimum
residential densities within the TCEA shall be ten units per acre for developments within '/z-
mile walking distance from major transit stops and a comparable level of intensity /density for
mixed use projects. The minimum floor area ratio for office and commercial uses shall be at
least 0.35. The City shall administratively initiate land use amendments within the US 17 -92
corridor. The City shall schedule the land use amendments to achieve the re- designation by
December 2010.
Policy 1- 2.5.3: Promote Integrated Land Use and Transportation Planning Principles.
The City shall amend the Land Development Code to incorporate regulations aimed at
improving the built environment through integrated land use and transportation planning.
The Land Development Code will be amended to include additional site planning
requirements within the TCEAs including:
a. Build -to lines requiring buildings to front the major roads and limit parking in the front;
b. Internal sidewalks connecting to parking areas and building entrances;
c. Building orientation and placement in close proximity to the street in order to
minimize the distance between the building entrances and the street;
d. Access requirements (including shared driveway connections) that do not impede
traffic flow and reduce pedestrian obstructions through limiting curb cuts;
e. Shared parking to minimize excessive parking and use parking resources efficiently;
f. Locating parking to the rear of the building to improve the relationship of the building
to the street;
g. Bicycle parking accommodations including shower and locker requirements;
h. Mandatory sidewalk connections from developments to the sidewalks along the
roads;
i. Landscaping and signage requirements for developments fronting the US 17 -92; and
j. Transit accommodations within larger developments including allowing buses to drop
off within site.
Policy 1- 2.5.4: Support Multimodal Supportive Densities /Intensities. Development and
redevelopment within the TCEA shall occur at densities and intensities that support
multimodal transportation services. The minimum residential densities within the TCEA shall
be sew units per acre for developments within '/z -mile walking distance from transit
stops and a comparable level of intensity /density for mixed use projects. The minimum floor
area ratio for office and commercial uses shall be at least -.2-5
Page 3
City of Sanford
First Comprehensive Plan Amendment - 2010
Justification for Text Amendment
The amendment to Policy 1 -2.5.4 corrects an error made in 2009 during the preparation of
the EAR -based amendments. The minimum residential densities within the TCEA is
incorrectly listed at 7 units per acre with a floor area ratio for office and commercial uses of
at least .25.
The intended minimum density and intensity for the TCEA corridor within '/z mile of a transit
stop is correctly listed in Policy 1 -2.5.2 as 10 units per acre and a floor area ratio of at least
.35.
A minimum density and intensity is necessary to ensure that there is sufficient population to
support multimodal transportation along the US 17/92 corridor.
The amendment does not change the density and intensity, as they are correctly listed in
Policy 1- 2.5.2.
Page 4
M � M
FBI
�I
0
0
0
N
4-I
O
0
U
wo
�I
42
M
4-o
0
U
kn
0
C�
0. 1
C
❑
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
'+•
k
k
k
k
k
X
k
X
k
k
k
X
a�
a�
v
a
a ❑�
a
a ❑ �
a�
a�
a�
a
a ❑ �
u = d
Fz,
z
z
z
z
z
z
Z
Z
z
z
Z
z
0
y � C
� y O
C
e r
D
�
o
a
C�'
U
CC
fx
CC
R'
CC
fx
'fl c
d h
V
• V
RY
C�
7i
'fl
G
'fl
"C7
•b
•L�
•fl
•b Vl U
•Q V1 U_
•Q
'b
d
Ri
V1
o
U V
� a / �
W
o o
U r
� a / �
CL
P:
W
�
W
W . Q
W S Q
S t u
W
CG
C
L
V
O
M
N
N
N
N
N
Q
M
00
O
M
O
O
C
N
M
O
O
N N
P C
C4 LY
C
o
A A
d
U
rA
O O
N
c
p
O
y
e0
ed
00
O N
[�
O O
U b
O O
[—
V1
>
° v
NA
MM
�Q�i
o
a a
Fin
v, v
MM
a
N
v,
MQ
°
M
M
U
N.
o
c
n;
0
L
°o
O O
o
l0
u u rq
o
N_
_o0
N
00
M 4
0 0° °po
M ° O
mM
M M
M
°
°
0
V
0
O
O
O
O O
O O
O O O O p p
0 0
O
O
O
Afi.
O
p0
O
00
00
O O� -00
C
00
O
Q
00
O
O
O
O
Z
0000
O O
O
•--�
00
0 0
O
00
O O
00
O O
O� O O°
O O Q x ti V]
00
O O
O
O
--
.n
O O
••-�
� �
U V
^�
O O
O O
O a 0 0 C 0 0 0
� �
�
O
O
O
v
U.
0 0
O
Q Q
M
.-.
NN
0 0
NN
0 0
O x-•00 x+000
CA N N N N N
Q Q
Q
O
O
M
O
M
O
M M
M
M M
M
M M
M M
M M M M M M
M M
M
M
M
M
Q\
i
O
ON
as
N a
--
OO
O
O
O
O
F
.--� .-i
N
r..- -
.••i
—
^� .••�
— —
.. ^
— ---
r. .-. rr .-i ^'
�
N N
N
N
N
N
M M
O
M
M M
NN
M M
N NN NNN
M M M M M M
MM
O O
M
O
[
O
N
N
a .
ce o
kn
0
C�
0. 1
N
b
O
as
o
u �
v u
ra Q R
fn C3 �O
a cd
o
On
• � Q
I �
oc�,C1,Qq
•�xx.a�
N
iF
H
C
w a
c �
-p �' � I I • a�q a�
cis U 1 � � I u
oQxA�z
U
MW
N
bb
/ � C3
914
U
U
�
O
�
Q
C
O
O
O
Q
U
U
Ix
u
y
r C
h �
r_=
z
b
y C bD
w
w
a:
Q
°
z
z
�c o
cc
w A
A
Q
Q
A
'C ."U'�'i
Y
N
N
�>
�
U
U
• r+ y
C
W
C
U
O
U
y
y
' 'UU' a a � 0 o
O
C.
Q
y
q q O ❑ O g O q O p O O❑
Qj
V1
V1
Q
Q Q¢ Q Q¢ Q¢ Q Q Q Q¢
cif
Q
n anon
oo�,Onoa 00
C
tri O� ON M 00 l— �o in O� O
vn Vt M vl h Vl 1 �0
N
O
Q
y
a
IC �o \O �o �-c �o �O �o IC 1 �0 �o �O
N N N N N N N N N N N N N
O
N
N
H
L
� �
d
Q y
c ' { v {y� bb•vb�b�b�b
W CC *
h R
�
o
U
•v
.-M. ^N
U
te a.
CF » »> id> »>
U
c>a
a
z z
a
y
O O O O O O O O O O O O O
in
�A V) �n v�
O
I�
O
O
O
O
O
.G
M M M M
� D 6
1
O
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O
O
O
Z
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O0000OOO000oo0
O
O
O
O
o
00000000000000
0
0
� �b
Z
4
�r
u
y
0
0000000000000
I?W, W�
0
C>
-•
--�
a:
00000000000000
0
0
�
M M M M M M M M M M M M M
i
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 66
M
O
M
O
M
O
E"
NNNNNNNNNNNNN
N
N
N
00000000000000
0
0
a .
R o
7 z
N
b
O
as
o
u �
v u
ra Q R
fn C3 �O
a cd
o
On
• � Q
I �
oc�,C1,Qq
•�xx.a�
N
iF
H
C
w a
c �
-p �' � I I • a�q a�
cis U 1 � � I u
oQxA�z
U
MW
N
bb
/ � C3
914
City of Sanford
First Comprehensive Plan Amendment — 2010
Data, Inventory and Analysis of Map Amendments
1. Introduction. The first Comprehensive Plan Amendment of 2010 consists of 16 amendments to the
Future Land Use Map totaling 40.18 acres. Fourteen map amendments are due to annexation. Two
amendments, Map No. 15 and Map No. 16, are due to the City's efforts to maintain consistency between
future land use designations and zoning designations.
Individual maps of each site depicting the existing land use and the current and proposed future land use
designations are included in the amendment packet.
2. Annexation Amendments. The City Commission recently approved 14 applications for annexation
(Map Nos. 1 -14). Pursuant to both the City's Comprehensive Plan Objective 1 -1.18 and the Seminole
County/City of Sanford Joint Planning Agreement, the future land use designations for these
amendments in the City are the equivalents of those in Seminole County. In Table 1 of Sanford's
amendment, these sites are identified in the second to last column, "Impact on Facilities and Services" as
having no impact because permitted uses, densities and intensities have not changed.
The City's Comprehensive Plan Objective 1 -1.18, Coordinate Unincorporated Urban Area Land Use,
states:
The City shall implement joint planning procedures, including a commitment to develop
consistent Future Land Use Map concepts for the unincorporated urban area plus
transportation, water, sewer and drainage facilities and services. The City of Sanford and
Seminole County shall maintain land development regulations which implement the mutually
agreed upon program for coordinating development within the unincorporated area.
To implement this objective, in 1991, the City entered into a Joint Planning Agreement (JPA) with
Seminole County to adopt standards and procedures to insure coordinated planning activities related to
urban expansion. Such standards ensure property owners some certainty regarding the development of
property when it is annexed into the City. Seminole County Commissioners have recently renewed the
JPA and City Commissioners are in the process of doing the same.
The JPA includes the following section on Comprehensive Planning, Future Land Uses And
Development Approvals:
(a) Findings. The COUNTY and the CITY have reviewed their respective future land use
designations and land development regulations for consistency between their jurisdictions. It
has been determined that many of their respective future land use designations and land use
regulations are equivalent and of similar nature.
(b) Future Land Use Equivalency. The "Future Land Use Equivalency Chart", labeled
Exhibit "B" and incorporated herein, describes equivalent future land use designations in the
City and County comprehensive plans. These designations have been deemed equivalent
due to their similar intensities and densities of allowable development. Both the County and
the City shall ensure that all of their respective land use amendments and rezonings are
consistent with the other jurisdiction's zoning and future land use designations for the
subject property as described in Exhibit "B ", except to the extent set forth in Section 3(c).
The County shall not oppose land development orders of the City if such actions are
compliant with applicable law and all County zoning and land use designations as described
in Exhibit `B ". The City shall not oppose any land development orders of the County if such
orders are compliant with applicable law and all City zoning and land use designations as
Page 7
described in Exhibit `B ". The Future Land Use Equivalency Chart may be amended from
time to time as agreed upon by both parties and each such proposed amendment shall
include, an assessment and evaluation of all required planning elements including, but not
limited to:
(1) Public services and facilities (e.g., water, drainage, sewer, roads, public safety, law
enforcement, schools, library services, etc.).
(2) The identification and evaluation of current supply of vacant land already designated for
the proposed land use category.
(3) Fiscal impacts related to the cost of and payment for urbanization.
(4) Rural/Urban transition controls.
(5) Designation and protection of parks, conservation areas, open space, flood prone and
environmentally sensitive areas within the "Joint Planning Area."
The Future Land Use Equivalency Chart contained in the Joint Planning Agreement and labeled Exhibit
"B" in this document, describes equivalent future land use designations in the City and County
comprehensive plans. These designations have been deemed equivalent due to their similar intensities
and densities of allowable development. For nearly twenty years Seminole County and Sanford have
agreed that all of their respective land use amendments and rezonings will be consistent with the other
jurisdiction's zoning and future land use designations as described in Exhibit `B ".
To further ensure equivalency, in the first Comprehensive Plan amendment of 2004, the City changed
the definition of open space in Policy 1 -1.1.1 and the definition of density in Policy 1 -2.1.1 to make the
maximum residential densities permitted by the City and the County equivalent. Although the City lists
a density of 6 units /acre in its low density single family district and the County lists 4 units /acre the 2004
changes make the densities of the two jurisdictions consistent.
The equivalency concept also extends to the County's Conservation designation which is equivalent to
the City's Resource Protection designation. Although the County uses Conservation as an overlay
district and the City does not, both designations severely restrict the types of permitted development in
wetlands areas and allow virtually no impacts to environmentally sensitive areas.
Because the future land use designations are equivalent in the County and the City, the potential impacts
of development from the 14 annexation sites on public facilities such as water, sewer, drainage,
transportation and parks are also equivalent and the impacts have already been taken into account by the
County.
3. Impacts of Other Map Amendments. When a change to the future land use designation is proposed, the
impacts of the change are based on the impact of the maximum development that is allowed to occur in
the new future land use designation minus the maximum impacts of development under the existing
future land use designation.
The City is proposing two amendments in an ongoing effort to reconcile discrepancies between future
land use designations and zoning designations. The impacts of these amendments are discussed in
Sections 7 and 8.
4. General Comment on Water and Sewer Facilities. In general, the public facilities of water and sewer
are within the City of Sanford Service Area per interlocal agreement with Seminole County. Therefore,
all of the City's and County's water and sewer facilities planning are based on similar data, inventory
and analysis. In 2003, the City, together with the County and the other cities and special districts within
the County, participated in preparing an Interlocal Service Delivery Agreement Report. The report did
not identify any overlapping of services within the County. The provider of water and sewer services is
determined by location and not by a parcel's jurisdiction. There is an underlying assumption that the
water and sewer infrastructure will be served by the City of Sanford in the Sanford Urban Planning
Page 8
Area. This assumption has been in effect since the Joint Planning Agreement of 1991 and is
incorporated in the City and County plans.
Based on the its Utility Strategic Business Plan (1999), its State- approved Water Supply Plan and the
capacity of its new wastewater treatment plant, Sanford has adequate capacity to operate at or below its
level of service standards for potable water and wastewater treatment through the planning period.
In the summer of 2007, the City opened a new wastewater treatment plant on the east side of town with
an initial capacity of 2 million gpd. The plant can be expanded to 3 million gpd with only minor
modifications and to 4 million gpd with an investment in additional tankage. With the new plant online,
the City now has a treatment capacity of 9.3 million gpd.
The City's Utility Department consistently implements a strategic plan and action plan to ensure that the
following objectives are met:
To provide quality water, reclaimed water and wastewater service to the residents of the
City at the lowest possible price;
To maximize the utilization of the City's water production and treatment and
wastewater treatment and reclaimed water facilities;
To plan for area growth;
To maintain or place the utility system in a competitive posture in relation to the cost of
operations, raters for service and the financing of the utility's infrastructure needs;
To achieve equity and fairness in providing utility services and the rates and charges
billed for such services to existing and future customers; and
To meet customer expectations as it relates to the value of the services provided by the
City.
In addition, the City has been so successful in conserving water, that it was able to reduce its level of
service standards from 147 to 132 gallons per capita per day for wastewater and from 161 to 144
gallons per capita per day for potable water.
The City is also implementing its DCA- approved water supply plan. The Water Supply Facilities Work
Plan (Work Plan) is the City's plan to meet current water demands and the anticipated growth in demand
within its jurisdiction through 2017. Although the projection shows that the source water allocation is
sufficient to meet the City's water demand through the 10 -year planning period, the City has started on
the extensive planning for the City's water supply. Over the term of the Work Plan, the City of Sanford
will improve the existing water production and distribution systems within the service area. In addition,
the City has started planning on alternative water supplies for future demand beyond the term of this
Work Plan. The City of Sanford also operates a very successful reclaimed water system. As a result of
the City's reuse effort, the City has achieved virtual total reuse and conserves approximately 5 MGD of
ground water through its water reclamation program at a host of sites, including a City -owned
citrus/hayfield, parks, golf courses, and commercial, residential and government owned properties.
Citv of Sanford Proiected Water Demand and Sources
Year
Projected Water
Demand MGD
CUP Permitted
Amount GD
Water Source
2007
7.577
8.77
Floridan Aquifer
2008
7.783
9.02
Floridan Aquifer
2009
7.994
9.30
Floridan Aquifer
2010
8.211
9.58
Floridan Aquifer
Page 9
2011
8.414
9.58
Floridan Aquifer
2012
8.622
9.58
Floridan Aquifer
2013
8.835
9.58
Floridan Aquifer
2014
9.053
9.58
Floridan Aquifer
2015
9.277
9.58
Floridan Aquifer
2016
9.383
9.58
1 Floridan Aquifer
2017
9.490
9.58
Floridan Aquifer
5. General Comments on Transportation Facilities. The City of Sanford provides funding to, and
participates in, the regional transportation modeling process by Metroplan Orlando (the MVO for
Orange, Osceola and Seminole Counties). Seminole County performs transportation modeling for the
area that includes Sanford. Therefore, the City has no need to conduct independent traffic analyses. Our
traffic impact review of specific plan amendment sites is based upon data, inventory and analysis that
are compiled through the Metroplan Orlando transportation modeling. The future land use data upon
which the Metroplan analysis is based reflects existing and future land use planning data from the City
of Sanford. That information is compiled by Seminole County with input from the seven cities within
the county. Sanford's Traffic Circulation Plan Element and the City's analysis of individual sites
incorporates traffic analysis that reflects future development for the entire Sanford area including the
unincorporated area around the City, much of which is subject to annexation. Traffic projections are
based on modeling by Seminole County and Metroplan Orlando.
Therefore, with regard to the future land use plan map amendment sites, unless the proposed future land
use designation is different than the Seminole County future land use plan map designation, the model
has already accounted for the impacts to the transportation system of the development potential of a site
and there would be no significant change to traffic impact.
The City has adopted LOS standards for roadways within the City based up the roadway's classification
and location. Based upon the best available data, including travel time and delay studies performed by
Seminole County, all roadway segments operate at an acceptable LOS. County Road 427, which serves
as a parallel route to U.S. Highway 17/92, has been 4 -laned from State Road 436 in Altamonte Springs
to State Road 46 in Sanford. This roadway has been constructed so that the majority of the roadway can
be upgraded to a 6 -lane facility if necessary.
6. School Capacity: The student generation rates at which a single family, multi - family and mobile home
generates public school students are currently established under Seminole County BCC Ordinance 92-
14, which adopts the impact fees and the related study that determined the rates. The study was also
adopted by resolution of all municipalities within Seminole County. The adopted rates are:
Housing
Type
Elem
Middle
High
All
Single Family
0.249
0.114
0.124
0.487
Multi Family
0.115
0.053
0.057
0.226
Mobile Home
0.186
0.083
1 0.075
1 0.345
Page 10
Formal school concurrency will be assessed during the review of the development application.
Normally this first occurs during the pre - application conference.
7. Needs Assessment and Compatibility of proposed amendments with objectives and
policies of the Comprehensive Plan:
May Nos. 15 & 16: 202 W. 27 Street and 2700 Park Avenue
Background:
These sites consist of two parcels totaling 1.1 acres and are located to the east of Pinecrest Elementary
School on W. 27` Street. Once parcel contains a child care facility and the other is a small commercial strip
center. Property records indicate that, although both of the commercial buildings were constructed in 1958,
they were given a future land use designation of LDR -SF, which does not permit commercial development.
Properties to the west of the subject site on the south side of 27 Street are all nonresidential. The remainder
of the area is single family residential. In order to make the existing uses conforming, a designation of
Neighborhood Commercial is proposed.
Neighborhood Commercial allows a limited number of low- impact commercial uses geared toward
supporting the surrounding neighborhood.
Consistency with Criteria for Map Amendments:
Policy 1- 3.2.1: Future Land Use Map and Related Policies, lists the criteria with which to judge amendments to
the future land use map:
• The amendment shall be consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 187, F.S.) and the
Growth Policy Act (Chapter 163 F.S.):
The amendment is consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan and furthers the Plan's land use policy:
Enhance the livability and character of urban areas through the encouragement of an attractive and
functional mix of living, working, shopping, and recreational activities. The amendment is also
consistent with the Growth Policy Act.
• The amendment shall be consistent with all elements of the City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan:
The amendment is consistent with all elements of the Comprehensive Plan and furthers Policy 1- 1.3.5:
Neighborhood Commercial Development.
• The amendment shall be consistent with Rule 9J -5, Florida Administrative Code:
The amendment is consistent with Rule 9J -5, including the discouragement of urban sprawl.
• Public facilities and services shall be available concurrent with development of the site:
All public facilities and services are available to the site.
• There have been changes in population, land use or economic development trends and/or projections
that warrant a change in the future land use designation:
Since 1958, the properties have been used for commercial purposes. Despite the commercial land use,
the properties were given a single family residential designation which renders the land uses
nonconforming. To rectify this situation, the Neighborhood Commercial designation is proposed.
• There have been sufficient changes in the character of the area or adjacent lands to warrant a different
land use designation;
N/A
Page 11
• The proposed future land use designation and its allowable uses are compatible with surrounding land
use designations and with the preferred growth and development pattern of the City as evidenced by
land use policies in the Comprehensive Plan. The amendment will not significantly alter acceptable
existing land use patterns or adversely affect the livability of the area or the health and safety of the
residents;
The proposed designation validates the uses that have been on the property since 1958 and does not alter
existing land use and development patterns.
• The capability of the land to support development allowed under the proposed future land use
designation as evidenced by the presence or absence on the site of soil types suitable for development,
vegetative habitats, wetlands, wetland protection zones or flood prone areas, well field protection zones,
wildlife habitats, archaeological, historical or cultural resources.
The land is suitable and able to support existing development.
• The proposed amendment will create a demonstrated benefit to the City and enhance the character of the
community.
The proposed amendment will benefit the City by rendering currently nonconforming, but suitable, uses
conforming.
• If the amendment increases the density or intensity of use, the applicant shall demonstrate that there is a
need for the increase in the near planning future (10 years).
The amendment reduces the density and does not increase intensity, since both properties are developed.
Page 12
City of Sanford
First Comprehensive Plan Amendment — 2010
Summary of Impacts of Proposed Amendments on Public Facilities
Summary of Future Land Use Plan Map Amendments
Evaluation of Service and Facility Impacts
Public Facility
Maps #1 -14
Map #15
Map #16
Total
Information and
Impacts
Acres
39.08
0.64
0.46
40.18
Existing Use
Annexations
Commercial
Commercial
Existing FLUM
County
LDR -SF
LDR -SF
Proposed
No Change
NC
NC
FLUM
Potable Water
No Change
(251)
(167)
(418)
Demand (GPD
Sewer Demand
No Change
(230)
(153)
(383)
(GPD
25 year,
25 year,
25 year,
25 year,
Drainage
24 hour
24 hour
24 hour
24 hour
Solid Waste
No Change
(6)
(6)
(12)
PPD
Recreation
No Change
N/A
N/A
No Change
Acres
Traffic (ADT)
No Change
429
286
715
Assigned Street
No Change
W. 27` Street
W. 27` Street
Elementary
No Change
0
0
0
School Demand
Middle School
No Change
0
0
0
Demand
High School
No Change
0
0
0
Demand
GPD: Gallons per Day
PPD: Pounds per Day
ADT: Average Daily Trips
Page 13
Adiusted Available Capacity
Potable Water
Total Permitted Capacity:
Current Flow
Available Capacity
Demand per Plan Amendment
Adjusted Available Capacity:
Solid Waste
Available Capacity:
Current Demand:
Demand per Plan Amendments:
Adjusted Available Capacity:
Million Gallons
Sanitary Sewer
Million Gallons
Per Day
Per Day
9.58
Total Permitted Capacity:
9.30
8.21
Current Flow:
7.68
1.37
Available Capacity:
1.62
( 1.00042)
Demand per Plan Amendments:
0.0( 0038)
1.37
Adjusted Available Capacity:
1.62
Tons
Recreation
Acres
23,580,000
Existing Park Land:
273.60
269,485
Available Park Land:
55.47
(0.006)
Demand per Plan Amendments:
0.00
23,310,515
Surplus:
55.47
TAComp Plan \CPA2010\2010 Comprehensive Plan Amendment.doc
Page 14
City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan Amendm
December 2010
Site: 1 - 8.03 acres
Proposed Future Land Use:
HI - 1 -4 High Intensity
Legend
Existing Land Use
Agriculture
Commercial
Institutional
Office
- Multi - Family Residential
Single Family Residential
Vacant
Future Land Use
HI I-4 High Intensity
MDR10 Med. Density Res. 10 Unitslacre
Existing Land Use
a
�
�
R
Q�
F
a
x
W
z
1
M 91 CR 46A
i
Present Future Land Use
i
4 /
I /
f
F
nm
Proposed Future Land Use
P
A
Q /
I �O
H
a
x
CR 46A
4T7 A
City of Sanford Department of Planning & Development Services, December 2010
City of Sanford Co mprehensive Plan Amendment
December 2010
Site: 2 - 0.36 acre
Proposed Future Land Use:
LDRSF - Low Density Residential Single Family
Legend
Existing Land Use
Vacant
Single Family Residential
- Multi - Family Residential
Public
Office
Commercial
Future Land Use
LDRSF Low Density Res. Single Family
NC Neighborhood Commercial
RP Resource Protection
PRO Parks, Recreation & Open Space
W 25TH ST
ET I T _�1
v
FE
Proposed Future Land Use
W 25TH ST
2
City of Sanford Department of Planning & Development Services, December 2010
City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan Amendment
December 2010
Site: 3 - 3.39 acres
Proposed Future Land Use:
WIC - Westside Industry & Commerce
Legend
Existing Land Use
Vacant
Single Family Residential
Multi - Family Residential
Public
Office
Institutional
Commercial
Future Land Use
WIC VVestside Industry & Commerce
Present Future Land Use
3 I
w
z
u
! ■ ! O
■
�a
NARM�
TER
a
2
w
w
a
Seminole Pointe
Apartments
I
G) z
FRANIUM
City of Sanford Department of Planning & Development Services, December 2010
City of Sanf Comprehensive Plan Amendment
December 2010
Site: 4 - 0.19 acre
Proposed Future Land Use:
MDR15 - Medium Density Residential
- 15 Units per Acre
Legend
Existing Land Use
- Commercial
Institutional
Public
Single Family Residential
vacant
Future Land Use
® GC General Commercial
LDRSF Low Density Res. Single Family
MDR15 Med. Density Res. 15 Units/acre
Proposed Future Land Use
r• M
oil
ro
City of Sanford Department of Planning & Development Services, December 2010
City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan A mendmen t
Site: 5 - 0.28 acre
Proposed Future Land Use:
LDRSF- Low Density Residential Single Family
Site: 6 - 0.29 acre
Proposed Future Land Use:
LDRSF- Low Density Residential Single Family
Legend
Existing Land Use
Vacant
Single Family Residential
Public
Institutional
Future Land Use
LDRSF Low Density Res. Single Family
MDR15 Med. Density Res. 15 Units /acre
N O
December 2010
City of Sanford Department of Planning & Development Services, December 2010
City of Sanford Compre hensive Plan Amendment
December 2010
Site: 7 - 14.15 acres
Proposed Future Land Use:
LDRSF - Low Density Residential Single Family
Legend
Existing Land Use
Institutional
Public
Single Family Residential
Vacant
Future Land Use
LDRSF Low Density Res. Single Family
City of Sanford Department of Planning & Development Services, December 2010
1
.ice
City of Sanford Department of Planning & Development Services, December 2010
City of Sanford Comprehen Plan Amendment
Site: 8 - 1.66 acres
Proposed Future Land Use:
AIC - Airport Industry and Commerce
Legend
Existing Land Use
Agriculture
Institutional
® Multi - Family Residential
Mobile Home
Single Family Residential
Transportation (Airport)
Vacant
Future Land Use
_ AIC Airport Industry & Commerce
Existing Land Use
CUE
Y
■ 8
I
E. LAKE MARY BLVD
City of Sanford Department of Planning & Development Services, December 2010
December 2010
City of Sanford Comprehe Plan Amendment
December 2010
Site: 9 - 2.5 acres
Proposed Future Land Use:
AIC - Airport Industry and Commerce
Legend
Existing Land Use
Agriculture
Institutional
- Multi - Family Residential
Single Family Residential
Transportation (Airport)
vacant
Future Land Use
IN AIC Airport industry & Commerce
Existing Land Use
E
Present Future Land Use
°
e °
9
w
a
E �
8 )
W
P��
Proposed Future Land Use
Io
E �
City of Sanford Department of Planning & Development Services, December 2010
City of Sanford Compre hensive Plan Amendment
December 2010
Site: 10 - 3.28 acres
Proposed Future Land Use:
LDRSF - Low Density Residential Single Family
Legend
Future Land Use
I Industrial
LDRSF Low Density Res. Single Family
MDR10 Med Density Res. 10 Units/acre
RP Resource Protection
Existing Land Use
Agriculture
Institutional
Public
- Multi - Family Residential
Single Family Residential
Vacant
Existing Land Use
J
J_
O
O
a
a
10 Silver
Lake
■ ■
Proposed
Present Future Land Use
Use
J
J
SitVERI
O
O
0
CL
S
10
I
Silver
Silver
10
Lake.
a u_
a9 ■ ■
■ ■ ■ NONE ■
1
■ ■
Existing Land Use
J
J_
O
O
a
a
10 Silver
Lake
■ ■
Proposed
Future Land
Use
J
J_
O
O
0 -
C '
10
I
Silver
Lake
a u_
a9 ■ ■
1
■
City of Sanford Department of Planning & Development Services, December 2010
City of Sanford Comprehensive Pl Amendment
December 2010
Site: 11 - 0.28 acre
Site: 12 - 0.28 acre
Proposed Future Land Use:
LDRSF - Single Family Residential
Legend
Existing Land Use
Commercial
Institutional
Public
Multi - Family Residential
Single Family Residential
Vacant
Future Land Use
GC General Commercial
I Industrial
LDRSF Low Density Res. Single Family
MDR10 Med. Density Res. 10 Units/acre
MDR15 Med. Density Res. 15 Units /acre
ROI Residential / Office / Institutional
20
Existing Land Use
12
7
0
0
1
z
11
City of Sanford Department of Planning & Development Services, December 2010
City of Sanford Comprehensive Plan Amendment
December 2010
Site: 13 - 3.95 acres
Site: 14 - 0.44 acre
Proposed Future Land Use:
LDRSF - Single Family Residential
Site: 15 - 0.64 acres
Site: 16 - 0.46 acres
Proposed Future Land Use:
NC - Neighborhood Commercial
Legend
Existing Land Use
Commercial
Institutional
_ Multi- Family Residential
Mobile Home
Single Family Residential
Vaca nt
Future Land Use
GC General Commercial
LDRSF Low Density Res. Single Family
MDR15 Med Density Res. 15 Units /acre
NC Neighborhood Commercial T
PSP Public /Semi - Public
RP Resource Protection
Present Future Land Use
I ��� ■� a te' . �
� -� �ilil� ■
IIIIIIIIII �� �� ■ ��
W% oil MM
City of Sanford Department of Planning & Development Services, December 2010
EXHIBIT A
Tusca Place North Owners per Seminole County Property Appraiser — August 4, 2010
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0010
GRACEY NICHOLE J & WILLIAM L &
2200 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0020
TROTTER ALEXANDER & PEARLIE
2204 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0030
HASSON ROBERT JR
2208 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0040
D R HORTON INC
2224 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0050
GUESS DOROTHY G
2232 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0060
POYSER DONOVAN L & VIVIAN S
2236 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0070
D R HORTON INC
2240 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0080
D R HORTON INC
2244 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0090
ANDERSON COLEEN R & ELLIOTT D
2248 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0100
D R HORTON INC
2252 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0110
GRACE TANICA L
2249 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0120
D R HORTON INC
2245 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0130
JORDAN EILEEN
2241 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0140
D R HORTON INC
2237 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0150
D R HORTON INC
2233 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0160
D R HORTON INC
2229 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0170
D R HORTON INC
2225 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0180
MERCEDES HOMES INC
2221 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0190
D R HORTON INC
2217 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0200
SMITH RONALD K & AUDRA D
2213 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0210
BRYANT TINA W
2209 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0220
BROSSARD ROSA M & FELIPE E
2205 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0230
HARMON ARVIS & DONNELL
2201 TULIP VALLEY PT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0240
D R HORTON INC
2153 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0250
FERGUSON MICHAEL G & FAY C
2149 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0260
TORRES GLENDA I &
2145 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0270
D R HORTON INC
2141 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0280
D R HORTON INC
2137 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0290
GREEN MICHAEL S SR & MARIA A
2133 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0300
D R HORTON INC
2129 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0310
GRACEY WILLIAM A & MARIANNE L
2125 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0320
D R HORTON INC
2121 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0330
STEELE FRANTZ & JAMEKA
2117 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0340
D R HORTON INC
2113 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0350
SMITH PAUL R & HEATHER D
2105 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0360
D R HORTON INC
2100 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0370
TINGLE LORI A & JONATHAN D
2104 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0380
HARRIS BERNARD L & NAYA L
2108 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0390
D R HORTON INC
2112 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0400
JONES ST CLAIR N & EVADNE M
2116 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0410
D R HORTON INC
2120 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0420
D R HORTON INC
2132 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0430
VAZQUEZ ANTHONY
2148 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0440
CRUEY JOSHUA & KSENIA &
2152 LILI PETAL CT
32 -19 -31 -520- 0000 -0450
D R HORTON INC
32- 19- 31- 520 -OA00 -0000
TUSCA PLACE HOMEOWNERS ASSN
32- 19- 31- 520 -01300 -0000
TUSCA PLACE HOMEOWNERS ASSN
32- 19- 31- 520 -0000 -0000
TUSCA PLACE HOMEOWNERS ASSN
32- 19- 31- 520 -OD00 -0000
TUSCA PLACE HOMEOWNERS ASSN
32- 19- 31- 520 -OE00 -0000
TUSCA PLACE HOMEOWNERS ASSN
32- 19- 31- 520 -OF00 -0000
TUSCA PLACE HOMEOWNERS ASSN
32- 19- 31- 520 -OG00 -0000
TUSCA PLACE HOMEOWNERS ASSN
32- 19- 31- 520 -01100 -0000
TUSCA PLACE HOMEOWNERS ASSN
32- 19- 31- 520 -OJ00 -0000
TUSCA PLACE HOMEOWNERS ASSN
32- 19- 31- 520 -OS00 -0000
D R HORTON INC
TAComp Plan \CPA2010 \Tusca Place North Owners.doc
H
a
2
Z
w
J
a
D
a
w
w
D
0
Z
J
w
D
D
LL
M
H
m
X
w
6
Q
0)
Q
Q
C i
CY i
Z
r i
Q
J
tq
J
a-
N
��
�Q
p
app
p
�N
_
J
c
N N m
O
O
Q
�
O U
U
Q
N
N
O
r
�U
CZ
Q Q
Q
Q�
00
O
Cl ?
U
Q
Q
Q
a�
c
aD
N
m
E
U_
Q Q
Q
Q U O
O
N
_
.�
v� r
O
O
O
p
o
j
r
_ >
U
X
U
O
x
o
�Q
CL
ACV
no, 1
0-
N
Cnp
C/) ._
(A�
CnW �
2i
_
V a
N
Q
a_
U)
C/)
C/)
(�
�
U
O
N
N
N
LL O
N
O D
U
c6
O C
O
= cL-
0 0 0
�
C
"- U
p U�
C/) L)
r
= .O
O .� ' -
m
"-
J
p0
QQ
pQ
=
c
�
�`)
a c
ZV
o cn
z
O
Q
m
�
O
U)
+ 'N
C
m
c �'
n
p ^ c `
W
Q C
n
J
Q m
E
E
N
O O LL
N
a 0
Q
O
C
�
J �
a��
2E
2
�+
�
J
N
U
rr,
U
p
c p
co
N U
C
c
a� EQF-
E p
U
N J W
WQ
J
c c Q d
0
c c o
j p
c >
}
ca
!1 L =
t6
�1 O Q
V
O M
L co
L
>
U
W
CO
U
N
C�
U
an
0
C
._
O M
r-
a)
m
D
�
C
c
N
��
N
N
Q
Q
Q
U
Q
Q
D
�
W
�
/
L
W
O
J
W �-0
OE
,y
Il
=
Q
W
�
U
N
m
c CL
c Q
E
Z
J
p c 0
= c O
p
♦r
�J
C
L.
n
O
N
V
O
rZ
O
D
cl
U
(D
LL
I
=
p
lof Sanford
Use Map -
,ive Plan Arnend;me
W 4221 December 13, 2010
Awn
aw
2
.................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7
'wh
j� 1` 111111111 Uffir."
.... ......
Re,
10
All
Eli
A
....... .....
Y .
+1`-1 =� � ��I
g
.................
1.5E
44
so
IIIr M FH MOT
I N I ON-Niiii P
M mom
MM
E3H
■ =MM
IBM IREB
MR
EM 00HEMN
iiENO Roffi9HO
EBHVHH�'a M ■
PREORES PH
Easo a
tttffM1wfflff
PEHMEffiffiffiEl
99H]HREHU
®®®®® ®®
FHERHES
WREHHHM
EHHHHE