1356 SJRWMD Water Consv Cost Share ResearchG ^�
0 —187
UTILITY DEPARTMENT
TRANSMITTAL MEMORANDUM
To: City Clerk
F ROM: Utility Department
RE: Request for Services
The item(s) noted below is /are attached and forwarded to your office for the following action(s):
❑
Development Order
❑
❑
Final Plat (original mylars)
❑
❑
Letter of Credit
❑
❑
Maintenance Bond
❑
Ordinance
❑
❑
Performance Bond
❑
Resolution
El
Once completed, please:
❑ Return original
❑ Return copy
❑
Special Instructions:
Mayor's signature
Recording
Rendering
Safe keeping (Vault)
Note: SJRWMD Water Conservation Cost Share Project- University of Florida Related
Research Agreement, approved November 8, 2010
Please advise if you have any questions regarding the above.
Thank you!
rid $ LCC4-�, J-jAe�G
From
12/2/2010
Date
�R
: -1
rN
T: \Dept_forms \City Clerk Transmittal Memo - 2010.doc
'a uj
RESEARCH AGREEMENT
Sponsor Agreement ID: Sanford 2010
�
THIS AGREEMENT is effective as of the last date of execution by both Parties and is entered into by and
between City of Sanford, Florida (herein referred to as "Sponsor ") and the University of Florida Board of y
Trustees, a public corporation of the State of Florida, primary location Gainesville, FL (hereinafter referred to f
as "University "). University and Sponsor may also be referred to as the "Party" or "Parties ".
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the research program contemplated by this Agreement is of mutual interest and benefit to University
and to Sponsor, will further the instructional and research objectives of University in a manner consistent with its
status as a non - profit, tax- exempt, educational institution, and may derive benefits for both Sponsor and
University through inventions, improvements and /or discoveries;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants herein contained, the Parties hereto
agree to the following:
Article 1— General Definitions
As used herein, the following terms shall have the following meanings:
1.1 "Project or Project Research" shall mean the description of the project as described in Appendix A
hereof, under the direction of Dr. James P. Heaney as principal investigator (University Project
Director /Principal Investigator).
1.2 "Contract/Performance Period" is October 1, 2010 through September 30, 2013
1.3 "Intellectual Property" shall mean individually and collectively all inventions, improvements and /or
discoveries, whether or not patentable, conceived or first actually reduced to practice in the course of
performing or as a result of this project research.
1.4 "Confidential /Proprietary Information and Property" means all technical data, computer software or other
information, and all equipment, items or other tangible property obtained from or furnished to the
University by Sponsor in connection with any Project Research and identified as "confidential" or
"proprietary ", or bearing a property tag or other indication of ownership. Oral disclosures between the
Parties must be reduced to writing and identified as "confidential" within thirty (30) days following the
oral disclosure.
1.5 "Data" means all data, designs, drawings, specifications, standards, process information, manuals,
technical reports, and research notes, and all computer software (whether in source or object code form),
flow charts, listings, programmer's notes and user manuals, and related documentation, program
materials and information, in any form, which result from any Project Research and which are required to
be delivered to the Sponsor.
.6 20
NRSW/UF 2009
1.6 "Materials" means the documents, drawings, media, models, or other tangible objects which contain Data
or from which Data may be derived.
1.7 "Researcher" or "Researchers" shall mean Principal Investigator, co- Principal Investigator, and other
Project researchers or members.
1.8 "University Reasonable Efforts ": shall mean that the University of Florida is required to make a diligent
and good faith effort to accomplish the goals, objectives, and milestones set out in this Agreement
between the Parties, and to fulfill University's obligations including reporting; making available
documentation; perfecting, prosecuting, defending, and enforcing intellectual property rights; and to
ensure the dedication of the Principal Investigator's and co- Principal Investigator's time to performances
under the agreements between the Parties.
1.9 Other:
Article 2 - Research Work
2.1 University shall commence the performance of Project promptly after the effective date of this
Agreement, and shall use reasonable efforts to perform such Project substantially in accordance with the
terms and conditions of this Agreement. Anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding,
Sponsor and University may at any time amend Project by mutual written agreement of the Parties.
2.2 In the event that the Principal Investigator becomes unable or unwilling to continue Project, and a
mutually acceptable substitute is not available, University and/or Sponsor shall have the option to
terminate said Project.
2.3 The deliverables and/or timelines of the Project will be outlined in Appendix A and is incorporated
hereto by reference.
2.4 Project is entitled / identified as: Perform Spatial and Temporal Analyses and Develop Conservation
Goals for City of Sanford Conservation C /Share Program.
2.5 Other:
Article 3 - Reports and Conferences
3.1 Written program reports shall be provided by University to Sponsor: (select one)
® Written progress /program reports shall be provided as specified phases of work are completed and a
final report shall be submitted by University within forty five (45) days of the conclusion of the Contract
Period, or early termination of this Agreement.
❑ As specified within Appendix of this agreement, as deliverables with associated timelines.
❑ Other:
2
Sanford 2010/UF Heaney
3.2 During the term of this Agreement, representatives of University will meet with representatives of
Sponsor at times and places mutually agreed upon to discuss the progress and results, as well as ongoing
plans, or changes therein, of Project to be performed hereunder.
Article 4 - Costs, Billings and Other Support
4.1 It is agreed to and understood by the Parties hereto that, subject to Article 2, total costs to Sponsor and
payable to University hereunder shall not exceed the sum of $ 150,000 US Dollars.
Payment shall be made by Sponsor according to the following schedule after receipt of an invoice from
the University. (select as appropriate)
This agreement is: ® Fixed Price
❑ Lump sum Payments: $ US Dollars due on (project start date) and equal
quarterly payments for the balance.
® Lump sum Payments Per Deliverable: as defined in the Task Payment Schedule within Appendix A
❑ Other:
OR
This agreement is: ❑ Cost Reimbursable
❑ $ , US Dollars upon signing and $ , every thereafter — with the final invoice
representative of total actual expenditures Sponsor will pay remaining balance due based on the report
of actual expenditures to date minus Sponsor prior payments. If an overpayment has occurred, University
will remit any overpayment at that time.
❑ Invoice no more frequently then monthly for actual costs incurred.
❑ Other:
4.2 Sponsor Payment should be sent to:
University of Florida
College of Engineering
Contracts and Grants Accounting
340 Weil Hall
PO Box 116550
Gainesville, FL 32611
4.3 IF applicable;
The Prime Agency providing funding to the Sponsor in support of this agreement is:
❑ a State of Florida Agency or ❑ a Federal Agency
(1) the Prime Agency is: ,
(2) the Prime Agency award ID is ,
(3) CFDA# (if applicable)
❑Special flow down requirements from the Prime Agency as applicable to research with a University
subcontractor is included under Appendix to this agreement.
4.5 Other attachments to be noted (as applicable):
Article 5 - Publicity
3
Sanford 2010 /UF Heaney
5.1 Sponsor will not use the name of University, nor of any member of University's Project staff, in any
publicity, advertising, or news release without the prior written approval of an authorized representative
of University. University will not use the name of Sponsor, nor any employee of Sponsor, in any
publicity without the prior written approval of Sponsor.
Article 6 - Publications
6.1 Sponsor recognizes that under University policy, the results of University Project must be publishable and
agrees that Researchers engaged in Project shall be permitted to present at symposia, national, or regional
professional meetings, and to publish in journals, theses or dissertations, or otherwise of their own
choosing, methods and results of Project, provided, however, that Sponsor shall have been furnished
copies of any proposed publication or presentation at least two (2) months in advance of the submission
of such proposed publication or presentation to a journal, editor, or other third party. Sponsor shall have
one (1) month, after receipt of said copies, to object to such proposed presentation or proposed
publication because there is patentable subject matter and /or Confidential/Proprietary information which
needs protection. In the event that Sponsor makes such objection, said Researcher(s) shall refrain from
making such publication or presentation for a maximum of three (3) months from date of receipt of such
objection in order for University to file patent application(s) with the United States Patent and Trademark
Office and /or foreign patent office(s) directed to the patentable subject matter contained in the proposed
publication or presentation.
Article 7 - Intellectual Property and Grant of Rights
All rights and title to Intellectual Property under Project shall be subject to the terms and conditions of this
Agreement.
7.1 Definitions as used herein:
"University Inventions" shall mean individually and collectively all technology including inventions,
improvements and /or discoveries which are conceived, created, discovered, developed and/or made solely
by one or more employees of University in performance of Project and any patents thereon, will be owned
by the University.
"Sponsor Inventions" shall mean any invention conceived solely by Sponsor personnel will be owned by
Sponsor.
"Joint Inventions" shall mean any invention conceived jointly by personnel of the University and Sponsor, and
any patents thereon, shall be jointly owned.
"Background Intellectual Property" shall mean Intellectual Property deemed to be relevant to the project and
already owned by the Parties on the date of signature of this agreement or developed independent of this
project.
0
Sanford 2010/UF Heaney
"Foreground Intellectual Property" includes Intellectual Property arising from the research and development
undertaken within the authorized performance period of this project as stipulated in this agreement
whether generated by one Party or two or more Parties jointly.
7.2 For University Inventions, the University grants to Sponsor the first option, for consideration, to an
exclusive or a non - exclusive license to University part of Intellectual Property with the right to sublicense
on terms and conditions to be mutually agreed upon. This option shall extend to one hundred and twenty
(120) days from the date of written disclosure by the University to Sponsor of a University Invention.
7.3 University will promptly notify Sponsor of any University Inventions conceived and/or made during the
Contract Period under Project. If Sponsor directs that a patent application or application for other
intellectual property protection be filed, University shall promptly prepare, file, and prosecute such U.S.
and foreign application in University's name. Sponsor shall bear all costs incurred in connection with
such preparation, filing, prosecution, and maintenance of U.S. and foreign application(s) directed to said
University Inventions. Sponsor shall cooperate with University to assure that such application(s) will
cover, to the best of Sponsor's knowledge, all items of commercial interest and importance. While
University shall be responsible for making decisions regarding scope and content of application(s) to be
filed and prosecution thereof, Sponsor shall be given an opportunity to review and provide input thereto.
University shall keep Sponsor advised as to all developments with respect to such application(s) and shall
promptly supply to Sponsor copies of all papers received and filed in connection with the prosecution
thereof in sufficient time for Sponsor to comment thereon.
7.4 If Sponsor elects not to exercise its option or decides to discontinue the financial support of the
prosecution or maintenance of the protection, University shall be free to file or continue prosecution or
maintain any such application(s), and to maintain any protection issuing thereon in the U.S. and in any
foreign country at University's sole expense and with no further obligation to Sponsor.
7.5 Prior to commencement of any project research as defined within Appendix A, the Parties shall identify
and notify the other of all pre- existing or "background" patent or data rights deemed necessary for the
performance of this Project Research and that which may limit Sponsor's enjoyment of its license rights
otherwise provided under this Agreement.
7.6 Without further investigation by University, the following intellectual property should be considered
background technology for the purposes of this Research Agreement:
University Owned: None
Sponsor Owned: None
Article 8 - Term and Termination
8.1 This Agreement shall become effective upon the date first hereinabove written and shall continue in
effect for the full duration of the Contract Period unless sooner terminated in accordance with the
provisions of this Article. The Parties hereto may, however, extend the term of this Agreement for
additional periods as desired under mutually agreeable terms and conditions which the Parties reduce to
E
Sanford 2010/UF Heaney
writing and sign. Either Party may terminate this Agreement upon sixty (60) days prior written notice to
the other.
8.2 In the event that either Party hereto shall commit any breach of or default in any of the terms or
conditions of this Agreement, and also shall fail to remedy such default or breach within ninety (90) days
after receipt of written notice thereof from the other Parry hereto, the Parry giving notice may, at this
option and in addition to any other remedies which it may have at law or in equity, terminate this
Agreement by sending notice of termination in writing to the other Party to such effect, and such
termination shall be effective as of the date of the receipt of such notice.
8.3 Upon termination of this Agreement by either Party for any reason, University will cease further
obligation of Project funds and will take all reasonable steps to cancel or otherwise reduce outstanding
obligations. Pursuant to the contract payment designation selected in Article 4 above;
(1) if the payment designation is cost - reimbursable (a) all unexpended and uncommitted funds
paid by Sponsor under this Agreement will be refunded to Sponsor or (b) Sponsor shall pay University for
all reasonable expenses incurred and any non - cancellable obligations on or before the date of termination
pursuant to the terms of Article 4.
(2) if the payment designation is fixed price Sponsor will pay University for either (a) percent of
completion or (b) deliverables completed to the date of termination and (c) any non - cancellable
obligations on or before the date of termination pursuant to Article 4. University will refund any portion
of Sponsor advance payments not obligated pursuant to (a), (b), or (c).
8.4 Subject to Article 7, termination of this Agreement by either Party for any reason shall not affect the
rights and obligations of the Parties accrued prior to the effective date of termination of this Agreement.
No termination of this Agreement, however effectuated, shall affect the Sponsor's rights and duties under
Article 7 hereof, or release the Parties hereto from their rights and obligations under Articles 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
and 9.
Article 9 - Independent Contractor
9.1 In the performance of all services hereunder:
9.1.1 University shall be deemed to be and shall bean independent contractor and, as such, University
shall not be entitled to any benefits applicable to employees of Sponsor;
9.1.2 Neither party is authorized or empowered to act as agent for the other for any purpose and shall
not on behalf of the other enter into any contract, warranty, or representation as to any matter.
Neither shall be bound by the acts or conduct of the other.
Article 10 - Insurance
10.1 University warrants and represents that University has adequate liability insurance, such protection being
applicable to officers, employees, and agents while acting within the scope of their employment by
University, and University has no liability insurance policy as such that can extend protection to any other
person.
C9
Sanford 20101UF Heaney
10.2 Each Parry hereby assumes any and all risks of personal injury and property damage attributable to the
negligent acts or omissions of that Party and the officers, employees, and agents thereof.
Article 11 - Governing Law
11.1 This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida,
USA.
Article 12 - Assignment
12.1 This Agreement shall not be assigned by either Parry without the prior written consent of the Parties
hereto.
12.2 This Agreement is assignable to any division of Sponsor, any majority stockholder of Sponsor, and/or any
subsidiary of Sponsor in which 51 percent of the outstanding stock is owned by Sponsor.
Article 13 - Agreement Modification
13.1 Any agreement to change the terms of this Agreement in any way shall be valid only if the change is
made in writing and approved by mutual agreement of authorized representatives of the Parties hereto.
Article 14 - Notices
14.1 Notices, invoices, communications, and payments hereunder shall be deemed made if given by registered
or certified envelope, postage prepaid, and addressed to the Parry to receive such notice, invoice, or
communication at the address given below, or such other address as may hereafter be designated by
notice in writing:
If to Sponsor:
Bill Marcous
Utility Manager
City of Sanford
P.O. Box 17888
Sanford, FL 32772 -1788
Tel (407) 688 -5105
If to University:
Administrative:
Authorized Representative:
Roslyn S. Heath, Assistant Director of Research
University of Florida
Office of Engineering Research
339 Weil Hall, Box 116550
Gainesville, FL 32611 -6550
7
Sanford 2010/UF Heaney
Technical Matter:
James P. Heaney
422 Black Hall, PO Box 116450
Gainesville, FL 32611
Phone: 352- 392 -0841
Email: heaney @ufl.edu
Article 15 — Export Control Law
The Parties hereto affirm that they are knowledgeable about the requirements of the export control laws and
regulations of the United States, that information related to the Project may be restricted under these export
control laws and regulations, and that information restricted by the export control laws and regulations shall be
exported outside of the United States or to a non -US person only when in compliance with all applicable U. S.
export control laws and regulations.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the authorized representatives of the Parties have caused these presents to be
executed in duplicate as of the day and year above written.
"Sponsor ":
City of Sanford
4
By: Linda hn
Title: Mayor
"University ":
University o Flor' a
By: Roslyn 9. Heath
Title: Assistant Director of Research
Date M, - , t�
Attested by:
Z� C`
hanet R. Dougherty, City Clerk
and legal
am L. Colbert , C', erne
of Page Blank — Appendix to follow
Date: // - Z /D
Sanford 2010/UF Heaney
) tidix A
Scope of Work for OF
James P. Heaney
1015110
1.0 Introduction
The University of Florida is responsible for Task 2 in the proposal that was accepted by
SJRWMD. The items listed under Task 2 are shown below.
Task 2. Perform Spatial and Temporal Analyses and Develop Conservation Goals
The work elements for this task from the existing proposal include:
• Evaluate water consumption data using property appraisal attributes and typical
water use benchmarks for indoor and outdoor use to determine water savings
potential.
• Evaluate CII water consumption and evaluate water savings potential
• Perform water audit and estimate water losses and trends using AMR data.
• Inventory water infrastructure, ages, and historical leakage events.
• Develop relationships and refined methods for calculating real and apparent losses
from sources to distribution system.
• Apply hydraulic modeling and other analysis to isolate areas of concern and
further study.
• Evaluate benefits of master and customer meter change -out program.
• Evaluate effectiveness of other conservation BMPs and compare against new
BMPs using the Conserve Florida Water Guide Version 2.0.
• Estimate the economically optimal level of water losses in the treatment and
distribution systems.
• Develop trends, criteria and thresholds to establish water - saving goals.
These ten work elements have been condensed into the five tasks that are described in
Table 1. The schedule of these activities over a three year period is shown.
Table 1. University of Florida Tasks and Schedule
A more detailed description of each of these tasks is presented below.
2.0 Task Descriptions
Task 1. Initial bottom up evaluation of water loss, water conservation, and water
reuse saving potential using EZ Guide
The new EZ Guide 2.0 Beta for water conservation evaluation is greatly improved over
the previous versions. Comejo and Heaney (2010) present an overview of this new
version. Key features include:
• Water use and parcel data pre - populated for each utility
• Updated Water Audit methodology
• Utility Water Budget
• End -use analysis replace default fixture water savings rates for indoor water use
• Optimal mix of BMPs is found using linear programming
During this initial phase, a detailed conservation evaluation will be done using EZ Guide
2.0 Beta that will provide an initial estimate of the potential savings from conservation
only. Also, water loss evaluations will be done using the new AWWA (2009) method.
Water loss is dealt with in the current version as a separate option that the user completes
and reports the result into EZ Guide. Based on a detailed review of water loss methods,
Friedman and Heaney (2009a and 2009b) recommend using the new AWWA (2009)
water audit and water loss control method along with supporting documents by Fanner et
al. (2007) and Thornton et al. (2009). Morales and Heaney (2010) describe how
commercial water use can be estimated. The water reuse evaluation will be done
following guidelines from the WateReuse Foundation (Raucher 2009) and the Florida
DEP water reuse program ( http• / /www.dep. state .fl.us /water /reuse /techdocs.htm This
Quarter
Year
1
Year 2
Year 3
ID
Task
11 21
31 4
51 61 71 8
9 10 11 12
Initial bottom up evaluation of water loss, water
conservation, and water reuse saving potential using
1
EZ Guide
X
X
Perform water audit and estimate water losses and
2
trends using AMR and other data
X
X
X
Refined bottom up benefit-cost optimization of water
loss, water conservation, and water reuse options
I
3
using EZ Guide
1XIX
X
X
Estimate the economically optimal level of water
ix
4
losses in the treatment and distribution systems.
Ix
ix
Develop trends, criteria and thresholds to establish
I
I
1 XXXX
5
water - saving goals for ater loss program
Table 1. University of Florida Tasks and Schedule
A more detailed description of each of these tasks is presented below.
2.0 Task Descriptions
Task 1. Initial bottom up evaluation of water loss, water conservation, and water
reuse saving potential using EZ Guide
The new EZ Guide 2.0 Beta for water conservation evaluation is greatly improved over
the previous versions. Comejo and Heaney (2010) present an overview of this new
version. Key features include:
• Water use and parcel data pre - populated for each utility
• Updated Water Audit methodology
• Utility Water Budget
• End -use analysis replace default fixture water savings rates for indoor water use
• Optimal mix of BMPs is found using linear programming
During this initial phase, a detailed conservation evaluation will be done using EZ Guide
2.0 Beta that will provide an initial estimate of the potential savings from conservation
only. Also, water loss evaluations will be done using the new AWWA (2009) method.
Water loss is dealt with in the current version as a separate option that the user completes
and reports the result into EZ Guide. Based on a detailed review of water loss methods,
Friedman and Heaney (2009a and 2009b) recommend using the new AWWA (2009)
water audit and water loss control method along with supporting documents by Fanner et
al. (2007) and Thornton et al. (2009). Morales and Heaney (2010) describe how
commercial water use can be estimated. The water reuse evaluation will be done
following guidelines from the WateReuse Foundation (Raucher 2009) and the Florida
DEP water reuse program ( http• / /www.dep. state .fl.us /water /reuse /techdocs.htm This
initial evaluation will provide a preliminary estimate of the most promising alternative
water supply and conservation options.
As part of this task, OF will work closely with Jones Edmunds & Associates, Inc (Jones
Edmunds) and the City to obtain geospatial datasets including billing address tables
linked to parcel identification numbers, account level billing information, AMR meter
locations, and distribution system asset information (pipe size, material, year of
installation) as populated by the City of Sanford.
The deliverable will be a report summarizing a conservation evaluation using EZ Guide
2.0 Beta, water loss evaluations using AWWA 2009 method, and a water reuse
evaluation following guidelines from the WateReuse Foundation and FDEP.
Task 2. Perform water audit and estimate water losses and trends using AMR and
other data
The success of the AWWA M36 water audit and water loss method is heavily dependent
on the quality of the input data. The Sanford AMR water meter replacement program
will provide vital information on unaccounted for water due to meter inaccuracy. The
AWWA M36 method only looks at annual average flow conditions to estimate water
losses. It does not address the question of the seasonality of these losses. The water
budget analysis in EZ Guide addresses this important question by going through a
calibration exercise based on historical water use practices including spatial variability.
Water infrastructure information will provide a better basis for locating the most serious
leaks. High frequency AMR data will greatly assist in pinpointing the location of losses.
The hydraulic model of the water distribution system will be used to evaluate the effect
of system pressures on water losses. Overall, a bottom up approach will provide a greatly
improved estimate of apparent and real losses. As part of this task, OF will work with the
City on establishing a workflow for updating the results of the EZ Guide Analysis and
Water Audit.
The deliverable will be a report summarizing the water audit performed and an estimate
of water losses.
Task 3. Refined bottom up benefit -cost optimization of water loss, water
conservation, and water reuse options using EZ Guide
The results of Tasks 1 and 2 provide estimates of the most promising water loss,
conservation, and water reuse options. However, site specific benefit -cost information is
needed to more accurately determine the best integrated solution to this problem. The
direct link with infrastructure information system should provide essential information to
make this determination. EZ Guide software will be refined to automatically determine
the best overall blend of these options.
The deliverable will be a report summarizing the best integrated options for water loss,
conservation and water reuse.
Task 4. Estimate the economically optimal level of water losses in the treatment and
distribution systems
The results from Task 3 provide the basis for more detailed evaluations of how to best
manage the water losses in the treatment and distribution systems. Ultimately, the
economically optimal level of losses depends on balancing the costs of control with the
savings from reduced losses. Existing methods only present this evaluation at a
conceptual level and do the implementation on an ad hoc basis. A more directed formal
approach will be used in this study to make this evaluation including how to deal with the
uncertainty associated with these estimates. A recommended action plan for addressing
water loss in the distribution system will be developed as part of this task. The action
plan will summarize the estimated costs and benefits of each recommendation. The
actions will be summarized in a timeline to show the benefits and costs over time so that
the actions can be compared with the timing of alternative water supplies.
The deliverable will be a report that evaluates how best to manage the water losses in the
treatment and distribution systems, along with a recommended action plan.
Task 5. Develop trends, criteria and thresholds to establish water - saving goals for
water loss program
The purpose of this task is to evaluate the best way to stage the implementation of the
recommended program and to develop a performance tracking system to provide
continuous feedback on the actual performance of the system.
The deliverable will be a report with implementation strategies, along with a performance
tracking system.
3.0 OF Budget
The Task payment schedule for this project is presented in Table 2.
Task
Description
Due Date
Total Program
Funds
Initial bottom up evaluation of water loss,
Month 6
1
water conservation, and water reuse saving
$22,000
potential using EZ Guide
Perform water audit and estimate water
Month 12
2
losses and trends using AMR and other
$25,161
data
Refined bottom up benefit -cost
Month 24
3
optimization of water loss, water
$49,906
conservation, and water reuse options using
EZ Guide
Estimate the economically optimal level of
Month 27
4
water losses in the treatment and
$27,933
distribution systems
Develop trends, criteria and thresholds to
Month 36
5
establish water - saving goals for water loss
$25,000
p rogram
Total
$150,000
Table 2. University of Florida Budget
4.0 References
American Water Works Association. 2009. Water Audits and Loss Control Programs.
Manual of Water Supply Practices M36, Denver, CO
Comejo, C. and J. Heaney. 2010. A Water Conservation and Planning Tool for Florida,
EZ Guide 2.0 (Beta). U. of Florida Water Institute Symposium, February.
http•/ /library conservefloridawater.org /publications /13314687.pdf
Fanner, P. et al. 2007. Evaluating Water Loss and Planning Loss Reduction Strategies.
Final Report to the Awwa Research Foundation, Denver, CO
Friedman, K. and J. Heaney. 2009a. Water Loss Management: Conservation Option in
Florida's Urban Water Systems. Florida Water Resources Journal, August.
http://www.f\vri.com/techarticles/0809%20FWRJ%20techl.pd
Friedman, K. and J. Heaney. 2009b.Validity of Water Audit and Water Loss Evaluations
for Florida. Proc. Florida Section ofAWWA Fall Conference, Orlando,
December. http•/ /library conservefloridawater .org/publications /7228329.pdf
Morales, M., and J. Heaney. 2010. Predominant Commercial Sectors in Florida and their
Water Use Patterns. Florida Water Resources Journal, August.
Raucher, R.S. 2006. An Economic Framework for Evaluating the Benefits and Costs of
Water Reuse. Final Report to the Water Reuse Foundation, Alexandria, VA
Thornton, J., Sturm, R., and G. Kunkel. 2008. Water Loss Control, 2 nd Ed., McGraw -Hill,
New York.