301-CPH-Amendment 37AMENDMENT NO. 37
AGREEMENT FOR CONTINUING SERVICES
FOR
EAST - WEST CONNECTOR ROAD
St. Johns Parkway - Coastline Road - Jewett Lane
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA
AND
CPH ENGINEERS, INC.
~ of C//Y')~ ~>,~/-)Z~between the
This Agreement made on the ~ -- day
City of Sanford, Florida (hereinafter called CITY) and CPH Engineers, Inc.
(hereinafter called ENGINEER), is mutually agreed upon and declared an
authorized Amendment to an Agreement dated December 17, 1987, between the
parties, herein setting forth the scope, terms, and conditions of the work herein
authorized.
In case of any conflict between this Amendment and the aforementioned
Agreement of December 17, 1987, this Amendment shall govern for the work
described herein.
\\CPH._SANF2\VOL2UOB SXZ6582.00\WP-WORDXPROPOSALXDAGMEast-West-Prop. doc
WHEREAS the CITY has available funding for design and construction of an
east-west roadway extending from Rinehart Road to Airport Boulevard, following
the St. Johns Parkway - Coastline Road - Jewett Lane alignment;
WHEREAS the ENGINEER and his proposed subconsultants are intimately
familiar with the project area having conducted utility design, surveying, and
wetland permitting along portions of the proposed roadway route;
WHEREAS the ENGINEER has experience on roadway design, stormwater
design and permitting, signalization design;
WHEREAS the CITY has requested the ENGINEER to perform
services relating to the design and permitting of the proposed
Connector Road;
engineering
East West
NOW THEREFORE, the CITY and the ENGINEER for the considerations named
herein agree as follows:
SECTION 1
General
1.1 Introduction
1.1.1
This Amendment work is to generally provide for engineering services
for the design and permitting of the East West Connector Road. The
CITY has identified the limits of connector road design and permitting
to include:
1.1.1,1.
A four lane divided roadway extending from St. John's Parkway at
Rinehart Road to Upsala Road, following a 110-ft right-of-way
previously acquired by the CITY.
1.1.1.2.
A 32-ft wide two lane road extending from the Smith Canal to
Airport Boulevard, following the existing 30-ft Jewett Lane right-of-
way. The CITY is in the process of acquiring an additional 50-ft of
right-of-way, resulting in an 80-ft right-of-way.
1.1.1.3.
Design of a bridge crossing of the Smith Canal, allowing a
connection of the new Jewett Lane roadway with existing Coastline
Road.
1.1.2
Subconsultant services for the roadway design and permitting include
surveying services, environmental services (wetlands and surface
water permitting, excluding preparation of mitigation plan(s)), and
2
\\CP}-I_SANF2\VOL2XJOBSNZ6582.00\WP-WORD~PROPOSALNDAGXEast-West-Prop. doe
geotechnical services, consisting of subsurface and groundwater
investigations.
1.1.3
1.1.4
2.1
2.1.1
2.1.2.
2.1.3
Additional subconsultant services including land acquisition, title
searches, boundary surveys, preparation of legal descriptions or
sketches of description, mitigation plans, water quality monitoring, or
other specialist services are not included. If these services are
subsequently determined advisable during the course of work, they
may be considered for authorization as an additional service under
Section 3 of this Amendment or separately provided by the CITY or
consultants employed directly by the CITY.
The plans for the project will be developed in three phases. Phase 1
will be from Rinehart Road to Upsala Road. Phase 2 will be from
Bevier Road to Airport Boulevard. Phase 3 will be from Smith Canal
to Bevier Road. This will allow portions of the project to proceed
based on obtaining the necessary rights-of-way and allow earlier
construction completion of the overall project.
SECTION 2
Scope of Services
General Description
The ENGINEER agrees to perform professional engineering services
in connection with the project as hereinafter stated.
The ENGINEER will serve as the CITY's professional engineering
representative in those phases of the project to which this Scope of
Services applies, and will give consultation and advice to the CITY
during the performance of his services.
Attached as Exhibit "A" to this Amendment is a manhour breakdown for
the project Scope of Services. A copy of the various proposed
subconsultant services are contained in Exhibit "B". Exhibit "C" shows
the proposed route and potential stormwater pond locations. These
are very preliminary alternative locations. The ENGINEER will
coordinate with adjacent property owners to locate the ponds in the
most beneficial locations.
2.1.4
The ENGINEER will coordinate with the CITY and will attend City
Commission Workshops and Commission Meetings to obtain
Commission and public input regarding the project. The ENGINEER
will prepare materials regarding the project design for presentation at
the meetings.
J:XZ6582.00\WP-WORDXPROPOSAL\DAGXEast-West-Prop.doc
2.2
2.2.1
2.2.2
2.2.3
2.2.4
Preliminary Design
The ENGINEER will gather information needed for the project including
maps, aerials, and reports.
The ENGINEER will procure the services of an environmental
consultant. The environmental consultant will determine limits of
SJRWMD and ACOE jurisdictional wetland and surface waters within
the road right-of-way.
The ENGINEER will procure the services of a survey subconsultant to
conduct a route survey of the road right-of-way. The limits of the route
survey are:
2.2.3.1
St. Johns Parkway: 110-ft right-of-way from Rinehart Road
to Upsala. The surveyor conducted a route survey of this
alignment for the CITY in 1994 as part of the St. Johns
Parkway East Utility construction project and will utilize some
of the same survey data as the roadway base survey,
2.2.3.2
Coastline Road: 60-ft right-of-way from Upsala Road to the
Smith Canal. The route between Upsala Road and Central
Park Drive has been previously surveyed; no additional
surveying is proposed. The route between Central Park
Drive and the Smith Canal has not been previously
surveyed. Since no roadway improvements are proposed in
this area, no surveying will be conducted. The exception to
this is the area west of the canal, which will be surveyed in
order to show how the new road will connect to the existing
east end of Coastline Road.
2.2.3.3
Jeweft Lane: 100 ft corridor centered on the proposed 80-ft
right-of-way from the Smith Canal to Airport Boulevard. The
CITY will provide information relating to the location of the
proposed right-of-way.
The route survey will include topography, cross sections, identification
of trees larger than 6" in diameter, utilities, physical culture, location of
wetlands lines flagged by the environmental consultant, and
identification of platted right-of-way. Property lines will only be shown
as platted, and will not be field located. Since it is difficult to determine
the quantity of wetlands lines which exist in the project area without
detailed field reconnaissance and determination of stormwater pond
locations, the proposed engineering fee identified in Section 5 of this
4
\\CPH_SANF2\VOL2UOBS~Z6582.00\WP-WORD~PROPOSAL~DAGXEast~West-Prop.doc
2.2.5
2.2.6
2.2.7
2.2.8
2.2.9
Amendment is based on surveying a total of 8000 lineal feet of
wetlands lines. The survey subconsultant has provided a unit cost of
wetland line surveying ($0.75 per lineal foot) which would be the basis
for additional services, if authorized by the CITY in accordance with
Section 3 of this Amendment.
The ENGINEER will procure the services of a geotechnical consultant
to conduct a subsurface and groundwater assessment of the proposed
roadway right-of-way. The geotechnical consultant will also conduct
muck probes along the portion of the alignment between Rinehart
Road and Upsala Road since there appear to be numerous wetlands
within the area.
The ENGINEER will conduct a drainage analysis in order to determine
the size and general location of stormwater ponds which would serve
the roadway limits identified in 2.2.3 above. Additionally, it is assumed
the drainage analysis will include an analysis of the parcels which are
adjacent to the new roadway in order to ensure the roadway design
does not adversely affect drainage on the adjoining parcels. The
ENGINEER will coordinate with the County regarding potential joint
use ponds at Rinehart Road and at the proposed Airport Boulevard/St.
Johns Parkway intersection. The ENGINEER will also coordinate with
adjacent property owners regarding potential joint use ponds where
feasible.
The ENGINEER will design the roadway vertical alignment based on
water tables, drainage concerns, and adjacent property elevations.
Additionally, the design will also consider earthwork requirements,
with an attempt to balance project excavation and fill requirements
where possible.
During the Preliminary design phase, construction plans will be
prepared. These plans will be approximately 30% complete, and will
show proposed pavement and the proposed vertical alignment. The
plans will consist of:
B.
C.
D.
E.
Cover Sheet
Key Sheet and General Notes
Typical Sections
Plan and Profile (15 sheets, 1"=20' scale)
Cross Sections (12 sheets, 1"=10'H, 1"=5'V,
200 ft)
sections every
The ENGINEER will identify stormwater pond sizes and locations on
an overall map. He will base locations according to proximity to the
right-of-way, and will attempt to choose parcels which are not
5
\\CPH_SANF2\VOL2XJOBSXZ6582.00\WP-WORD~PROPOSALXDAGMEast-West-Prop.doc
2.2.10
2.2.11
currently developed and do not contain an inordinate amount of
quality wetlands. The ENGINEER will also work with adjacent
property owners to evaluate the potential for joint use ponds along the
corridor to help reduce acquisition costs. The ENGINEER will
coordinate his services with appraisers/acquisition personnel
employed directly by the CITY.
The ENGINEER will prepare a Preliminary Opinion of Probable
Construction cost based on the 30% plans and pond sizing and
locations.
The ENGINEER will meet with the CITY to review the plans, pond
locations, and construction cost estimate.
2.3
2.3.1
2.3.2
2.3.3
Final Design
The ENGINEER will obtain and coordinate the work of an
environmental subconsultant who will flag all jurisdictional wetlands for
a maximum of five (5) stormwater pond locations, up to eighteen-(18)
acres maximum total area. Environmental consultant work will also
include preparation of information required for wetland resource permit,
dredge/Till applications and PAl's, and protected species survey for
Corps of Engineers, if required. Since it is difficult to determine the
extent of the wetland impacts (quantity and quality) without detailed
field reconnaissance and determination of stormwater pond locations,
the engineering fee identified in Section 5 of this Amendment does not
include preparation of a mitigation plan. The environmental
subconsultant has provided a cost for one mitigation plan ($500),
which would be the basis for additional services, if authorized by the
CITY in accordance with Section 3 of this Amendment. other
mitigation plan preparation additional services may also include
surveying, title work, coordination with property owners, preparation of
construction drawings, and exhibits, depending on the type of
mitigation chosen for this project.
The ENGINEER will obtain and coordinate required survey
subconsultant services to consist of topographic information at the
proposed stormwater ponds as well as legal descriptions and boundary
surveys.
The ENGINEER will obtain and coordinate geotechnical consultant
services consisting of subsurface and groundwater assessment of a
maximum of five (5) stormwater pond locations, up to eighteen-(18)
acres maximum total area.
\\CPH_SANF2\VOL2XJOBS~Z6582.00\WP-WORDLPROPOSALXDAG~East-West-Prop.doc
6
2.3.4
2.3.5
2.3.6
2.3.7
2.3.8
2.3.9
2.3.10
2.3.11
2.3.12
The ENGINEER will perform calculations to determine Smith Canal
Bridge span requirements (horizontal and vertical) based on existing
topography and drainage studies prepared by others for Seminole
County and coordinate permitting of the bridge with the St. Johns River
Water Management District and Seminole County.
The ENGINEER will coordinate design of Smith Canal Bridge with
Con-Span (Precast Bridge System) and with the geotechnical
consultant.
The ENGINEER will prepare 60% construction plans which will consist
of the following:
A. Cover Sheet
B. Key Sheet and General Notes
C. Drainage Map
D. Typical Sections
E. Summary of Drainage Structures
F. Plan/Profile Sheets (15 sheets, 1" ~ 20' scale)
G. Intersection Details -4 sheets (Rinehart Road; Upsala Road;
Bevier Road; Airport Boulevard).
H. Stormwater Pond Construction (5 sheets)
I. Canal Crossing Details
J. General Details
K. Cross Sections - 12 Sheets (1"=10' H; 1"=5' V; Sections every 200
feet)- 12 Sheets
ENGINEER will prepare stormwater design calculations (ponds and
storm sewer system) for use in permitting the project.
ENGINEER will prepare exhibits relating to stormwater design as
needed for the permitting of the project.
ENGINEER will update previously prepared Preliminary Opinion of
Probable Construction Cost.
ENGINEER will meet with CITY to review 60% plans, stormwater
calculations, and opinion of construction cost.
The ENGINEER will modify plans and calculations as necessary based
on CITY review.
ENGINEER will prepare SJRWMD Permit Application Package and will
submit with 60% plans to SJRWMD. Additionally, ENGINEER will
prepare Seminole County RAN Utilization Permit Applications and
submit to the County with 60% plans. Note: The CITY will need to
\\CPH_SANF2\VOL2XJOBS~Z6582.00\WP-WORDXPROPOSALXDAGXEast-West-Prop. doc
2.3.13
2.3.14
2.3.15
2.3.16
2.3.17
2.3.18
2.3.19
make decisions, based on input from ENGINEER and environmental
subconsultant, as to type of proposed wetland mitigation. The
prepared mitigation plan (an additional service, if authorized by the
CITY), needs to be a part of the permit application submittal to the
SJRWMD.
ENGINEER will respond to the various agencies during permit review
process and make required revisions as necessary
ENGINEER will coordinate traffic signalization revisions necessary for
the Rinehart Road Intersection with Seminole County. Other than
revisions to the Rinehart Road intersection signalization, no other
signalization design is included. Additionally, preparation of traffic
studies are not included.
ENGINEER will prepare 90% construction Plans consisting of:
A. Cover Sheet
B. Key Sheet and General Notes
C. Drainage Map
D. Typical Sections
E. Summary of Quantities
F. Summary of Drainage Structures
G. Plan/Profile Sheets (15 sheets, 1 "- 20' scale)
H. Intersection Details -4 sheets (Rinehart Road; Upsala Road;
Bevier Road; Airport Boulevard).
I. Stormwater Pond Construction (5 sheets)
J. Canal Crossing Details
K. General Details
L. Cross Sections - 12 Sheets (1"=10' H; 1"--5' V Sections every 200
feet) - 12 Sheets
M. Traffic Control Plan Requirements (1 sheet of traffic control general
notes)
N. Signing and Marking Plans (8 sheets, 1" = 20' scale).
O. Signalization General Notes
P. Signalization Plans.
Prepare Opinion of Probable Construction Cost.
Meet with City and review 90% plans and construction cost.
Submit signalization plans to Seminole County Traffic Engineer for
review.
Prepare Project Manual (front-end contract documents and
specifications) and deliver to City for review.
8
\\CPI-I_SANF2\VOL2~JOBS~Z6582.00\WP-WORD~PROPOSAL~DAG~East-West-Prop.doc
2.3.20
2.3.21
2.3.22
Modify engineering plans as necessary based on City and County
reviews.
Prepare final Opinion of Probable Construction Cost.
Submit 6 sets of 100% plans and project manual to City.
3.1
3.1.1
3.1.2
3.1.3
3.1.4
3.1.5
SECTION 3
Additional Services of the ENGINEER
If authorized by the CITY, the ENGINEER shall furnish or obtain from
others the following additional services, or the CITY may provide these
services separately or directly with the provider. Such additional
services will be paid for by the CITY as outlined in Section 5.
Additional services due to significant changes in the scope of the
project or its design including, but not limited to, changes in size,
complexity, character of construction or due to time delays in initiating
or completion of the work as described herein.
Provide through subconsultants, construction quality control testing;
traffic studies; wetland or surface water mitigation relating to proposed
creation or restoration areas, or wetland preservation; land acquisition
boundary surveys, title searches, preparation of legal descriptions or
sketches of description; or other specialist services including real
estate or right-of-way agents, project or construction management,
financial or budgetary consultants, and bookkeeping or accounting
services. If these services are subsequently determined advisable
during the course of work, they may be considered for authorization as
an additional service under this section or separately provided by the
CITY.
Except as otherwise provided herein, services or additional costs
associated with revising previously accepted studies, reports, or other
documents prepared by the ENGINEER when such revisions are due
to causes beyond the ENGINEER's control.
Additional services resulting from public protests, administrative
hearings, or similar matters.
Preparing to serve and/or serving as an Expert Witness for the CITY in
any litigation, public hearing, condemnation proceeding, right-of-way or
easement acquisition or negotiation, or other legal / administrative
proceeding.
9
\\CPH_SANF2\VOL2~JOBS~Z6582.00\WP-WORDXPROPOSAL~DAGMEast-West-Prop.doc
3.1.6
3.1.7
3.1.8
3.1.9
Furnishing additional sets of prints of drawings and other Documents
beyond those designated in Section 2.
Additional engineering services required by revisions to regulations
(after the date of this Amendment) as applicable to the Florida
Department of Environmental Protection, the St. Johns River Water
Management District, Corps of Engineers, Seminole County, FDOT, or
other regulatory agency requirements or revisions necessary due to
changes in the Road Improvement Plans.
Additional services in connection with the project including services
normally furnished by the CITY as described in Section 4 herein and
services not otherwise provided for in this Agreement.
Construction Engineering and Inspection Services shall be provided
under separate authorization.
4.1
4.1.1
4.1.2
4.1.3
4.1.4
4.1.5.
SECTION 4
CITY Responsibilities
The CITY will:
Advise the ENGINEER of his requirements for the project and
designate a person to act as the CITY's representative with respect to
the work to be performed under this Amendment, and such person
shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive
information, interpret and define the CITY's policies and decisions
pertinent to the work covered by this Amendment.
Obtain and provide data requested that is reasonably available on the
project along with operational and maintenance requirements and
easement and right-of-way requirements.
Guarantee access to and make all provisions for the ENGINEER to
enter upon public and private lands as required for the ENGINEER to
perform his work under this Amendment.
Make facilities accessible for inspection.
Examine all studies, reports, sketches, schedules, and other
documents presented by the ENGINEER and render decisions
pertaining thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the work
of the ENGINEER. Assist in obtaining approval of all governmental
authorities having jurisdiction over the project, and such approvals and
consents from such other individuals or bodies as may be necessary
10
\\CPH_SANF2\VOL2~JOBSXZ6582.00\WP-WORD~PROPOSALXDAGMEast-West-Prop.doc
4.1.6
4.1.7
4.1.8
for completion of the Project.
Furnish or direct the ENGINEER in writing to provide at the CITY's
expense, any sub-consultant services not designated in Section 2, if
advised by the ENGINEER and CITY concurs that they are necessary.
Provide such legal, accounting, financial and insurance counseling
services as may be required for the project, and such auditing services
as the CITY may require.
Give prompt written notice to the ENGINEER whenever the CITY
observes or otherwise becomes aware of any defect in the Project.
5.1
5.1.1
5.1.2
5.1.3
SECTION 5
Payment
General Payment Provisions
Compensation paid ENGINEER for services described herein and
rendered by principals and employees assigned to the Project will be
computed by multiplying Standard classification billing rates for all
classifications of employees directly engaged on the project, times the
numbers of hours worked on the project.
The engineering fee for the services described herein is estimated to
be $339,535, inclusive of out-of-pocket expenses. Invoices will be
submitted periodically, indicating the hours expended during that billing
cycle.
The CITY will make prompt monthly payments in response to
ENGINEER's monthly statements without retention for all categories of
services rendered under this Agreement and for reimbursable
expenses incurred.
\\CPH_SANF2\VOL2~JOBS~Z6582.00\WP-WORD~PROPOSAL~DAGXEast-West-Prop.doc
11
5.1.4
5.1.5
6.1
6.2
6.3
Charges for the services rendered by principals and employees as
witnesses in any litigation, hearing or proceeding will be computed at a
rate of $1200.00 per day or any portion thereof (but compensation for
time spent in preparing to appear in any such litigation, hearing or
proceeding will be computed in accordance with the payment method
as set forth in Paragraphs 5.1.1 ).
If this Agreement is terminated dudng prosecution of the services prior
to completion of the services of Section 2, payments to be made in
accordance with Paragraph 5.1.1 and 5.1.2 on account of that and all
prior work under this Amendment shall be due and payable, and shall
constitute total payment for services rendered. In addition, upon
termination, the ENGINEER shall be paid for any additional services
authorized and rendered under Section 3.
SECTION 6
General Conditions
Since the ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labor, materials,
or equipment or over any construction Contractor's method of
determining prices, any opinion of probable construction cost which
may be provided in the services of this Amendment are made on the
basis of his experience and qualifications and represent his best
judgment as a design professional familiar with the construction
industry, but the ENGINEER cannot and does not guarantee that bids
or the construction cost will not vary from opinions of probable cost
prepared by him. Similar limitations apply to construction schedules
reviewed or prepared by the ENGINEER.
The CITY and the ENGINEER each binds himself and his partners,
successors, executors, administrators and assigns to the other party of
this Agreement and to partners, successors, executors, administrators,
and assigns of such other party in respect to all covenants of this
Amendment. Nothing herein shall be construed as creating any
personal liability on the part of any officer or agency of any public body
which may be a party hereto, nor shall it be construed as giving any
rights or benefits hereunder to anyone other than the CITY and the
ENGINEER.
The ENGINEER agrees to initiate work promptly upon receipt of
authorization to proceed and to prosecute the work in an expeditious
and timely manner until the Project is completed.
\\CPH_SANF2\VOL2UOBSXZ6582.00\WP-WORD~ROPOSAL~DAG~East-West-Prop.doc
12
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this
Amendment the day and year first above written.
(ATTEST& SEAL)
D
& SEAL)
ENGINEER:
CPH Engineers, Inc.
David A. Gierach, P.E.
President
Date
J:XZ6582.00\WP-WORDXPROPOSALXDAGXEast-West-Prop.doc
13
EXHIBIT "A"
\\CPH_SANF2WOL2xJOBSxZ6582,00\WP-WORDXPROPOSALxDAG~East-West-Prop.doc
14
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE OF SERVICES
TIME AND COST ESTIMATE
EAST - WEST CONNECTOR ROAD
(St. Johns Parkway - Coastline Rd - Jewett Lane)
PRELIMINARY DESIGN PHASE
Gather data and information (maps,
2.2.1 aerials, reports)
Obtain from environmental consultant
jurisdictional wetland lines along roadway
2.2.2 alignment
2.2.3 and Obtain from surveyor route survey
2.2.4 (roadway alignment)
Obtain from geotechnical consultant
subsurface and groundwater assessment
of road right-of-way; existing pavement
2.2.5 assessment (Coastline Road)
Conduct drainage analysis to determine
2.2.6 stormwater ponds needed for roadway
Design roadway vertical alignment based
on water tables, drainage concerns,
2.2.7 earthwork cut vs. fill analysis
Prepare 30% construction plans consisting
2.2,8 of:
A Cover Sheet
B Key Sheet and General Notes
C Typical Sections
D Plan and Profile (15 sheets, 1"=20' scale)
Cross Sections (1"=10' H; 1"=5' V, sections
E every 200 feet) o 12 sheets
Identify stormwater pond sizes and
locations. Work with property owners
2.2.9 regarding potential joint use ponds.
Prepare preliminary opinion of probable
2.2.10 construction cost
Meet with City, review 30% plans, pond
2.2.11 locations, preliminary construction costs
FINAL DESIGN PHASE
Obtain from environmental consultant
2.3.1 jurisdictional wetland lines at pond parcels
Obtain from surveyor pond site topographic
surveys, boundary surveys and legal
2.3.2 descriptions
Obtain from geotechnical consultant
subsurface and groundwater assessment
2.3.3 of stormwater ponds
Determine Smith Canal Bridge span
requirements (horizontal and vertical)
based on existing topography and drainage
studies prepared by others for Seminole
2.3.4 County
I 8 12 4 4 $10.00
6 I $5.00
6 1 $5.00
12 1 $5.00
4 60 40 12 $5.00
6 100 60 80 $50.00
4
4
8 $25.00
4 4 24 2 $25.00
8 8 16 $25.00
90 60 120 $375.00
48 24 96 $300.00
24 80 60 24 $10.00
2 16 20 20 $5.00
2 2 $10.00
2 $5.00
2 $5.00
2 $5.00
2 20 12 2 $20.00
east-west-prop.xls
TASK NO. DESCRI,PTiO:.
2.3,5
2.3.6
2.3.7
2.3.8
2.3,9
2.3.10
2.3.11
2.3.12
2.3.13
2.3.14
2.3.15
Coordinate Design cf Smith Canal Bridge
with Con-Span (Precast Bridge System)
and geotechnical consultant
Prepare 60% construction plans consisting
of:
A Cover Sheet
B Key Sheet and General Notes
C Drainage Map
D Typical Sections
E Summary of Drainage Structures
F Plan and Profile (15 sheets, 1"=20' scale)
Intersection Details - 4 sheets (Rinehart
Road; Upsala Road; Bevier Road; Airport
G Boulevard)
H Stormwater Pond Construction (5 sheets)
I Canal Crossing Details
J General Details
Cross Sections (1"=10' H; 1"=5' V, sections
K every 200 feet) - 12 sheets
Prepare stormwater design calculations
(Ponds and storm sewer system)
Prepare Exhibits relating to stormwater
design
Update Preliminary Opinion of Probable
Construction Cost
Meet with City, review 60% plans,
stormwater calclations, construction cost
Modify plans and calculations as necessary
based on City review
Prepare SJRWMD Permit Application
Package, Submit with 60% plans to
SJRWMD. Permit Application Fees To Be
Paid By City.
Prepare Seminole County RRV Utilization
Permit Applications; submit to County with
60% plans. Permit Application Fees to Be
Paid by City.
Coordinate traffic siganlization revisions
necessary for Rinehart Road intersection
with Seminole County
Prepare 90% construction plans consisting
of:
A Cover Sheet
B Key Sheet and General Notes
C Drainage Map
D Typical Sections
E Summary of Quantities
F Summary of Drainage Structures
G Plan and Profile (15 sheets, 1"=20' scale)
Intersection Details - 4 sheets (Rinehart
Road; Upsala Road; Bevier Road; Airport
H Boulevard)
I Stormwater Pond Construction (5 sheets)
J Canal Crossing Details
K General Details
P
. E
4O
4
8
8
20
90
40
20
10
2
48
120
8
20
4
16
3O
2O
2O
1
1
2
4
10
45
10
4
2
1
T
2O
4
4
8
10
60
60
40
10
6
24
40
8
40
20
10
10
10
1
2
2
12
10
60
2O
8
2
2
4
24
24
16
3O
120
100
100
20
10
96
40
10
60
6
2
12
12
8
30
20
100
60
20
10
4
5
5
2
1
4
2
4
2
2
2
2
1
$20.00
$25,00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$375.00
$100.00
$125.00
$25.oo
$25.OO
$300.00
$10.00
$100.00
$10.00
$10.00
$250.00
$50.00
$20.00
$50.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$375.00
$100.00
$125.00
$25.00
$25.00
east-west-prop, xls
ITA$ K NO.
L
M
N
O
P
2.3.16
2.3.17
2.3.18
2.3.19
2.3.20
2.3.21
2.3.22
TOTAL
DESCR'I.PI:ICIN., ; , P
Cross Sections (1"=10' H: 1"=5' V. sections
every 200 feet) - 12 sheets 1
Traffic Control Plan Requirements 1
Signing and Marking Plans (8 sheets,
1 "=20' scale) 1
Signalization General Notes 1
Signalization Plan 1
Prepare Opinion of Probable Construction
Cost 1
Meet with City, review 90% plans and
construction cost 2
Submit Signalization Plans to Seminole
County Traffic Engineering for Review
Prepare Project Manual (Front end contract
documents and specifications) 1
Modify plans as necessary based on City
and County review 1
Prepare Final Opinion of Probable
Construction Cost
Submit 6 sets of 100% plans and project
manual to City
92 1262
,i
E': '.' T" D
24 24 60
8 2 10 1
40 20 120 2
8 2 10 1
32 8 40 1
10 20 4 1
2 2
2 4 2 2
40 4
10 20 40 2
2 2 I 1
4
907 1646 82
Sub-total (Based on Standard Billing
Rates)
Reimbursed Expenses
Survey Sub-consultant (Route Survey)
Survey Sub-consultant (VVetland Line Surveying - Assume up to 8000 ft)
Topographic Survey Sub-consultant (Pond Survey - Up to 5 locations, total area approx. 18 acres)
Boundary Survey/Legal Descr. Sub-consultant Allowance (Ponds Up to 5 locations)
Environmental Subconsultant (Rd R/w plus up to 5 pond locations)
Geotechnical Subconsultant
TOTAL
$300.00
$25.00
$200.00
$25.00
$25.00
$20.00
$10.00
$25.00
$20.00
$250.00
$10.00
$225.00
$4,420.00
$267,315.00
$4,420.00
$22,350.00
$6,000.00
$11,400.00
$10,000.00
$3,950.00
$24,100.00
$349,536.00
east-west-prop.xls
EXHIBIT "B"
t5
\\CPH_SANF2\VOL2X.IOBSXZ6582.00\WP-WORD~PROPOSALXDAGXEast-West-Prop.doc
.. RS'OG..I, VOC~: I0/ 811=lta 1U:II::IAMj -,.> ur-'rl *'-rlg,Lreu~r,~ j.~lui r~ ~
'FROM ! NOTTINGHAM ENUIRONMENTAL
FAX NO.:
Oct. 08 1999 10:13AM P1
*t
October. 8, f999
N- Ka.tr~na Bovanan, P.E:.
.Con~rHl~, .. POrter ~nd. Ho~s .En~cers, ~.
P.O. Bgx 2808. "
Sa~oid, Flo~da ~2~72L2808 ..
' ~: 'C1~ of s~ord "" : '.
. .St. Johns. P~bay "'
. .. ..,.'.. f.:..'...
Dec M~. Bo~~" ' " ' "'"
'. Noffingharn Env/r. oz~.men.~kl. A~6~i,~f~s~ IncL is'pie'ased to 'sUbmit' the
,following'proposal in support of the St. Joh.ns Parkw~3f ~mprovements
'proJ;ec~:. · ...: ' ' '" , ' "
· "wafers of~ the United :States" Wl~ch occur wltb]n tl~e. ~ollowing areas:
,. ..... ..,........, '......:,.., ..'..: . . :. . .. .
.,.. .' ~ ... . . ...' ' ... · ·
· C. ':Px:oposed'sto~te'~p~nd~ " "
.:' .,."......"..',.. ~'..'..' ~'....':':...'......'"
... :Z :." .....
':' Th~ W..etI~/nds7 will be flagged' '~ma J'&rtsaic~ioriai "wa~r's" determined"
' "'.m ac. cqrd..'.a~.de.wittj Bnvir. on.mental Resouf-ce, Permit (ERp.) and U.S.
' Army Corps Of'Bngtneers (Corps) erit'~ri&.' THe flagged line will then b~
'.." ~,efl~ed '.b~ District. 'and Corl~.s st.aLff, as ~a~es~ary: S~Bsequent to the ·
-. ' ".'."vefifl:cati. on.'.of.'tl~ We~hn~ .~0urO~i-t~, ~h~. flagged.lines will most
".' ILkel~r' need t~ Be .su~.e~ &n.d 'th~ are'al':~x~&nt. 6f 'fla~' .We~lanas "
..."."~" detemika&d,'by ~t'h~s., ' ""' ' ' ':' ""' ' '. .
.'. ;'.....'. '::v. .. '. ' .... .;..'.. .;. '. ' ' . '. ':' '.'.,: ...., ".... .'. ~. . '
.9L .' .Once. the areas .tm,~e been' determined, o~e mitigation .plan, ff
· ' .' req.u~ed~ Will.be ~3r~b.a:r~a. by NotO-n~h~m"l~nv~r~n'm~ntal Associates,
· . .. I~e.. 'and'~ubi~ait{ed .~o CPH' B'.ng[neerS, ~..e; f6r .i~clu. sion in the
"' . .; &i / li6a{ .on .......: .:.'... :."':. ' '
'. ,..to atten. d xb.~eti~gs .~.th thai. a~en~ies,' &s..d'.~ee~ed by CPH'.
"'. "fr{'.cl.U~il.ng a p~:e:'.~pi3n~3ation mee.{t_ng a't ~'~. St. J6hris:River Water
. ." "'.'; 'M .anag~;~en~ DiStrict. f6r' .the pu~.'.os'~. of aiset~.ifig this project
.' ,...:.an.d"tt~ envi~o~m~n~al'i.~ues and ktt~_4~c~ a'mi~i'~ai~m_ :of.'two ·
'..: 'i'~.oo~;a.~nado~' m~tings ~rlf. h {he lCity. ' .....' "','.""!'.'.'
. .' i
FRON': NOTTZNGHRH ENUZRONNENTRL
FAX NO. :'
Oct. 08 1999 10:13RN P2
4. ' t6r~vide a desdription 6f the ~e~ands. (,~egetat~v~ ~ssociations),
hy~dlo~, .~e u~l~on, ~d habitat f~c~ons,' plus ~y
re~ements' of ~R~D's .~n~b~nt~ Resource Petit program..
. :~so, '~ req~ed, 'pr6~de seconda~ and cumula~ve ~mpacts
" :'stat'~m~nts reg~d'~g ~ en~onment~.~pac'ts. . '
... L"; . .':~ '.... ' ~ ..':'.:"' .' ' ." '~' "' ".',.C"'
.. ,... '.. :,. .... ~ . . , .....
...... ... ..... ,,,: . .'~.,. . .'. ,..: . . .:.. .. ....
... . .~ ~a~- ..' ~.......... ': ..:,.,.~.,'.. :.......: .~ .'.....'...
,... .... .' .. ,. ... .... ~ . .., . . ..
: :..'~s~O~ ~e S~' ~.b~s.~v~= ~te~ ~~emc~.. ' .
." D~.~ ~ O:S:..~.Co~.e~.~E~e~ ~ .: '.'. 'S2,OO0.O0.
, ,.. ~. . .., . .,. ........
.... .....:......., ......:.:.. .....,:: ........ ~....: .. :.. .......: .. · . . ,.
...... .. ....: ~ .. .. ....,........:...,......., ..'
" ~u~a: ~'a~ aa~H6n~ cost.. :. :."'..: ".. ' .: :. ' ',' ,..·'
' '~[ ~. Nofi~ ~' ~o~ed. ~~ ~a~at~o~:,' etc.' '~ E~ e6~lete8 ~s' ' ."
· .. ., . :....: . ,~ ' . .,.' :. ~ . · ,.. '..: .:..:. , ...": '..' ...:' ...: ,.: .':. ".' ,'. :,.. . . '.
"' ' ~ q~es.~A'or ~e~e ~a~o~ ~o~6n, p~da~':~;' ':' '
: ., ...' :.: .'... ~....: '.'...::.....;..:., .: '.: :.: '-..: :',....: :.... :....' . :' :"...:~::...'..'
" ~~~~3Y', ', '.. ;:'.; :..'... "~'....' ..
· ~ ' ' fAy, . ~. ,~ . . . .,
.. ..
Vi~ c~ ....
" ' ~3~50. oo.
Tink!epaugh
SURVEYING SERVICES INC,
October 21, 1999'
CPH Engineers, Inc.
500 West Fulton Street
Sanford, Florida 32772
Attention: Katriina Bowman
RE:
Jewett Lane/East-West Connector/St. Johns Parkway
Proposal # 99 - 221.1
Dear Katriina,
Tinklepaugh Surveying Services, .Inc. is 'pleased to.present' he following proposal:
.SCOPE
For all projects, with the exception of Section 3, we will provide topographic information
along each' route (see individual sections for specific widths). Cross sections will be taken
at approximately 100' foot intervals. including any grade breaks. Above ground
improvements, trees 6" in diameter and larger and culture within the Specified widths will
'be shown.....Above groijnd and surfaria i'ndi~'~tidnS"of utilities servicing. the site wilt be
10cated~ .In addition, prior to co~nmencing the field work, we wijl' contact the various uti'lities
to flag the .10cati'on of a. ny ijnde'rg~-0und lines ~ffeCting, the' site, These lines as flagged ,by
the responding uti'lity Companies will 'be' ShoWn 0n' tlie survey. We '.will establish 'the
.alignment of the various righ'ts of way based upon in-house information (St. John's
Parkway) record plats~ and additional right of way widths to be acquired. it is our
understanding that individual parcel ownerships will not be determined. The cost
breakdown is as follows:
SeCtion 2 - St..John's Parkway - Rinehart Road to Upsala Road:
Top.ographic information to.' be pr.0vided along the .110' corridor as' previous y.
surveyed 'by this firm. ..
., .FEE: .$8:0.00.00 · ..
SeCtion 3 - Coastline Road - Upsala ROad tO Lockhart Smith Canal:
It. i.s oui' unde.rstanding that this section will consist of depicting the Right of Way
data only (No topographic information) from Up~ala Road to the beginning of the
Cul.-de.-.sa.c area Wes.t of .the Lockhart Smith canal. We will then resume providing
., .topographic information for {he .Cu.l-'de-saC area E~.st thr~dgh ~he canal to'Jewett
"Lane. ' ' ""' ....
" 'FEE: $1;850:00 :" · ' ': ". '."'
379 WEST MICHIGAN ST.,,SUITE 208 · ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32806
TELEPHONE (407) 422-0957
FAX (407) 422-6915
" E-Maih tinklepaugh@ mpinet.net
CPH Engineers, inc.
Attn: K. Bowman
10/21/99
Page-2-
99-221.1
Section 4 - Jewett Lane - Lockhart Smith Canal to Bevier Road:
Existing 30' right of way topographic information to be provided along a 100'
corridor.
FEE: $8,250.00 .(if additional right of way taken on South side)
FEE: $9,000.00 (if additional right of way taken on North side)
Section S - Jewett Lane - Bevier Road to Airport BIrd:
existing 30' right of way plus additional 50' along South side (80' total)
FEE: $3,500.00
Additional Services:
1.)
Location of environmental wetlands as flagged in the field by others: FEE: $0.75
per linear.foot. ..
1)
Topographic survey of proposed stormwater ponds - see aerial for approximate
location. - We will provide topographic information for the 5 pond sites as generally
depicted on the aerial photo supplied to this firm. The outlines of wooded areas will
be shown along with the location of trees 20" and larger. Boundary work and legal
descriptions are 'not a part of this scope:
Pond # 1 - FEE = $1,500.00
Pond # 2 - FEE = $2,000.00
Pond # 3 - FEE = $4,500.00
Pond # 4 - FEE = $2,300.00
Pond # S .- FEE = $t,I00.00
Revisions, additional certifications, title reviews, etc. will be provided at an additional fee.
The terms of this agreement shall be valid for client acceptance for thirty (30) days.
Invoices are due and payable at time of receipt; in the case of delinquent accounts (90
days or over) the client agrees to pay, in addition to the full face amount of the invoice, all
reasonable collection, and/or attorney's fees required in the process of collection.
CPH Engineers, Inc,
Attn: K. Bowman
10/21/99
Page-3-
99-221.1
Four sets of the survey, signed and sealed, will be provided at job completion. Additional
prints, pick-ups or delivery, and other identifiable direct out of pocket expenses will be
invoiced at a multiplier of 1.25.
We sincerely appreciate your choosing Tinklepaugh Surveying Services,
proposal and look forward to working with you on this project,
Sincerely,
TINKLEPAUGH SURVEYING SERVICES, INC.
Arthur W. Tucker
Vice President. "
Inc. 'for a
If this proposal is satisfactory, please have the financially responsible party execute and
return one copy to this office as our authorization to proceed.
The undersigned affirms that he or she is responsible for the fees as stated in this
proposal and agrees to the terms contained therein.
Signed Name .- Title .. Date
Printed Name
AWT:ss
Be~,e~ved= 10/26/99
i0/26/99 15:55
~'4074234410 RAE WHITNEY
~002/002
UNIVERSAL
ENGINEERING SCIENCES
Consull~nls In: Geotechnicai Engineering · Threshold Insl~ectlon
Brlvlronrne.tal S~lafices · Constnjctloll Materials Testing
CPH Eng[neers, Inc.
500 W Fulton Street
P.O. Box 2808
Sanford, FL 32772-2808
October 20, I999
Offices in
· Orlando
· Giatnesville
· Fort Myers
, Ro~kledge
· St Augustine
· Daytona Beach
· west Pa~m Beach
· Jacksonvlile
· Ocela
· Tampa ,
· Dabcry
Attention:
Ms. Katdna Bowman, P.E
Reference:
Cost 'Proposal
Geotechnical Exploration
Road Construction and Improvements
Jewett Lane/East-West Connector/St. Johns Parkway
Sanford, Florida
UES Proposal No. 84606 (v2)
Revised: October 26, t999
Dear Ms. Bowman:
Universal Engineering Sciences is pleased tO Submit our proposal for geotechniCai engineering -
services on this project. Our understanding of this project, with our proposed scope of services
and costs, is presented in the following paragraphs.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
We understand CPH Engineers is working with the City of Sanford to develop design and
construction plans for four (4) sections of roadway (Sections 2 through 5) that will eventually
serve as an East-West Connector from the Towne Center Mall to the downtown area of
Sanford, Florida. We were asked to identify the anticipated geotechnical work elements that
will be required for each section of roadway.
Section 2 extends from St. Johns Parkway (where it currently ends, east of the Towne Center
Mall at Rhinehart Road) to Upsala Road. This 2,800 foot (+/-) section is undeveloped, except
that water, sewer, and rouse water lines have been installed. This section contains wetlands,
and muck may be present. Two retention ponds are anticipated. Because this area is very
swampy, a special "tracked" drilling rig will be required to access these swampy lowlands to
investigate the pond areas and roadway for subgrade and groundwater conditions.
Section 3 extends from Upsala Road eastward to Lockhart Smith Canal. Soil borings will be
required for foundation design in the area where a Con-Span type bridge is anticipated. Coring
of the existing pavement will be conducted to determine the existing structural condition.
Evaluation of the site soils for corrosion potential will be performed.
3532 Maggie Blvd. · Orlando, F! 32811 · (407) 423-0504 · Fax (407) 423-3106
Rec'e~ved= IO/26/99 2:~4PM; ->
10/26/99 14:15 r~'4074234410
upl-I
R__~ WHITNEY ..
~003/008
CPH Engineers, Inc.
Ms. Katdna Bowman, P.E.
UES Proposal No. 84606 (v2)
Page 2
Section 4 ranges from Lockhart Smith Canal to Bevier Road. This 3,350 foot (+/-) section will
acquire 80 to 100 feet of ROW in order to upgrade the existing roadway. Soil borings will be
required for evaluation of the roadway widening area. Evaluation of the site soils for corrosion
potential will be performed. Three retention ponds are anticipated
Section 5 ranges from Bevier Road to Airport Boulevard. This 1,350 foot (+1-) section will
acquire 50 feet of ROW in order to upgrade the existing roadway. Soil borings will be required
for evaluation of the roadway widening area and coring of the existing roadway to determine
the existing structural conditions will be required. Evaluation of the site 'soils for corrosion
potential will be performed.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
SECTION 2
Universal Engineering Sciences proposes to perform 10 soil borings to a depth of 15feet each
for this project, Due to the difficult access, we believe a truck-mounted drilling rig will be
required to access this low lying, swampy 'area. Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) will. be
performed continuously in the upper 10;feet of each boring and on 5-foot centers after that to
the bottom of the borings. Our field representative will visually classify the soil samples at each
test interval and place them in clean glass jars, which are labeled for future identification.
Groundwater levels will be obtained in each boring upon initial encounter and later when the
water table has stabilized. At the completion of the site investigation work, the borings will be
backfilled with the soil cuttings.
The soil samples will be transported to our Orlando laboratory for better classification testing
than can be performed by field methods, and to determine the pertinent engineering properties
for foundation design and site preparation recommendations. At the completion of the field and
laboratory testing services, our project engineer will prepare a report under the direction of a
registered professional engineer who specializes in geotechnica} engineering consulting. The
report will contain the following information at a minimum:
· Soil boring logs.and classifications
· Existing groundwater levels and estimated seasonal high levels
· Site preparation recommendations
· Underdrain design and location evaluation
· Existing pavement structural evaluation
· Pavement design recommendations
· Presence or absence of muck
· Retention pond design parameters
· Corrosion potential of site soils for utility lines
· Other concerns as appropriate
Received: 10/26/99 2:25PM~
10126/99 I4:16 ,~'4074234410
CPH
004/008
CPH Engineers, Inc.
Ms. Katrina Bowman, P.E.
UES Proposal No. 84606 (v2).
Page 3
SECT[ON 3
Universal Engineering Sciences' proposes to perform 4 soil borings to a depth of 15 feet each
for this project. Coring of the existing roadway on 600 foot centers wilt also be performed to
evaluate its existing structural condition. Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) will be performed
continuously in the upper 10-feet of each boring and on 5-foot centers after that to the bottom
of the borings. Our field representative will visually classify the soil samples at each test
interval and place them in clean glass jars, which are labeled for future identification.
Groundwater levels will be obtained in each boring upon initial encounter and later when the
water table has stabilized. At the completion of the site investigation work, the borings will be
backfilled with the soil cuttings.
The soil samples will be transported to our Orlando laboratory fo~' better classification .testing
than can be performed by field methods, and to determine the pertinent engineering properties
for foundation design and site preparation recommendations. At the completion of the field and
laboratory testing services, our project engineer will prepare a report under the direction of a
registered professional engineer who specializes in geotechnical engineering consulting.. The
report will contain the following inf0~:mation at a minimum: ·
· Soil boring togs and classifications
· Existing groundwater levels and estimated seasonal high levels
· Foundation recommendations for bridge
· Anticipated settlement; total and differential
· Site preparation recommendations
· Underdrain design and location evaluation.
· Existing pavement structural evaluation
. Pavement design recommendations
· Corrosion potential of site soils for utility lines
· Retention pond design parameters
· Other concerns as appropriate
SECTION 4
Universal Engineering Sciences Proposes to perform 11 soil borings to a depth of 15 feet each
for this project. Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) will be performed continuously in the upper
10-feet of each boring and on 5-foot centers after that to the bottom of the borings. Our field
representative witl visuaily ciassify the soil samples at each test interval and place them in dean
glass jars, Which are labeled for future identification, Groundwater levels will be obtained in
each boring upon initial encounter and later when the water table has stabilized. At the
completion of the site investigation work, the borings will be backfilled with the soi~ cuttings.
The soil samples will be transported to our Orlando laboratory for better classification testing
than can be performed by field methods, and to determine the pertinent engineering properties
CPH Engineers, Inc.
Mrs. Katrina Bowman, P.E.
UES Proposal No. 84606
Page 4
for foundation design and site preparation recommendations. At the completion of the field and
laboratory testing services, our project engineer will prepare a report under the direction of a
registered professional engineer who specializes in geotechnical engineering consulting. The
report will contain the following information at a minimum:
· Soil boring logs and classifications
· Existing groundwater levels and estimated seasonal high levels
· Site preparation recommendations
· Underdrain design and location evaluation
· Existing pavement structural evaluation
· Pavement design recommendations
· Presence or absence of muck
· Corrosion potential of site soils for utility lines
· Retention pond design parameters
· Other concerns as appropriate
SECTION 5
Universal Engineering Sciences proposes to perform 6 Soil borings to.a depth of'l 5 feet each
for this project. Standard Penetration TeSts (SPT) will be performed continuously in the upper
10-feet of each boring and on 5-foot centers after that to the bottom of the borings. Our field
representative will visually classify the soil samples at each test interval and place them in clean
glass jars, which are labeled for future identification. Groundwater levels will be obtained in
each boring upon initial encounter and later when the water table has stabilized. At the
completion of the site investigation work, the borings will be backfilled with the soil cuttings.
The soil samples will be transported to our Orlando laboratory for better classification testing
than can be performed by field methods, and to determine the pertinent engineering properties
forfoundation design and site preparation recommendations. At the completion of the field and
laboratory testing services, our project engineer will prepare a report under the direction of a
registered professional engineer who specializes in geotechnicat engineering consulting. The
report will contain the following information at a minimum:
· Soil boring logs and classifications
· Existing groundwater levels and estimated seasonal high levels
· Site preparation recommendations
· Underdrain design and location evaluation
· Existing pavement structural evaluation
· Pavement design recommendations
· Presence or absence of muck
· Retention pond design parameters
· Corrosion potential of site soils for utility lines
· Other concerns as appropriate
CPH Engineers, Inc.
Mrs. Katrina Bowman, P.E.
UES Proposal No. 84608
Page 6
COST AND TERMS
Presented on Exhibit I, attached, are our costs for performing the previously described services.
We will not exceed our budget unless the soils encountered are significantly different from
those anticipated, or the site is not accessible to our drilling rig. In either event you will be
notified prior to any increase in costs. We recommend elevation surveying be performed on
the borehole locations by a registered professional surveyor to extend the usefulness of the
geotechn ical information with regards to seasonal high groundwater levels. We have not made
an allowance for surveying services or environmental assessment of the property. We
anticipate you will pay for the surveying services required to locate and provide elevations for
the design effort.
Enclosed you will find our General Contract Conditions with two copies of our Work
Authorization/Proposal Acceptance Form. If you wish us to proceed, please have the party
responsible for payment sign the appropriate space .on the Work Authorization/Proposal
Acceptance Form and return one copy to us. Also, please include a site plan, information on
the current owner, and legal description on the subject property. This information is necessary
for us to keep accurate records of your project.
We can begin this work within 'two to' four days afternotification.tO proceed and will complete
this project in less than four to six weeks after that. Should you have any questions concerning
this information please call. We look forward to working with you on this project and being of
service to both the City of Sanford and CPH Engineers, Inc..
Sincerely,
U n i~ty rz
Senior Vice President
Orlando Regional Manager
RKD:dsc
Enclosures:
Cost Proposal (Exhibit I)
Work Authorization/Proposal Acceptance Forms (2)
General Contract Conditions
"'~,,s:~"":::"'"
pRoFEsSIoNAL SERVICES
Senior Project Engineer
Technical Secretary
Drafting
Principal Consultant
SUPPORT SERVICES
Track Rig - Mobilization/Demobilization
Pond Borin.<:ls
4 - 15' SPT Barings
Road Borinas
6 - Track Rig Borings
24 Hour Groundwater Readings
Senior Engineering Technician, Muck Probe
LABORATORY TESTING
Wash No. 200 Sieve Determinations
Organic Content Determinations
Corrosion Potential Series
Atterberg Limits Determinations
EXHIBIT I
Cost Proposal
Geotechnica] Exploration Services
Section 2 - St. Johns Parkway
Rinehart Road to Upsala Road
Sanford, FL
TOTALCOST
12 hours $80.00 $960.00
4 houm $35,00 $140.00
8 hou~ $45.00 $360.00
2 hours $130,00 $260.00
SUBTOTAL $t,720.00
1 ) t.s. ) $2,000.00
60 } ~et ~ $8.50
90 feet $12.00
6 hours $40.00
32 hours $40.00
SUBTOTAL
6 each
16 each
2 each
3 each
$25.00
$35.00
$130.00
$75.00
SUBTOTAL
GRAND TOTAL
$2,000.00
$510.00
$1.080.00.
$240.00
$1,280.00
$5,110.00
$150.00
$560.00
$260.00
$225.00
$1,195.00 '
$8,025.00
j.O/26/g9 3.4:16 'ZJ'407423~,410
RAE WHITNEY
005/008
EXHIBIT II
Cost Proposal
Geotechnical Exploration Services
Section 3 - Coastline Road (Sanford Central Park)
Upsale Road to Lockhart Smith Canal
Sanford, FL
TASK
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Senior Project Engineer
Technical Secretary
Drafting
Principal Consultant
SUPPORT SERVICES
Mobilization/Demobilization
Bridge Foundations
2 - 25' SPT Bodngs
,Road Borin.as
I - 15' SPT Bodngs
8 - Road Corings
Road Auger Borings
Patch Cores
LABORATORY TESTING
Wash No. 200 Sieve Determinations
Permeability Tests
Corrosion Potential Series
Atterberg Limit Determinations
TOTAL COST
12 hours $80.00 $960.00
4 hours $35.00 $140.00
8 hours $45.00 $360.00
2 hours $130.00 $260.00
SUBTOTAL $1,720,00
1 I Ls.}$200.00
,0 i ...,eet!$8.50
lS feet $8.50
8 each $75.00
40 feet $7.25
8 each $25.00
SUBTOTAL
$25.00
$100.00
$t30.00
$75.00
SUBTOTAL
GRAND TOTAL
16 each
2 each
4 each
8 each
$200.00
$425,00
$127.50
$600.00
$290.00
$200.00
$1,842.50
$400.00
$200.00
$520.00
$600.00
$1,720,00
$5,282,50
R ec'e :Lye ct:
10/26/99
10/26/9g
I4:17
~4074234410 .---RAEWE~T-NE.Y
[~;1006/008
TASK
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Senior Project Engineer
Technical Secretary
Draffing
Principal Consultant
· SUPPORT SERVICES
Mobilization/Demobilization
Road Borin.~s.
6 - 15' SPT Bodngs
' Retention Pond Sodntis
9-15' SPT Borings
24 Hour Groundwater Readings
LABORATORY TESTING
Wash No. 200 Sieve Determinations
Corrosion Potential Series
Attarberg Limit Determinations
EXHIBIT III
Cost Proposal
Geotechnlcal Exploration Services
Section 4 - Jewett Lane.
Lockhart Smith. Canal to Bevier ROad
Sanford, FL
Revised: 10/26199
' i UN~.T COST ~ TOTA'- COST ,
I.o.u.,x'm,'rv ) UN:T , ............. .--.,
12 hours $80,00 $960.00
4 hours $35.00 $140,00
8 hours $45.00 $360.00
2 hours $130.00 $260.00
S UBTOTAL $ t ,720.00
$200.00 ~ ' $200.00
~' 90 '} ' feet '} $8.50
$765.00 '
135 feet $8.50 $1,147.50
6 each $25.00 $I 50,00
SUBTOTAL $2,262.S0
$25.00
$130.00
$75.00
SUBTOTAL
GRAND TOTAL
36 each
6 each
18 each
$900.00
$780.00
$1.350.00
$3,030.00
$7,012.50
Rede~ved: 10/26/GB 2:26PM; ->
10/26/99 14:17 ~4074234410
CPH
007/008
TASK
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Senior Project Engineer
Technical Secretary
Draffing
Principal Consultant
SUPPORT SERVICES
Mobilization/Demobilization
Road Bodn.cls
4 - 15' SPT Borings
Road Corings ..
Patch Cores
24 Hour Groundwater Readings
LABORATORY TESTING
Wash No. 200 Sieve Determinations
Corrosion Potential Series
Atterberg Limit Determinations
EXHIBIT IV
Cost Proposal
Geotechnical Exploration Services
Section 5 - Jewett Lane
Bevier Road to Airport Boulevard
Sanford, FL
~ QUANTrlY ~ UNIT I UNrr COS'" I
TOTAL COST t
8 hou~ $80,00 $640,0Q
4 houm $35.00 $140.00
4 houm $45.00 $180.00
I hou~ $130.00 $130.00
SUBTOTAL $~,090.00
1 ~ I.s. I $200.00
60 feel~ $8.50
3 each $75.00'
3 each $25,00
4 each $40.00
SUBTOTAL
$25.00
$130.00
$75,00
SUBTOTAL
GRAND TOTAL
16 each
4 each
8 each
$200.00
$510.00
$225.00
$75,00
$160.00
$1,t70.00
$400.00
$520,00
$600.00
$1,520.00
$3,780.00
EXHIBIT NOTES:
Additional services, consultations, or meetings if requested, will be invoiced at Universal
Engineering Sciences' standard rates.
This fee estimate includes six (6) copies of the final report. Additional copies can be provided
at a cost of $0.25 per page, $1.00 per plan sheet, plus mailing costs.
All reports will be shipped Via first class mail on project completion. Shipping via overnight
delivery service will be provided at the client's request at cost plus 15%.
This fee proposal will remain effective for sixty days. If you should require more than 60 days
to formally authorize us to proceed, we request that you permit us to update our proposal to
account for any changes in costs.
We have made a good faith effort to work with you to develop a work scope and fee estimate.
Because of the possibility of unknown, discovered, underground conditions and/or the need for
additional services that neither you nor we can currently foresee, we recommend that you
budget a contingency equal to 15% of the total fee estimate. We will not use the contingency
amount without first notifying you.
The Client will be responsible for all applicable taxes.
1'0/R6/99
"~4074234410 R.~.. WHITNEY ~008/008
UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC,
Work Authorization / Proposal Acceptance Form.
Universal Engineering Sciences, Inc. (UES)is pleased to provide the services described below. The purpose of this document is
to describe the terms under which the services wltl be provided and to obtain formal authorization.
PROJECT NAME: Jewelf; Lane / East-West Connector / St, Johns Parkway
PROJECT LOCATION: Seminole County, FL
CLIENT NAME: CPH Engineers PHONE:
CLIENT ADDRESS: 500 W. Fulton Street, Sanford, FL 32772-2808 FAX:
, I. Scope of hervices and Understanding of Project (See attached proposal or as indicated below)
UES Proposal No.
Exhibit ! .............................. . .......................... .t;8,025.00
Exhibit fl ....................................................... $5,282.60
Exhibit III ...................................................... $7,012.50
Exhibit IV ...................................................... $3~180.00
322..6841
330-0639
II.
Contract Documents, The following documents form part of this Agreement and are Incorporated herein by referral:
A. UES General Conditions. B. UES Proposal Dated: . October26, 1999 · ' ·
C. Pians, reports, specifications and other documents provided by the Client pdor to this Agreement date.
D, Other exhibits marked and described as follows: Exhibits I, !1, !11 and IV
III,
In the event of any inconsistency Qr conflict among the Contract Documents, the provision in the Contract Document first listed
above shall govern.
Authority to proceed and for payment. (To be completed by Client)
If the invoice is to be mailed for approval to someone other than the account charged, please indicate below:
Social Secudty Number or
Firm: Federal Identification No.:
Address: City/ST: Zip:
Attention: TitSe:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be executed by their duly .authorized representatives
CLIENT
BY (SIgnature) _
TYPED NAME
TITLE
DATE
UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING SCIENCES, INC.
BY (Signature)
TYPED NAME R. Kenneth Derick. P.E.
TITLE Senior Vice President
DATE October 26. 1 999
Return an executed copy to Universal Engineering Sciences
3532 Maggie Boulevard, Odando. FL 328t I
EXHIBIT "C"
16
\\CPH_SANF2\VOL2XJOBSXZ6582.00\WP-WORDXPROPOSAL~DAGXEast-West-Prop.doc
SMITH
SCALE
ROAD
UpSALA ROAD
CENTRAL PARK DRIVE
BEVIER ROAD
AIRPORT BOULEVARD;!