520-CPH-CR 46A erConklln Port and Holmes
~ (~ [~ L~ ENGINEERS, INC.
500 W. FUt.TOH ~i'REET
POST OFFICE EO× 2808
SANFORD, FLORaDA 32772-28~
TEL407-322~;841 TEI. 407~31.57~7
Mr. Paul Moore, P.E.
Director of Utilities
City of Sanford
P.O. Box 1788
Sanford, FL 32772-1788
RE: Engineering Proposal for Utility Relocation Work
Oregon Avenue to Upsala Road
Due to CR 46A Widening Project
CPH Project No. S0612.00
Dear Mr. Moore:
We are pleased to submit an estimated fee proposal for engineering services relative to utility
relocation work due to the CR 46A Widening Project.
We have reviewed the preliminary plans for the widening done by P.E.C. and our f~es relating
to the existing facilities in the project area. We understand the Cxty maintains raw and potable
water, reclaimed water and sanitary sewer force main (2-6" F.M.) pipelines of various types and
sizes through the project area. Limits of effected utilities due to County's roadway widening
project along CR 46A is between Oregon Avenue and approximately 400' east of Upsala Road.
We propose to provide the following services relating to the relocation of these facilities;
1. Meeting, coordinating and reviewing the project with the City and the County to obtain
available data and information on the overall scope and limits of the project, City utilities
and other available existing information.
2. Review County's proposed roadway plans; check and review the potential conflict
locations, evaluate the feasibility of utility relocation vs. leaving in place (where
possible); review and analyze upgrading the existing water main from 12" to 16" as
recommended in City's Master Water Plan; review and analyze the .existing fome main
and pumping capacities and determine the sizing and location for a new force main to
possibly replace the two existing force mains; discuss with the Owner and make
recommendations.
3. Review and discuss with Seminole County the proposed utility location. within the
roadway project limits. provide the County a preliminarily marked up roadway plan,
showing the location of the proposed utilities for the County' s us to update their plans.
Page - 2
May 10, 1994
4. By utilizing information from the County 's plan, generate base drawings in I" = 20'
scale for the E.ngineer's use to develop the construction plans for the utility relocation
work. Meet'with the City and other utility companies to field verify existing utility
locations within a few target locations. (City is to schedule and notify the Engineer for
field meetings.)
5. Develop preliminary engineering plans by usihg the generated base. Meet and coordinate
with the City and the County. Utilize information regarding other utilities that may be
required to be relocated, and incorporate the City's and the County's comments and
information into the plans.
6. Develop a final engineering plan, which includes ti~e sheet, general notes, technical
specifications and testing requirements, plan and profile (1" = 20' scale) and required
construction details. Develop quantities and Opinion of Probable Construction Cost.
Review and meet with the City and then provide the County with a copy of the final
engineering plan to update the utility locations on their roadway plans prior to them
sending the plans for bidding.
7. Provide up to forty (40) complete sets of utility construction plans for County's use for
bidding.
8. coordinate with responsible regulatory agencies and assist the City in obtaining an FDEP
and possibly a County construction permit for the work.
Please note that the base drawings ~vill be generated by tracing the existing information from the
County's roadway plans, which we have no knowledge of accuracy of the existing information
shown. As it is covered in our scope, we would review our ties and check with the City to
compare and verify the location of City's existing utilities. To further verify the existing utilities
shown, a few target locations need to be field verified for existing utility locations. If the
existing utility location is found to be different from what is shown on the County's plan, we
may require additional survey information for proper development of our final engineering plans.
We will attempt to obtain a copy of the County' s subsurface investigation report for the proposed
roadway project (if available). However, an individual soils report pertaining to the City utility
work may be needed to specifically inform us of any specific treatment that may be needed for
proper construction of the pipeline. The fee for this work is not included in our proposal. If
additional soil work is needed, we propose to solicit proposals from soils subconsultants, and
coordinate with you for your authorization.
Page - 3
May 10, 1994
The above scope of services is per the intent of our Continuing Engineering Services Contract
with the City. We would be pleased to meet and discuss -with you the scope of services as
outlined above and fu.rther described on attached plan of study.
The Engineer's estimated fee, based on the manhours contained in the attached Plan of Study,
is $36,975.00.
If the above described services and estimated fee associated with the services shown are
acceptable to the City, please sign one (1) copy of this letter proposal in the space provided and
return it to us for our records.
If you have any questions regarding these services, please feel free to contact us.
Sincerely,
Kamran Khosravani, P.E.
Vice President
Attachment (as stated)
CITY:
'* City of Sanford, Florida
ATFEST & SEAL
ENGINEER:
Conklin, Porter & Holmes - Engineers, Inc.
PLAN OF STUDY
FOR
CR 46A UTILITY RELOCATION
CPH Job No. S0612.00
Item Description P E T D S Expenses
1. Project planning, budgeting and project 1 4 1
organization
2. Data Gathering 4 8 1 $100
3. Coordination with Owner on standards, 1 8 2
progress, design plan and
specifications, etc.(up to 3 m~ings).
4. Determine seeps, prepare &negotiate 8 1
subcontracts.
5. Coordinate liaison end eommllRieate 1 8 1 $75
with regulatory agencies (County,
DEP) up to 3 meefmgs).
6. Initial field investigation of the site, 8 8 $50
review proposed roadway
improvements, evaluate end select a
7. Preliminary design end review with 1 8 8 5 1
Owner end County. (This work will not
include eny draRing, only markup on
county provided drawings.
8. Review of equipment end material with 4 2 0.5
Owner.
Item Description P E T D S Expenses
9. Meet with City and other utility 4 20 1 $75
companies to field verify existing
locations. (This work will be
coordinated by the City).
BASE DRAWING PREPARATION
AND FINAL DESIGN
1. Review proposed pipe route for utility i 8 16 $50
and future roadway improvement
conffiet, right-of-way or easement
considerations and soil conditions. )
2. Review and analyze the existing force 1 8 24 2 1
main and pmnping capacities and
determine the sizing and location for a
new forco main to possibly replace the
two existing force mains.
3. Review and discuss with City 1 3 6 1
upgrading the existing water main from
12" to 16'.
4. Review trenching, backfilling and 4 2 1
compaction requirements.
5. Prepare base drawings from the County 8 I0 64 $100.00
provided plans (8 sheets).
6. Prepare design sketches and details for 1 20 80
drafting.
DRAWING PREPARATION
1. Cover Sheet 1 6 $10.00
2. General Note Sheets (2) and 8 5 10 4 $10.00
Construction Specification
3. 8 Sheets of Plan &Profile (20 scale) 80 2 $100.00
using generated base sheets.
Item Description P E T D S Expenses
4. 1 Detail Sheet 4 8 2 $10.00
5. Supervise drafting 6 10
6. Office checking of individual drawings. 2 30 6
7. Review of Draw'rags with City 4 4 $25
8. Changes to Drawings 4 2 24 2
QUANTITIES & OPINION OF
PROBABLE COST
1. Preparation 3 20 4
2. Checking 4 1
SPECIFICATIONS & CONTRACT
DOCUMENT PREPARATION &
CHECKING (would be part of General
Notes)
1. Writing 10
2. Typing 8
3. Internal Review 6
4. Coordination w/City & County 6
5. Revisions I 4 3
PERMIT APPLICATION AND
COORDINATION
1. County (Seminole) ROW 4 2
2. DER for Construction 12 4 3
3. Reproduction (total of 12 sheets), .5 4 4 4 4 $l,200
assembly, review, and submission.
TOTALS: 11.50 217.00 234.00 209.00 45.50 $1,805.00
0425prop.jsb
May 12, 1994
MEMORANDUM
To: City Manager~
From: Utility Director
Re: CR 46 A - Utility Relocation
Bill
As you are aware, Seminole County is planning to widen CR46A from
Rinehart Road east to Upsala Road. There are a number of City
utility lines that will be impacted by this road work. Some of
these lines are on City property (Golf Course) or dedicated City
easements.
Seminole County is requesting information on these lines
including proposed line relocations. There is a considerable
amount of engineering work required from the City in order to
accomplish the utility relocations.
Attached are two copies of a proposal that I requested from CP&H
to accomplish this work. Based on certain assumptions, they have
estimated their engineering fee at $36,975.
It is recommended that the City enter into an agreement with CP&H
and accept this proposal.
PM/ap
attachment