199-SUNCOM
EXHIBIT 1
to
the AGREEMENT
for Telecommunications Services from the
SUNCOM NET~VORK
The following list outlines the services ~rovided by the state of Florida
SUNCOM network, Services to be provided for under this agreement are checked
and further detailed with an appropriate Rider:
CHECK FOR AllACHED SERVICE LEVEL
INCLUSION RIDERS DEFINITIONS
X.. I, SUNCOM long distance telephone communication services
{RIDER I).
X II, SUNCOM local telephone system services (RIDER II),
X III, SUNCOM Florida Information Transport and Exchange
System {FLITES) Data Services (RIDER III),
IV, SUNCOM Video Teleconferencing services {RIDER
V, SUNCOM special services {RIDER V),
8/15/97
RIDER
to
Exhibit 1 of the
5UNCOM NETWORK SERVICE AGREEMENT
SUNCOM FLITE5 Data Services shall be provided according to the following terms
and conditions (see attachmentS):
selected services: a) Dedicated Data service
b) capitol center FDDI Service
c) SNA Transport service
d) Frame Relay Transport Service
e) Router Transport service
f) Internet X
s/~s/s7
4050 Esplanade Way · Tallahassee, Florida 323990950
LAV,'TON CHILES, GOVERNOR WYLIJAM H. LINDNER, SECRETARY
Information Technology
Building 4030, Suite 215
January 15, 1998
Mr. William A. Simmons
City Manager
City of Sanford
Post Office Box 1788
Sanford, FL 32772-1788
SUBJECT: Telecommunications System Service Agreement (SUNCOM)
Dear Mr. Simmons,
Enclosed is your copy of the completed SUNCOM Network Services Agreement that
authorizes the Information Technology Program t0 provide SUNCOM service to your organization.
We at the Information Technology Program appreciate your interest in SUNCOM Network
Services, and trust we can meet your telecommunications needs. A , has
b~en established for your organization for use with any future requests. This code is also noted on your
SUNCOM Network Services Agreement. This code must be entered in block (1), Authorization Number,
on all Communications Service Authorization (CSA) forms, and these forms must be used to order
service. All CSA forms must be processed through this Division before being directed to the telephone
company for service. There is one notable exception involving SUNCOM voice service. After the initial
CSA requesting ESSX, CENTREX, or CENTRANET service has been processed through this office,
agencies can forward all subsequent requests directly to the telephone company, provided the quantity of
lines does not exceed 25.
Please call Ms. Ruby Wells, of my staff, at SC 292-7481 or (850) 922-7481 if you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
Robert R. Davis, Supervisor
Transport Systems Section
RRD/rmw
Enclosure
m:\wellsr\agregRTN
Recycled Paper
MEMORANDUM
Department Heads, Communications Service
Authorization Representatives, ~ Purchasing Agents
July 6, 1984
Page Four
rate increases in Fiscal Year 1984-85. Details on the methodology
for the distribution of the funds are not available at this time,
however when the information becomes available, we will notify you.
As your agency prepares its 1985-87 Biennium Budget Requests in the
coming months, serious consideration should also be given to
requesting funds to procure either your in-place telephone equipment
or new equipment. If the FPSC proposed rule referenced earlier is
adopted this calendar year, the telephone companies in Florida will
no longer be able to provide telephone equipment for your offices on
a month to month basis as a regulated offering, thus the Purchasing
Rules and Regulations concerning competitive bidding may apply.
The Department has established annual purchase/lease contracts on
new telephone equipment to facilitate obtaining new equipment
without the necessity of individual competitive bids.
If you require additional information or clarification, please
contact Mr. Donald R. Allen at (904) 488-3595 or at SUNCOM 278-
3595. The Division of Communications' personnel are available
between 8:00AM and 5:00PM wpekdays to assist you.
]~xecutive Director
RWT:kte
/
· BOND FINANCE SERVICES
DEPARTMENT OF ~ · BUILDING CONSTRUCTION · MOTOR POOL
G EN ERAL SERVICES AND P.OPERT MANAGEMENT · PURCH S,NG
· COMMUNICATIONS · SECURITY
Larson Building, Tallahassee 32301 · SURPLUS PROPERTY
Ronald~W;'"T~b~'has, Executive Director
II' Please address reply to:
TO: All Department Heads, Communications Service
Authorization Representatives, and Purchasing Agents
SUBJECT: Update on Telephone Deregulation
Since our memorandum of January 25, 1984, several important
developments have occurred. The Federal Communications Commission
(FCC) has ruled on the implementation of access charges for
interstate-long distance services with an effective date of May
1984. The Florida Public Service Commission (FPSC) is reviewing
their rules relating to the total deregulation of Customer Premi-se
~quipment and inside Wire. The 1985-87 Budget preparations are
getting underway and the financial impact of deregulation should be
considered.
Federal Access Charges Now In ~ffect
The FCC rule for the implementation of monthly access charges for
interstate long distance services took effect on May 25, 1984.
These charges will be collected by the local telephone companies
monthly from all business users, regardless of whether or not the
user makes any interstate long distance calls. They will also be
collected even if your te!z~hones lines are restricted from the toll
network and you are unable to make an interstate long distance
call. The charges are assessed on your monthly local service
invoices in one of the following ways:
1. $6.00 per month for each central office trunk if your agency is
served by a Private Automated Branch ~xchange (PABX) or
switchboard.
2. $6.'00 per month for each telephone number if your agency is
served by a multiple line (key telephone) business system.
BoP Graham Jim Smdh George Firestone Gerald A. Lews
Governor Attorney General Secretary of SIa~e CornDIroiler
Bill Guntot Doy~e Connet Ralph D Tur~ington
MIEMORANDUM
Department Heads, Communications Service
Authorization Representatives, and Purchasing Agents
July 6, 1984
Page Two
3. $6.00 per month for each telephone number connected to a
Centrex type system ordered after July 27, 1983 or $2.00 per
month for each telephone number connected to a Centrex type
system if installed or ordered prior to July 27, 1983. The DMS
100 telephone system serving Florida A ~ M University (FAMU)
and state agencies in Tallahassee is an example of the type of
system tha~ will experience this type of access charge.
If your agency is invoiced directly from the local telephone company
for your local telephone service, the charges should be clearly
identified onthe invoice. If th~ charges are not easily identified
or understood, contact the telephone company or the Division of
Communications for an explanation.
If your agency is invoiced by the Department of General Services'
Division of Communications for local service, then the charge may
appear in several ways as explained below depending on your
location.
FAMU and other users located in the Capital Center area served by
the DMS-100 will see the charges as a separate line item on the
itemized actual charges report for the June 13, 1984 billing
cycle. Since the rules and regulations for the industry are
changing so rapidly and dramatically, program areas should pay close
attention to their bills for accuracy. Again, in the Capital Center
area, the $6.00 per month per telephone number charge applies to
lines ordered after July 27, 1983 and the $2.00 per month per
telephone number charge applies to lines ordered before July 27,
1983. If a line is added to a system installed before July 27,
1983, the new line's access charge will be $6.00 per month and the
original lines' access charges will remain at $2.00 per month.
Review your itemized report carefully to see that the overall system
is not charged $6.00 per telephone number for access charges.
State agencies provided service b7 either the St. Petersburg or
Tampa Regional Service Center Systems will see the access charges
itemized separately on the actual report of charges distributed as a
supplement to the estimated invoices. Please review this report
carefully; especially after any repair work or additions/deletions
to the present system have been performed. Erroneous charges may
result.
MEMORANDUM
Department Heads, Communications Service
Authorization Representatives, ~ Purchasing Agents
July 6, 1984
Page Three
State agencies located in the Orange, Duval, Escambia, Dade/Miami,
Broward, and Palm Beach Regional Service Centers are presently
serviced by specialized systems (ESSX) provided by Southern Bell.
The access charges are assessed as a function of the number of
trunks from the telephone company'~ central office to the
building. These charges are part of the system's "common costs" and
will be distributed across all main stations. Therefore, your
agency will experience this as an increase in the main station rate
on the itemized actual report of charges. The overall impact to
each user will vary somewhat with any increase or decrease in the
number of telephone numbers in service in the overall specialized
system (ESSX) serving the center.
FPSC Proposes Deregulation Rule Change
A review of the proposed administrative rules of the FPSC relating
to the deregulation of Customer Premise Equipment (in-place
equipment) and Inside Wire (in-place wire for equipment) is
underway. The FPSC has proposed to totally deregulate or detariff
all in-place telephone equipment on January 1, 1985 for the
independent telephone companies (other than Southern'Bell/AT~T-
IS). As was previously explained in our January 25, 1984
memorandum, the Southern Bell Telephone Company equipment was
deregulated and divested on January 1, 1984. In essence, if the
rules are adopted as proposed, the transition period for
deregulating the telephone equipment provided by the independent
telephone companies will be reduced from January 1, 1988 to January
1, 1985.
Kelative to Inside Wire, the FPSC is proposing to transfer ownership
of the wire from the telephone companies to the users effective
January 1, 1985. The Department participated in the initial
workshop on Ma7 25, 1984 regarding these proposed rule changes and
plans to participate in the formal hearings and workshops scheduled
to begin in July 1984. We will keep you informed of the progress as
the proceedings develop and their subsequent impact on state and
local government.
1985-87 Budget Considerations
Federal access charges should be considered in your budget
preparation for the 1985-87 Biennium. The 1984 Legislature
appropriated 7.9 million dollars in Administered Funds for the
Fiscal Year 1984-85 to help offset the costs to state agencies
associated with access charges, recent rate increases, and projected
AT T
f -I "' ,.o.
July 2, 1984 ~
Suite 4~
5~ ~ke Ellenor D~
C~ o~ San~o~d Orlando, Florida 32~
~.0. ~ox ]778 Phone (3~) 82~82~
San~o~, ~lo=~a
Attention: W.E. Knowlea
Dear Mr. Knowles:
Notice of Modification of Service/Purchase Agreement
In February, 1984, AT&T Information Systems Inc. (AT&T-IS), formerly
known as American Bell Inc. (ABI), replaced its Service/Purchase Agreement
with AT&T'IS's new ~aster Agreement" for the use and/or sale of AT&T-IS
products.
On Decemeber 31, 1983, the divestiture of American Telephone and Telegraph
Company was completed. As part of divestiture, embedded customer premises
equipment and services (maintenance) personnel were transferred from the Bell
Operating Companies (BOCa) to AT&T-IS effective January 1, 1984. In addition
to changes in our business and after one year's experience and input from our
customers regarding our contracts, it was apparent that the Service/Purchase
Agreement needed to be modified to conform with AT&T-IS's changed business
environment and to better serve our customerrs needs.
AT&T-IS reserved the right under paragraph 20.A of the Service/Purchase
Agreement to modify your existing contract with AT&T-IS upon ninety (90)
days!prior written notice.
Attached to this letter is the "Notice of Modifications to Service/Purchase
Agreement, Contract No. A00509256 ." THIS NOTICE SERVES AS AN
AMENDMENT TO YOUR' CONTRACT. Please retain it with your Final Customer
Copy of your Service/Purchase Agreement.
THE AMENDMENT ONLY AFFECTS NEW ORDERS AND RENEWALS ACCEPTED BY AT&T-IS
ON OR AFTER NOVEMBER 1, 1984. YOU ARE NOT REQUIRED TO SIGN THE NEW
MASTER AGREEMENT. THIS NOTICE DOES NOT AFFECT ORDERS ACCEPTED BY
AT&T-IS PRIOR TO NOVEMEBER 1, 1984.
The Notice adds to, and where inconsistent, changes certain terms and
conditions of your contract. The following are highlights of the
modifications to your contract:
Change of Names and Definitions
- "American Bell Inc. (ABI)" to "AT&T Information Systems Inc.
(AT&T-IS)"
~ ~'~ PAGE 2.
- "Service/Purchase Agreement" to "Master Agreement"
- "Service Agreement" to "Term Plan"
Automatic renewal of Term Plans (Service Agreements) changed to
shortest period available.
Date of title passage for purchase products installed by Customer
will be date of delivery instead of date of shipment.
Ninety (90)-day warranty on used equipment
$50,000.000 maximum liability under the Exclusive Remedies and
Limitations of Liabilities provisions will replace one month's
recurring charges
]0% cancellation charge for cancelled orders
Price difference on accepted orders not more than S% due to
unforeseen configuration and/or technical changes will not require
new order (supplement) ~igned by Customer
New maintenance plans
Questions concerning this notice and/or AT&~is newMaster'Agreement
should be addressed to your AT&T-is account representative at telephone
number ~305) 826-8200 or (813) 963-7716.
Yours Truly,
W.J~f.~d'a~
Branch Manager
STATE LONG DISTANCE COPLMUNICATIONS
_SYS'fhH AGRijLM~NI'
This AGREEHENT is by and between the CITY OF SANFORD, FLORIDA
hereinafter referred to as the MUNICIPALITY, and the State of
Florida Department of General Services, Division of
Communications, hereinafter referred to as the STATE, regarding
the MUNICIPALITY'S participation in the State Long Distance
Communications System.
The STATE shall proyide to the MUNICIPALITY accessibility to the
present State long distance communications system, or any future
long distance system, as requested by the MUNICIPALITY and as
provided by the STATE. All lines not restricted by the
MUNICIPALITY shall have access to the State long distance
communications system. Charges shall be paid to the STATE by
the MUNICIPALITY for this service and shall be based upon the
MUNICIPALITY'S prorated share of the system usage and shall
cover administrative costs as well as system utilization and
shall be consistent with the charges and services provided to
participating State agencies. The STATE, as well as the
MUNICIPALITY will be required to provide a minimum of 30 days'
written notice to the other party prior to termina'tion of
service.
The requesting municipality shall pay its share of all the costs
to include all connection charges, service charges, and the cost
of additional equipment required to connect that municipality to
the state lon~ distance communications system,
The STATE shall ~rovide the MUNICIPALITY with an invoice each
month for services utilized by the MUNICIPALITY that are
consistent with the billing system and concepts used by the
participating state agencies.
The MUNICIPALITY recognizes and agrees that the billing concepts
and system configuration may be subject to changes from time-to-
time as a result of changes in applicable laws, regulations,
such information, and thereupon this contract shall be
terminated at the end of the period of time for which such
monies are available.
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF
GENERAL SERVICES, DIVISION OF
COMMUNICATIONS
/
NAME: Thomas R. Brown
TITLE: Executive Director
ATTEST: SIGNATURE:
DATE:
City of Sanford ,FLORIDA
NAME: Warren E. ' K~owles
TITLE: City Manager
DATE: February 15, 1983