205-CPH-Amendment 40 Conkiln Porter and Holmes
(~D~ L~ ENGINEER~ INC.
PO~ OFFICE BOX 2808
August 11, 1994
Mr. Paul Moore, P.E.
City of Sanford
P. O. Box 1788
Sanford, Florida 32772-1788
Re: Waste Water Master Plan
Request for Additional Services to Computer Model the Fome Main and Lift Station in the
Southeast Service Area
CPH Job No. S0602.82
Dear Mr. Moore:
We are pleased to respond to your request for a proposal to provide additional Engineering Services for
the referenced project.
We propose to perform this additional Engineering as part of "Amendment 40 to Agreement for
Consulting Engineering Services for Revisions to Master Water and Waste Water Plans Giving Primary
Emphasis to Southern and Southeastern Areas", dated December 18, 1992.
These additional Engineering Services are to consist of creating a computer model of the City's force
main and lift station systems. The computer model will be used to analyze current capabilities of the
system and to evaluate future performance of the systems under projected flow conditions. The objective
is to determine what improvements should be made to enable the systems to convey flows to available
treatment facilities through the planning period. The modelling will include evaluations of what
improvements are needed to provide interim collection system interconnects or upgrades until a second
waste water treatment facility is required, due to treatment capacity limitations at the existing Sanford
Water Reclamation Facility. The alternative to be evaluated incorporates a second treatment facility at
the southeast side of the Central Florida Regional Airport.
In order to assess the projected sewer demands, new planning figures for development and population
growth as provided by the City Planning Department will be used to project waste water flows for this
area.
The modeling information will be summarized and incorporated into the Waste Water Master Plan
Document as phasing of the plan to develop the system with the second facility located at the southeast
side of the Sanford Airport.
PLAN OF STUDY
'. "'.H~EM ' ~ · P' ~: '.E' T · D · :. 'S ..EXP
1. Data Collection
A. Review System Maps 2 4 4
B. Obtain Lift Station and Force
Main Information
- Meet with City Staff (we 2 4
understand most of this
information is available from
City records) to collect lift
station data.
- Review as~builts and 16 32
tabulate lift station data
provided by the City.
- Obtain information on a 4 16
limited number of lift stations
through site visits
(approximately 10 lift
stations)
- Review system data to 2 8 24
determine flows.
2. Data Compilation and Mapping
A. Prepare a map of the Lift 2 8 30 30 25.00
Station/Force Main system
depicted in the Computer
Model.
B. Obtain elevations of the 4 16 8
system from best available
information, as required for
computer model. No
surveying to be done.
C. Tabulate information 8 32 16
required for computer model
including force main sizes
and lengths, elevations,
coordinates, and lift station
pump data.
3. Computer Modeling
A. Input System Data. 20
B. Verification of data input m~d 4 8
test runs.
C. Run one computer model of 4 8
existing system.
D. Review data with City staff 4 8 12 2
and assess accuracy of
model.
E. Calibrate model based on 2 4 8
City and CPH review.
F. Model future conditions and 2 16 32
examine various methods to
serve development south of
the airport.
G. Review results with City 4 4 4 2
staff.
H. Revise Model and rerun 4 4 16
computer analysis to
determine final
recommendations.
I. Summarize the results of the 2 8 8 8 4
computer analysis and
recommend system
improvements, and provide
to City staff.
4. Review information with City staff 2 4 4 2
and select appropriate improvements.
5. Incorporate the computer analysis 4 32 4 16 24 250.00
and selected improvements into the
Second Facility Alternative with the
facility located on the SE side of the
airport, modifying the Waste Water
Master Plan.
TOTAL 28 132 282 82 34 275.00
P = Principal' = 28 x 71.50 = 2,002
E = Engineer = 132 x 60.00 = 7,980
T = Technician = 282 x 50.00 = 14, 100
D = Draftsman = 82 x 35.50 = 2,911
S = Secretary = 34 x 32.50 = 1,105
28,038
Expenses = 275
Total = $28,313
· ~,~ ~-==.-..
Mr. Paul Moore, P.E.
August 11, 1994
Page 2
The Scope of Work is further defined by the enclosed Plan of Study. We propose to perform the needed
Engineering work as outlined in the Plan of Study for a not-to-exceed fee of $28,313.
If the above services and proposed fee meet with your approval, please sign and return one copy of this
letter proposal to us.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service.
Sincerely,
CONKLIN, PORTER & HOLMES-ENGINEERS, INC.
David A. Terwilleger, P.E.
City of Sanford Conklin, Porter & Holmes-Engineers, Inc.
datS05.pro:ss
AuguSt 17, 1994
MEMORANDUM
To: City Manager
From: Utility Director
Re: Wastewater Master Plan - Revisions
Bill -
After discussions with CP&H concerning the wastewater system
master plan, it was decided that additional information was
needed on the City's force-main network. Attached is a proposal
from CP&H for providing these requested additional services.
The main emphasis will be on creating a computer model of the
City's force-main and lift station system. This model will be
used to analyze current system capabilities and to evaluate
future performance of the system under projected flow conditions.
The results of this computer model will better aid in
establishing schedules for system improvements and upgrades until
a second treatment facility is required.
The estimated cost for these added engineering services is
$28,313. It is recommended that this amendment be approved.
Funds for this work are available in account number 321-0000-536-
65-84.
PM/ap
attachment
MEMORANDUM
TO: William A. Simmons, P.E. ~
City Manager
FROM: B.C. Conklin, P.E. ~
Executive Vice President
DATE: December 17, 1992
SUBJECT: Amendment 40 - Revisions to Master Water and Wastewater Plans (Giving
Primary Emphasis to Southern and Southeastern Areas)
CPH Job No. S0602.82
We are enclosing for your review and signature, three copies of Amendment No. 40, as
described above.
We understand the "draft" copy of this Amendment was approved at the recent City Commission
meeting. Please return one fully executed copy for our ~es.
We look forward to worldng with the City on this project.
1217MEM1 .jms
Amendment 40
To Agreement for Consulting Engineering Services
For
Revisions to Master Water and Wastewater Plans
Giving Primary Emphasis to Southern and Southeastern Areas
Between
The City of Sanford, Florida
And
Conkiln, Porter and Holmes-Engineers, Inc.
This Agreement made on the/~day of/__.)z~_//~-3~ ,1992 between the CITY
OF SANFORD, FLORIDA (hereinafter called the CITY) and CONKLIN, PORTER AND
HOLMES-ENGINEERS, INC. (hereinaftercalled the ENGINEER), is mutually agreed upon
and declared an authorized Amendment to an Agreement dated December 7, 1983,
between the parties, herein setting forth the scope, terms and conditions of the work
herein authorized.
In case of any conflict between this Amendment and the aforementioned Agreement
of December 7, 1983, this Amendment shall govern for the work described herein.
All other Amendments which have been previously executed provided for other
municipal engineering services and have no applicability to the services covered by this
Amendment.
WHEREAS, the CITY has previously had the ENGINEER complete a Master Water Plan
in 1986 and there is a need to review, update and supplement that Master Water
-1-
Distribution and Storage Plan giving primary emphasis to the south and Southeastern
portions of the City, and
WHEREAS, the CITY has previously had the ENGINEER prepare a long range
Wastewater 201 Plan including Amendments thereto and that 201 planning is in need
of review, updating and supplementing giving primary emphasis to the South and
Southeastern portions of the City and giving special consideration to the construction
of a second treatment plant located in that area, and
WHEREAS, the CITY has previously had the ENGINEER perform treatment plant,
Infiltration/Inflow and other sewer system and water system studies and projects, and
through these endeavors the ENGINEER has considerable knowledge of the City, its
facilities and needs and
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY AND THE ENGINEER for the considerations named
hereinafter agree as follows:
Section 1
1.1 General
1.1.1 The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for engineering services,
more specifically itemized herein, in the review and updating of a Master
Water Distribution and Storage Plan and a Master Wastewater Plan. The
study will incorporate the information from the utility, the Comprehensive
Plan, the 1986 Master Water Plan and 201 Wastewater Plan and other
previously planned improvements. The Plan will provide a review of
existing facilities, expansions, and capabilities to serve the planned
service areas and the advisability or need to expand, improve, or
consolidate the systems giving primary emphasis to the South and
Southeast portions of the CITY. The Plans are to examine the needs for
the Year 2000 and for the Year 2010.
Section 2
2.1 General Services of the ENGINEER
2.1.1 The ENGINEER agrees to perform professional services in connection
with the project as hereinafter stated.
2.1.2 The ENGINEER will serve as the CITY's professional engineering
representative in those phases of the project to which this Amendment
applies, and will give consultation and advice to the OWNER during the
-2-
performance of his services. The ENGINEER will perform the work for
the City Commission under the general supervision of the Utilities
Director in cooperation with the City Manager.
2.1.3 In performing these planning level studies, the ENGINEER will give
consideration to the capacity, general condition, remaining useful life,
reliability, efficiency, and operation and maintenance costs in connection
with existing facilities. The ENGINEER will consult with the City staff
and operating personnel on these matters.
2.1.4 Existing base maps of the water and sewer systems, and existing
topographic maps and information will be utilized for this study. Existing
base maps of facilities and topographic maps and data will be utilized for
this study and additional base maps, topographic, and physical culture
surveys, are not included nor thought necessary for this planning level
study.
Section 3
Review of Service Areas, Population & Land Use
3.1 Review of Water & Wastewater Service Areas
3.1.1 The ENGINEER will do preliminary preparation work including researching
the 201 Plan and the Master Water Plan service areas; segregating the
east and southeast area flows; Comprehensive Plan research and
comparison; and consider Year 2000 and 2010 service areas.
3.2 The ENGINEER will consider dividing sewer service areas into two sub-
areas for two-plant alternative.
3.2.1 The ENGINEER will summarize for comparison Land Use and Population
data from the 1986 Master Water Plan, 201 Wastewater Plan and
adopted City Comprehensive Plan and furnish to CITY.
3.2.2 The ENGINEER will participate in discussions and generally assist the
CITY staff in reviewing and preparing land use and summarizing existing
population data by traffic zones to include projections for all traffic zones
within the selected water service and wastewater service areas for the
year 2000 and 2010.
-3-
Section 4
Water Distribution and Distribution Storage Plan
4.1 General
4.1,1 This study and resulting Master Plan is to be based on certain basic
assumptions as follows:
· Water Supply & treatment plants & facilities are not included in
the study.
· The 2 existing plants will remain in service without any new or
additional plants being constructed during the planning period.
· All previous recommendations of the previous 1986 Master Plan
or other studies will be implemented for distribution lines, storage,
and high service pumping at the times indicated. This assumed
condition will form the basis for the initial analysis of the system
for the Year 2000 and 2010 needs. However, it is anticipated
that significant changes from the previous Master Plan will be
required, particularly in the southern, southeast, and eastern
sections of the CITY.
4.2 The design criteria for average day, maximum day, peak hour, and fire
flows and application to the design of lines, storage and pumping
facilities will be summarized from the previous 1986 Master Water Plan
and the result compared with extended historical data. The City staff
will be consulted in setting design criteria.
4.3 Upgrade work maps and records to include all lines, pumping, storage,
and improvements made since the 1986 study, and upgrade the existing
computer model of the system.
4.4 Perform a computer analysis of the distribution, pumping, and storage
systems based on Year 2010 demands, assuming physical facilities in
place that have been recommended in the 1986 Master Water Plan.
Primary emphasis is to be given to the southern and southeastern
portions of the CITY.
4.5 Modify the assumed physical facilities based on the results and the
original run and re-run the computer analyses as required to meet 2010
needs and provide a minimum of 3 alternative ways of meeting the 2010
needs utilizing different sizes and routes for lines and differing amounts
and location of system storage and pumping.
4.5.1 Repeat the steps of 4.4 and 4.5. for the Year 2000 service area,
computer model, and water demands.
4.5.2 Summarize the 3 alternative solutions for the Year 2000 and 2010 needs
and formulate 3 time-phased plans that will satisfy both design years'
requirements. Meet with the CITY staff to go over the 3 alternative
staged plans to arrive at 2 final alternatives for further study.
4.6 Refine the 2 selected alternative staged physical facility plans as to size,
location and detail.
4.7 Preliminarily cost the 2 final staged alternative physical facility Master
Plans including capital costs, operation and maintenance costs, and
timing of the expenditures required by utilizing both a capital cost and
present worth analysis.
4.8 Meet with CITY staff to present results and select the recommended plan
and make resulting refinements requested by the CITY.
4.9 Prepare a summary report giving special emphasis and detail to the
southern and southeastern portions of the CITY and furnish 15 copies to
the CITY. It is anticipated that this report would be a supplement or
updated revision to the 1986 Master Water Plan.
4.10 Planning level maps showing proposed physical facilities will be included
in the report or attached as appendices.
Section 5
Wastewater Master Plan
5. I General
5.1.1 This planning level study is to consider collection systems, treatment
systems, effluent disposal by wet weather discharge and reuse systems.
However, residual management (sludge) studies involving any further
processing / treatment than included in the 1992 expansion and ultimate
disposal on the land or further processing into usable product, is not
-5-
included in this study. It is the intent that this study, by supplementing
previous work, will provide data to satisfy the requirements of F.S.
403.064 for a Reuse Study (except for rate analysis). A capacity
analysis as required by 17-600 FAC will also be provided. The study is
to include an evaluation of year 2000 and 2010 needs. Primary
emphasis is to be given to the south and southeasterly sections of the
CITY. Two basic concepts are to be considered. One of the concepts
is to consolidate all collected sewage flows and provide treatment and
reuse water, or wet weather discharge, from a single site (existing
Sanford Sewage Treatment Plant). The second basic concept is to
provide a second, somewhat smaller plant at another location. This
second plant would receive sewage from a developing area and a portion
of the existing Sanford system that would be separated and re-directed
to the second plant to provide an initial base flow. From this second
plant, treated effluent would be directly used for irrigation or other uses,
or pumped into the extended reclaimed water gridiron system for reuse
elsewhere in the CITY or at Site 10. Potential locations to consider for
the second plant shall be designated by the CITY.
5.2 Review all previous treatment, collection, and reuse studies including the
201 Plan (latest amendment) and residential and other reuse studies.
Summarize data including capacity and actual reuse.
5.3 Upgrade, summarize and consolidate working maps of the collection
system, lift stations, and reuse system to include the latest information.
5.4 Review previous flow projections by traffic zone and compare with
current flow projections to be made from new land use and population
projections of Section 3 for the year 2000 and 2010. Also compare
projected flows with existing plant and lift station flows to look for
discrepancies in existing flows or projections. The ENGINEER will give
consideration to the use of septic tanks for existing and future conditions
with the idea of providing a gradual transition partly away from septic
tanks to central sewers over the planning period, dependent on land use
and density, soils conditions, surface water bodies and trend in
regulations.
5.4,1 Study the practical upper capacity limit of the existing Sanford Sewage
Treatment Plant site. Evaluate the capacities of the various treatment
and processing units and room available for further expansions on site or
adjacent to the site. Consider several alternatives and consult with City
staff.
-6-
5.4.2 Examine the existing collection / transmission and reclaimed water
systems' physical facilities and their capacities, and relate the existing
capacity to existing service area (or parts thereof) flows.
5.4.3 Summarize year 2000 and 2010 flows in potential service areas of the
proposed second plant under that alternative. Review service area and
sub-area divides and existing and projected flows in this secondary
alternative service area and compare with plant capacity from 5.4.1 and
overall capacity required by 5.4. Give preliminary consideration to the
physical collection system costs to separate the service areas and
preliminarily evaluate the physical facilities and costs required to transmit
on to the main existing plant with and without a second plant.
5.4.4 Review previous work and give consideration to reuse capacities by
irrigation and other uses within and adjacent to the second plant
alternative service area. Also give preliminary consideration to reuse
physical system needs in and adjacent to the second plant alternative
service area.
5.4.5 Prepare a minimum of 3 general alternative overall wastewater collection,
treatment and disposal / reuse plans for the year 2010 and review with
City staff. Included will be the following general alternatives:
1. Single plant at the existing plant site.
2. Two plant plan with one plant at the existing plant site and a
second plant at a location to be chosen. This alternative will have
a smaller service area and tributary flow to the second plant than
Alternative #3 described below.
3. Same as Alternative #2, except the second plant will have a larger
tributary service area and larger flow.
5.4.6 Formulate and study collection systems, level of treatment, treatment
processes, and disposal / reuse plans for each alternative and rough size
facilities. Reuse / disposal irrigation application rates will be based on
existing general soils information.
5.4.7 Prepare planning level cost estimates for the construction of the physical
improvements required for each alternative for 2010 needs and meet
with City staff to present, review and narrow down the alternatives to
2.
-7-
5.4.8 Refine the selected 2 alternatives and prepare refined physical plans and
capital cost estimates, and perform rough present worth analyses of the
2 alternatives including Operation and Maintenance costs.
5.4.9 Prepare a summary of advantages and disadvantages for each alternative
including capital and Operation and Maintenance costs. Also included
will be factors not reducible to cost, such as reliability, flexibility,
expandability, aesthetics, public acceptance, and regulatory
considerations.
5.4.10 Meet with the CITY and select one of the 2 alternatives for phased
implementation consideration. Following selection of the 2010 Master
Plan, the ENGINEER will then generate a phased physical implementation
plan for the year 2000 and 2010.
5.4.11 Prepare a summary report and furnish the CITY with 15 copies, giving
special emphasis and detail to the southern and southeastern portions of
the CITY.
S6ctioll 6
supplementary Services of the ENGINEER
6.1 Provide, through subconsultants, surveying, electrical, soils, construction
quality control testing, or other subconsultant services not described in
this Agreement, if requested or authorized in writing by the CITY.
6.2 Additional services due to significant changes in the scope of the project
or its design including, but not limited to, changes in size, complexity,
character of construction or due to time delays in initiating or completion
of the work as described herein.
6.3 Additional services in connection with the project including services
normally furnished by the CITY as described in Section 7 herein and
services not otherwise provided for in this Agreement.
6.4 Preparing to serve and serving as an expert witness for the CITY in any
protest, litigation, or other proceeding involving the project.
-8-
6.5 Additional engineering services required by revisions to regulations (after
the date of this Amendment) as applicable to the Florida Department of
Environmental Regulation, the St. Johns River Water Management
District, or other regulatory agency requirements,
6.6 Except as otherwise provided herein, services 'or additional costs
associated with revising previously accepted studies, reports, or other
documents when such revisions are due to causes beyond the
ENGINEER's control.
6.7 Investigations (beyond those outlined in Sections 3, 4 and 5), involving
detailed consideration of operations, maintenance and overhead expenses
including preparation of operating and maintenance manuals, feasibility
studies, appraisals and valuations.
6.8 Furnishing additional copies of reports beyond those called for in the
Basic Services.
Section 7
The CITY'S Responsibilities
7.1 The CITY will:
7.1.1 Advise the ENGINEER of his requirements for the project and designate
a person to act as the CITY's representative with respect to the work to
be performed under this Amendment, and such person shall have
complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret
and define the CITY's policies and decisions pertinent to the work
covered by this Amendment.
7.1.2 Provide data requested that is reasonably available on the existing utility
systems, land use and planning information, and provide population
projections as described in 3.2.2.
7.1.3 The CITY will designate a site for a second sewage treatment plant for
purposes of this study following receipt of information and
recommendation from the ENGINEER.
-9-
7.1.4 The CITY will provide the ENGINEER with rough estimates of land cost
suitable for purposes of this study for any land needed to be acquired or
leased as called for in the Master Planning.
7.1.5 Guarantee access to and make all provisions for the ENGINEER to enter
upon public and private lands as required for the ENGINEER to perform
his work under this Amendment.
7.1.6 Provide personnel to locate facilities and mow, trim, or otherwise make
them accessible for inspection.
7.1.7 Examine all studies, reports, sketches, and other documents presented
by the ENGINEER and render decisions pertaining thereto within a
reasonable time so as not to delay the work of the ENGINEER.
7,1.8 Obtain approval of all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over
the project, and such approvals and consents from such other individuals
or bodies as may be necessary for completion of the Project.
7.1.9 Furnish or direct the ENGINEER in writing to provide at the CITY's
expense any physical culture, topographic or elevation surveys, if advised
by the ENGINEER and CITY concurs that they are necessary.
7.1.10 Furnish, or direct the ENGINEER in writing to provide at the CITY's
expense, necessary supplementary services as stipulated in Section 6 of
this Amendment, or other services as required.
7.1.11 Provide such legal, accounting, and insurance counseling services as may
be required for the project, and such auditing services as the CITY may
require.
7.1.12 Give prompt written notice to the ENGINEER whenever the CITY
observes or otherwise becomes aware of any defect in the Project.
Section 8
Payment
8.1 Payment
Payment for services and expenses of the ENGINEER to be as set forth
below:
8.1.1 Principals and Employees of the ENGINEER.
8.1.2 Compensation paid ENGINEER for services described herein and rendered
by principals and employees assigned to the Project will be computed by
multiplying Direct Personnel Expense (defined in paragraph 8.2.3 herein)
times a factor of 1.95 plus all reimbursable expenses. The fee for the
engineering services for the Service described in Sections 3, 4, and 5
including reimbursement for subconsultants as described in those
sections, without increase, plus out of pocket expenses of 8.2.1 at
actual cost thereof shall not exceed $47,085.00.
8.2 Reimbursed Expenses
8.2. I Expenses for items not specifically valued herein are to be reimbursed to
the ENGINEER at the actual cost thereof. Said expenses shall include
transportation and subsistence of principals and employees, when
traveling in connection with the project, toll telephone calls, telegrams
and similar project-related items.
8.2.2 The CITY will make prompt monthly payments in response to
ENGINEER's monthly statements without retention for all categories of
services rendered under this Agreement and for reimbursable expenses
incurred.
8.2.3 Direct Personnel Expense used as a basis for payment shall mean the
salaries and wages paid to principals and employees of all classifications
engaged directly on the Project, plus the cost of fringe benefits including
but not limited to, social security contributions, worker's compensation,
health and retirement benefits, bonuses, sick leave, vacation and holiday
pay applicable thereto. For purposes of this Amendment, Direct
Personnel Expense shall be considered an amount equal to 1.47 times
applicable salaries and wages.
8.2.4 Charges for the services rendered by principals and employees as
witnesses in any litigation, hearing or proceeding will be computed at a
rate of $400.00 per day or any portion thereof (but compensation for
time spent in preparing to appear in any such litigation, hearing or
proceeding will be computed in accordance with the. funding levels as set
forth in Paragraphs 8.1.1 and 8.2.1 herein).
-11-
8.2.5 If this Agreement is terminated during prosecution of the services prior
to completion of the services of Sections 3, 4 and 5 payments to be
made in accordance with Paragraph 8.1.1 and 8.2, 1 on account of that
and all prior work under this Amendment shall be due and payable, and
shall constitute total payment for services rendered, In addition, upon
termination, the ENGINEER shall be paid for any Supplementary services
authorized and rendered under Section 6.
8.2.6 Services provided by outside subconsultants will be billed at the direct
cost without increase.
Section 9
General Conditions
9.1 Since the ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labor, materials, or
equipment or over any construction Contractor's method of determining
prices, any opinion of probable construction cost which may be provided
in the services of this Amendment are made on the basis of his
experience and qualifications and represent his best judgment as a design
professional familiar with the construction industry, but the ENGINEER
cannot and does not guarantee that bids or the construction cost will not
vary from opinions of probable cost prepared by him.
9.2 The CITY and the ENGINEER each binds himself and his partners,
successors, executors, administrators and assigns to the other party of
this Agreement and to partners, successors, executors, administrators,
and assigns of such other party in respect to all covenants of this
Amendment. Nothing herein shall be construed as creating any personal
liability on the part of nay officer or agency of any public body which
may be a party hereto, nor shall it be construed as' giving any rights or
benefits hereunder to anyone other than the CITY and the ENGINEER.
9.3 The ENGINEER agrees to initiate work promptly upon receipt of
authorization to proceed and to prosecute the work in a timely manner
until the Project is completed and to complete the Master Plans within 6
months of receipt of authorization to begin work.
-12-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this
Amendment the day and year first above written.
' CITY:
· City of Sanford, Florida
ENGINEER:
Conklin, Porter & Holmes - Engineers, Inc.
EST & SEAL
Date /~'/7/7~-'
SAN, MVV~V
-13-
PLAN OF STUDY
-14-
Review of Water & Wastewater Service Areas
· Prelirnln~ry preparation work:
· Research 201 Plan &Master Water Pla~ Semite A~ess 1 2 2 2
· Segregating esst and southeast area flows 2 4
·Comprehensivo Plan rese~ch and comparison 2 1 50.00
· Consider service area differences for water and sewer 2 2 1
· Consider Year 2000 & 2010 ser~ic~ areas 2 4 2
Consider dividing sewer service area into 2 sub-areas for 2 plant alternative
Participate in discussions and decisions with City staff 1 2 1 1
SUmmariZe IAllld Use and Population Data from the 1986 Master Water Plan, 201 1 6 4 10.00
Wastewater Plan and Comprehensive Plan.
The ENGINEER will assist the CITY in preparing land use and summarizing population 1 2 4 2
date by traffic zones within the water and wastewater service meas for the year 2000 and
2010.
Water Distribution and Distribution Storage Plan
The de. sign criteria for average day, maximum day, peak hour, and fir6 flows and 2 4 6 4
application to the design of lines, storage and pumping facilities will be sBmmaviZed from
the previous 1986 Master Water Plan and compared with extended historical date. The City
staff will be consulted in the review.
Upgrade work maps and r~,~ords to include all lines, pumping, storage, and improvements' 1 8 12 12 50.00
made since the 1986 study, and upgred6 the existing computer model of the system.
Review demand points in the system and establish demand at these points for 2000 and 4 8
2010 modeling.
-15-
Dcs,;ription Printjill Engineer Tc~hnician Dral'ts[~iii~iii~iiEii
Perfern a ~ter ~ysis of ~e ~s~bution, pmphg, nd sWmge sys~ b~ oo 2 16 4 2 50.~
Y~ ~10 de~, ~g physic~ fac~iti~ ~ pla~ ~t hve ~n ~
~e 1986 M~ter Water Ply.
M~ ~e ~n~ physi~ ~ciliti~ b~ on ~e r~ ~d re-m ~e ~u~r 2 12 2 50.~
~ly~ ~ r~r~ W m~t 2010 n~ ~d devi~ 3 ~ve ways of ~ag ~e 2010
n~.
R~t ~e a~ve steps for ~o Y~r 2~ so~ice ~, co~ut~ m~6l, ~d water 1
den~.
S~ ~e 3 alte~tivo solutions for 2~ ~d 2010 n~s ~d ave at 3 ov~ 2 12 2 1
~to~ve smg~ plus t~t ~11 ~tis~ ~ d~i~ y~s ~m~. M~t wi~ ~o
CffY stuff to go over ~te~ves Ed ~vo at 2 ~ ~v~ for ~er s~dy.
Ro~6 ~e 2 ~l~t~ ~toma~v6 smg~ physic~ f~ility plus a W si~, l~tion ~d do~l. I 12
Prolin~y ~st ~e 2 ~ smg~ ~te~ve physical facifi~ MEter PI~ ~clud~g 2 16 ~ 1
capitol, 0 & M ~d pr~ent wo~ ~alysis.
M~t ~ CffY s~ff W pr~ent ~ul~ ~d ~l~t the r~mmend~ pl~ ~d ~e 2 6 8 2 2
r~lt~g refmemon~ r~u~t~ by the CffY.
Prepare a s~mm~ r~o~ ~ a su~lemont giv~g ~i~ e~h~is ~d de~ W ~e 6 32 8 16 32 1,500.~
sou~em ~d sou~tem ~ffions of ~e CffY ~d ~sh 15 c~ to ~o CffY.
Plannin~ level ~ps sho~g pro~ physi~ facili~ ~11 ~ ~clud~. 1 2 8
Wa~wa~r ~r ~
Review previo~ atat, ~ll~don, ad re~ smdi~ ~clud~g ~e 201 Pla (lat~t 2 8 6 2 50.00
m~d~nt) ad ~id~al ad o~er ~u~ sm~. Sua~ ad cosli&te &~ ~d
UpgrMe, ~mm~, ad ~n~H&te wor~g ~ps of collation sys~m, r~r~ for fir 1 8 12 12 4 50.~
s~tio~, pl~t, ad re~ system to ~cl~e ~e latest ~.
-16-
Destrip|ion Principal F, neineer 'f~chn~cian DmlisZ S~.
Review p~vio~ flow p~j~6~ b~ t~c ~oe ud ~e ~ c~eat proj~6o~ for 2 6 ]6 4
· e y~ 2~ ~d 2010, ~ ~e proj~t~ flows ~ exis~ p~t ~d ti~ sWtio8
flows to l~k for ~cies ~ exist~ flows o~ p~j~o~. Oive ~ide~6oa W the
~ of ~pec ~s for e~s~ ~d ~mre
Study ~e p~ti~l u~r ~pacity l~t of ~e exis~g S~ord Sewage Tr~t Pl~t site 6 24 16 6 2 20.~
~d ~pacity. Ev~t6 ~e ~paciti~ of ~e v~o~ trident ~d pras~g ~ ~d
r~m av~lable for ~er exp~siom on site or ~ja~t to ~e site. Comider ~v~.
Sllmmnd~ y~ 2~ ~d 2010 flows ~ ~t~ti~ ~ice ~ of the pro~s~ ~ond 4 ~ ~ 6 2 50.
pl~t ~der ~t alUmafire. Review ~ffi~ ~ ~d sub-~ divid~ ~d ~tial ~d long-
rage ~d ~ capacity ~d n~ h ~s ~na~ ~mtive semite ar~ ~d co~are
wi~ pl~t ~paeity. Give p~limin~ consideration to the physi~l ~ll~tion system ~s~
to sopaate ~e ~ieo ~ ~d v~ prelimin~ly eval~to ~e physil facili~ ~d costs
r~uir~ ~ tms~t on to the m exis~g plEt ~ ~d ~out a s~nd pl~t.
Review previous work ~d give ~nsidem~on to re~ ~paci~ by i~gation ~d o~er 2 8 12 2 20.~
~ ~ja~t to ~o ~nd pl~t ~d physil facilities r~ to a~lish.
Examine ~6 exist~g ~ll~on / tms~ssion ~d r~lim~ water sysB~' physi~l 6 24 36 4 1 20.00
facilifi~ ~d ~ek ~paci~es, ~d relate ~e exis~g ~paeity to exist~g ~i~ m (or
pa~ ~em0 flows.
S~dy tr~t pr~, mll~ sys~, level of intent ~d ~s~ / mu~ plus 4 40 30 4 1 50.~
for ~ch altemtive ~d rough si~ ~ili~es n~. Re~ / dis~l pla will ~ b~
~ exis~g gene~ so~s ~fom~on.
Propue planning level rou~ ~st ~tes for ~o ~nstmc~on of ~e physi~ 4 ~ 16 2
i~rovem~ts r~r~ for ~eh ~te~tive for 2010 ~d m~t ~ Ci~ s~ to ~ow
~ ~e ~ ~tema~ves ~ 2.
Rete ~e ~1~ 2 ~m~v~ ~d prepue re~ physic~ pl~ ~d ~pi~l cost 4 ~ 12 1 20.~
es~mt~, ~d ~rfom rough pr~t wo~ ~aly~ of ~e 2 ~te~ives hclulg
~mtion ~d Mmte~ cos~.
Prepare a summary of advantages and disadvantages for each alternative including capital 2 4 1
and Operation and Maintenance costs and other considerations not reducible to cost, such
as flexibility, reliability, expandability, aesthetics, regulatory agency, and public
ac, ceptanca, etc.
Meet with the CITY and select one of the 2 alternatives for more detailed phased 2 2 1
implementation consideration.
Following selection of the 2010 Master Plan, the ENGINEER will then generate a phased 4 12 6 1 5 )
physical implementation plan for 2000 and 2010.
Prepare a summary report and furnish the CITY with 15 copies, giving special emphasis 6 40 8 32 1500.00
and detail to the southern and southeastern portions of the CITY.
Planning level maps showing proposed facilities will be included. 1 2 ' 8 24 500.00
TOTALS 77.00 396.00 332.00 113.00 108.00 4,640.00
Fee Calculation:
$14,806.33 x 1.95 x 1.47 -- $42,442.34
4,640.00
Total Fee = $47,082.34 )
-18-