951-Seminole County Transportation/Education Infrastructure Plan SEMINOLE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AND EDUCATION
INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT, by and between SEMINOLE COUNTY, a
political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose address is Seminole County Services
Building, 1101 East First Street, Sanford, Florida 32771 (hereafter referred to as the
"COUNTY"),
THE SEMINOLE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, a school district created by
Florida law, whose address is 400 East Lake Mary Boulevard, Sanford, Florida 32773,
(hereafter referred to as "SCHOOL BOARD"), and the following municipalities:
THE CITY OF ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, a Florida municipal corporation, whose
address is 225 Newburyport Avenue, Altamonte Springs, Florida 32701 (hereafter
referred to as "ALTAMONTE SPRINGS"); and
THE CITY OF CASSELBERRY, a Florida municipal corporation, whose address
is 95 Triplet Lake Drive, Casselberry, Florida 32707 (hereafter referred to as
"CASSELBERRY"); and
THE CITY OF LAKE MARY, a Florida municipal corporation, whose address is
Post Office Box 950700, Lake Mary, Florida 32795-0700 (hereafter referred to as "LAKE
MARY"); and
THE CITY OF LONGWOOD, a Florida municipal corporation, whose address is
175 West Warren Avenue, Longwood, Florida 32750 (hereafter referred to as
"LONGWOOD"); and
THE CITY OF OVlEDO, a Florida municipal corporation, whose address is 400
Alexandria Boulevard, Oviedo, Florida 32765 (hereafter referred to as "OVIEDO"); and
CEEI*IFI[D C0~
~ARYANNE
C[£1~1( OF CIRCUIT COURT
SE~NOLE COUNTY. FLORIDA
THE CITY OF SANFORD, a Florida municipal corporation, whose address is
Post Office Box 1788, Sanford, Florida 32772-1788 (hereafter referred to as
"SANFORD"); and
THE CITY OF WINTER SPRINGS, a Florida municipal corporation, whose
address is 1126 East State Road 424, Winter Springs, Florida 32708 (hereafter referred
to as "WINTER SPRINGS").
WlTNESSETH:
WHEREAS, under the authority of Section 212.055(2), Florida Statutes, and
pursuant to Seminole County Ordinance Number 2~01-30 , the COUNTY has
imposed a 1.0 percent (1¢) local government infrastructure sales surtax upon taxable
transactions occurring in Seminole County and has provided for distribution of the
proceeds from the surtax, subject to the outcome of a referendum in September, 2001;
and
WHEREAS, the COUNTY, the SCHOOL BOARD, and signatory municipalities
desire to earnestly and cooperatively work together in order to benefit the citizens of
Seminole County and the municipalities within Seminole County by improving the
infrastructure of the Seminole County school system, by providing acceptable levels of
service for roadways Within Seminole County, and by providing for the distribution of
revenues of the local government infrastructure sales surtax according to the terms of
this Agreement,
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises, covenants and
commitments contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged by all parties hereto, the parties
agree to provide for the distribution of the revenues derived from the local government
infrastructure sales surtax as follows:
Section 1. Term. This Agreement shall become effective when approved by
the Governing Bodies of the COUNTY, the SCHOOL BOARD, and the requisite number
of municipalities pursuant to Section 212.055(2)(c)1, Florida Statutes. This Agreement
shall remain in effect for the life of the surtax imposed pursuant to Seminole County
Ordinance Number 20o]_-30
Section 2. Distribution of Proceeds.
(a) The net revenues (meaning the collected surtax less the amounts retained
by the Florida Department of Revenue pursuant to Florida law) derived from the local
government infrastructure sales surtax levied and imposed by the COUNTY shall be
allocated totally to the COUNTY.
(b) The COUNTY shall transfer to the SCHOOL BOARD twenty-five percent
(25%) of the overall net revenues collected during the life of the surtax, for use by the
SCHOOL BOARD on the projects listed in Exhibit "A" to this Agreement. The proceeds
shall be distributed as shown in Exhibit "A" to this Agreement.
(c) The COUNTY shall use thirty-seven and one half percent (37½%) of the
net revenues to diligently prosecute the projects on major roads in Seminole County
listed in Exhibit "B" to this Agreement.
(d) The COUNTY and the signatory municipalities shall use the remaining
thirty-seven and one half percent (37½%) of the net revenues to diligently prosecute the
transportation projects listed in Exhibit "C" to this Agreement. The net revenues
referred to in the immediately preceding sentence shall be distributed among the
COUNTY and the signatory municipalities according to the formula contained in Section
218.62, Florida Statutes, incorporating population data from the 2000 Census published
by the Census Bureau in March 2001. The distribution that results from the application
of this formula is attached hereto as Exhibit "D".
(e) If any local government successfully appeals the results of the 2000
Census figures as published by the Census Bureau, the distribution formula found in
Exhibit "D" shall be recalculated to reflect the adjustments made in the 2000 Census
results by the Census Bureau. Any such change shall be effective at the start of the
distribution year following the adjustment.
(f) It is the intent of the parties to improve the infrastructure of the Seminole
County school system. It is the intent of the parties to improve the transportation
infrastructure within Seminole County and its municipalities, and thereby provide
acceptable levels of service to the residents of Seminole County and its municipalities
as they travel the transportation system within Seminole County. It is the intent of the
parties that revenues derived from the local government infrastructure surtax (other than
the revenues distributed to the School Board pursuant to this Agreement) will be used to
fund the identified improvements and other necessary transportation improvements by
constructing and reconstructing transportation facilities. The parties recognize the need
to consistently communicate on an ongoing basis with regard to the use of surtax
revenues and as to the project needs and timing as set forth in Exhibits "A", "B", and
4
Section 3. Project Lists.
(a) A project listed in Exhibits "A", "B" or "C' may be deleted from these
exhibits, or a project may be added to Exhibits "A", "B", or "C", only after approval by the
governmental entity controlling the project following an advertised public hearing. The
governmental entity proposing the changes shall notify the COUNTY's Manager and all
other governmental entities that are parties to this Agreement no less than thirty (30)
days before the public hearing. The other government entities that have received notice
of the proposed addition or deletion shall have the right to propose comments to the
local government entity proposing the change, and any such comments shall be duly
considered. Within ten (10) business days following the action of the governmental
entity proposing the changes, any of the commenting parties may file an appeal of that
action with the Seminole County Board of County Commissioners. After reviewing the
original comments, recommendations and action with the governmental entity proposing
the change, the COUNTY shall approve or reject the proposed revisions at a public
meeting.
(b)
The scope of an existing project listed in Exhibit "A", "B" or "C" may be
expanded, reduced, or otherwise altered upon the written approval of the chief
administrative officer of the governmental entity seeking the change, subject to the
statutes, rules, and procedures of the local government entity, and with the written
concurrence of the COUNTY's Manager.
Section 4. Entire Agreement.
(a) It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement of the parties is
contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and
5
negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any
previous agreements presently in effect between the parties relating to the subject
matter hereof.
(b) Any alterations, amendments, or waivers of the provisions of this
Agreement, other than those matters addressed in Section 3 of this Agreement, shatl be
valid only when expressed in writing and duly signed by the parties.
IT WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties having caused this Agreement to be duly
executed in nine (9) counterparts by their respective and duly authorized offices on the
respective dates.
SIGNATURES BEGIN ON PAGE 7
6
ATTEST:
Clerk to the
Seminole County School Board
SEMINOLE COUNTY/S)CHOOL BOARD
SANDY ROBI~4SON, Chairman
D ate:~~_~
SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON PAGE 8
7
PA¥S'{'(;~/AiN RI G H~/, City Clerk
Date: /~, /4 .~gO0/
SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON PAGE 9
8
ATTEST:
THELMA L. McPHERSON, City Clerk
CITY OF CASSELBERRY
By: ;
BRL]CE A. PRONOVOST, Mayor
SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON PAGE 10
ATTEST:
C~AROL A. FOSTER, City Clerk
Date:
SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON PAGE 11
10
ATTEST:
GERALDINE ZA~BRI, Ci~ Clerk
CITY OF LONGWOOD
PAUL LOVESTRAND, Mayor
Date: ~'/~"'.Z ~'"~ ¢2¢¢~/
SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON PAGE 12
11
ATTEST:
CITY OF OVIEDO
MARY L(~)4J ~AtqDREWS, Mayor
Date: ~ c~?/,, c~¢0/
SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON PAGE 13
12
A'FrEST:
ET R. DOUGF~RTY, ~ity Clerk
CITY OF SANFORD
SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON PAGE 14
13
ATT~iST: ·
LUACES
PAUL PARTYKA, Maycr ~
Date: ,,.~'//]t ¢~ t
SIGNATURES CONTINUE ON PAGE 15
14
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA
County Commissioners of
Seminole County, Florida.
- ~- DICK VAN DER WEIDE, Chairman
Date:
For the use and reliance of
Seminole County only. Ap-
proved as to form and legal
"'County Attorney
As authorized for execution
of County Commissioners at its
2001, regular meeting
by the Board
HB\dre
05\01\01
Attachments
Exhibit A - SCHOOL BOARD Project List
Exhibit B - COUNTY Project List
Exhibit C - COUNTY and municipalities' Project List
Exhibit D - Distribution of Proceeds List
G:\CA\USERS\CAHB02~D GEN SALES TAX~INTERLOCAL6 DOC
15
EXHIBIT A
1% Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Distribution Of Net Revenues For Educational Facility Projects
Year* % to School Board
1/2002
2/2OO3
3/20O4
4/2005
5/2006
6/2007
7/2OO8
8/2OO9
9/2010
10/2011
45%
45%
45%
25%
25%
25%
25%
8% **
8% **
8%**
Revenues received monthly by
Seminole County.
Upon receipt of monthly revenue
distribution from the State Dept. of
Revenue, the applicable % will
promptly be remitted to the School
Board by Seminole County.
Overall 25%
*Year = 1 Year of the Life of the 1% Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Levy, which is a calendar year.
** During Year 7, a projection update of net revenues shall be prepared by Seminole
County and provided to the School Board for review. As part of the projection update,
the percentages for Years 8 through 10 will be recalculated so as to yield a projected
distribution to the School Board at the end of the 10 years-of 25% of the overall net
revenues.
A similar projection update shall be prepared and reviewed during Year 9, including a
recalculation of the final year's percentage which would be used for the first 11 months
of Year 10. The last monthly distribution of Year 10 shall be adjusted as necessary to
yield a final distribution to the School Board at the end of the 10 Years of 25% of the
overall net revenues.
S:\Special Proiects\l Cent Sales Tax\EXHIBIT A.doc/05t08/01/8:02 AM
1 of 2
EXHIBIT A
1% Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Educational Facility Projects
(by Seminole County School Board)
PROPOSED NEW CONSTRUCTION/EXPANSION -RENOVA'RON SCOPE
PRELIMINARY
COST
SCHOOL ORIG. CONST. ESTIMATE
DESCRIPTION NO. ADDED DATE FOR
CLASSROOMS RENOVATION
SITES
ALTAMONTE ELEM Convert open plan to self-contained classrooms; 20 1974 $8.5M
add media center; add classrooms
FOREST CITY ELEM Convert open plan to self-contained classrooms: 20 1971 $8,5 M
add media center; add classrooms
ABAL POINT ELEM Convert open plan to self-contained classrooms 10 1974 $6.5 M
add media center; add classrooms
;TERLING PARK ELEM Conve¢' open plan to self-contained classrooms 10 1974 $6.5 M
add media center; add classrooms
~/INTER SPRINGS ELEM Convert open plan to self-contained classrooms; 10 1974 $6.5 M
add media center; add classrooms
EASTBROOK ELEM Sonvert open plan to self-contained classrooms 10 1970 $6.5 ~
add classrooms
LAKE MARY HIGH Renovate and upgrade classrooms; add 8 1979 $20 IV
performing arts center/classrooms; upgrade
media center
OVlEDO HIGH Renovate classrooms; add physical education 1(] 1967 $36 N
facility, band and chorus rooms and general
classrooms
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL To provide relief for Greenwood Lakes. 56 New Site $22 M
Millennium, and Sanford Middle
NEW ELEMENTARY To provide relief in the Oviedo area 35 New Site $11 M
RED BUG ELEM Convert open plan to self-contained classrooms; 15 1972 $7 M
add classrooms
*These projects are part of an overall $277,75 M capital program of renovations and classroom additions which will add
a total of 400 classrooms over the next 10 years.
S:\Special Proiects\l Cent Sales Tax\EXHIBIT A.doc/05/08/01/8:02 AM
2of2
EXHIBIT B
1% Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Major Road System Projects Proposed Scope Preliminary
Cost
(by Seminole County)
Estimate
State Road System
SR 434 (1)
:rom: Orange County Line Six-Lane
To: SR 436
SR 415 (1/
From: SR 46 :our-Lane
To: Volusia County Line
US Highway 17/92
From: Orange County Line Curb & Gutter $ 8.0 M (2)
To: Lake of the Woods Boulevard
US Highway 17/92
From: Shepard Road Six-Lane $38.2 M (2)
To: Lake Mary Boulevard.
US Hi~]hway 17/92 & SR 436 Interchange $48.3 M (2)
SR 434
From: Montgomery Road Six-Lane And/Or Traffic Cps $74.3 M (2)
To: CR 427
SR 436 & Red Bug Lake Road Interchange $35.0 M (2)
US 17-92 Lake Front Roadway Protective Reconstruction (This is $ 2.9 M
a cost-shared project with the City
of Sanford; project will also have
other funding, including
approximately $5.4 M through
FDOT.)
(1) Assumes funding through other sources including, but not limited to, the Transportation Outreach
Program (TOPS). Cost est/mates are $10.4 M for SR 434 and $10.0 M for SR 415.
(2) The costs shown are "100%" estimates based upon various scope parameters for the contemplated
improvements. Implementation of the aggregate of these State Road projects would be contingent upon
successful acquisition of an assumed overall 50% State Match.
Major County Road Multi-Lan/rigs
Dean Road
From: Orange County Line
To: SR 426 Four Lane $30.0 M
CR 419 Arterial Projects
From: Orange County Line
To: Chuluota Bypass
S:\Special Proiects\t Cent Sales Tax\EXHIBIT B doc/05/08/01/8:02 AM 1 of 2
EXHIBIT B
1% Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Major Road System Projects Proposed Scope Preliminary
(by Seminole County) Cost
I Estimate
Pedestrian Overpasses
Red Bug Lake Road School-Related Overpass $ 4.0 M
Lake Mary Boulevard 2 Overpasses $ 6.0 M
(1 School-Related)
Future Location Overpass $ 4.0 M
County/City Cost - Shared Projects
Altamonte Springs
North of SR 436 Pedestrian Overpass (This is up to $ 2.0 M
a 50% Share, capped at $2 M.)
Casselberry
I~IS 17-92/Triplet Lake Drive Pedestrian Overpass (This is up to $1.5 M
a 50% Share, capped at $1.5 M.)
Oviedo
Major Widenings See City list in Exhibit C for project $ 6.0 M
· SR 426 details. (This is contemplated to
(from SR 434 to Winter be up to a 50% match per project.)
Springs Boulevard)
· East CR 419/PH I
(from SR 434 to a point east of
Division Street)
Total Including State Match $262.2 M
Total NET of State Match $160.3 M
Contingency Other improvements may be done $40.1 M
if revenues and actual costs on
projects identified abo~,e allow.
Candidate examples include
intersections of County Arterials
with State Roads such as US 17-
92/CR 46-A, and additional
County/City cost-shared projects
such as East CR 419/PH II (from a
point east of Division Street to
Lockwood Boulevard, which would
complete the widening of East CR
419).
TOTAL $200.4 M
S:\Special Proiects\l Cent Sales TaxtEXHIBIT B.doc/05/08/01/8:02 AM 2 of 2
EXHIBIT C
1% Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Transportation Projects
(By the Seven Cities and Seminole County)
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS
Project Proposed Scope Preliminary
Cost
Estimate
Douglas Avenue Widen Douglas Avenue between SR 436 and Central $3.242 M
Parkway to a 3-lane urban section to reduce conflicts
created by turning vehicles.
Jamestown Boulevard Widen Jamestown Boulevard between Montgomery, $3.918 M
Road and SR 434 to three lanes and consider
realignment to Sand Lake Road.
Gateway Drive Construct new 4-lane roadway between AIbermarle $3.292 M
Road and Keller Road to provide improved roadway
for vehicular traffic currently using Hillcrest,
McNorton, and Keller Road.
West Town Parkway Extension Extend West Town Parkway northeasterly from the $2.392 M
intersection of West Town Parkway and Laurel Street
to Orange Avenue. The right-of-way has been
dedlcated to the City as part of the west Town Center
Development of Regional Impact.
Intersection Improvements SR 436 and Boston Avenue turn lanes; SR 436 and $1.465 M
Hattaway Drive turn lanes; Central Parkway and
Palm Springs southbound turn lanes; Central
Parkway and Douglas Avenue turn lanes; Central
Parkway and Montgomery Road turn lanes; SR 434
and West. Note: Funds will be in addition to
developer/DRI-related improvements.
SR 436 Corridor Feasibility Perform a Feasibility Study from SR 434 to US 17-92 $.992 M
Study to determine capacity alternatives for both
roadway/intersection, and multi-modal alternative to
enhance capacity. Note: Total cost is estimated at
$2 million with additional funding from Transportation
Outreach Program, the County Incentive Grant
Program or other state or county funding programs.
Multimodal Improvements Construct pedestrian connections between uses and $1.592 M
modes of transportation; transportation circulator
systems; and multi-modal congestion, management
systems.
TOTAL $16.893 M
CASSELBERRY
Alternate Connector Seminola Boulevard to SR 434 $8 M
US 17-92 and Triplet Lake Drive Intersection Improvements $1.5 M
Additional Safety and Level of Service Improvements $1.5 M
Roadway/Intersection
Improvements
TOTAL $11 M*
*TOTAL exceeds projected share ($9.278 M) for the City. If/as necessary, balance of project costs would be
funded through other legally available city revenues.
S \Specia{ Projects\l Cent Sales Tax\EXHIE~IT C doc10510810118 03 AM 1 of 9
EXHIBIT C
1% Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
LAKE MARY
Project Proposed Scope Preliminary
Cost
Estimate
Sand Pond Road; Skyline Drive East of Greenwood Boulevard to Emma Oaks Trail;
urban road improvements with closed drainage. $4.076 M
Evansdale Road / Pine Tree Sidewalk and drainage improvements. $.622 M
Road
TOTAL $4.698 M
LONGWOOD
Dirt Road Paving East Warren Ave.; East Bay Ave.; East Pine Ave.; $5.636 M
Oleander St.; Myrtle St.; Oak St.; Longwood St.;
Jessup Ave.; Magnolia Ave.; Ridge St.; Oak Lane;
Credo St.; Overstreet Ave.; Hardy St.; Woodcock St.;
Evergreen Ave.; Tullis Ave.; Oxford St.; Florida Ave.;
Rosedale Ave.; Lakeview Dr.
TOTAL $5.636 M
S 'Soecial Prolects 1 Cent Sales Yax~EXHrBIT C dcx;/05/08,'01/~t 03 AM 2 of 9
EXHIBIT C
1% Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
OVIEDO
Project Proposed Scope Preliminary
Cost
Estimate
INTENDED PROJECTS: IN PRIORITY ORDER
Franklin Street/Division Street/ Construction of Franklin Street - Lake Jesup Avenue $.3 M
to the intersection of Division Street and CR 426, and
OR 426 reconstruct Division Street from the same
intersection to CR 419. Also, improvements to the
intersection.
Lindsay Lane Extension ' Division Street (Central) to SR 434; construct road. $.7 M
North/South One-way Pairs Construct North/South one-way pairs in downtown $1.8 M
area using Garden Street, Station Street, and
Railroad Street; and realign Geneva Road
intersection @ RR Crossing.
CANDIDATE PROJECTS: IN PRIORITY ORDER
SR 426 Widening Construct two additional lanes from SR 434 to Winter I
Springs Boulevard (including purchasing for offsite
retention/detention). Total Project Cost Estimate: $8
M, which includes match from the County/City Cost - $ 4 M
Shared Projects component of the Major Road
System Program shown in Exhibit B.
East CR 419 Widening Phase I; Construct two additional lanes from a point
east of Division Street to SR 434 (including
purchasing for offsite retention/detention). Total $ 4 M
Project Cost Estimate: $6 M, which includes match
from the County/City Cost - Shared Projects
component of the Major Road System Program
shown in Exhibit B.
TOTAL $10.8 M*
'TOTAL somewhat exceeds projected share ($10.790 M) for the City. If/as necessary, balance of project costs
would be funded through other legally available city revenues. Other Candidate Projects may be undertaken if
revenues and/or actual costs on the projects identified above allow. Specific priorities are: widening of East CR
419 from Lockwood Blvd to a point east of Division Street (Phase II; $4 M total c(~st estimate); West Mitchell
Hammock widening/improvements ($7 M total cost estimate); East Mitchell Hammock widening/improvements ($8
M total cost estimate). These projects are also eligible for match from the Cost - Shared Projects component of
the Major Road System Program shown in Exhibit B.
EXHIBIT C
1% Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
SANFORD
Project Proposed Scope Preliminary
Cost
Estimate
Collector System North of West vwden pavement, add drainage (including: White $3.701 M
Cedar Avenue, Church Street, others)
SR 46
Mulberry Avenue Extension 14~ Street to Country Club Road; $1.194 M
new extension - 2 lane urban section.
Downtown Circulation Location and scope -TBD by study. $1.790 M
Improvements
Intersection Improvements Add turn lanes, upgrade signals, align lanes, add $3.164 M
Ped X-Walks etc. to high accident intersections.
Lakefront Roadway Protective Reconstruction $2.388 M
Sidewalks Rehabilitate deficient sidewalk installations and add ,$2.568 M
E._zxisting and New to citywide network, based on plan.
UFgrade Railroad Crossings Miscellaneous locations. $.895 M
TOTAL $15,7 M
WINTER SPRINGS
Town Center Collectors Hickory Grove; Spine Road I $1.7 M
Traffic Signal Installations $.9 M
Moss Road Reconstruction $1.3 M
SR 419/SR 434 Intersection improvements $.2 M
Arterial Lighting SR 434; SR 419; Tuskawilla Road $.959 M
New Sidewalks $.5 M
SR 434 Reconstruction; intersection improvements $1.5 M
(includes Village Walk)
Residential Road $1,6 M
Reconstruction & Traffic
Calming
Ranchlands Dirt Road $1.4 M
Alternative Surface Treatment
Fisher Road Improvements $.725 M
Winter Springs Boulevard Reconstruction; Turn Lanes $1.8 M
Bahama Road improvements $.4 M
I TOTAL $12.984 M
EXHIBIT C
1% Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
SEMINOLE COUNTY
Major County Projects/Collector Reconstructs
Proposed Scope
Project
CR 426
Marty/Nancy & Cadillac
Sabal Palm Drive
Deleon Street
General Hutchinson
Longwood-Lake Mary Road
Longwood-Lake Mary Road
Division Street to Snow Hill Road; pave 5' shoulders
W. Cadillac to W. Lake Brantley Rd; pave roadways
with drainage imp.
Wekiva Springs Rd. to 1300 ft. north; rebuild road
with structural imp.
Florida Avenue to Howard Avenue; rebuild road/12'
travel lanes
US 17-92 to 300' west of intersection; repair guardrail
and include a turn lane
CR 427 to Green Way Blvd.; pave 5' shoulders
Humphrey Rd. to Green Way Blvd.; rebuild road with
3 lane section
Preliminary
Cost
Estimate
$ .75 M
$ .50 M
$ .25 M
$1 .O6 M
$ .13M
$ .31 M
$ .45 M
Lake Way Drive Greenwood Blvd. to Longwood-Lake Man/Rd.; $ .30 M
rebuild road with sidewalks
Old Mims Road SR 46 to CR 426; rebuild road $ .30 M
Longwood-Markham Road Markham Road to SR 46; reconstruct to 12' travel $ .50 M
lanes, and shoulders
Markham Road $ .63 M
Longwood Markham Road to Orange Boulevard;
reconstruct to 12' travel lanes, and shoulders
CR 46-A to SR 46; reconstruct to 12' travel lanes.
and shoulders
Brumley Road to SR 46; pave 5' shoulder
US 17-92 to Hospital Road; median turn lane
CR 419 to Division Street; median turn lane
US 17-92 to SR 415; retrofit improvements
@ Mayfair; rebuild road
Kentucky Street to SR 46; retrofit & rebuild roadway
CR 415/Celen/ Avenue; Lake Mary Boulevard @
Longwood Lake Man/ Road; McCulloch Road @
Lockwood Boulevard; CR 426 @ Lake Charm; CR
426 @ Snowhill Road; Lake Mills Road @ CR 419;
Slavia Road @ SR 425
New Tribes; Brisson Avenue; Red Bug Lake Road;
First Street; Penelope Road; Sipes Avenue; Rand
Yard; Slavia Road; Richmond Avenue; Sand Dollar;
Pine Way; Bass
CR 431 (Orange Boulevard)
Snow Hill Road
County Home Road
CR 426
Celery Avenue
Country Club Road
Beardall Avenue
Intersection Improvements
Various Roadway Retrofits,
including culvert/channel and
safety rehabs
$ .56 M
$ .19 M
$ .50 M
$1.00 M
$2.50 M
$ .38 M
$ .94 M
$2.59 M
$3.54 M
S ',Special Proiects\l Cenl Sales Tax~,EXHIBIT C doc/05/08/01/8 03 AM 5 of 9
EXHIBIT C
1% Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Project Proposed Scope Preliminary
Cost
Estimate
Paving of Various Roadways Includes paving dirt roads requiring major associated $2.50 M
drainage:
Intended:
Palm Springs Road - SR 434 to dead end; S.
Beardall Avenue - Kentucky Street to dead end
Candidate:
Lazy Acres Lane - eastern connector Longwood Hills
Road to western connector Longwood HiJls Road
Other Projects Intended: (Various Structure Replacements) $3.52 M
Palm Way/Mellonville Rd.; Palm Way; Pine Way;
Cameron Ave. S; Wekiva Springs Rd.; Kentucky St.
Candidates:
Horselovers Lane Outfall; Spring Lake Ouffall; Eider
CreePJC15; Cassel Creek Blvd.; SR 436 box culvert;
Elder ditch;' Beth & Tangelo Dr./46A Outfall; Lincoln
Heights; Red Bug Lk. Rd., E. of SR 436; Oxford Rd.;
Loch Arbor; W. Crystal Dr.; Nebraska Ave.; Borrow
Area, W. of I-4; Jewitt culverts; Old Monroe culvert;
Virginia Dr.; Eagle Pass Rd.; Alder Ave.; Baymeadow
Rd.; Lochart-Smith, SR 46 to 1~4; Michigan Ave.
Outfall; Delaware St.; Willow Ave.; Brisson Ave.;
Alhambra
Total $23.40 M
Collector Safety and Capacity Enhancement Projects
Markham Woods Road EE Williamson Road to Springs Landing Boulevard; $1.0 M
median turn lane
Lake Emma Road Lake Mary Boulevard to Sand Pond Road; raised $1.5 M
medians & install curb includes LMB intersection eval
& imp.
Wekiva Springs Road Wekiva Lane to Sabal Palm Drive; raised medians & $2.25 M
install curb
Wekiva Springs Road Fox Valley Drive to County Line; add raised median $1.5 M
with turn lanes
Lake Mary Boulevard 1500' E of Rinehart Road to US 17-92; Pavement $4.75 M
rehab/traffic lanes improvements
Bear Lake Road SR 436 to Orange County Line; roadway retrofit, incl. $1.0 M
drainage
E. Lake Brantley Road Wekiva Springs Road to SR 434; retrofit Roadway $ .75 M
with drainage and sidewalk
Markham Woods Road EE Williamson road to Lake Mary Boulevard; rebuild $1.7'5 M
road with median turn lane section
Markham Woods Road Lake Mary Boulevard to Markham Road; pave 5' $ .5 M
shoulders
Total $15,00 M
S ~Soecial Prolects~l Cen~ Sales Ta×\EXHIBIT C doc,05/08/01/8 03 ml/~ 6 of 9
EXHIBIT C
1% Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
County Sidewalk Program
Project Proposed Scope Preliminary
Cost
Estimate
Program based on Seminole Address sidewalk gaps within 2-mile school radius $40 M
County Sidewalk Inventory along Countywide Ar[erial/Collector Roadways
[including inside Cities], and along Local
Needs Assessment Report Unincorporated Area Roads.
(Berryman & Henigar, 2000) ArteriaVCollector, -167 lineal miles @ -$24 M
Intended Examples:
North/Charlotte St. - CR 427 to Raymond; W. Lake
Brantley - SR 436 to Marty Blvd.; Dike Rd. - Bassin
Lane to Princess Gate Blvd.; Raymond Ave. - North
St. to SR 434; Old Lake Mary Rd. - Palmeto St. to
Airport Blvd.; Longwcod Hills Rd~ - Lake Emma Rd.
to CR 427
Unincorporated Local, primarily Non-Sudivision,
-182 lineal miles @ -$16 M (-25% of total need);
Intended Examples:
Fairview Ave.- Spring St. to North St.; Lake Reservoir
Lane - Live Oak Blvd to dead end; Magnolia Dr. -
Aim Dr. to Manor Ave.; Railroad Ave. - SR 434 to
dead end
Total $40 M
Traffic Operations/Safety
School Circulation Projects Keeth Elementary/Indiana Trail Middle $1,6 M
Lake Mary Elementary
Greenwood Lake Middle School
Oviedo High School
Lake Howell High School
Carillon Elementary/Law(on Chiles Middle
Wilson Elementary
Lake Mary High School
Woodlands Elementary
Heathrow Elementary
Sterling Park Elementary
Stenstrom Elementary
S 'Special PrOleCts~,l Cent Sales Tax\EXHIBIT C doc/05/08/01/8 03 AM 7 of 9
EXHIBIT C
1% Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Project Proposed Scope Preliminary
Cost
i Estimate
Traffic Safety & Efficiency, and Safety/efficiency projects are generated from crash $6 M
Railroad Highway Crossings histories and traffic concerns reported by the
citizens. Road-Railway Crossing projects are
generated based upon reported rough crossings
and lack of safety gates at some crossings.
Intended Projects:
Turn Lanes
McCulloch Rd. @ Lockwood Blvd.; Lk. Mary Blvd.
@ Lk, Emma Rd.; Bear Gully Rd. @ Old Howell
Branch Rd.; Markham Wds. Rd, s. of Heathrow
Elem.; Old Geneva Rd. near Osceola Rd.; CR 426
@ Oklahoma St.; Snowhill Rd, @ Wilderness Trail;
CR 426 @ Van Arsdale St.
Intersection Improvements
SR 436 @ Bear Lk. Rd.; Orange BIvd @ Markham
Rd.; CR 426 @ Old Mims; Old Lockwood @
McCulloch Rd.; CR 426 @ Wilderness Trail/Barr St.
Gates, Signals, or Rubberizs Crossings
RR Crossings on Hester Ave.; S. Sanford Ave.
Other Improvements
McCulloch Rd. e. of SR 434-median imp.; Celery
Ave. w of SR 415-geometric imp.
Candidate Projects:
Turn Lanes
Oregon Ave. @ CR 46A
Gates, Signals, or Rubberize Crossings
RR Crossings on Bear Lake Rd.; Southwest Ave.;
Plumosa Ave.; Leonard Ave.; 18~h St.; Merritt St.;
Osprey Tr.; C-15 @ Orange Blvd.
Intersection Improvements
Orange Blvd. @ C15; SR 46 @ Longwood
Markham; CR 426 @ CR 419; SR 46 @ Upsala Rd.
Orange Blvd. @ Wayside; Myrtle lake Hill @ EE
Williamson; CR 426 @ SR 46; SR 426 @ Dean Rd.
Other Improvements
Palm @ Oakhurst-Radii Imp.; US 17/92-County
Home Road to N. Bush-access mgmt.; Bush Blvd.
@ College Dr.-partial access; CR427. @ SR 434-
median mod.
S ~Special Prolects\l Cent Sales Tax\EXHIBIT C doc.105/08/011803 AM 8 of 9
EXHIBIT C
1% Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Project Proposed Scope Preliminary
Cost
Estimate
This category of projects includes design and $5.5 M
Traffic Signals & Signal construction of new signals as warranted; and
Systems reconstruction of existing signals.
Intended:
Convert to Mast Arm
SR 46 @ Rinehart Rd.; SR 46 @ Orange Bird; Red
Bug Lake Rd. (9 locations); SR 436 @ US 17/92; SR
436 @ Howell Branch Rd.; SR 436 (6 locations);
Howell Branch Rd. (5 locations); SR 434 @
Tuskawilla
New Signals
SR 415 @ CR 415; County Home Road @ CR 427
Traffic Communication Network Expansion and capacity improvement of the multi- $2 M
use fiber optic communication network.
Wekiva Sprlngs Rd.- SR 434 to Hunt Club Blvd.; CR
427 - SR 434 to SR 436; SR 426 - Mitchell
Hammock to Howell Branch Rd.; US 17/92 -
Spartan to County Line; SR 434 - McCulloch to
Tuskawilla; SR 46 - US 17/92 to SR 426; SR 46 -
CR 431 to Lake Markham; Lk. Emma Rd.- Lk.
Mary Blvd. to Sand Pond; CR 419- CR 426 to
County Line; SR 415 - SR 46 to Celery Ave.; Bear
Lk. Rd. - SR 436 to Dutch Elm; SR 436 - Balmy
Beach to Cassleton
ITS/ATMS Traffic Management System updates to the next $5 M
generation traffic control system. Basic elements of
the system include the new NTCIP compatible traffic
control system, motorist information system,
detection and monitoring stations, incident
management system, regional traffic information
sharing system, etc.
Traffic Calming Design and installation of traffic calming features on $1.5 M
neighborhood roadways to address speeding and
cut-through issues.
Total $21.6 M
Seminole County Projects SUB TOTAL $100 M
I $ 24.4 M
Contingency I TOTAL $124.4 M
S:\$pecial Proiects\l Cent Sa[es TaxtEXHIE~IT Cdoc/05/08/0~/8 03 AM ~) of 9
EXHIBIT D
1% Local Government Infrastructure Sales Surtax
Distribution of Net Revenues Under
Interlocal Agreement Section 2(d)
Altamonte Springs
Casselberry
Lake Mary
Longwood
Oviedo
Sanford
Winter Springs
Seminole County
3.161237374 %
1.736302049 %
.87916159 %
1.054641046 %
2.019201958 %
2.938032649 %
2.429702603 %
23.281720798 %
Total [per Section 2(d)]
37.5 %
Notes:
· Revenue received monthly by Seminole County
· Upon receipt of monthly revenue distribution from the State Department of Revenue,
the applicable % for each municipal jurisdiction will be promptly recorded in a distinct
interest-bearing account by Seminole County.
S:\Special Proiects~l Cent Sales Tax\EXHIBiT D doc/05/08/01/8:03 AM 1 of 1
ORDINANCE #2001-30
SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA
ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE IMPOSING A LOCAL GOVERNMENT
INFRASTRUCTURE SURTAX ON ALL AUTHORIZED
TAXABLE TRANSACTIONS OCCURRING WITHIN
SEMINOLE COUNTY, AS AUTHORIZED BY SECTION
212.055(2), FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING THAT THE
IMPOSITION OF THE SURTAX SHALL NOT BE
EFFECTIVE UNLESS APPROVED AT A REFERENDUM
ELECTION; PROVIDING THAT THE IMPOSITION SHALL
BE EFFECTIVE FOR A PERIOD OF TEN (10) YEARS,
BEGINNING JANUARY 1, 2002; PROVIDING FOR
DISTRIBUTION OF SURTAX REVENUES PURSUANT TO
LAW; DIRECTING THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS TO
HOLD A REFERENDUM ELECTION ON SEPTEMBER 4,
2001; PROVIDING BALLOT LANGUAGE AND A BRIEF
DESCRIPTION OF INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITAL
PROJECTS; PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION OF A
RESOLUTION DETAILING PROJECT EXAMPLES;
PROVIDING FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION OF SAID
RESOLUTION; DIRECTING THE CLERK OF CIRCUIT
COURT TO ADVERTISE THE SPECIAL REFERENDUM
ELECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW; PROVIDING
FOR CODIFICATION IN THE SEMINOLE COUNTY CODE;
PROVIDING FOR; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, Section 212.055(2), Florida Statutes, authorizes Seminole County to
impose a 0.5 percent or 1.0 percent local government infrastructure surtax upon
transactions occurring within Seminole County which are taxable under Part I, Chapter
212, Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, a 1.0 percent surtax would, under current State sales tax rates,
result in a one cent (1¢) surtax on each ONE AND N0/100 DOLLAR ($1.00) sale as
specifically provided in the Florida Statutes; and
WHEREAS, moneys received from the local government infrastructure surtax
authorized by
Section 212.055(2), Florida Statutes,
may be utilized
by Seminole
' ~ "~' ~
County, the Seminole County School Board, and the municipalities of Seminole County
to finance, plan, construct, renovate and improve needed infrastructure such as
construction, reconstruction, and improvement of the infrastructure of the Seminole
County school system and of the County road system and collector and arterial roads
related thereto, and these infrastructure projects will be for the use and benefit of the
citizens of Seminole County, its municipalities, and the Seminole County School Board;
and
WHEREAS, the free, open and safe flow of citizens utilizing motor vehicles
throughout Seminole County and upon the County and State road systems will benefit
the public in terms of public safety and other significant enhanced levels of service
driving to the public; and
WHEREAS, a brief description of the projects to be funded is set forth in the
ballot language contained in this Ordinance, while a more specific project listing will be
contained in a Resolution adopted by the Board of County Commissioners with the
purpose of and intent of stating specific identified public roadway and school
infrastructure projects which would be specific projects to be funded from the revenues
derived from the surtax; and
WHEREAS, Seminole County and its municipalities are presently without
sufficient revenues to adequately fund the infrastructure needs and are without sufficient
fiscal resources to adequately fund the County road system and related roadways and
thereby move traffic from place to place at acceptable levels of service; and
2
WHEREAS, the Seminole County School Board is presently without sufficient
revenues to adequately fund the infrastructure needs of the Seminole County school
system; and
WHEREAS, adequate infrastructure facilities promote the safe, efficient and
uninterrupted provision of numerous essential public services in Seminole County such
as fire, police and emergency medical services, as well enhancing education within the
Seminole County school system; and
WHEREAS, the provision of adequate and efficient infrastructure facilities such
as roadways upon which the public depends on a day- to day basis is a matter of great
public concern to the citizens of the Seminole County; and
WHEREAS, improving the infrastructure of the Seminole County school system
is a matter of great public concern to the citizens of Seminole County; and
WHEREAS, Section 212.055, Florida Statutes (1999), requires voter approval in
a referendum election prior to imposition of the local government infrastructure surtax,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA:
Section 1. Authorization. This Ordinance is authorized by Section
212.055(2), Florida Statutes ('~999), and other applicable law.
Section 2. Imposition of Local Government Infrastructure Surtax. There is
hereby imposed a 1.0 percent local governmental infrastructure surtax upon all
authorized taxable transactions occurring within Seminole County.
Section 3. Distribution of Surtax Revenues. In accordance with Section
212.055(2), Florida Statutes (1999), the Florida Department of Revenue shall distribute
3
the proceeds of the revenues of the surtax hereby imposed to Seminole County.
Seminole County shall redistribute the revenues pursuant to interlocat agreement.
Section 4. Referendum Election.
(a) The surtax imposed in Section 2 of this Ordinance shall not take effect
unless and until approved by a majority of the electors of Seminole County voting in a
referendum election on the surtax.
(b) The Supervisor of Elections of Seminole County is hereby directed to hold
such referendum election on September 4, 2001.
(c) The Supervisor of Elections of Seminole-County shall cause the following
question to be placed on the ballot:
SEMINOLE COUNTY TEN (10) YEAR SALES SURTAX TO FUND
COUNTYWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS AND SCHOOL
CONSTRUCTION
To provide public transportation improvements and fund
school construction, Seminole County requires additional
revenue. The proposed revenue source is a ten (10) year
one cent (1¢) per dollar sales surtax on taxable transactions
occurring within Seminole County. These revenues would
be used only for funding transportation improvements such
as renovation, improvement, reconstruction and construction
of road, sidewalk and pedestrian safety projects throughout
Seminole County, and improvements to the infrastructure of
the Seminole County school system.
FOR THE ONE CENT SALES TAX
AGAINST THE ONE CENT SALES TAX
(d) A Resolution adopted by the Board of County Commissioners shall
identify to the public specific projects, which would be funded by the surtax imposed
herein subject to voter approval. A certified copy of said Resolution shall be provided to
the Seminole County School Board and to each municipality within Seminole County by
the Clerk of the Circuit Court, and the Resolution shall be made available to the public.
The Board of County Commissioners also anticipates entering into an interlocal
agreement with the Seminole County School Board and all municipalities within
Seminole County. Copies of any such interlocal agreements shall, likewise, be made
available to the public.
Section 5. Advertisement. The Clerk of the Circuit Court shall insure that
notice of this referendum shall be advertised in accordance with the provisions of
Section 100.342, Florida Statutes (1999). Proof of publication shall be provided to the
Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners for Seminole County.
Section 6. Codification. It is the intention of the Board of County
Commissioners that the provisions of this Ordinance, including its preamble, shall
become and be made a part of the Seminole County Code, and the word "ordinance"
may be changed to "section," "article," or other appropriate word or phrase and the
sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such
intention; provided, however, that Sections 6, 7, and 8 shall not be codified.
Section 7. Severability. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application
thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, it is the intent of the Board of
County Commissioners that such invalidity shall not affect other provisions or
applications of the Ordinance which can be given effect without the invalid provision or
application and, to this end, the provisions of this Ordinance are declared severable.
Section 8. Effective Date.
(a) The tax imposed hereby shall be effective from January 1, 2002 to
December 31,2011, both inclusive, if approved in the referendum election to be held on
September 4, 2001.
(b) This Ordinance shall take effect when the Clerk of Circuit Court has
received notification from the Secretary of State that this Ordinance has been filed with
the Secretary of State.
ENACTED this ,~¢'~:lay of .~, 2001.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DICK VAN DER V~EIDF_.~.Ch~ma~ ·
H B\dre 'P /~ '.~'
05\08\01 .... '"'
F:\Ca\Users\CAHB02~2d gen sales tax~2d gen sales tax ord dra~3 doc "
6